The effect of azithromycin on ivermectin pharmacokinetics--a population pharmacokinetic model analysis.

BACKGROUND: A recent drug interaction study reported that when azithromycin was administered with the combination of ivermectin and albendazole, there were modest increases in ivermectin pharmacokinetic parameters. Data from this study were reanalyzed to further explore this observation. A compartmental model was developed and 1,000 interaction studies were simulated to explore extreme high ivermectin values that might occur. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first-order elimination and absorption was developed. The chosen final model had 7 fixed-effect parameters and 8 random-effect parameters. Because some of the modeling parameters and their variances were not distributed normally, a second mixture model was developed to further explore these data. The mixture model had two additional fixed parameters and identified two populations, A (55% of subjects), where there was no change in bioavailability, and B (45% of subjects), where ivermectin bioavailability was increased 37%. Simulations of the data using both models were similar, and showed that the highest ivermectin concentrations fell in the range of 115-201 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first pharmacokinetic model of ivermectin. It demonstrates the utility of two modeling approaches to explore drug interactions, especially where there may be population heterogeneity. The mechanism for the interaction was identified (an increase in bioavailability in one subpopulation). Simulations show that the maximum ivermectin exposures that might be observed during co-administration with azithromycin are below those previously shown to be safe and well tolerated. These analyses support further study of co-administration of azithromycin with the widely used agents ivermectin and albendazole, under field conditions in disease control programs.

Pharmacokinetics of azithromycin and the combination of ivermectin and albendazole when administered alone and concurrently in healthy volunteers.

Azithromycin is a critical component of an integrated disease elimination program against trachoma. This study was conducted to evaluate whether azithromycin has a pharmacokinetic interaction with the combination of ivermectin and albendazole. Eighteen healthy volunteers were administered single doses of azithromycin, ivermectin/albendazole, and the combination of the three agents in random, crossover fashion. To assess the presence of interactions, test (combination) and reference (single dose) data were compared using an estimation approach. Compared with reference phases, the geometric mean values for the combination arm's azithromycin AUC(0-t) and C(max) were increased approximately 13% and 20%, respectively, albendazole AUC(0-t) decreased by approximately 3% and C(max) increased approximately 3%, and ivermectin AUC(0-t) and C(max) were increased 31% and 27%, respectively. Albendazole sulfoxide AUC(0-t) and C(max) were decreased approximately 16% and 14%, respectively. All treatments were well tolerated. The interactions for azithromycin and albendazole were minimal although the increase in ivermectin exposure requires further study.

Regulatory disincentives for developing antibiotics for common indications.

Pediatric and adult community-acquired respiratory tract infections remain some of the most common reasons for visits to primary care practitioners, and the antibiotics used to treat them are historically highly profitable for their manufacturers. Despite these facts and the continued evolving need for new treatments for these infections, virtually no new agents have been developed in the past decade. This review explores some regulatory guidelines that could potentially explain the dearth of development, and it provides some practical answers for resolving them.

Efficacy and safety of 3-day azithromycin versus 5-day moxifloxacin for the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

Antibiotic therapy is of clinical benefit in certain patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). In this randomised, investigator-blinded, multicentre trial, azithromycin (500mg once a day (qd) for 3 days) was compared with moxifloxacin (400mg qd for 5 days) for the treatment of outpatients with AECB (forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) >35%). Of 342 patients randomised to either treatment, 169 received azithromycin and 173 received moxifloxacin. The mean age in the azithromycin and moxifloxacin groups was 56.4 years and 55.5 years, respectively. In the intent-to-treat analysis, clinical success rates for azithromycin and moxifloxacin were comparable at Days 10-12 (90% versus 90%, respectively) and Days 22-26 (81% versus 82%, respectively). Among patients who were culture-positive at baseline for Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis or Haemophilus parainfluenzae, clinical efficacy for azithromycin versus moxifloxacin at Days 10-12 was 93% versus 84%, respectively, and at Days 22-26 it was 89% versus 73%, respectively. The incidence of at least one treatment-related adverse event (AE) in the azithromycin and moxifloxacin groups was 18.3% and 19.1%, respectively. The most common AEs were diarrhoea, nausea, abdominal pain and vaginitis. Most treatment-related AEs were of mild or moderate severity, with no serious treatment-related AEs. One subject in the moxifloxacin group discontinued treatment owing to a treatment-related AE (precordial pain and dry throat). Compliance with both regimens was >90%. Three-day azithromycin and 5-day moxifloxacin demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety for the treatment of AECB in outpatients.

Altered steady state pharmacokinetics of levofloxacin in adult cystic fibrosis patients receiving calcium carbonate.

BACKGROUND: Levofloxacin is used in adult patients with cystic fibrosis but its pharmacokinetics is not well characterized in this population. Patients with cystic fibrosis use calcium routinely to prevent osteoporosis. A slower intestinal transit time is common in cystic fibrosis implying that the standard 2-h spacing of minerals and levofloxacin to prevent a chelation interaction may be insufficient. The objectives of this study were to characterize the steady state pharmacokinetics of oral levofloxacin 750 mg with and without 2-h spaced calcium carbonate in patients with cystic fibrosis compared to matched healthy volunteers. METHODS: In an open-label, randomized, cross-over study of five patients with cystic fibrosis and five age, sex, race, and serum creatinine matched healthy volunteers received 750 mg of oral levofloxacin alone daily for 5 days and the same dose of levofloxacin with 2-h spaced calcium carbonate supplementation 500 mg po thrice daily with meals in random sequence. Blood was collected for plasma assay of levofloxacin pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24h after the fifth levofloxacin dose. RESULTS: There was no significant interaction in healthy volunteers, however, when cystic fibrosis patients were given levofloxacin with 2-h spaced calcium, the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) decreased by 19% and time to Cmax increased by 37% (p<0.05). This difference in peak concentrations resulted in a lack of bioequivalence (Cmax geometric mean ratio 81.6%, 90% confidence intervals: 71.8%, 91.4%) even when levofloxacin and calcium supplements were spaced by the standard 2h administration instruction in patients with cystic fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that multivalent cations such as calcium should be maximally separated from oral levofloxacin administration in adult patients with cystic fibrosis to prevent this drug interaction, thereby better optimizing antibiotic efficacy and decreasing the potential for resistance development.

Interferon gamma-1b in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinical aspects of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and the efficacy and safety of interferon gamma-1b (IFNgamma-1b) in its treatment. DATA SOURCES: Epidemiologic, preclinical, and clinical studies published in the English language were identified by a MEDLINE search (1966-January 2005) using the search terms idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis, and interferon. Additional citations were identified from the reference lists of related publications. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Selected preclinical studies describing the pathophysiologic basis for IFNgamma-1b therapy and all clinical studies were included. Additional trials describing other treatment modalities and the determinants of response to therapy in patients with IPF were also reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: IFNgamma-1b targets the fibrotic rather than inflammatory processes of IPF. The efficacy of IFNgamma-1b in patients with IPF is inconsistent with regard to changes in pulmonary function and mortality, although a modest survival benefit was observed in the largest clinical trial. Adverse events related to IFNgamma-1b are frequent although transient. Several cases of respiratory failure occurring subsequent to the administration of IFNgamma-1b are documented. CONCLUSIONS: To date, although trials suggest that earlier-stage IPF may be responsive to IFNgamma-1b, study results overall are inconsistent; further investigation is needed.

The disease-modifying effects of twice-weekly oral azithromycin in patients with bronchiectasis.

INTRODUCTION: Bronchiectasis is a chronic pulmonary process characterized by recurrent respiratory infections leading to destruction of airways secondary to inflammation. We investigated whether the addition of 6-months' twice-weekly azithromycin to the existing treatment regimen in patients with pulmonary bronchiectasis decreased the number of exacerbations and improved pulmonary function compared with a similar period of time without concurrent azithromycin. METHODS: Thirty patients with high-resolution computed tomography scan-confirmed bronchiectasis were to be recruited. In random order, patients received usual medications for 6 months, and usual medications plus oral azithromycin 500mg twice weekly for 6 months. Patients receiving azithromycin first had a 1-month washout period prior to entering the second phase. Patients recorded weekly peak flow (PF) measurements. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs), 24-hour sputum volume, and needs for intervention with medication or ancillary support were collected at baseline and every 3 months. Exacerbation incidence and sputum volume measurements were compared from baseline to the end of each study phase. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled; 11 were included in the analysis. Owing to randomization, most patients received the azithromycin first, which was fairly well tolerated. PFTs did not change significantly during either study phase and PFs appeared to remain stable during azithromycin therapy and throughout the subsequent control phase. Azithromycin significantly decreased the incidence of exacerbations compared with usual medications (5 vs 16; p = 0.019). Mean 24-hour sputum volume significantly decreased (15% [p = 0.005]) during the active treatment phase, and remained decreased during the control phase (p = 0.028). Subjectively, patients reported increased energy and quality of life while receiving treatment with azithromycin. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of twice-weekly azithromycin significantly decreased the incidence of exacerbation and 24-hour sputum volume and may have stabilized the PFTs and PFs in this 11-patient pilot study. The results of this study justify further investigation of adding azithromycin to the treatment regimens of patients with bronchiectasis for its disease-modifying effects.

Treatment of Legionnaires' disease.

Legionnaires' disease is pneumonia, usually caused by Legionella pneumophila, which can range in severity from mild to quite severe. While it is commonly acquired in the community, it can just as easily be acquired nosocomially from water sources that have not been appropriately decontaminated. While historically initial treatment was always with erythromycin, current case series and treatment recommendations suggest that outpatients receive immediate treatment with one of the following antibacterials: azithromycin, erythromycin, clarithromycin, telithromycin, doxycycline or an extended-spectrum fluoroquinolone. If the symptoms are severe enough to warrant hospitalisation then the patient should receive treatment with parenteral azithromycin or extended-spectrum fluoroquinolones followed by step-down to oral formulations to complete the regimens. While a shorter course of 7-10 days for more severe infections may be possible for intravenous/oral azithromycin, other antibacterials should be administered for a total of 10-21 days and started as soon as possible upon presentation to optimise outcomes.

Once-daily azithromycin for 3 days compared with clarithromycin for 10 days for acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of oral azithromycin 500 mg once daily for 3 days with those of oral clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 10 days. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study. SETTING: Seventy-six study centers in eight countries (Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Costa Rica, India, South Africa, and USA). PATIENTS: Three hundred and twenty-two adult outpatients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) as documented by increased cough or sputum production, worsening dyspnea, and purulent sputum production. INTERVENTIONS: Randomization 1 : 1 to azithromycin 500 mg once daily for 3 days or clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 10 days. RESULTS: The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical response at day 21-24, or test of cure (TOC) visit in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) analysis (n = 318 patients). The TOC clinical cure rates in the MITT population were equivalent in the two treatment groups at 85% with azithromycin and 82% with clarithromycin (95% CI -5.9%, 12.0%). Clinical success rates on day 10-12 were also equivalent at 93% with azithromycin and 94% with clarithromycin (95% CI -7.9%, 4.4%). Clinical cure rates at TOC by pathogen were equivalent for the two treatment groups for Haemophilus influenzae (azithromycin, 85.7%; clarithromycin, 87.5%), Moraxella catarrhalis (91.7% and 80.0%, respectively) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (90.6% and 77.8%, respectively). Bacteriologic success rates were also equivalent between the azithromycin and clarithromycin treatment groups at TOC for S. pneumoniae (90.6% and 85.2%, respectively), H. influenzae (71.4% and 81.3%, respectively) and M. catarrhalis (100% and 86.7%, respectively). The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar in the azithromycin and clarithromycin groups (20.9% and 26.8%, respectively), with the most common being abdominal pain (6.3% and 6.1%, respectively), diarrhea (4.4% and 5.5%, respectively), and nausea (4.4% and 3.7%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Three-day treatment with azithromycin 500 mg once daily is equivalent to a 10-day treatment with clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily in adult patients with AECB.

Comparative efficacies and tolerabilities of intravenous azithromycin plus ceftriaxone and intravenous levofloxacin with step-down oral therapy for hospitalized patients with moderate to severe community-acquired pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of ceftriaxone plus azithromycin with those of levofloxacin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with moderate to severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). DESIGN: Randomized, open-label multicenter trial with 1 : 1 treatment allocation in an inpatient setting. PATIENTS: 212 male or female inpatients with a clinical diagnosis of CAP were included in the study. In each treatment group >50% of patients had a pneumonia severity index of IV or V. INTERVENTIONS: Open-label treatment with either intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone 1g and IV azithromycin 500 mg daily or IV levofloxacin 500 mg daily. Patients who improved clinically were switched to oral follow-on therapy with either azithromycin 500 mg/day or levofloxacin 500 mg/day. At the clinician's discretion, oral cefuroxime axetil was added to the treatment regimen of patients who received oral azithromycin if a macrolide resistant pneumococcal isolate was documented. RESULTS: Overall, both study treatments were well tolerated. Favorable clinical outcomes in clinically evaluable patients were demonstrated in 91.5% of patients treated with ceftriaxone plus azithromycin and 89.3% (95% CI -7.1%, 11.4%) of patients treated with levofloxacin at the end of therapy visit and in 89.2% and 85.1% (95% CI -6.7%, 14.8%) patients, respectively, at the end of study visit. Bacteriological eradication rates for both treatments were equivalent with the exception of Streptococcus pneumoniae; 44% of isolates were eradicated with levofloxacin compared with 100% of isolates with ceftriaxone plus azithromycin. CONCLUSIONS: As acknowledged by international CAP treatment guidelines, the combination of a third-generation cephalosporin and a macrolide is at least as efficacious as monotherapy with a fluoroquinolone with enhanced anti-pneumococcal activity, for hospitalized patients with moderate to severe CAP. Combined medication with a macrolide and third-generation cephalosporin may be preferred over fluoroquinolones as first-line therapy of hospitalized patients with CAP to minimize the development of multiresistant nosocomial Gram-negative bacilli.

Single-dose azithromycin for respiratory tract infections.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety data of the use of single-dose azithromycin for respiratory tract infections in children and adults. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search (1990-September 2003) was performed to identify all pertinent studies and review articles. When appropriate information was not available in the literature, data were obtained from the product manufacturers or abstracts from international conferences. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All available studies were reviewed to provide pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, efficacy, and safety data on use of single-dose azithromycin for respiratory tract infections. DATA SYNTHESIS: Several studies have demonstrated that shorter regimens of azithromycin (1500 mg over 3 day vs 5 day or single dose vs 3 day) provide higher serum exposures compared with the longer regimens. This makes it possible to give the same dose over a shorter period of time and achieve the same efficacy with the potential for enhanced adherence. Single-dose azithromycin 30 mg/kg was approved in 2003 for treatment of acute otitis media (AOM) in children. Studies have demonstrated that, when administering azithromycin as a single dose, its efficacy and safety are comparable to that of other standard regimens for AOM. Single-dose regimens for treatment of respiratory tract infections in adults have not been studied widely, with only 2 studies being conducted for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and one study for treatment of tonsillitis; all demonstrated at least equal efficacy with the single-dose regimen compared with comparators given for longer periods of time. CONCLUSIONS: Available data regarding single-dose azithromycin are promising. Although use of this regimen in children is warranted based on studies to date, additional large-scale trials are needed prior to mainstream use of the regimen in adults.

Pneumococcal resistance in perspective: how well are we combating it?

Because Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most commonly isolated community-acquired respiratory tract pathogen, the reports of high rates of antibiotic resistance throughout the world highlight the need for intervention to stem any further increases in resistance. Efforts to reduce the incidence of pneumococcal resistance have been mainly 2-fold, involving attempts to reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing, as well as to assure early childhood immunization with the pneumococcal heptavalent conjugate vaccine. To reduce unnecessary prescribing for infections that are typically viral in etiology, such as acute bronchitis, education efforts have been focused not only on clinicians but also on parents and patients. These education efforts significantly reduce unnecessary antibiotic prescribing, and initial evidence suggests that they may stabilize, if not reduce, the incidence of penicillin and macrolide-resistant pneumococcal isolates. Utilization of the relatively new pneumococcal heptavalent conjugate vaccine not only reduces the incidence of acute otitis media caused by pneumococcal serotypes included in the vaccine as well as disease caused by related serotypes but also has a highly significant effect on reducing the incidence of invasive pneumococcal disease in children and potential adult contacts. In addition more recent data have established that vaccination is also decreasing the carriage and transmission of antibiotic-resistant pneumococcal isolates. Education and vaccine programs that attempt to stabilize and/or reduce the rate of pneumococcal resistance are at least as important as having effective antibiotic treatments for pneumococcal disease. These efforts to address pneumococcal resistance have been highly successful to date.

Characterization of the penetration of garenoxacin into the breast milk of lactating women.

The primary objective of this study was to characterize the extent of excretion of garenoxacin, a novel des-F(6)-quinolone antimicrobial, into the breast milk of lactating women. A secondary objective was to determine the time after dose administration that garenoxacin was no longer detected in breast milk so as to define when a mother may resume breastfeeding if it was interrupted for garenoxacin administration. Six healthy, lactating women (age [mean +/- SD]: 32 +/- 6 years; weight: 68.3 +/- 19.8 kg; body mass index: 26 +/- 5 kg/m(2)) who had completed weaning their infants were administered a single 600-mg oral dose of garenoxacin. Plasma samples were collected predose and repeatedly up to 72 hours postdose. Breast milk was collected predose and for 6- to 12-hour intervals repeatedly up to 120 hours postdose. Breast milk/plasma concentration ratios for garenoxacin ranged from 0.35 to 0.44 up to 24 hours postdose, and the mean peak breast milk concentration was 3.0 microg/mL (0- to 6-h collection interval). Overall, garenoxacin exposure in breast milk was minimal, with a mean of 0.07% of the administered dose recovered within 120 hours. Indeed, garenoxacin was undetectable in the breast milk of a majority of subjects within 84 hours of dosing. As such, an infant nursing from a mother who had received a single 600-mg oral dose of garenoxacin could theoretically be exposed to 0.42 mg of garenoxacin (0.105 mg/kg/day for a 4-kg infant over the period of 5 days of nursing). If extrapolated to a 14-day course of garenoxacin 600 mg once daily, total exposure would be approximately 5.88 mg. These findings indicate that, like other quinolone antimicrobials, garenoxacin is secreted in breast milk.

Lack of bioequivalence of levofloxacin when coadministered with a mineral-fortified breakfast of juice and cereal.

Previous studies have demonstrated that the chelation interactions demonstrated between fluoroquinolones and antacids also occur when they are coadministered with mineral-fortified foods. This study was conducted to evaluate the bioequivalence of levofloxacin when administered in a fasting state as compared to when it was administered with a common breakfast of calcium-fortified orange juice and ready-to-eat cereal. Fourteen of 16 healthy volunteers completed this study and received 500 mg of levofloxacin with each of the following: (1) 12 ounces of water, (2) subject-measured portions of juice and cereal, and (3) subject-measured portions of juice and cereal with milk. Plasma samples were collected prior to dosing and for up to 48 hours after. The results demonstrated that neither fed phase was bioequivalent to the fasting arm in terms of Cmax (with milk, 79.2% [72.6%, 85.7%]; without milk, 79.1% [73.3%, 84.9%]). In addition, a weak correlation was identified between the amount of change in 24-hour exposure and mineral fortification. The results of this study further demonstrate a need to require additional fed-fasted bioequivalence studies for drugs that demonstrate no interaction with the FDA meal but have significant interactions with drugs or supplements that contain large amounts of multivalent ions.

Lack of bioequivalence when levofloxacin and calcium-fortified orange juice are coadministered to healthy volunteers.

Chelation interactions between drugs/supplements that contain large amounts of multivalent ions and the fluoroquinolones have been known for quite some time. However, there has been a lack of taking this interaction into account when they may be coadministered with foods that have been fortified with amounts of multiple multivalent ions that equal or exceed many supplement products. A previous study demonstrated that 12 ounces of calcium-fortified orange juice significantly decreased the bioequivalence of a dose of ciprofloxacin. This study examined, in 16 healthy volunteers, whether 12 ounces of orange juice with and without calcium fortification would demonstrate the same chelation interaction with single doses of levofloxacin. The results of the study demonstrated that both types of juice decreased levofloxacin Cmax values by 14% to 18% and prolonged tmax values by approximately 50%, with calcium-fortified orange juice decreasing Cmax enough to lose bioequivalence as compared to the control arm (89% [78.1%, 99.8%]). Due to the lack of change in overall exposure, it is thought that rather than a chelation interaction, levofloxacin and components of the orange juices competed for intestinal transport mechanisms such as P-glycoprotein and organic anion-transporting polypeptides, which resulted in the discovered interaction. These results further confirm the need to adjust regulatory studies to include bioequivalence/bioavailability studies that contain fortified foods more than high-calorie/high-fat foods to better reflect current American consumption habits.

Efficacy and safety of azithromycin vs levofloxacin in the outpatient treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the safety and efficacy of oral azithromycin and levofloxacin in the treatment of outpatients with acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (ABECB). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blinded, double-dummy, multicenter trial with 1:1 treatment allocation. SETTING: Outpatient treatment setting. PATIENTS: Two hundred thirty-five male or female outpatients between the ages of 35 and 75 years who had received a clinical diagnosis of ABECB. INTERVENTIONS: Blinded treatment with either oral azithromycin, 500 mg on day 1 and 250 mg per day for days 2 to 5, or, oral levofloxacin, 500 mg q24h for 7 days. RESULTS: Both treatments were well-tolerated, with the majority of adverse events being GI in nature. Favorable clinical outcomes in clinically evaluable patients were demonstrated in 89% of patients receiving azithromycin and in 92% of patients receiving levofloxacin by day 4 of therapy. At day 24, the posttherapy visit, favorable responses were approximately 82% and 86%, respectively, for patients in the two treatment groups. The bacterial eradication rates of respiratory pathogens were 96% for azithromycin and 85% for levofloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing concerns over macrolide resistance and a higher incidence of Gram-negative pathogens, a standard 5-day course of oral azithromycin was clinically and bacteriologically equivalent to a 7-day course of oral levofloxacin in the treatment of patients with ABECB.

Lack of bioequivalence of gatifloxacin when coadministered with calcium-fortified orange juice in healthy volunteers.

Previous work has demonstrated that the chelation interaction seen with ciprofloxacin when it is coadministered with antacids also happens when it is coadministered with calcium-fortified foods. This study was conducted to study whether this was a drug-specific finding or whether the interaction occurs with other members of the fluoroquinolone class of drugs. Sixteen healthy volunteers received single 400-mg oral doses of gatifloxacin with 12 ounces each of water, nonfortified orange juice, and calcium-fortified orange juice and had plasma samples drawn for assay over the subsequent 48 hours. Results demonstrated significant increases in total oral clearance (15%) and volume of distribution (13%) along with a matching significant decrease (12%) in exposure (AUC) when gatifloxacin was taken with the fortified juice. Although not statistically significant, peak concentrations decreased by 15% and were reached (tmax) approximately 38% later when gatifloxacin was coadministered with the calcium-fortified juice. Bioavailability testing indicated that although the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ratio of the geometric means of the calcium-fortified juice and water arms' AUC stayed within the range of 80% to 125%, those for Cmax did not. This study demonstrated a chelation or adsorption interaction between the fortified juice and gatifloxacin that reached regulatory significance. As a result, clinicians may wish to instruct patients to take gatifloxacin either with nonfortified foods or on an empty stomach.