Influencia de la concentración de calcio en el líquido de hemodiálisis sobre el control de la tensión arterial / Influence of calcium concentration in haemodialysis fluid on blood pressure control

Introducción: La hipertensión arterial es altamente prevalente en los pacientes en hemodiálisis. Implica un mayor riesgo cardiovascular y es fundamental su control. A pesar de medidas dietéticas, optimización de la pauta de hemodiálisis y tratamiento farmacológico, existe un porcentaje de pacientes en nuestras unidades que continúan hipertensos. Es por ello que nos planteamos que la reducción de calcio en el líquido de diálisis puede ayudar al manejo de los pacientes hipertensos en hemodiálisis. Material y métodos: Se seleccionaron todos los pacientes hipertensos de nuestra unidad de hemodiálisis. Se comprobó estado de normovolemia mediante bioimpedancia espectroscópica y se disminuyó la concentración de calcio del líquido de hemodiálisis a 2,5 mEq/l, con un seguimiento de 12 meses. Resultados: Cumplieron criterios de hipertensión arterial no volumen-dependiente 24 pacientes (edad 61±15 años, varones el 48%, diabetes el 43%). Se observó una disminución significativa en la tensión arterial sistólica y diastólica a los 6 y 12 meses de la reducción de la concentración del calcio de diálisis, sin acompañarse de mayor inestabilidad hemodinámica (tensión arterial sistólica basal 162 ± 14; a los 6 meses 146 ± 18; a los 12 meses 141 ± 21 mmHg; p = 0,001) (tensión arterial diastólica basal 76 ± 14; a los 6 meses 70 ± 12; a los 12 meses 65 ± 11mmHg; p = 0,005) Existió un aumento de los niveles plasmáticos de PTH de forma no significativa. No se evidenciaron efectos secundarios. Conclusiones: La hemodiálisis con calcio en el líquido de 2,5mEq/l es una alternativa terapéutica eficaz y segura para el control de hipertensión arterial de difícil manejo en los pacientes de hemodiálisis

Background: Hypertension is a highly prevalent disorder among patients undergoing haemodialysis. It contributes to greater cardiovascular risk and must be controlled. However, despite dietary measures, haemodialysis regimen optimisation and pharmacological treatment, some patients in our units continue to maintain high blood pressure levels. The objective of the study is to demonstrate that reducing calcium in dialysis fluid can help treat hypertension patients undergoing haemodialysis. Material and methods: We selected all of the hypertensive patients from our haemodialysis unit. We checked their normovolemic status by means of bioimpedance spectroscopy, decreasing the haemodialysis fluid's calcium concentration to 2.5 mEq/l, with a follow-up period of 12 months. Results: A total of 24 patients met the non-volume dependent hypertension criteria (age 61±15 years, males 48%, diabetes 43%). A significant systolic and diastolic blood pressure decrease was observed at 6 and 12 months as a result of reducing the dialysis calcium concentration; this was not accompanied by greater haemodynamic instability (baseline systolic blood pressure: 162 ± 14 mmHg; at 6 months: 146 ± 18 mmHg; at 12 months: 141 ± 21 mmHg; P = .001) (baseline diastolic blood pressure: 76 ± 14 mmHg; at 6 months: 70 ± 12 mmHg; at 12 months: 65 ± 11 mmHg; P = .005). A non-significant increase in plasma parathyroid hormone levels was also found. No side effects were observed. Conclusions: Adding 2.5 mEq/l of calcium to dialysis fluid is a safe and effective therapeutic alternative to control hard-to-manage hypertension among haemodialysis patients

Influence of calcium concentration in haemodialysis fluid on blood pressure control. / Influencia de la concentración de calcio en el líquido de hemodiálisis sobre el control de la tensión arterial.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a highly prevalent disorder among patients undergoing haemodialysis. It contributes to greater cardiovascular risk and must be controlled. However, despite dietary measures, haemodialysis regimen optimisation and pharmacological treatment, some patients in our units continue to maintain high blood pressure levels. The objective of the study is to demonstrate that reducing calcium in dialysis fluid can help treat hypertension patients undergoing haemodialysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We selected all of the hypertensive patients from our haemodialysis unit. We checked their normovolemic status by means of bioimpedance spectroscopy, decreasing the haemodialysis fluid's calcium concentration to 2.5mEq/l, with a follow-up period of 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients met the non-volume dependent hypertension criteria (age 61±15 years, males 48%, diabetes 43%). A significant systolic and diastolic blood pressure decrease was observed at 6 and 12 months as a result of reducing the dialysis calcium concentration; this was not accompanied by greater haemodynamic instability (baseline systolic blood pressure: 162±14 mmHg; at 6 months: 146±18 mmHg; at 12 months: 141±21 mmHg; P=.001) (baseline diastolic blood pressure: 76±14 mmHg; at 6 months: 70±12 mmHg; at 12 months: 65±11 mmHg; P=.005). A non-significant increase in plasma parathyroid hormone levels was also found. No side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Adding 2.5mEq/l of calcium to dialysis fluid is a safe and effective therapeutic alternative to control hard-to-manage hypertension among haemodialysis patients.

Consulta de acceso vascular: resultados antes y después de la instauración de un programa multidisciplinar con realización de ecografía doppler de rutina / Vascular access clinic results before and after implementing a multidisciplinary approach adding routine Doppler ultrasound

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVO: El abordaje multidisciplinar y el uso de ecografía doppler (ED) en la creación y vigilancia del acceso vascular (AV) puede mejorar la prevalencia y permeabilidad de las fístulas arteriovenosas (FAV) para hemodiálisis. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar el impacto de una nueva consulta multidisciplinar (CMD) de AV con ED de rutina. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Evaluamos los resultados de la consulta de AV en 2014 (pre-CMD) y 2015 (CMD), antes y después de la implantación de un equipo multidisciplinar (cirujano vascular/nefrólogo) con ED de rutina en mapeo prequirúrgico y FAV prevalente. RESULTADOS: Se evaluaron 345 pacientes en 2014 (pre-CMD) y 364 pacientes en 2015 (CMD). En ambos periodos se realizó un número similar de cirugías, 172 vs. 198, p = 0,289, con tendencia a aumentar las cirugías preventivas de reparación de FAV en el periodo CMD, 17 vs. 29 (p = 0,098). En FAV de nueva creación (155 vs. 169), disminuyó la tasa de fallo primario en el periodo CMD, 26,4 vs. 15,3%, p = 0,015 y aumentó de forma no significativa la realización de FAV radiocefálicas distales, 25,8 vs. 33,2% (n = 40 vs. 56), p = 0,159. También aumentó la concordancia entre la indicación quirúrgica en la consulta y la cirugía realizada (81,3 vs. 93,5%, p = 0,001). En el periodo CMD se solicitaron menos exploraciones radiológicas desde la consulta, 78 vs. 35 (p < 0,001), con una reducción del gasto sanitario (81.716€ vs. 59.445€). CONCLUSIONES: El manejo multidisciplinar y la utilización del ED de rutina permiten mejorar los resultados de AV, con disminución de la tasa de fallo primario de FAV, más opciones de FAV distal nativa, mejor manejo de la FAV prevalente disfuncionante y menor coste en exploraciones radiológicas

BACKGROUND: A multidisciplinary approach and Doppler ultrasound (DU) assessment for the creation and maintenance of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) for haemodialysis can improve prevalence and patency. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of a new multidisciplinary vascular access (VA) clinic with routine DU. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analysed the VA clinic results from 2014 and 2015, before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary team protocol (vascular surgeon/nephrologist) with routine DU in preoperative mapping and prevalent AVF. RESULTS: We analysed 345 and 364 patients from 2014 and 2015 respectively. The number of surgical interventions was similar in both periods (p = .289), with a trend towards an increase in preventive surgical repair of AVF in 2015 (17 vs. 29, p = .098). 155 vs. 169 new AVF were performed in 2014 and 2015, with a significantly lower primary failure rate in 2015 (26.4 vs. 15.3%, p = .015), and a non-significant increase in radiocephalic AVF, 25.8 vs. 33.2% (n = 40 vs. 56), p = .159. The concordance between the indication at the clinic and the surgery performed also increased (81.3 vs. 93.5%, p = .001). Throughout 2015 fewer complementary imaging test were requested from the clinic (78 vs. 35, p < .001), with a corresponding reduction in costs (€87,716 vs. €59,445). CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary approach with routine DU can improve VA results, with a decrease in primary failure rate, higher likelihood of radiocephalic AVF, better management of dis-functioning AVF and lower radiological test costs

Vascular access clinic results before and after implementing a multidisciplinary approach adding routine Doppler ultrasound. / Consulta de acceso vascular: resultados antes y después de la instauración de un programa multidisciplinar con realización de ecografía doppler de rutina.

BACKGROUND: A multidisciplinary approach and Doppler ultrasound (DU) assessment for the creation and maintenance of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) for haemodialysis can improve prevalence and patency. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of a new multidisciplinary vascular access (VA) clinic with routine DU. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analysed the VA clinic results from 2014 and 2015, before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary team protocol (vascular surgeon/nephrologist) with routine DU in preoperative mapping and prevalent AVF. RESULTS: We analysed 345 and 364 patients from 2014 and 2015 respectively. The number of surgical interventions was similar in both periods (p=.289), with a trend towards an increase in preventive surgical repair of AVF in 2015 (17 vs. 29, p=.098). 155 vs. 169 new AVF were performed in 2014 and 2015, with a significantly lower primary failure rate in 2015 (26.4 vs. 15.3%, p=.015), and a non-significant increase in radiocephalic AVF, 25.8 vs. 33.2% (n=40 vs. 56), p=.159. The concordance between the indication at the clinic and the surgery performed also increased (81.3 vs. 93.5%, p=.001). Throughout 2015 fewer complementary imaging test were requested from the clinic (78 vs. 35, p <.001), with a corresponding reduction in costs (€87,716 vs. €59,445). CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary approach with routine DU can improve VA results, with a decrease in primary failure rate, higher likelihood of radiocephalic AVF, better management of dis-functioning AVF and lower radiological test costs.