Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Data Brief ; 10: 283-293, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27995164

ABSTRACT

Levels of biomarkers of exposure to selected harmful and potentially harmful smoke constituents found in cigarette smoke, in addition to nicotine were measured in 160 smokers randomized for 5 days to continuing smoking conventional cigarettes (41 participants), switching to Tobacco Heating System 2.2 (THS 2.2) (80 participants), or abstaining from smoking (39 participants). The data reported here are descriptive statistics of the levels of each biomarker of exposure expressed as concentrations adjusted to creatinine; at baseline, and at the end of the study, and their relative change from baseline. Reductions in the levels of biomarkers of exposure when expressed as quantity excreted, are also reported. Detailed descriptions of bioanalytical assays used are also provided. The data presented here are related to the article entitled "Evaluation of the Tobacco Heating System 2.2. Part 8: 5-Day randomized reduced exposure clinical study in Poland" (Haziza et al., 2016) [1].

2.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 81 Suppl 2: S139-S150, 2016 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27816672

ABSTRACT

The Tobacco Heating System (THS) 2.2, a candidate Modified Risk Tobacco Product (MRTP), is designed to heat tobacco without burning it. Tobacco is heated in order to reduce the formation of harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHC), and reduce the consequent exposure, compared with combustible cigarettes (CC). In this 5-day exposure, controlled, parallel-group, open-label clinical study, 160 smoking, healthy subjects were randomized to three groups and asked to: (1) switch from CCs to THS 2.2 (THS group; 80 participants); (2) continue to use their own non-menthol CC brand (CC group; 41 participants); or (3) to refrain from smoking (smoking abstinence (SA) group; 39 participants). Biomarkers of exposure, except those associated with nicotine exposure, were significantly reduced in the THS group compared with the CC group, and approached the levels observed in the SA group. Increased product consumption and total puff volume were reported in the THS group. However, exposure to nicotine was similar to CC at the end of the confinement period. Reduction in urge-to-smoke was comparable between the THS and CC groups and THS 2.2 product was well tolerated.


Subject(s)
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems/adverse effects , Harm Reduction , Hot Temperature , Smoke/adverse effects , Smoking/adverse effects , Tobacco Industry , Tobacco Products/toxicity , Adult , Aerosols , Biomarkers/blood , Biomarkers/urine , Consumer Product Safety , Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2/metabolism , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Inhalation Exposure/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Poland , Risk Assessment , Smoking/blood , Smoking/urine , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Prevention , Time Factors , Toxicity Tests/methods , Young Adult
3.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 81: 489-499, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27693654

ABSTRACT

Smoking conventional cigarettes (CCs) exposes smokers to harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs). The Tobacco Heating System 2.2 (THS 2.2), a candidate modified risk tobacco product, was developed to reduce or eliminate the formation of HPHCs, while preserving as much as possible the taste, sensory experience, nicotine delivery profile and ritual characteristics of CC. This randomized, controlled, open-label study in confinement for 5 day exposure aimed to demonstrate the reduction in exposure to selected HPHCs, to assess nicotine uptake and subjective effects, in participants switching to THS 2.2 (n = 80) compared to participants continuing smoking CCs (n = 40) and abstaining from smoking (n = 40). The subjects were randomized according to sex and daily CC consumption. The levels of biomarkers of exposure to HPHCs were significantly reduced in participants switching to THS 2.2, compared to CC use. More importantly, the magnitude of exposure reduction observed was close to that which was seen in participants who abstained from smoking for 5 days, while nicotine uptake was maintained. Reduction in urge-to-smoke was comparable between THS and CC groups, however THS 2.2 was slightly less satisfactory than CCs. The new, alternative tobacco product THS 2.2 was well tolerated.


Subject(s)
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems/instrumentation , Heating , Nicotiana/adverse effects , Smoking/adverse effects , Tobacco Products/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
4.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 64(2 Suppl): S74-84, 2012 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22951349

ABSTRACT

This randomized, open-label, ambulatory, controlled clinical study investigated biomarkers associated with cardiovascular risk and biomarkers of exposure to 10 selected harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHC) in cigarette smoke in 316 male and female Polish smokers. Subjects were randomized to continue smoking conventional cigarettes (CC; N=79) or switch to smoking the Electrically Heated Cigarette Smoking System series-K cigarette (EHCSS-K6; N=237). Biomarker assessments were performed at several time points during the study at baseline and during the 1-month investigational period. The primary biomarkers were high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and white blood cell counts. No statistically significant differences in the two primary biomarkers were found between the study groups at the end of the study. End-of-study comparisons of secondary biomarkers between study groups indicated an increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and reductions in red blood cell count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit levels in the EHCSS-K6 group. All biomarkers of exposure to cigarette smoke HPHC were decreased in the EHCSS-K6 group, despite an increase in cigarette consumption, compared to the CC group. There were no apparent differences in any of the safety assessment parameters between the groups, and the overall incidence of study-related adverse events was low.


Subject(s)
Inhalation Exposure/adverse effects , Nicotiana/metabolism , Smoking , Tobacco Products/analysis , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/analysis , Adult , Ambulatory Care , Biomarkers/blood , Biomarkers/urine , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/urine , Electricity , Erythrocyte Count , Female , Hemoglobins/analysis , Hot Temperature , Humans , Inhalation Exposure/analysis , Leukocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Poland , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/blood , Smoking/urine , Time Factors , Nicotiana/chemistry , Nicotiana/toxicity , Tobacco Products/toxicity , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/adverse effects , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL