The concentration of cyclosporine metabolites is significantly lower in kidney transplant recipients with diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is prevalent among kidney transplant recipients. The activity of drug metabolizing enzymes or transporters may be altered by diabetes leading to changes in the concentration of parent drug or metabolites. This study was aimed to characterize the effect of diabetes on the concentration of cyclosporine (CsA) and metabolites. METHODS: Concentration-time profiles of CsA and metabolites (AM1, AM9, AM4N, AM1c, AM19, and AM1c9) were characterized over a 12-hour dosing interval in 10 nondiabetic and 7 diabetic stable kidney transplant recipients. All patients were male, had nonfunctional CYP3A5*3 genotype, and were on combination therapy with ketoconazole. RESULTS: The average daily dose (±SD) of CsA was 65 ± 21 and 68 ± 35 mg in nondiabetic and diabetic subjects, respectively (P = 0.550). Cyclosporine metabolites that involved amino acid 1 (AM1, AM19, AM1c) exhibited significantly lower dose-normalized values of area under the concentration-time curve in patients with diabetes. Moreover, during the postabsorption phase (≥3 hours after dose), metabolite-parent concentration ratios for all metabolites, except AM4N, was significantly lower in diabetic patients. The pharmacokinetic parameters of ketoconazole were similar between the 2 groups thus excluding inconsistent ketoconazole exposure as a source of altered CsA metabolism. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that diabetes mellitus significantly affects the concentration of CsA metabolites. Because CsA is eliminated as metabolites via the biliary route, the decrease in the blood concentration of CsA metabolites during postabsorption phase would probably reflect lower hepatic cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme activity. However, other mechanisms including altered expression of transporters may also play a role. Results of cyclosporine therapeutic drug monitoring in diabetic patients must be interpreted with caution when nonspecific assays are used.

Cyclosporine A- and tacrolimus-mediated inhibition of CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in vitro.

Cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus (Tac) are immunosuppressive drugs used in the majority of patients with solid organ transplants, generally in combination with a wide range of drugs. CsA and Tac seem not only to be substrates of CYP3A but have also been described as inhibitors of CYP3A. For CsA, in particular, inhibition of CYP3A has been suggested as the main mechanism of interactions seen clinically with various drugs. The aim of this study was to investigate the inhibitory effect and inhibition characteristics of CsA and Tac on CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 in vitro and to evaluate its clinical relevance. Inhibition by CsA and Tac was studied using midazolam as the probe substrate in coincubation and preincubation investigations using human liver microsomes (HLMs) as well as specific CYP3A4- and CYP3A5-expressing insect microsomes (Supersomes). In vitro-in vivo extrapolations (IVIVEs) were performed to evaluate the clinical relevance of the inhibition. Both CsA and Tac competitively inhibited CYP3A in HLMs, showing inhibition constants (K(i)) of 0.98 and 0.61 µM, respectively. Experiments in Supersomes revealed that Tac inhibited both CYP3A4 and CYP3A5, whereas CsA only inhibited CYP3A4. In contrast to the HLM experiments, studies in Supersomes showed inhibition by Tac to be NADPH- and time-dependent, with a 5-fold reduction in IC(50) after preincubation, supporting a time-dependent inhibition mechanism in recombinant microsomes. By application of HLM data, IVIVE estimated the area under the concentration versus time curve of midazolam to increase by 73 and 27% with CsA and Tac, respectively. The inhibitory effect was predominantly on the intestinal level, whereas hepatic intrinsic clearance seemed unaffected.

[Drug interactions and immunosuppression in organ transplant recipients]. / Legemiddelinteraksjoner og immunsuppresjon hos organtransplanterte.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressive drugs are used to prevent rejection following organ transplantation. Most immunosuppressive drugs have narrow therapeutic concentration ranges. This increases the probability of clinically relevant drug interactions. In the following, we provide an overview of drug interactions that may be of importance to immunosuppressive treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data on the interaction of immunosuppressant drugs was obtained by means of a non-systematic literature search in PubMed. Articles were selected on the basis of their clinical relevance. RESULTS: The literature is primarily concerned with pharmacokinetic interactions. Calcineurin inhibitors (cyclosporine, tacrolimus) and mTOR inhibitors (sirolimus, everolimus) are particularly susceptible to the effects of substances that inhibit or induce cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and P-glycoprotein. These interactions may lead to the levels of the immunosuppressive drugs in blood altering by a factor of more than 10. Methylprednisolone and prednisolone may also be affected by substances that modulate CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein. The level of mycophenolate is lowered by simultaneous use of some proton pump inhibitors, antibiotics and anion binders, and by valproic acid and rifampicin. Some immunosuppressive drugs also interact with one another: cyclosporine raises the level of mTOR inhibitors and lowers the level of mycophenolate. In general, the degree of pharmacological interaction will vary from one individual to the next. INTERPRETATION: In the event of an expected clinically relevant drug interaction, frequent measurements of the concentrations of the drug in question are a good means of achieving individual adjustment of the immunosuppressant treatment. Prior knowledge of drug interactions can thereby contribute to prevent undesirable changes in the immunosuppressant effect.

Cyclosporine A, but not tacrolimus, shows relevant inhibition of organic anion-transporting protein 1B1-mediated transport of atorvastatin.

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of calcineurin inhibitors [cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus (Tac)] to inhibit cellular uptake of atorvastatin mediated by the liver-specific organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1) in vitro. Patients with solid organ transplants are frequently treated with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins). CsA increases atorvastatin systemic exposure severalfold, an effect not observed with Tac. The effect of CsA and Tac on atorvastatin transport via OATP1B1 was investigated in transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells. An in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) was performed to estimate the clinical potential for CsA and Tac to inhibit OATP1B1-mediated transport. CsA inhibited OATP1B1-mediated uptake of atorvastatin approximately 90-fold more efficiently than Tac, with half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) values of 0.021 +/- 0.004 and 1.99 +/- 0.42 muM, respectively. Coincubation compared with preincubation with CsA showed a 20-fold lower inhibitory capacity, with an IC(50) value of 0.47 +/- 0.34 muM. The IVIVE showed that clinically obtainable concentrations of CsA, but not Tac, inhibit OATP1B1 transport of atorvastatin. CsA inhibition ranged from 28 to 77% within a dosing interval, whereas it was less than 1% for Tac, considering free concentrations and assuming competitive inhibition. This does not fully explain the clinically observed interaction with CsA, suggesting that a more complex inhibitory mechanism may be present. This is also supported by the decreased IC(50) value of CsA after preincubation. This study provides evidence that OATP1B1 inhibition is a relevant mechanism for the interaction observed between CsA and atorvastatin.

Rimonabant affects cyclosporine a, but not tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a common problem following renal transplantation. Rimonabant, a cannabinoid-1 receptor blocker, offers a new approach for reducing obesity. METHODS: The potential pharmacokinetic interaction between rimonabant and cyclosporine A (CsA, n=10) and tacrolimus (Tac, n=8) was assessed in stable renal transplant recipients 6.2 (0.9-21.7) years posttransplant. A 12-hour pharmacokinetic profile was obtained before and after two months of concomitant treatment with 20 mg rimonabant each morning. RESULTS: Rimonabant treatment induced a moderate, but significant increase in CsA AUC0-12 (19.8+/-16.1 %, P=0.005). Cmax and C2 values tended to increase whereas C0 remained unaffected. Tac pharmacokinetics was not significantly affected by rimonabant treatment. Eleven of 18 patients experienced adverse events. Two patients reported depressions and one reported severe nightmares. CONCLUSIONS: The effect on CsA pharmacokinetics is probably of marginal clinical relevance since trough concentrations were unaltered, but CsA concentrations should probably be more closely monitored if rimonabant treatment is initiated, preferably by C2 monitoring.