Plasma concentrations of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone during combined treatment with paroxetine.

SUMMARY: The effects of paroxetine on steady-state plasma concentrations of risperidone and its active metabolite 9-hydroxyrisperidone (9-OH-risperidone) were studied in 10 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Patients stabilized using risperidone therapy (4-8 mg/d) also received paroxetine (20 mg/d) for 4 weeks. During paroxetine administration, mean plasma concentrations of risperidone increased significantly (P < 0.01), whereas levels of 9-OH-risperidone decreased slightly but not significantly. After 4 weeks of paroxetine treatment, the sum of the concentrations of risperidone and 9-OH-risperidone (active moiety) increased significantly by 45% (P < 0.05) over baseline. The mean plasma risperidone/9-OH-risperidone ratio was also significantly modified (P < 0.001) during paroxetine treatment. The drug combination was generally well tolerated with the exception of one patient who developed Parkinsonian symptoms in the second week of adjunctive therapy. In this patient total plasma levels of risperidone and its active metabolite increased by 62% during paroxetine co-administration. The authors' findings indicate that paroxetine, a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, may impair the elimination of risperidone, primarily by inhibiting CYP2D6-mediated 9-hydroxylation and to a lesser extent by simultaneously affecting the further metabolism of 9-OH-risperidone or other pathways of risperidone biotransformation. Careful clinical observation and possibly monitoring of plasma risperidone levels may be useful whenever paroxetine is co-administered with risperidone.

Relationship between plasma risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone concentrations and clinical response in patients with schizophrenia.

RATIONALE: Evaluation of relationships between serum antipsychotic drug concentrations and clinical response may provide valuable information for rational dosage adjustments. For risperidone, this relationship has been little investigated to date. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between plasma concentrations of risperidone and its active 9-hydroxy-metabolite (9-OH-risperidone) and clinical response in schizophrenic patients who experienced an acute exacerbation of the disorder. METHODS: Forty-two patients (30 males, 12 females, age 24-60 years) were given risperidone at dosages ranging from 4 to 9 mg/day for 6 weeks. The design of the study was open and risperidone dosage could be adjusted individually according to clinical response. Steady-state plasma concentrations of risperidone and its 9-hydroxymetabolite were measured after 4 and 6 weeks using a specific HPLC assay. Psychopathological state was assessed at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, and 6 by means of the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS), and patients were considered responders if they showed a greater than 20% reduction in total PANSS score at final evaluation compared with baseline. RESULTS: Mean plasma concentrations of risperidone, 9-OH-risperidone, and active moiety (sum of risperidone and 9-OH-risperidone concentrations) did not differ between responders (n = 28) and non-responders (n = 14). No correlation between plasma levels and percent decrease in total PANSS score was found for risperidone (rs = -0.187, NS), 9-OH-risperidone (rs = 0.246, NS), and active moiety (rs = 0.249, NS). Active moiety concentrations in plasma were higher (P < 0.001) in patients developing clinically significant parkinsonian symptoms (n = 7) than in those with minimal (n = 7) or no drug-induced parkinsonism (n = 28). CONCLUSIONS: In chronic schizophrenic patients experiencing an acute exacerbation of the disorder, plasma levels of risperidone and its active metabolite correlate with the occurrence of parkinsonian side effects, whereas no significant correlation appears to exist with the degree of clinical improvement.

No effect of reboxetine on plasma concentrations of clozapine, risperidone, and their active metabolites.

The effect of reboxetine on steady-state plasma concentrations of the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and risperidone was studied in 14 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder with associated depressive symptoms. Seven patients stabilized on clozapine therapy (250-500 mg/day) and seven receiving risperidone (4-6 mg/day) were given additional reboxetine (8 mg/day). After 4 weeks of reboxetine therapy, mean plasma concentrations of clozapine, norclozapine, and risperidone active moiety (sum of concentrations of risperidone and 9-hydroxyrisperidone) increased slightly but not significantly by 5%, 2%, and 10%, respectively. The mean plasma clozapine/norclozapine and risperidone/9-hydroxyrisperidone ratios were not modified during reboxetine treatment. Reboxetine coadministration with either clozapine or risperidone was well tolerated. These findings indicate that reboxetine has minimal effects on the metabolism of clozapine and risperidone and may be added safely to patients receiving maintenance treatment with these two antipsychotics.

Relationship between plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine and therapeutic response in patients with schizophrenia resistant to conventional neuroleptics.

RATIONALE: Monitoring plasma clozapine concentrations may play a useful role in the management of patients with schizophrenia, but information on the relationship between the plasma levels of the drug and response is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between plasma concentrations of clozapine and its weakly active metabolite norclozapine and clinical response in patients with schizophrenia resistant to conventional neuroleptics. METHODS: Forty-five patients, 35 males and ten females, aged 19-65 years, were given clozapine at a dosage up to 500 mg/day for 12 weeks. Steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine were measured at week 12 by a specific HPLC assay. Psychopathological state was assessed at baseline and at week 12 by using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, and patients were considered responders if they showed a greater than 20% reduction in total BPRS score compared with baseline and a final BPRS score of 35 or less. RESULTS: Mean plasma clozapine concentrations were higher in responders (n=18) than in non-responders (n=27) (472+/-220 versus 328+/-128 ng/ml, P<0.01), whereas plasma norclozapine levels did not differ between the two groups (201+/-104 versus 156+/-64 ng/ml, NS). A significant positive correlation between plasma levels and percent decrease in total BPRS score was found for clozapine (r(s)=0.371, P<0.02), but not for norclozapine (r(s)=0.162, NS). A cutoff value at a clozapine concentration of about 350 ng/ml differentiated responders from non-responders with a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 70%. At a cutoff of 400 ng/ml, sensitivity was 67% and specificity 78%. The incidence of side effects was twice as high at clozapine concentrations above 350 ng/ml compared with lower concentrations (38% versus 17%). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that plasma clozapine levels are correlated with clinical effects, although there is considerable variability in the response achieved at any given drug concentration. Because many patients respond well at plasma clozapine concentrations in a low range, aiming initially at plasma clozapine concentrations of 350 ng/ml or greater would require in some patients use of unrealistically high dosages and imply an excessive risk of side effects. Increasing dosage to achieve plasma levels above 350-400 ng/ml may be especially indicated in patients without side effects who failed to exhibit amelioration of psychopathology at standard dosages or at lower drug concentrations.

Plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites during combined treatment with paroxetine or sertraline.

The effect of paroxetine or sertraline on steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites was studied in 17 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder stabilized on clozapine therapy (200-400 mg/day). In order to treat negative symptomatology or concomitant depression, 9 patients received additional paroxetine (20-40mg/day) and 8 patients sertraline (50-100 mg/day). After 3 weeks of paroxetine administration, mean plasma concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine increased significantly by 31% (p<0.01) and by 20% (p<0.05), respectively, while levels of clozapine N-oxide remained almost unchanged. The mean plasma norclozapine/clozapine and clozapine N-oxide/clozapine ratios were not modified during paroxetine treatment. No significant changes in plasma concentrations of clozapine and its major metabolites were observed after 3 weeks of combined therapy with sertraline. Clozapine coadministration with either paroxetine or sertraline was well tolerated. Our findings suggest that the metabolism of clozapine is not affected by sertraline treatment at typical therapeutic doses, while paroxetine, a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6, appears to inhibit the metabolism of clozapine, possibly by affecting pathways other than N-demethylation and N-oxidation. While sertraline may be added safely to patients on maintenance treatment with clozapine, careful clinical observation and monitoring of plasma clozapine levels may be useful whenever paroxetine is coadministered with clozapine.

Iron status in schizophrenic patients with acute neuroleptic-induced dystonic reactions.

1. Serum iron parameters were measured in a group of schizophrenic patients who had developed acute neuroleptic-induced dystonia (N = 17) and in control patients with no history of extrapyramidal disorders (N = 16). No differences were found between the two groups for iron, ferritin or transferrin levels. 2. Iron status was estimated in 44 schizophrenic patients starting treatment with high-potency neuroleptics before and after 3 weeks of medication. In the 6 patients developing dystonia serum iron levels as well as other iron parameters did not differ from the values observed in the remaining 38 patients either on admission or after neuroleptic treatment. In each group the haematological profile was not modified by neuroleptic medication. 3. These results do not support an association between low serum iron and the occurrence of neuroleptic-induced dystonic reactions.

Adjunctive fluoxetine in the treatment of negative symptoms in chronic schizophrenic patients.

The effect of adjunctive fluoxetine on negative schizophrenic symptoms was evaluated in 34 chronic schizophrenic in-patients on maintenance therapy with neuroleptics. They received randomly, on a double-blind basis, fluoxetine (20 mg/day) or placebo for 12 weeks. In the fluoxetine group, three patients dropped out because of side effects. Negative symptoms, as measured by change on the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms at the end point compared to baseline values, were significantly improved in fluoxetine-treated patients (p < 0.001), but not in the placebo group. Fluoxetine treatment did not influence positive schizophrenic symptoms, while it induced a slight, but statistically significant, decrease (p < 0.05) in depressive symptoms, as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Unwanted effects were more common among patients receiving fluoxetine. These data suggest that the addition of fluoxetine to neuroleptic treatment may be beneficial in some schizophrenic patients with negative symptoms.

Prevalence of acute dystonic reactions associated with neuroleptic treatment with and without anticholinergic prophylaxis.

The occurrence of acute dystonic reactions was intensively monitored in a population of 646 patients, 379 males and 267 females, aged 18-87 years, consecutively admitted to different psychiatric units and treated with neuroleptics alone or in combination with anticholinergic drugs. Thirty-four patients experienced acute dystonic reactions yielding a total incidence of 5.3%. There was a tendency towards a higher frequency of dystonia in males than in females, and in young patients than in older ones. Patients without anticholinergic medication had a higher frequency of the reaction than those receiving anticholinergic drugs (8.5% vs. 2.8%; p < 0.02). Neuroleptic-induced dystonia was more common in patients treated with butyrophenones than in those receiving phenothiazines or substituted benzamides.

Debrisoquine oxidation phenotype and neuroleptic-induced dystonic reactions.

To evaluate the role of defective drug oxidation as a predisposing factor for neuroleptic-induced dystonic reactions, 26 patients who developed the reaction and 53 with no history of dystonia were phenotyped by the debrisoquine hydroxylation test. The percentage of poor debrisoquine metabolizers was similar in patients with dystonic reactions (11.5%) and in the control group (9.4%). These results suggest that there is no association between the individual's drug oxidative status and the occurrence of neuroleptic-induced dystonia.