Barriers to integrated primary care and specialty mental health services: Perspectives from Latinx and non-Latinx White primary care patients.

Significant disparities in access to mental health care exist in the current mental health system; integrated primary care (IPC) offers an alternative model of service delivery with initial evidence for reducing disparities. Little is known about whether, and how, IPC reduces barriers to mental health services. Here we report on a set of three studies using mixed methodology to explore the perceptions of potential recipients of care regarding barriers to accessing mental health treatment by setting (IPC or specialty mental health [SMH]) and ethnicity (Latinx or non-Latinx White). In Study 1, a main effect of setting indicated IPC patients perceived fewer barriers to accessing IPC than SMH. A setting by ethnicity interaction revealed Latinx patients perceived greater barriers to SMH than non-Latinx White patients. In Study 2, data from qualitative interviews suggested IPC patients found behavioral health treatment in IPC to be accessible and satisfactory. In Study 3, a non-treatment-seeking sample did not endorse a difference in barriers by setting or ethnicity. Overall, it appears IPC patients perceive behavioral health treatment delivered in primary care to be satisfactory, beneficial, and successful in reaching individuals with mental health need who otherwise may not receive care. Non-treatment-seeking individuals with lower psychiatric distress did not identify a difference in barriers between IPC and SMH settings. Findings are consistent with the potential of the IPC setting for reducing barriers to care, although key elements of IPC may need to be addressed to increase acceptability across all population subgroups. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

A Retrospective Examination of Symptom Improvements in Primary Care Patients Receiving Behavior Therapy With and Without Concurrent Pharmacotherapy.

Primary care providers are the biggest prescribers of psychopharmacological medications. In this non-randomized retrospective examination, we asked whether primary care patients receiving behavioral health interventions with and without concurrent pharmacological treatments showed differential symptom improvement. Participants (79.4% women, 61.5% Hispanic, M age = 41.68, SD = 13.50) were 431 primary care patients referred to behavioral health with a primary concern of depression at one of three federally qualified health centers. Thirty-three percent of patients initiated or had an increase in pharmacotherapy concurrently with behavioral therapy; 26.9% had no change in medication during the episode of care, and 39.7% had no concurrent psychotropic medication prescribed during the episode of care. One-way analyses of variance revealed patients in the no medication group had higher global functioning, as measured by Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores, than patients who were taking medication, or who initated or had an increase in medication. There was a significant main effect of time, where patients had significantly higher GAF scores during their last session in comparison to the first session. All three patient groups experienced comparable improvements in GAF scores, but patients in the initiated/increased medication group were significantly more likely to terminate behavioral health treatment prematurely. Results suggest primary care patients experience improvements in functioning across an episode of behavioral health care, even without concurrent psychotropic medication use.

Can brief behavioral health interventions reduce suicidal and self-harm ideation in primary care patients?

OBJECTIVE: We examined whether brief behavioral health visits reduced suicidal and self-harm ideation among primary care patients and compared the effectiveness of interventions that targeted ideation directly (i.e., safety planning) with those that targeted ideation indirectly through management of underlying mental illness (e.g., behavioral activation). METHOD: We examined first- and last-visit data from 31 primary care patients with suicidal or self-harm ideation seen by behavioral health consultants. RESULTS: Patients reported significantly lower frequencies of suicidal and self-harm ideation at their final visit than at their initial visit. Patients whose ideation was targeted directly showed greater improvements than patients whose ideation was targeted indirectly. DISCUSSION: Although preliminary, results suggest mild to moderate suicidal ideation could be addressed in primary care through integration of behavioral health consultants into the medical team. (PsycINFO Database Record

Need, access, and the reach of integrated care: A typology of patients.

INTRODUCTION: This paper is a report on a study exploring a potential typology of primary care patients referred for integrated behavioral health care (IBHC) services. We considered whether primary care patients could be grouped into meaningful clusters based on perceived need for behavioral health services, barriers to accessing care, and past-year service utilization. We also described the development of a working partnership between our university-based research team and a federally qualified health center (FQHC). METHOD: A total of 105 adult primary care patients referred for same-day behavioral health appointments completed a brief self-report questionnaire assessing past-year behavioral health concerns, service utilization, and perceived barriers to utilization. RESULTS: Hierarchical and k-means cluster analyses revealed 3 groups: (a) Well-Served patients, characterized by high perceived need for services, high service use, and low barriers to service use (40%); (b) Underserved patients, characterized by high perceived need, low service utilization, and high barriers to service use (20%); and (c) Subclinical patients, characterized by low perceived need, low service use, and low barriers to service use (20%). Clusters were reliably differentiated by age, primary language, insurance status, and global functioning. DISCUSSION: We found primary care patients could be grouped into 3 categories and that 60% (Underserved and Subclinical) represented groups less commonly seen in traditional mental health (MH) settings. IBHC may be a promising approach for extending the reach of MH care, and partnerships between FQHCs and university-based research teams may be a promising approach for conducting research on the IBHC service-delivery model. (PsycINFO Database Record

Effects of language concordance and interpreter use on therapeutic alliance in Spanish-speaking integrated behavioral health care patients.

The discrepancy between the growing number of Spanish speakers in the U.S. and the availability of bilingual providers creates a barrier to accessing quality mental health care. Use of interpreters provides one strategy for overcoming this linguistic barrier; however, concerns about whether sessions with interpreters, versus bilingual providers, impede therapeutic alliance remain. The current study explored associations between the use of interpreters and therapeutic alliance in a sample of 458 Spanish-speaking patients seen for integrated behavioral health visits at primary care clinics. Patients completed a brief (4 item) therapeutic alliance scale at their behavioral health appointment. In addition, to supplement the quantitative study data, a pilot study of 30 qualitative interviews was conducted with a new sample of 10 Spanish-speaking patients, 10 behavioral health consultants (BHCs), and 10 trained interpreters. Quantitative results showed that interpreter use did not relate to therapeutic alliance, even when controlling for relevant demographic variables. However, qualitative interviews suggested major themes regarding the relative benefits and challenges of using interpreters for patients, interpreters, and BHCs. In interviews, patients expressed a strong preference for bilingual providers. Benefits included greater privacy, sense of trust, and accuracy of communication. However, in their absence, interpreters were seen as increasing access to services and facilitating communication with providers, thereby addressing the behavioral health needs of patients with limited English proficiency. BHCs and interpreters emphasized the importance of interpreter training and a good collaborative relationship with interpreters to minimize negative effects on the quality of care.

Understanding Service Utilization Disparities and Depression in Latinos: The Role of Fatalismo.

Research demonstrates a disparity between need and utilization of mental health services for Latinos. Cultural variations in perceptions of mental illness may be partially responsible for this discrepancy. Past research with Latinos has shown links between fatalismo, a cultural value similar to external locus of control, and both depression and lower service utilization in medical care, while links to psychiatric care have not been investigated. The current study therefore aimed to explore the associations between fatalismo, depression, and past year mental health service utilization by Latinos. A community sample of 83 Latino adults were recruited during local cultural events. Participants completed self-report measures of depression, fatalism, and past year service utilization. Analyses using structural equation modeling showed fatalismo was directly negatively related to past year medical service utilization (ß = -.35). In contrast, the link between fatalismo and past year mental health service utilization was mediated by self-reported depressive symptoms (indirect ß = .19, p < .001). We conclude that while fatalismo is associated with depression in Latinos, other barriers likely serve as more salient deterrents of service utilization.