Surgical intervention in pediatric trauma at a level 1 trauma hospital: a retrospective cohort study and report of cost data.

BACKGROUND: Given that the management of severely injured children requires coordinated care provided by multiple pediatric surgical subspecialties, we sought to describe the frequency and associated costs of surgical intervention among pediatric trauma patients admitted to a level 1 trauma centre in southwestern Ontario. METHODS: All pediatric (age < 18 yr) trauma patients treated at the Children's Hospital - London Health Sciences Centre (CH-LHSC) between 2002 and 2013 were included in this study. We compared patients undergoing surgical intervention with a nonsurgical group with respect to demographic characteristics and outcomes. Hospital-associated costs were calculated only for the surgical group. RESULTS: Of 784 injured children, 258 (33%) required surgery, 40% of whom underwent orthopedic interventions. These patients were older and more severely injured, and they had longer lengths of stay than their nonsurgical counterparts. There was no difference in mortality between the groups. Seventy-four surgical patients required intervention within 4 hours of admission; 45% of them required neurosurgical intervention. The median cost of hospitalization was $27 571 for the surgical group. CONCLUSION: One-third of pediatric trauma patients required surgical intervention, of whom one-third required intervention within 4 hours of arrival. Despite the associated costs, the surgical treatment of children was associated with comparable mortality to nonsurgical treatment of less severely injured patients. This study represents the most recent update to the per patient cost for surgically treated pediatric trauma patients in Ontario, Canada, and helps to highlight the multispecialty care needed for the management of injured children.

CONTEXTE: La prise en charge des enfants grièvement blessés nécessite la coordination des soins fournis dans le contexte de plusieurs surspécialités chirurgicales pédiatriques. Dans ce contexte, nous avons cherché à décrire la fréquence et les coûts des interventions chirurgicales chez les patients pédiatriques victimes de trauma admis dans un centre de traumatologie de niveau 1 dans le sud-ouest de l'Ontario. MÉTHODES: Tous les patients pédiatriques (moins de 18 ans) ayant subi un trauma traités à l'Hôpital pour enfants du Centre des sciences de la santé de London entre 2002 et 2013 ont été retenus pour l'étude. Nous avons comparé les caractéristiques démographiques et les résultats cliniques des patients ayant subi une intervention chirurgicale et de ceux n'en ayant pas subi. Les coûts d'hospitalisation n'ont été calculés que pour le premier groupe. RÉSULTATS: Parmi les 784 enfants à l'étude, 258 (33 %) avaient eu besoin d'une intervention chirurgicale; 40 % de ceux-ci avaient subi des interventions orthopédiques. Ces patients étaient plus âgés et plus grièvement blessés que les enfants n'ayant pas subi d'intervention chirurgicale, et leur séjour à l'hôpital était généralement plus long. Nous n'avons relevé aucune différence entre les 2 groupes quant à la mortalité. En outre, 74 des patients ayant subi une intervention chirurgicale ont dû être opérés dans les 4 heures suivant l'admission; 45 % d'entre eux ont eu besoin d'une intervention neurochirurgicale. Le coût médian d'une hospitalisation était de 27 571 $. CONCLUSION: Le tiers des patients pédiatriques victimes de trauma ont eu besoin d'une intervention chirurgicale, et le tiers de ceux-ci ont dû être opérés dans les 4 heures suivant leur arrivée. Malgré les coûts, le traitement chirurgical des enfants était associé à un taux de mortalité comparable à celui du traitement non chirurgical des patients blessés moins grièvement. Cette étude est la source d'information la plus récente sur le coût par patient associé au traitement chirurgical des enfants victimes de trauma en Ontario, et elle met en évidence le besoin de soins de multiples spécialités.

The Future Liver Remnant in Patients Undergoing the Associating Liver Partition with Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS) Maintains the Immunological Components of a Healthy Organ.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A short-interval, two-stage approach termed associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) increases the number of patients with extensive malignant disease of the liver and a small future liver remnant (FLR) that can undergo liver resection. While this approach results in accelerated liver hypertrophy of the FLR, it remains unknown whether this phenomenon is restricted to liver parenchymal cells. In the current study, we evaluated whether ALPPS alters the immunological composition of the deportalized lobe (DL) and the FLR. METHODS: In this prospective, single-center study, liver tissue from the DL and the FLR were collected intra-operatively from adult patients undergoing ALPPS for their liver metastases. The extent of hypertrophy of the FLR was determined by volumetric helical computed tomography. Flow cytometry and histological analyses were conducted on liver tissues to compare the frequency of several immune cell subsets, and the architecture of the liver parenchyma between both stages of ALPPS. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients completed the study. Histologically, we observed a patchy peri-portal infiltration of lymphocytes within the DL, and a significant widening of the liver cords within the FLR. Within the DL, there was a significantly higher proportion of B cells and CD4(+) T cells as well innate-like lymphocytes, namely mucosa-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells and natural killer T (NKT) cells following ALPPS. In contrast, the frequency of all evaluated immune cell types remained relatively constant in the FLR. CONCLUSION: Our results provide the first description of the immunological composition of the human liver following ALPPS. We show that following the ALPPS procedure, while the immune composition of the FLR remains relatively unchanged, there is a moderate increase in several immune cell populations in DL. Overall, our results support the continued utilization of the ALPPS procedure.

An acute care surgery service expedites the treatment of emergency colorectal cancer: a retrospective case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency colorectal cancer (CRC) is a complex disease that requires multidisciplinary approaches for management. However, it is unclear whether acute care surgery (ACS) services can expedite the workup and treatment of complex surgical diseases such as emergency CRC. We sought to assess the impact of an Acute Care and Emergency Surgery Service (ACCESS) on wait-times for inpatient colonoscopy and surgical resection among emergency CRC patients. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study was conducted at a tertiary-care, university-affiliated, cancer centre in London, Ontario, Canada. All patients aged 18 or older who presented to the emergency department with a recent (within 48 hours) diagnosis of CRC, or were diagnosed with CRC after admission, were included in the study. Patients were either in the pre-ACCESS (July 1, 2007-June 31, 2010) or post-ACCESS (July 1, 2010-June 30, 2012) groups. A third group of emergency CRC patients treated at an adjacent cancer centre that lacked ACCESS (non-ACCESS) was evaluated separately. The primary outcome was time from admission to colonoscopy and surgery. RESULTS: A total of 149 patients (47 pre-ACCESS, 37 post-ACCESS, and 65 non-ACCESS) were identified. Only 19% (n = 9) of pre-ACCESS patients underwent inpatient colonoscopy, compared to 38% (n = 14) in the post-ACCESS group (p = 0.023). Additionally, 100% of patients in the post-ACCESS era underwent inpatient colonoscopy and surgery during the same admission, compared to only 44% of pre-ACCESS patients (p = 0.006). Median wait-times for inpatient colonoscopy (2.0 and 1.8 days for pre- and post-ACCESS groups respectively, p = 0.08) and surgical resection (1.6 and 2.3 days for pre- and post-ACCESS groups respectively, p = 0.40) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted to ACCESS underwent more inpatient colonoscopies and were more likely to have definitive surgery on that admission. ACS services can facilitate the workup and management of complex surgical diseases such as emergency CRC without delaying treatment.

Allocating operating room resources to an acute care surgery service does not affect wait-times for elective cancer surgeries: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Acute care surgical services provide timely comprehensive emergency general surgical care while optimizing the use of limited resources. At our institution, 50% of the daily dedicated operating room (OR) time allocated to the Acute Care Emergency Surgery Service (ACCESS) came from previous elective general surgery OR time. We assessed the impact of this change in resource allocation on wait-times for elective general surgery cancer cases. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed adult patients who underwent elective cancer surgeries in the pre-ACCESS (September 2009 to June 2010) and post-ACCESS (September 2010 to June 2011) eras. Wait-times, calculated as the time between booking and actual dates of surgery, were compared within assigned priority classifications. Categorical and continuous variables were compared using chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests respectively. RESULTS: A total of 732 cases (367 pre-ACCESS and 365 post-ACCESS) were identified, with no difference in median wait-times (25 versus 23 days) between the eras. However, significantly fewer cases exceeded wait-time targets in the post-ACCESS era (p <0.0001). There was a significant change (p = 0.027) in the composition of cancer cases, with fewer breast cancer operations (22% versus 28%), and more colorectal (41% versus 32%) and hepatobiliary cancer cases (5% versus 2%) in the post-ACCESS era. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that shifting OR resources towards emergency surgery does not affect the timeliness of surgical cancer care. This study may encourage more centres to adopt acute care surgical services alongside their elective or subspecialty practices.

Implementation of an acute care emergency surgical service: a cost analysis from the surgeon's perspective.

BACKGROUND: Acute care surgical services provide comprehensive emergency general surgical care while potentially using health care resources more efficiently. We assessed the volume and distribution of emergency general surgery (EGS) procedures before and after the implementation of the Acute Care and Emergency Surgery Service (ACCESS) at a Canadian tertiary care hospital and its effect on surgeon billings. METHODS: This single-centre retrospective case-control study compared adult patients who underwent EGS procedures between July and December 2009 (pre-ACCESS), to those who had surgery between July and December 2010 (post-ACCESS). Case distribution was compared between day (7 am to 3 pm), evening (3 pm to 11 pm) and night (11 pm to 7 am). Frequencies were compared using the χ(2) test. RESULTS: Pre-ACCESS, 366 EGS procedures were performed: 24% during the day, 55% in the evening and 21% at night. Post-ACCESS, 463 operations were performed: 55% during the day, 36% in the evening and 9% at night. Reductions in night-time and evening EGS were 57% and 36% respectively (p < 0.001). Total surgeon billings for operations pre- and post-ACCESS were $281 066 and $287 075, respectively: remuneration was $6008 higher post-ACCESS for an additional 97 cases (p = 0.003). Using cost-modelling analysis, post-ACCESS surgeon billing for appendectomies, segmental colectomies, laparotomies and cholecystectomies all declined by $67 190, $125 215, $66 362, and $84 913, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Acute care surgical services have dramatically shifted EGS from nighttime to daytime. Cost-modelling analysis demonstrates that these services have cost-savings potential for the health care system without reducing overall surgeon billing.

CONTEXTE: La mise sur pied d'un service d'urgences chirurgicales permet d'offrir des soins de chirurgie générale d'urgence complets, tout en assurant une utilisation potentiellement plus efficiente des ressources en soins de santé. Nous avons évalué le volume et la distribution des interventions de chirurgie générale d'urgence (CGU) avant et après la mise sur pied d'un service de soins chirurgicaux d'urgence (SSCU) dans un hôpital de soins tertiaires canadien et mesuré son effet sur la facturation émise par les chirurgiens. MÉTHODES: Cette étude rétrospective cas­témoins réalisée dans un seul centre a comparé des patients adultes soumis à des interventions de CGU entre juillet et décembre 2009 (pré-SSCU) à ceux qui avaient subi une intervention chirurgicale entre juillet et décembre 2010 (post-SSCU). Nous avons comparé la distribution des cas entre les quarts de jour (de 7 heures à 15 heures), de soir (de 15 heures à 23 heures) et de nuit (de 23 heures à 7 heures). Nous avons utilisé le test χ2 pour comparer les fréquences. RÉSULTATS: Pendant la période pré-SSCU, 366 interventions de CGU ont été effectuées : 24 % durant le jour, 55 % durant la soirée et 21 % durant la nuit. Après la mise en place du SSCU, 463 opérations ont été effectuées : 55 % durant le jour, 36 % durant la soirée et 9 % durant la nuit. Les réductions observées au plan des CGU réalisées durant la nuit et la soirée ont été de 57 % et 36 %, respectivement (p < 0,001). La facturation totale soumise par les chirurgiens pour les interventions réalisées avant et après la mise en place du SSCU a été respectivement de 281 066 $ et de 287 075 $ : la rémunération a été de 6008 $ supérieure après la mise en place du SSCU, pour 97 cas additionnels (p = 0,003). L'analyse de modélisation des coûts a révélé qu'après la mise en place du SSCU, la facturation soumise par les chirurgiens pour les appendicectomies, les colectomies segmentaires, les laparotomies et les cholécystectomies a diminué de 67 190 $, 125 215 $, 66 362 $ et 84 913 $, respectivement (p < 0,001). CONCLUSION: Les services de soins chirurgicaux d'urgence ont considérablement modifié les interventions de CGU, les faisant passer des quarts de travail de nuit à ceux du jour. L'analyse de modélisation des coûts démontre que le SSCU recèle un potentiel d'économies pour le système de soins de santé sans réduire la facturation totale émise par les chirurgiens.

Risk factors for mortality among patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a single-centre retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Given the paucity of recent Canadian data, we estimated the mortality rate associated with S. aureus bacteremia in a tertiary care hospital and identified risk factors associated with mortality. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of adults with S. aureus bacteremia admitted to a tertiary care centre in southwestern Ontario between 2008 and 2012. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate associations between predictor variables and all-cause, in-hospital, and 90-day postdischarge mortality. RESULTS: Of the 925 patients involved in the study, 196 (21.2%) died in hospital and 62 (6.7%) died within 90 days after discharge. Risk factors associated with in-hospital and all-cause mortality included age, sepsis (adjusted hazard ratio [adjusted HR] 1.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-2.06, p = 0.02), admission to the intensive care unit (adjusted HR 3.78, 95% CI 2.85-5.02, p < 0.0001), hepatic failure (adjusted HR 3.36, 95% CI 1.91-5.90, p < 0.0001) and metastatic cancer (adjusted HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.77-3.75, p < 0.0001). Methicillin resistance, hepatic failure, cerebrovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and metastatic cancer were associated with postdischarge mortality. INTERPRETATION: The all-cause mortality rate in our cohort was 27.9%. Identification of predictors of mortality may guide empiric therapy and provide prognostic clarity for patients with S. aureus bacteremia.