Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
J Patient Saf ; 8(1): 30-5, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22343801

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Ensuring the safe care of patients in any health-care setting is paramount for all health-care professionals. Recent research has shown that there are thousands of preventable adverse events happening each year in health care. As a result of these findings, the Canadian Patient Safety Institute was established in 2003 with a mandate to ensure the safety of health care in Canada. METHODS: One strategy to assist with this goal was the development of an interprofessional competences framework to help improve patient safety across the health-care continuum. RESULTS: This paper will report on the framework development process, which resulted in the identification of 6 domains that represent overall patient safety competencies. The domains are as follows: (1) contribute to a culture of patient safety; (2) work in teams for patient safety; (3) communicate effectively for patient safety; (4) manage safety risks; (5) optimize human and environmental factors; and (6) recognize, respond to, and disclose adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The intent of this framework is that these domains, including the underlying knowledge, skills, and attitude competencies, can be applied to all health-care professionals in any setting. In addition, as one explores each competency, it is evident that an interprofessional approach is essential to ensuring patient safety.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel/education , Professional Competence , Safety Management , Canada , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Medical Errors/prevention & control
2.
Laryngoscope ; 120(6): 1129-34, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20513029

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To conduct a comprehensive assessment of shoulder and neck function following the pectoralis major pedicled flap (PMPF) for head and neck reconstruction. DESIGN: Case-control study. METHODS: The study group consisted of laryngectomized patients who underwent PMPF and a control group of those who underwent standard laryngectomy. Bilateral quantitative measurements of shoulder strength and range of motion (ROM) and neck ROM by a blinded physiotherapist and subjective quality-of-life assessment using the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaires were collected. Lateral cervical radiographs in the neutral, flexion, and extension positions were evaluated by a blinded neuroradiologist. The main outcome measures were shoulder ROM, strength, and SPADI scores; physical and radiologic measurements of neck ROM; and NDI Score. RESULTS: Shoulder analysis showed a significantly reduced flexion angle (P = .043) and combined internal/external rotation angle on the operated side (P = .027) and a significant strength reduction for the flexion, external rotation, and adduction domains (P < .05). SPADI score analysis showed a significantly higher disability score (P = .017) and total score (P = .009) on the PMPF side. Neck physical analysis showed significant differences in extension (P = .013) and total ROM distances (P = .002) but not flexion (P = .184). The total flexion/extension angular ROM was reduced in the PMPF population (P = .05) due to a reduced neck extension excursion angle from a neutral position (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: The PMPF for head and neck reconstruction is associated with a limitation in neck ROM attributed to a loss in extension and reduced shoulder strength and ROM.


Subject(s)
Laryngectomy , Neck/physiopathology , Pectoralis Muscles/transplantation , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Shoulder Joint/physiopathology , Surgical Flaps , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Disability Evaluation , Female , Hand Strength , Humans , Male , Muscle Strength , Neck/diagnostic imaging , Quality of Life , Radiography , Rotation , Shoulder Pain/physiopathology
3.
4.
Physiother Can ; 62(3): 215-21, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21629599

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine current Canadian physical therapy practice for adult patients requiring routine care following cardiac surgery. METHODS: A telephone survey was conducted of a selected sample (n=18) of Canadian hospitals performing cardiac surgery to determine cardiorespiratory care, mobility, exercises, and education provided to patients undergoing cardiac surgery. RESULTS: An average of 21 cardiac surgeries per week (range: 6-42) were performed, with an average length of stay of 6.4 days (range: 4.0-10.6). Patients were seen preoperatively at 7 of 18 sites and on postoperative day 1 (POD-1) at 16 of 18 sites. On POD-1, 16 sites performed deep breathing and coughing, 7 used incentive spirometers, 13 did upper-extremity exercises, and 12 did lower-extremity exercises. Nine sites provided cardiorespiratory treatment on POD-3. On POD-1, patients were dangled at 17 sites and mobilized out of bed at 13. By POD-3, patients ambulated 50-120 m per session 2-5 times per day. Sternal precautions were variable, but the lifting limit was reported as ranging between 5 lb and 10 lb. CONCLUSIONS: Canadian physical therapists reported the provision of cardiorespiratory treatment after POD-1. According to current available evidence, this level of care may be unnecessary for uncomplicated patients following cardiac surgery. In addition, some sites provide cardiorespiratory treatment techniques that are not supported by evidence in the literature. Further research is required.

5.
Physiother Can ; 62(4): 355-7, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21886375
6.
Can Respir J ; 16(3): e6-17, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19557211

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To update a previous clinical practice guideline on suctioning in adult patients, published in the Canadian Respiratory Journal in 2001. METHODS: A primary search of the MEDLINE (from 1998), CINAHL, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library (all from 1996) databases up to November 2007, was conducted. These dates reflect the search limits reached in the previous clinical practice guideline. A secondary search of the reference lists of retrieved articles was also performed. Two reviewers independently appraised each study before meeting to reach consensus. Study quality was evaluated using the Jadad and PEDro scales. When sufficient data were available, a meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model. Data are reported as ORs, weighted mean differences and 95% CIs. When no comparisons were possible, qualitative analyses of the data were completed. RESULTS: Eighty-one studies were critically appraised from a pool of 123. A total of 28 randomized controlled trials or randomized crossover studies were accepted for inclusion. Meta-analysis was possible for open versus closed suctioning only. Recommendations from 2001 with respect to hyperoxygenation, hyperinflation, use of a ventilator circuit adaptor and subglottic suctioning were confirmed. New evidence was identified with respect to indications for suctioning, open suction versus closed suction systems, use of medications and infection control. CONCLUSIONS: While new evidence continues to be varied in strength, and is still lacking in some areas of suctioning practice, the evidence base has improved since 2001. Members of the health care team should incorporate this evidence into their practice.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases/therapy , Suction , Adult , Humans , Oxygen/administration & dosage , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Respiration, Artificial , Suction/instrumentation , Suction/methods
7.
Physiother Can ; 61(3): 133-40, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20514175

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To systematically review the effects of early ambulation on development of pulmonary embolism (PE) and progression or development of a new thrombus in patients with acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: Medline, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PEDro, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to June 2008. Study quality was appraised using the Jadad and PEDro scales. Meta-analyses were reported as relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Four randomized trials were accepted. For development of a PE, the pooled relative risks for ambulation and compression versus bed rest and compression (RR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.34-1.19) and for ambulation and compression versus bed rest alone (RR = 1.36, 95% CI: 0.57-3.29) were not significant. For progression of an existing thrombus or development of a new thrombus, the independent relative risks for ambulation and compression versus bed rest and compression (RR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.13-1.14) and for ambulation and compression versus bed rest alone (RR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.20-1.57) were also not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Given the clinical benefits of mobility, and because there was no significant difference between ambulation and bed rest for risk of developing a PE or development and progression of a new DVT in any of the studies, clinicians should be confident in prescribing ambulation in this population.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...