An Introductory Over-the-Counter Simulation for First-Year Pharmacy Students Using a Virtual Pharmacy.

Objective. First-year pharmacy students at two institutions were required to complete a virtual over-the-counter (OTC) simulation during their community pharmacy practice skills laboratory course. The simulation was designed to introduce first-year pharmacy students to OTC product selection and consultation prior to didactic coursework and community introductory pharmacy practice experiences. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of the OTC simulation on students' knowledge and confidence of OTC medications and overall perceptions of the activity.Methods. Patient simulation cases in the virtual community pharmacy setting were developed and delivered to students using the MyDispense platform. Students concurrently completed a Google Form that provided directions for the virtual activity, including a combination of didactic and active learning strategies within the online platform. Student surveys assessed knowledge and confidence before and after the activity, with perceptions added to the postsurvey.Results. Total knowledge scores for the 142 students from two institutions who completed both the pre- and postsurvey significantly improved and, when assessed individually, improved for seven out of 10 individual knowledge questions. All five confidence statements significantly increased after students completed the OTC simulation. Student perceptions were overall very positive.Conclusion. Introduction of OTC counseling processes to first-year pharmacy students through a virtual pharmacy simulation resulted in increased student knowledge and confidence in providing OTC recommendations. Students perceived the activity favorably.

Pharmacogenomics and clinical cultural competency: pathway to overcome the limitations of race.

Global migration trends are accelerating population admixture. Increasing population diversity met with minority health disparities necessitates thoughtful training of health professional students. Health professional accreditation standards emphasize pharmacogenomics and clinical cultural competency (CCC); however, published studies focus on students' knowledge in pharmacogenomics alone. This report reviews considerations for integrating CCC into required pharmacogenomic education in pharmacy and other health disciplines. By coupling both topics during didactic training and active learning exercises repeated throughout the existing curriculum, students can become adept at these individualized patient care skills and retain their knowledge into their careers. Moving beyond race as a proxy for healthcare decision-making, the CCC of clinicians coupled with patients' genetic test results could empower clinicians to address health disparities and facilitate discussions about the role of race in clinical practice. Ultimately, an integrated approach of teaching pharmacogenomics and CCC could dismantle race-norming or race-based clinical practices.

Introducing LGBTQIA+ Patient Care to Pharmacy Students Through Laboratory-Based Exercises.

Objective. To assess the impact of novel skills-based laboratory exercises on first-, second-, and third-year pharmacy students' confidence and knowledge regarding care for people identifying as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersex, asexual, and other (LGBTQIA+).Methods. An LGBTQIA+ lecture discussing pronouns, common terminology, health disparities, health screenings, and gender-affirming hormone therapy was presented to students. During laboratory sessions, students applied lecture topics via a learning level-specific activity. Students completed a pre- and post-activity survey assessing their knowledge, confidence, and activity experience.Results. Seventy-nine students (N=348) completed both the pre- and post-activity survey. Students' overall increase in knowledge scores was significant, with improvement in four out of six questions among each cohort. A significant increase was seen in students understanding of the role of the pharmacist, their confidence in caring for LGBTQIA+ patients, and their comfort with using appropriate terminology. Most students (92%) agreed or strongly agreed that learning about LGBTQIA+ patient care was a positive experience, while 74% agreed that additional education on LGBTQIA+ patients is needed within their pharmacy curriculum.Conclusion. After a brief skills-based laboratory course, students' knowledge and confidence in caring for LGBTQIA+ patients improved; however, students agreed that more exposure was necessary. Future studies will follow students as they progress through the curriculum to determine the impact of exposure to LGBTQIA+ content across all three didactic years.

Insurance Adjudication Simulation Across Multiple Institutions and Levels of Learners.

Objective. A virtual educational innovation was designed and implemented to have student pharmacists simulate insurance processing. This article describes the impact of this third-party payer simulation on student knowledge and confidence and reports student perceptions of the activity.Methods. First-, second-, and third-year pharmacy students (P1, P2, and P3 students, respectively) at four institutions completed the self-paced simulation. Knowledge was assessed by comparing results of multiple-choice questions on the pre- and post-assessments and evaluated by the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Confidence was assessed by students' change in self-reported confidence scale measurements and compared using the chi-square test.Results. The simulation had a significant impact on student knowledge. The largest improvement was in P1 students, with a pre- to post-assessment average score difference (scale 0-100) of 16.6 compared to 7.2 for P2 and 10.2 for P3 students. Significant improvement was seen on most of the knowledge questions, with variations for certain questions between groups. All groups had significantly improved self-rated confidence in their abilities. Most students agreed that they would recommend this activity to other students (91.7%) and that it encouraged them to think about the material in a new way (85%).Conclusions. Through an innovative simulation on prescription insurance processing, positive results were seen across all three levels of learners. Knowledge assessments significantly improved, and student confidence increased across all groups and all confidence items. Participants would recommend this activity to other students and felt it was an effective way to learn about insurance adjudication.

Lessons learned: Assessing team creation by personality inventories in pharmacy students.

BACKGROUND: Proper team formation is critical for team performance and dynamics in the setting of team-based learning (TBL). Faculty should stratify students to ensure an even allocation of learner resources; however, the ideal method of team creation for TBL in pharmacy education has yet to be determined. A study aimed to assess team formation stratified by personality strengths on student performance for graded team activities, peer evaluations, and student perceptions of team dynamics compared to randomization of teams the previous semester with the same cohort. This Live and Learn piece will describe lessons learned throughout this project and research considerations for future studies on TBL team creation. IMPACT: The study design compared team stratification by strengths vs. randomization, which resulted in similar distribution of CliftonStrengths domains with a variation of two teams between the semesters. Due to homogeneity in student strengths and negligible difference in purposeful team creation by strengths vs. randomization, the study was limited in its methodology and findings. RECOMMENDATIONS: Through the description of this experience, the authors have outlined suggestions for designing studies to explore team creation methods, specifically capturing preliminary data, including a control group, and recognizing the influence of randomization. DISCUSSION: Future studies to identify the optimal method for team formation may include alternate stratification approaches and should be performed over multiple cohorts from varying institutions. It is equally plausible that randomization consistently generates teams with equitable resource distribution and team formation has no overall impact on TBL effectiveness.

Implementation of pharmacist-administered pediatric vaccines in the United States: major barriers and potential solutions for the outpatient setting

No disponible