Safety and Effectiveness of Stellate Ganglion Cryoablation in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome.

This was a retrospective, observational, descriptive study to evaluate the safety and 6-month effectiveness of percutaneous cryoablation of the stellate ganglion for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). Eight patients with CRPS diagnosed by Budapest criteria were treated with this procedure. CRPS symptom severity was assessed prior to the procedure and at 3-month intervals after the procedure using a novel CRPS scoring system-the Budapest score-created by the authors. The mean Budapest score prior to and 6 months (187 days, SD ± 43) after stellate ganglion cryoablation was 7.0 (SD ± 2.0) (n = 6) and 3.8 (SD ± 2.3) (n = 6), respectively, showing a decrease of 3.2 (SD ± 1.7) (n = 6; P = .006). There were no major adverse events due to the procedure, and there was only 1 minor adverse event. Stellate ganglion cryoablation is a feasible, safe, and minimally invasive procedure that may represent an efficacious adjunct treatment option for select patients with CRPS.

Optimal epidural analgesia for patients diagnosed as having gynecologic cancer undergoing interstitial brachytherapy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal epidural analgesia for patients receiving interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) for gynecologic cancers. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Operating room and hospital ward. PATIENTS: Seventy-three patients diagnosed as having gynecologic cancer and undergoing ISBT. INTERVENTIONS: Twelve patients received ropivacaine alone, 14 patients received ropivacaine with fentanyl, and 45 patients received ropivacaine with hydromorphone by epidural infusion. MEASUREMENTS: Numeric Rating Scale pain scores, amounts of nonnarcotic and narcotic pain medications used in intravenous morphine equivalents (IVMEs), and amount of antiemetic or antipruritic medications used. MAIN RESULTS: Patients receiving ropivacaine alone had higher pain scores the morning of day 2 (4.2 vs 1.71 vs 0.6, P=.001), the afternoon of day 2 (4.9 vs 2.5 vs 1.7, P=.005), and the night of day 2 (2.4 vs 2.0 vs 0.6, P<.001). Patients receiving opioids in their epidural had lower pain scores on the night of placement (P=.050), the morning of day 2 (P<.001), the afternoon of day 2 (P=.002), and the night of day 2 (P<.001). Patients receiving ropivacaine alone used more oral narcotics than did those receiving ropivacaine with fentanyl or ropivacaine with hydromorphone on day 3 (5.9 vs 3.8 vs 2.8mg IVME) and received more intravenous opioids day 1 (5.8 vs 0.0 vs 0.7mg IVME, P=.004) and day 2 (20.6 vs 4.8 vs 1.0mg IVME, P=.042). There were no differences in antiemetic or diphenhydramine usage at any time point. No epidural complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: For patients receiving ISBT for gynecologic cancer, epidural analgesia provides safe and effective pain control. Combined modality epidural analgesia improves pain control and lessens oral and intravenous opioid requirements without increased risk of adverse effects compared with epidural analgesia with local anesthetic alone.

Computed tomography-planned interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced gynecologic cancer: Outcomes and dosimetric predictors of urinary toxicity.

PURPOSE: To identify dosimetric predictors of outcome and toxicity in patients receiving CT-planned interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) for gynecologic cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients who received ISBT between 2009 and 2014 were reviewed. Demographic, disease specific, treatment, and toxicity data were collected. Logistic regression was used to model toxicity. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalty was used to identify relevant predictors. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to analyze the relation between dosimetric factors and urinary toxicity. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients received ISBT (21 at time of cancer recurrence and 52 at the first presentation). Thirty-six patients had cervical cancer, 16 had vaginal cancer, 13 had uterine cancer, and 8 had vulvar cancer. ISBT was performed using both high-dose-rate and low-dose-rate 192Ir sources (27 low dose rate and 46 high dose rate). With a median followup of 12 months, Grade 3 vaginal, urinary, and rectal toxicity occurred in 17.8%, 15.1%, and 6.8% of patients, respectively. No patients experienced Grade 4 or 5 toxicity. Dose to 0.1cc of urethra predicted for development of Grade 3 urinary toxicity (area under the curve of 0.81; 95% confidence interval: 0.66, 0.96). A 10% probability of a Grade 3 urinary toxicity associated with a dose of 23.1 equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (95% confidence interval: 9.51, 36.27 equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions). CONCLUSIONS: ISBT is a safe treatment for gynecologic malignancies. The dose to 0.1cc significantly predicts for severe urinary toxicity. Our data suggests that dose to a small urethral volume may be the most significant predictor of urinary toxicity in patients receiving ISBT for gynecologic cancer.

Computed tomography planned interstitial brachytherapy for recurrent gynecologic cancer.

PURPOSE: To report outcomes and identify predictors of toxicity in patients undergoing reirradiation with interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) for recurrent cancers of the female reproductive tract. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-one patients received ISBT performed using (192)Ir sources (10 low dose rate and 11 high dose rate) at our institution between 2009 and 2013. Demographic, disease specific, treatment, toxicity, and outcome data were collected. Kaplan-Meier and proportional hazard models were used to estimate survival and logistic regression to model toxicity. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalty was used to identify relevant predictors of outcome and toxicity. RESULTS: Eleven patients had uterine cancer, 7 patients had cervical cancer, and 3 patients had vulvar cancer. One-year actuarial freedom from local-regional failure, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival were 71.5%, 66.0%, and 82.2%, respectively. Tumor size was a significant predictor of worse PFS and overall survival (1 cm increase in tumor size = hazard ratio [HR], 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16, 2.62 for PFS; HR, 2.02; 95% CI: 1.21, 3.38). Grade 3 or higher vaginal, urinary, and rectal toxicity occurred in 28.5%, 9.5%, and 19% of patients, respectively. Urethra D0.1cc predicted for grade 2 or higher urinary toxicity (one equivalent dose in 2 Gy fraction increase = HR, 1.156; 95% CI: 1.001, 1.335). CONCLUSIONS: Reirradiation with ISBT is both safe and effective. In patients with recurrent cancer, urethra D0.1cc predicts for increased urinary toxicity. Increased tumor size is a negative prognostic factor in patients receiving ISBT for cancer recurrence.

Using computed tomography scans and patient demographic data to estimate thoracic epidural space depth.

Background and Objectives. Previous studies have used varying methods to estimate the depth of the epidural space prior to placement of an epidural catheter. We aim to use computed tomography scans, patient demographics, and vertebral level to estimate the depth of the loss of resistance for placement of thoracic epidural catheters. Methods. The records of consecutive patients who received a thoracic epidural catheter were reviewed. Patient demographics, epidural placement site, and technique were collected. Preoperative computed tomography scans were reviewed to measure the skin to epidural space distance. Linear regression was used for a multivariate analysis. Results. The records of 218 patients were reviewed. The mean loss of resistance measurement was significantly larger than the mean computed tomography epidural space depth measurement by 0.79 cm (p < 0.001). Our final multivariate model, adjusted for demographic and epidural technique, showed a positive correlation between the loss of resistance and the computed tomography epidural space depth measurement (R (2) = 0.5692, p < 0.0001). Conclusions. The measured loss of resistance is positively correlated with the computed tomography epidural space depth measurement and patient demographics. For patients undergoing thoracic or abdominal surgery, estimating the loss of resistance can be a valuable tool.

Brachial artery reactivity and vascular reactive hyperemia for preoperative anaesthesia risk assessment - an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive measures of vascular reactivity have emerged to refine cardiovascular risk. However, limited data exists investigating vascular reactivity as a preoperative diagnostic tool for anesthesiologists. In this study, we compare the utility of two non-invasive techniques, Brachial Artery Reactivity Testing (BART) and Digital Thermal Monitoring (DTM), as surrogates for measuring vascular reactivity. METHODS: Following IRB approval, 26 patients scheduled for major thoracic surgery (e.g. esophagectomy and pneumonectomy) were studied prospectively. BART [Flow mediated dilation (FMD) and Peak flow velocity (PFV)] and DTM [Temperature rebound (TR%)] were performed preoperatively at baseline using 5 minute blood pressure cuff occlusion of the upper arm. Statistical summaries were provided for the comparison of BART and DTM with select patient characteristics, and correlations were used to investigate the strength of the relationship between BART and DTM measurements. RESULTS: Patients preoperatively diagnosed with hyperlipidemia were associated with lower FMD% values {Median (Range): 14.8 (2.3, 38.1) vs. 6.2 (0.0, 14.3); p = 0.006}. There were no significant associations between BART and DTM techniques in relation to cardiovascular risk factors or postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that impaired vascular reactivity as measured by BART is associated with the incidence of hyperlipidemia. Also, using a novel technique such as DTM may provide a simpler and more accessible point of care testing for vascular reactivity in a perioperative setting. Both non-invasive techniques assessing vascular function warrant further refinement to better assist preoperative optimization strategies aimed at improving perioperative vascular function.