Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Language
Publication year range
1.
B. Joseph Elmunzer; Rebecca L. Spitzer; Lydia D. Foster; Ambreen A. Merchant; Eric F. Howard; Vaishali A. Patel; Mary K. West; Emad Qayad; Rosemary Nustas; Ali Zakaria; Marc S. Piper; Jason R. Taylor; Lujain Jaza; Nauzer Forbes; Millie Chau; Luis F. Lara; Georgios I. Papachristou; Michael L. Volk; Liam G. Hilson; Selena Zhou; Vladimir M. Kushnir; Alexandria M. Lenyo; Caroline G. McLeod; Sunil Amin; Gabriela N. Kuftinec; Dhiraj Yadav; Charlie Fox; Jennifer M. Kolb; Swati Pawa; Rishi Pawa; Andrew Canakis; Christopher Huang; Laith H. Jamil; Andrew M. Aneese; Benita K. Glamour; Zachary L. Smith; Katherine A. Hanley; Jordan Wood; Harsh K. Patel; Janak N. Shah; Emil Agarunov; Amrita Sethi; Evan L. Fogel; Gail McNulty; Abdul Haseeb; Judy A. Trieu; Rebekah E. Dixon; Jeong Yun Yang; Robin B. Mendelsohn; Delia Calo; Olga C. Aroniadis; Joseph F. LaComb; James M. Scheiman; Bryan G. Sauer; Duyen T. Dang; Cyrus R. Piraka; Eric D. Shah; Heiko Pohl; William M. Tierney; Stephanie Mitchell; Ashwinee Condon; Adrienne Lenhart; Kulwinder S. Dua; Vikram S. Kanagala; Ayesha Kamal; Vikesh K. Singh; Maria Ines Pinto-Sanchez; Joy M. Hutchinson; Richard S. Kwon; Sheryl J. Korsnes; Harminder Singh; Zahra Solati; Amar R. Deshpande; Don C. Rockey; Teldon B. Alford; Valerie Durkalski; Field F. Willingham; Patrick S. Yachimski; Darwin L. Conwell; Evan Mosier; Mohamed Azab; Anish Patel; James Buxbaum; Sachin Wani; Amitabh Chak; Amy E. Hosmer; Rajesh N. Keswani; Christopher J. DiMaio; Michael S. Bronze; Raman Muthusamy; Marcia I. Canto; V. Mihajlo Gjeorgjievski; Zaid Imam; Fadi Odish; Ahmed I. Edhi; Molly Orosey; Abhinav Tiwari; Soumil Patwardhan; Nicholas G. Brown; Anish A. Patel; Collins O. Ordiah; Ian P. Sloan; Lilian Cruz; Casey L. Koza; Uchechi Okafor; Thomas Hollander; Nancy Furey; Olga Reykhart; Natalia H. Zbib; John A. Damianos; James Esteban; Nick Hajidiacos; Melissa Saul; Melanie Mays; Gulsum Anderson; Kelley Wood; Laura Mathews; Galina Diakova; Molly Caisse; Lauren Wakefield; Haley Nitchie.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppmedrxiv-20143024

ABSTRACT

BackgroundThe prevalence and significance of digestive manifestations in COVID-19 remain uncertain. MethodsConsecutive patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were identified across a geographically diverse alliance of medical centers in North America. Data pertaining to baseline characteristics, symptomatology, laboratory assessment, imaging, and endoscopic findings from the time of symptom onset until discharge or death were manually abstracted from electronic health records to characterize the prevalence, spectrum, and severity of digestive manifestations. Regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association between digestive manifestations and severe outcomes related to COVID-19. ResultsA total of 1992 patients across 36 centers met eligibility criteria and were included. Overall, 53% of patients experienced at least one gastrointestinal symptom at any time during their illness, most commonly diarrhea (34%), nausea (27%), vomiting (16%), and abdominal pain (11%). In 74% of cases, gastrointestinal symptoms were judged to be mild. In total, 35% of patients developed an abnormal alanine aminotransferase or total bilirubin level; these were elevated to less than 5 times the upper limit of normal in 77% of cases. After adjusting for potential confounders, the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms at any time (odds ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.76-1.15) or liver test abnormalities on admission (odds ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval 0.80-2.12) were not independently associated with mechanical ventilation or death. ConclusionsAmong patients hospitalized with COVID-19, gastrointestinal symptoms and liver test abnormalities were common but the majority were mild and their presence was not associated with a more severe clinical course

2.
Article in English | WPRIM (Western Pacific) | ID: wpr-765966

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Fecal incontinence (FI) is a common complaint that increases in prevalence with age. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of FI and assess its severity by self-report in a male-predominant Veteran outpatient clinic setting. METHODS: An anonymous 28 item questionnaire was administered to a convenience sample of veterans awaiting appointments. FI was defined as a loss of liquid or solid stool at least monthly. Multivariable logistic and linear models were used to identify predictors of FI prevalence and severity. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-three gastroenterology (GI) participants and 126 primary care (PC) participants completed the survey. Ninety-four of 259 participants (36.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 30.4–42.5) reported an episode of FI (41.4% GI participants vs 31.0% PC participants; P = 0.078) with 33.6% having FI within the last 30 days (36.8% GI participants vs 30.2% PC participants; P = 0.122). Participants with more bowel movements per week (P = 0.005) and per day (P < 0.001) and with a higher Bristol Stool Scale form (P = 0.010) were more likely to have FI. Of participants with FI, mean Fecal Incontinence Severity Index score was 23.0 ± 9.5 with a significantly higher symptom score in GI participants compared to PC participants (25.2 ± 10.0 vs 20.1 ± 8.2; P = 0.011). Few participants had ever been asked by (35.0%) or evaluated by (18.0%) a doctor for FI symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: FI is a common complaint and under-recognized problem in the male-dominant Veteran population. Despite its prevalence, relatively few participants were asked about FI, with even less being treated. Due to the possible effects and implications on quality of life, more should be done to recognize this condition and arrange treatment.


Subject(s)
Humans , Ambulatory Care Facilities , Anonyms and Pseudonyms , Appointments and Schedules , Fecal Incontinence , Gastroenterology , Linear Models , Prevalence , Primary Health Care , Quality of Life , Veterans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...