ABSTRACT
Inner ear cell regeneration from stem/progenitor cells provides potential therapeutic strategies for the restoration of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), however, the efficiency of regeneration is low and the functions of differentiated cells are not yet mature. Biomaterials have been used in inner ear cell regeneration to construct a more physiologically relevant 3D culture system which mimics the stem cell microenvironment and facilitates cellular interactions. Currently, these biomaterials include hydrogel, conductive materials, magneto-responsive materials, photo-responsive materials, etc. We analyzed the characteristics and described the advantages and limitations of these materials. Furthermore, we reviewed the mechanisms by which biomaterials with different physicochemical properties act on the inner ear cell regeneration and depicted the current status of the material selection based on their characteristics to achieve the reconstruction of the auditory circuits. The application of biomaterials in inner ear cell regeneration offers promising opportunities for the reconstruction of the auditory circuits and the restoration of hearing, yet biomaterials should be strategically explored and combined according to the obstacles to be solved in the inner ear cell regeneration research.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of Z-shape elevating-pulling reduction as compared to that of conventional skull traction in the treatment of lower cervical locked facet. METHODS: Patients with cervical locked facet (n = 63) were retrospectively enrolled from four medical centers and divided into two groups according to the pre-operative reduction method used: Z-shape elevating-pulling reduction (Z-shape elevating group; n = 20) or traditional skull traction reduction (skull traction group; n = 43). RESULTS: The success rates, efficacy of reduction, and safety were compared between the two groups. The success rates were significantly better in the Z-shape elevating group than in the skull traction group: 87.5% (7/8) vs. 35.3% (6/17) for unilateral locked facet reduction (P = 0.03) and 100% (12/12) vs. 69.2% (18/26) for bilateral locked facet reduction (P = 0.04). There was no obvious change in American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade after the reduction in either group. Combined surgery was necessary in 5% in the Z-shape elevating group vs. 27.9% in the skull traction group. Imaging showed that the segment angle and horizontal displacement were significantly improved after surgery in both groups, with no significant difference between the groups. Follow-up with radiography showed good recovery of the cervical spine sequence; all internal fixation sites were stable, with no loosening, prolapse, or breakage of internal fixators. CONCLUSIONS: Halo vest-assisted Z-shape elevating-pulling reduction appears to be a simple, safe, and effective technique for pre-operative reduction of lower cervical locked facets.
