Association of Lower Extremity Lymphedema and Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients with lymphedema of a lower extremity (LE) had a greater risk of skin cancer than those without lymphedema. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with LE lymphedema examined at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, USA, from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2020. All patients with the phrase "lower extremity lymphedema" and a diagnostic code for lymphedema present in their electronic health record, as well as their age-, race-, and sex-matched controls without lymphedema, were included in the study. A Kaplan-Meier curve was constructed to examine the time to development of the first skin cancer for the lymphedema cohort and the controls. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to calculate hazard ratios. RESULTS: In total, 4437 patients had lymphedema within the study period. Compared with the matched control group, the lymphedema group had a significantly increased risk of skin cancer. For the subset of patients with unilateral lymphedema, the lymphedematous extremity was 2.65 times as likely as the nonlymphedematous LE to have skin cancer, particularly basal cell carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Lower extremity lymphedema appears to be a risk factor for squamous cell carcinoma, basal call carcinoma, and as expected, angiosarcoma. Clinicians caring for patients with LE lymphedema should be aware of this increased risk and monitor at-risk patients accordingly.

Suggestions for a New Clinical Classification Approach to Panniculitis Based on a Mayo Clinic Experience of 207 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Panniculitis, or inflammation of adipose tissue, includes a heterogeneous group of disorders with similar morphologic presentations. Currently, panniculitides are classified based on histopathologic findings only. OBJECTIVE: In this retrospective study of 207 cases of biopsy-proven panniculitis over 20 years at Mayo Clinic, we aimed to propose a new classification that integrates the clinical morphologic features with the histopathology of panniculitis. METHODS: We collected patient demographic and lesion morphologic characteristics using lesion photographs and physician notes for each of our 207 cases, including location, ulceration, scale, pattern (unilateral versus circumferential), atrophy/sclerosis (cicatricial), redness, and swelling. RESULTS: The panniculitides most likely to ulcerate were calciphylaxis (85.7% ulcerating), pancreatic panniculitis (66.6%), and α1-antitrypsin deficiency-associated panniculitis (100%). The panniculitides least likely to ulcerate were erythema nodosum and medication-induced and granulomatous panniculitis. This retrospective study used only descriptions in clinical notes and available medical photographs. CONCLUSION: We present an updated classification schema of panniculitides based on clinical findings. The primary distinctions are based on ulceration, location, and number of lesions. Although complete distinction of all panniculitides based on clinical examination alone is not possible, we hope the proposed schema allows clinicians to tailor differential diagnoses.