Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in lymph node-negative, T1b and T1c triple-negative breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommendations regarding chemotherapy in small (T1b and T1c), node-negative triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) differ due to lack of high-quality data. Our study aimed to assess the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T1bN0M0 and T1cN0M0 TNBC. METHODS: We obtained data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for patients with node-negative, T1b/T1c TNBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2020. Logistic regresion models assessed variables associated with chemotherapy administration. We evaluated the effect of chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) with Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards methods. RESULTS: We included 11,510 patients: 3,388 with T1b and 8,122 with T1c TNBC. During a median follow-up of 66 months, 305 patients with T1b and 995 with T1c died. After adjusting for clinicopathological, demographic and treatment factors, adjuvant chemotherapy improved OS in T1b TNBC (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.41-0.68 p < 0.001) but did not improve BCSS (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.45-1.07; p = 0.10); the association between chemotherapy and BCSS was not statistically significant in any subgroup. In T1c TNBC, adjuvant chemotherapy improved OS (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.47-0.62; p < 0.001) and BCSS (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.63-0.99; p = 0.043); the benefit of chemotherapy in OS varied by age (Pinteraction=0.024); moreover, the benefit in BCSS was similar in all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-negative, T1c TNBC. Patients with node-negative, T1b TNBC had excellent long-term outcomes; furthermore, chemotherapy was not associated with improved BCSS in these patients.

Assessment of Use and Impact of Chemotherapy in Lymph Node-Negative, T1a Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Current treatment guidelines suggest considering adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk patients with T1a, node-negative triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); however, limited quality data support this statement. Our population-based study assessed the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy and factors associated with its administration in node-negative, T1a TNBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for patients with T1aN0 TNBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2019. We utilized the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model to analyze the overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in chemotherapy benefit. We performed stratified models to identify differences in OS and BCSS between those who received chemotherapy and those who did not across subgroups. Competing risk analysis was conducted to assess differences in risk of breast cancer death in patients with chemotherapy administration versus no chemotherapy. Additionally, propensity score matching was executed to assess survival analysis in a matched cohort. RESULTS: We included 1739 patients with T1a TNBC. Patients who received chemotherapy were younger, had higher histological grade and ductal histology subtype, were more likely to be married and undergo mastectomy. Our study did not show improvement in OS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.35-1.13; P = .122) or BCSS (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.37-2.43; P = .908) after chemotherapy use. We did not identify any subgroup of patients that may benefit from chemotherapy. Without chemotherapy, 8-year risk of breast cancer death is 2.75% for these patients. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy is not associated with benefit on OS or BCSS in node-negative, T1a TNBC.

Racial disparities in treatment and outcomes between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White women with nonmetastatic inflammatory breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The incidence rate of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is higher among non-Hispanic Black (NHB) than non-Hispanic White (NHW) women. We examined the differences in treatment and outcomes between NHB and NHW women with IBC, accounting for demographic, clinicopathological, and socioeconomic factors. METHODS: We collected data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for NHB and NHW women with IBC diagnosed between 2010-2016. We analyzed the odds of receiving chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery between NHB and NHW women. We evaluated overall survival (OS) with Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards methods. Competing risk analysis was used to compare the risk of breast cancer death between NHB and NHW women. We also evaluated the magnitude of survival disparities within the strata of demographic, socioeconomic, and treatment factors. RESULTS: Among 1,652 NHW and 371 NHB women with IBC, the odds of receiving chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation were similar for NHB and NHW. After 39-month follow-up, the median OS was 40 and 81 months for NHB and NHW, respectively (p < 0.0001). The risk of breast cancer death was higher for NHB than NHW women (5-year risk of breast cancer death, 51% vs. 35%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: After adjustment for demographic, clinicopathological, and socioeconomic factors; NHB women with IBC had similar odds of receiving surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, but were more likely to die of the disease compared to their NHW counterparts. Our findings suggest the presence of masked tumor biology, treatment, or socioeconomic factors associated with race that can lead to worse IBC outcomes.

The landscape of systemic therapy for early stage triple-negative breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer with higher risk of disease recurrence and mortality than other breast cancer subtypes. Historically, chemotherapy has been the primary systemic treatment for early stage TNBC. Recent developments in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and novel therapeutic agents have transformed the treatment of TNBC. AREAS COVERED: This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current evidence on treatment of early stage TNBC. We highlight the incorporation of ICIs and other targeted therapies in (neo)adjuvant treatment and the ongoing development of novel therapeutic agents. EXPERT OPINION: The landscape of early TNBC treatment is rapidly evolving, which has given rise to the introduction of ICIs and PARP inhibitors into the systemic therapy. Despite modest improvement in the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, ICI plus chemotherapy significantly improves long-term outcomes and is now used in (neo)adjuvant treatment of patients with TNBC and high risk for disease recurrence. Capecitabine remains the standard adjuvant treatment for residual disease, with olaparib being an option for patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. Early detection of minimal residual disease may identify patients requiring additional therapy to prevent recurrence.

Racial disparities in neutrophil counts among patients with metastatic breast cancer during treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors.

PURPOSE: The three CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) approved for use in HR-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC), palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, are generally well tolerated; however, neutropenia is a common toxicity. Within the general population, neutropenia has been shown to be more common in individuals of African descent. The landmark CDK4/6i trials in MBC lacked racial diversity in their patient populations. We aimed to assess the toxicity profiles of CDK4/6is in a racially diverse population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study at Montefiore Medical Center in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC prescribed CDK4/6i as first or subsequent line therapy between January 2015 and April 2020. Baseline characteristics and laboratory data at various treatment timepoints were collected. RESULTS: The final analysis included 182 patients, of whom 46% were Black. Baseline absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was lower in the Black vs. Non-Black cohort (p = 0.001) but the change in ANC from baseline (delta-ANC) was smaller in the Black cohort, and the ANC at different treatment timepoints was similar between groups. There was no difference in the rate of infection or number of dose delays/reductions between racial groups. We did not find any difference in PFS between Black and Non-Black groups, regardless of the presence of CDK4/6i-induced neutropenia. CONCLUSION: We analyzed toxicity profiles of 182 patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative MBC treated with CDK4/6i. Despite the lower baseline ANC seen in our Black cohort, treatment toxicities were similar between racial groups. Long-term outcomes with CDK4/6i therapy, measured by PFS, were similar between Black vs. Non-Black patients.

Efficacy of booster doses in augmenting waning immune responses to COVID-19 vaccine in patients with cancer.

Anti-COVID-19 immunity dynamics were assessed in patients with cancer in a prospective clinical trial. Waning of immunity was detected 4-6 months post-vaccination with significant increases in anti-spike IgG titers after booster dosing, and 56% of seronegative patients seroconverted post-booster vaccination. Prior anti-CD20/BTK inhibitor therapy was associated with reduced vaccine efficacy.

Dual inhibition of MDMX and MDM2 as a therapeutic strategy in leukemia.

The tumor suppressor p53 is often inactivated via its interaction with endogenous inhibitors mouse double minute 4 homolog (MDM4 or MDMX) or mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2), which are frequently overexpressed in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and other cancers. Pharmacological disruption of both of these interactions has long been sought after as an attractive strategy to fully restore p53-dependent tumor suppressor activity in cancers with wild-type p53. Selective targeting of this pathway has thus far been limited to MDM2-only small-molecule inhibitors, which lack affinity for MDMX. We demonstrate that dual MDMX/MDM2 inhibition with a stapled α-helical peptide (ALRN-6924), which has recently entered phase I clinical testing, produces marked antileukemic effects. ALRN-6924 robustly activates p53-dependent transcription at the single-cell and single-molecule levels and exhibits biochemical and molecular biological on-target activity in leukemia cells in vitro and in vivo. Dual MDMX/MDM2 inhibition by ALRN-6924 inhibits cellular proliferation by inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in cell lines and primary AML patient cells, including leukemic stem cell-enriched populations, and disrupts functional clonogenic and serial replating capacity. Furthermore, ALRN-6924 markedly improves survival in AML xenograft models. Our study provides mechanistic insight to support further testing of ALRN-6924 as a therapeutic approach in AML and other cancers with wild-type p53.