Prevalence of Cognitive and Manual Dexterity Disorders Among Men Following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement.

PURPOSE: Cognitive ability and manual dexterity sufficient to operate an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) are critical for device function and safety. We aimed to define the incidence of cognitive and/or dexterity disorders among men after AUS. We secondarily aimed to assess for association between these disorders and postimplant complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results)-Medicare linked database (2000-2018). We included men ≥ 66 years diagnosed with prostate cancer between 2001 to 2015 who subsequently underwent AUS placement. We excluded patients with < 1-year continuous fee-for-service Medicare enrollment or cognitive and/or manual dexterity disorder diagnoses prior to AUS implant. Subsequent cognitive/dexterity disorders and implant-related complications were queried using appropriate ICD (International Classification of Diseases)-9/10 and/or CPT (Current Procedural Terminology) codes. Associations between cognitive/dexterity disorders and postimplant complications were assessed using extended Cox proportional hazards modeling. Secondary analysis focused on serious complications (device revision/removal, Fournier's gangrene, urethral erosion). RESULTS: We identified 1560 men who underwent AUS who met inclusion criteria. Median age was 73.0 (IQR 70-77) years. Cumulative incidence function analysis estimated 44% and 17% incidence of cognitive and manual dexterity disorder, respectively, at 15 years post-AUS. Presence of cognitive with/without manual dexterity disorder was associated with increased hazard of any, but not serious, complication during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients develop cognitive and/or manual dexterity disorders following AUS. These data support the need for close longitudinal monitoring after implant.

Development and acceptability of PETS-Now, an electronic point-of-care tool to monitor treatment burden in patients with multiple chronic conditions: a multi-method study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a web-based tool for patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCC) to communicate concerns about treatment burden to their healthcare providers. METHODS: Patients and providers from primary-care clinics participated. We conducted focus groups to identify content for a prototype clinical tool to screen for treatment burden by reviewing domains and items from a previously validated measure, the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS). Following review of the prototype, a quasi-experimental pilot study determined acceptability of using the tool in clinical practice. The study protocol was modified to accommodate limitations due to the Covid-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with MCC and 18 providers participated in focus groups to review existing PETS content. The pilot tool (named PETS-Now) consisted of eight domains (Living Healthy, Health Costs, Monitoring Health, Medicine, Personal Relationships, Getting Healthcare, Health Information, and Medical Equipment) with each domain represented by a checklist of potential concerns. Administrative burden was minimized by limiting patients to selection of one domain. To test acceptability, 17 primary-care providers first saw 92 patients under standard care (control) conditions followed by another 90 patients using the PETS-Now tool (intervention). Each treatment burden domain was selected at least once by patients in the intervention. No significant differences were observed in overall care quality between patients in the control and intervention conditions with mean care quality rated high in both groups (9.3 and 9.2, respectively, out of 10). There were no differences in provider impressions of patient encounters under the two conditions with providers reporting that patient concerns were addressed in 95% of the visits in both conditions. Most intervention group patients (94%) found that the PETS-Now was easy to use and helped focus the conversation with the provider on their biggest concern (98%). Most providers (81%) felt they had learned something new about the patient from the PETS-Now. CONCLUSION: The PETS-Now holds promise for quickly screening and monitoring treatment burden in people with MCC and may provide information for care planning. While acceptable to patients and clinicians, integration of information into the electronic medical record should be prioritized.

Patient Experience of Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated patient experience with screening contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) to determine whether a general population of women with dense breasts would accept CEM in a screening setting. METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved prospective study, patients with heterogeneous and extremely dense breasts on their mammogram were invited to undergo screening CEM and complete pre-CEM and post-CEM surveys. On the pre-CEM survey, patients were asked about their attitudes regarding supplemental screening in general. On the post-CEM survey, patients were asked about their experience undergoing screening CEM, including causes and severity of any discomfort and whether they would consider undergoing screening CEM again in the future or recommend it to a friend. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-three women were surveyed before and after screening CEM. Most patients, 97.5% (159/163), reported minimal or no unpleasantness associated with undergoing screening CEM. In addition, 91.4% (149/163) said they would probably or very likely undergo screening CEM in the future if it cost the same as a traditional screening mammogram, and 95.1% (155/163) said they would probably or very likely recommend screening CEM to a friend. Patients in this study, who were all willing to undergo CEM, more frequently reported a family history of breast cancer than a comparison cohort of women with dense breasts (58.2% vs 47.1%, P = .027). CONCLUSION: Patients from a general population of women with dense breasts reported a positive experience undergoing screening CEM, suggesting screening CEM might be well received by this patient population, particularly if the cost was comparable with traditional screening mammography.

US Medicare Hospice and Palliative Medicine Physician Workforce and Service Delivery in 2008-2020.

CONTEXT: Despite clinical benefits of early palliative care, little is known about Medicare physician workforce specialized in Hospice and Palliative Medicine (HPM) and their service delivery settings. OBJECTIVES: To examine changes in Medicare HPM physician workforce and their service delivery settings in 2008-2020. METHODS: Using the Medicare Data on Provider Practice and Specialty from 2008 to 2020, we identified 2375 unique Medicare Fee-For-Service (FFS) physicians (15,565 physician-year observations) with self-reported specialty in "Palliative Care and Hospice". We examined changes in the annual number of HPM physicians, average number of Medicare services overall and by care setting, total number of Medicare FFS beneficiaries, and total Medicare allowed charges billed by the physician. RESULTS: The number of Medicare HPM physicians increased 2.32 times from 771 in 2008 to 1790 in 2020. The percent of HPM physicians practicing in metropolitan areas increased from 90% to 96% in 2008-2020. Faster growth was also observed in female physicians (52.4% to 60.1%). Between 2008 and 2020, we observed decreased average annual Medicare FFS beneficiaries (170 to 123), number of FFS services (467 to 335), and Medicare allowed charges billed by the physician ($47,230 to $37,323). The share of palliative care delivered in inpatient settings increased from 47% to 68% in 2008-2020; whereas the share of services delivered in outpatient settings decreased from 37% to 19%. CONCLUSION: Despite growth in Medicare HPM physician workforce, access is disproportionately concentrated in metropolitan and inpatient settings. This may limit receipt of early outpatient specialized palliative care, especially in nonmetropolitan areas.

Testing the feasibility of the QuitAid smoking cessation intervention in a randomized factorial design in an independent, rural community pharmacy.

BACKGROUND: Adult smoking rates in the USA are highest in economically depressed rural Appalachia. Pharmacist-delivered tobacco cessation support that incorporates medication therapy management (such as the QuitAid intervention) is a promising approach to address this need. METHODS: Twenty-four adult smokers recruited between September and November 2021 through an independent pharmacy in rural Appalachia were randomized in a non-blinded 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design to (1) pharmacist delivered QuitAid intervention (yes vs. no); (2) combination nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) gum + NRT patch (vs. NRT patch); and/or (3) 8 weeks of NRT (vs. standard 4 weeks). Participants received 4 weeks of NRT patch in addition to the components to which they were assigned. Participants completed baseline and 3-month follow-up assessments. Primary outcomes were feasibility of recruitment and randomization, retention, treatment adherence, and fidelity. RESULTS: Participants were recruited in 7 weeks primarily through a referral process, commonly referred to as ask-advise-connect (61%). Participants were on average 52.4 years old, 29.2% were male and the majority were white (91.6%) and Non-Hispanic (91.7%). There was a high level of adherence to the interventions, with 85% of QuitAid sessions completed, 83.3% of the patch used, and 54.5% of gum used. Participants reported a high level of satisfaction with the program, and there was a high level of retention (92%). CONCLUSIONS: This demonstration pilot randomized controlled study indicates that an ask-advise-connect model for connecting rural smokers to smoking cessation support and providing QuitAid for smoking cessation is feasible and acceptable among rural Appalachian smokers and independent pharmacists. Further investigation into the efficacy of a pharmacist-delivered approach for smoking cessation is needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Trial #: NCT05649241.

Investigating psychological mechanisms linking pain severity to depression symptoms in women cancer survivors at a cancer center with a rural catchment area.

PURPOSE: Women cancer survivors, especially those in rural areas, with high levels of depression may be acutely susceptible to pain due to the ways they think, feel, and behave. The current study seeks to elucidate the relationship between symptoms of depression and pain severity in women cancer survivors, by examining the putative mediators involved in this relationship, specifically their self-efficacy for managing their health, how overwhelmed they were from life's responsibilities, and relational burden. METHODS: Self-report data were collected from 183 cancer survivors of breast, cervical, ovarian, or endometrial/uterine cancer, who were between 6 months and 3 years post-active therapy. RESULTS: Women cancer survivors with higher (vs. lower) symptoms of depression had more severe pain. Individual mediation analyses revealed that survivors with higher levels of depression felt more overwhelmed by life's responsibilities and had lower self-efficacy about managing their health, which was associated with greater pain severity. When all mediators were simultaneously entered into the same model, feeling overwhelmed by life's responsibilities significantly mediated the link between survivors' symptoms of depression and their pain severity. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between symptoms of depression and pain severity in women cancer survivors may be attributed in part to their self-efficacy and feeling overwhelmed by life's responsibilities. Early and frequent assessment of psychosocial factors involved in pain severity for women cancer survivors may be important for managing their pain throughout the phases of cancer survivorship.

The Breast-Imaging Operations, Practices and Systems Inventory: A framework to examine mammography facility effects on screening in rural communities.

PURPOSE: Develop and test a measurement framework of mammogram facility resources, policies, and practices in Appalachia. METHODS: Survey items describing 7 domains of imaging facility qualities were developed and tested in the Appalachian regions of Kentucky, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia. Medicare claims data (2016-2018) were obtained on catchment area mammogram services. Construct validity was examined from associations with facility affiliation, community characteristics, mammogram screening uptake, and market reach. Analyses were performed with t-tests and ANOVA. RESULTS: A total of 192 (of 377) sites completed the survey. Five factors were initially selected in exploratory factor analysis (FA) and refined in confirmatory FA: capacity, outreach & marketing, operational support, radiology review (NNFI = .94, GFI = 0.93), and diagnostic services (NNFI = 1.00, GFI = 0.99). Imaging capacity and diagnostic services were associated with screening uptake, with capacity strongly associated with catchment area demographic and economic characteristics. Imaging facilities in economically affluent versus poorer areas belong to larger health systems and have significantly more resources (P < .001). Facilities in economically distressed locations in Appalachia rely more heavily on outreach activities (P < .001). Higher facility capacity was significantly associated (P < .05) with larger catchment area size (median split: 48.5 vs 51.6), mammogram market share (47.4 vs 52.7), and screening uptake (47.6 vs 52.4). CONCLUSIONS: A set of 18 items assessing breast imaging services and facility characteristics was obtained, representing policies and practices related to a facility's catchment area size, market share, and mammogram screening uptake.

Investigating the Spatiotemporal Summation of Perimetric Stimuli in Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Purpose: To measure achromatic spatial, temporal, and spatiotemporal summation in dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) compared to healthy controls under conditions of photopic gaze-contingent perimetry. Methods: Twenty participants with dry AMD (mean age, 74.6 years) and 20 healthy controls (mean age, 67.8 years) performed custom, gaze-contingent perimetry tests. An area-modulation test generated localized estimates of Ricco's area (RA) at 2.5° and 5° eccentricities along the 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° meridians. Contrast thresholds were measured at the same test locations for stimuli of six durations (3.7-190.4 ms) with a Goldmann III stimulus (GIII, 0.43°) and RA-scaled stimuli. The upper limit (critical duration) of complete temporal summation (using the GIII stimulus) and spatiotemporal summation (using the RA stimuli) was estimated using iterative two-phase regression analysis. Results: Median (interquartile range [IQR]) RA estimates were significantly larger in AMD participants (2.5°: 0.21 [0.09-0.41] deg2; 5°: 0.32 [0.15-0.65 deg2]) compared to healthy controls (2.5°: 0.08 [0.05-0.13] deg2; 5°: 0.15 [0.08-0.22] deg2) at all test locations (all P < 0.05). No significant difference in median critical duration was found in AMD participants with the GIII stimulus (19.6 [9.9-30.4] ms) and RA-scaled stimuli (22.9 [13.9-40.3] ms) compared to healthy controls (GIII: 17.0 [11.3-24.0] ms; RA-scaled: 22.4 [14.3-33.1] ms) at all test locations (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: Spatial summation is altered in dry AMD, without commensurate changes in temporal summation. Translational Relevance: The sensitivity of perimetry to AMD may be improved by utilizing stimuli that probe alterations in spatial summation in the disease.

A multi-dimensional assessment of financial hardship of cancer patients using existing health system data.

BACKGROUND: Existing financial hardship screening does not capture the multifaceted and dynamic nature of the problem. The use of existing health system data is a promising way to enable scalable and sustainable financial hardship screening. METHODS: We used existing data from 303 adult patients with cancer at the University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center (2016-2018). All received distress screening and had a valid financial assistance screening based solely on household size-adjusted income. We constructed a composite index that integrates multiple existing health system data (Epic, distress screening, and cancer registry) to assess comprehensive financial hardship (e.g., material conditions, psychological responses, and coping behaviors). We examined differences of at-risk patients identified by our composite index and by existing single-dimension criterion. Dynamics of financial hardship over time, by age, and cancer type, were examined by fractional probit models. RESULTS: At-risk patients identified by the composite index were generally younger, better educated, and had a higher annual household income, though they had lower health insurance coverage. Identified periods to intervene for most patients are before formal diagnosis, 2 years, and 6 years after diagnosis. Within 2 years of diagnosis and more than 4 years after diagnosis appear critical for subgroups of patients who may suffer from financial hardship disparities. CONCLUSION: Existing health system data provides opportunities to systematically measure and track financial hardship in a systematic, scalable and sustainable way. We find that the dimensions of financial hardship can exhibit different patterns over time and across patient subgroups, which can guide targeted interventions. The scalability of the algorithm is limited by existing data availability.

Relevance of the Updated Recursive Partitioning Analysis (U-RPA) Classification in the Contemporary Care of Patients with Brain Metastases.

Patients with brain metastases (BMETS) need information about the prognosis and potential value of treatment options to make informed therapeutic decisions, but tools to predict survival in contemporary practice are scarce. We propose an Updated Recursive Partitioning Analysis (U-RPA) instrument to predict survival and benefit from brain-directed treatment (BDT) of contemporary patients. This was a retrospective analysis of patients with BMETS treated between 2017 and 2019. With survival as the primary endpoint, we calculated the U-RPA and generated estimates using Kaplan-Meier curves and hazard ratios. Of 862 eligible patients, 752 received BDT and 110 received best supportive care (BSC). Median overall survival with BDT and BSC was 9.3 and 1.3 months, respectively. Patients in RPA class 1, 2A, 2B and 3 who underwent BDT had median survival of 28.1, 14.7, 7.6 and 3.3 months, respectively. The median survival for patients in RPA 3 who received BDT (n = 147), WBRT (n = 79) and SRS (n = 54) was 3.3, 2.9 and 4.1 months, respectively. The U-RPA defines prognosis estimates, independent of tumor type and treatment modality, which can assist to make value-based care treatment decisions. The prognosis for patients in U-RPA class 2B and 3 remains poor, with consideration for early palliative care involvement in these cases.

Temporal summation in myopia and its implications for the investigation of glaucoma.

PURPOSE: We have previously demonstrated the upper limit of complete spatial summation (Ricco's area) to increase in non-pathological axial myopia compared to non-myopic controls. This study sought to investigate whether temporal summation is also altered in axial myopia to determine if this aspect of visual function, like in glaucoma, is influenced by reductions in retinal ganglion cell (RGC) density. METHODS: Achromatic contrast thresholds were measured for a GIII-equivalent stimulus (0.43° diameter) of six different stimulus durations (1-24 frames, 1.1-187.8 ms) in 24 participants with axial myopia (mean spherical refractive error: -4.65D, range: -1.00D to -11.25D, mean age: 34.1, range: 21-57 years) and 21 age-similar non-myopic controls (mean spherical refractive error: +0.87D, range: -0.25D to +2.00D, mean age: 31.0, range: 18-55 years). Measurements were performed at 10° eccentricity along the 90°, 180°, 270° and 360° meridians on an achromatic 10 cd/m2 background. The upper limit of complete temporal summation (critical duration, CD) was estimated from the data with iterative two-phase regression analysis. RESULTS: There was no significant difference (p = 0.90, Mann-Whitney U-test) in median CD between myopes (median: 44.3 ms; IQR: 26.5, 51.2) and non-myopes (median: 41.6 ms; IQR: 27.3, 48.5). Despite RGC numbers underlying the stimulus being significantly lower in the myopic group (p < 0.001), no relationship was observed between the CD estimate and co-localised RGC number (Pearson's r = -0.13, p = 0.43) or ocular length (Pearson's r = -0.08, p = 0.61). CONCLUSIONS: Unlike spatial summation, temporal summation is unchanged in myopia. This contrasts with glaucoma where both temporal and spatial summation are altered. As such, perimetric methods optimised to test for anomalies of temporal summation may provide a means to differentiate between conditions causing only a reduced RGC density (e.g., myopia), and pathological processes causing both a reduced RGC density and RGC dysfunction (e.g., glaucoma).

Investigating the linkage between mesopic spatial summation and variations in retinal ganglion cell density across the central visual field.

PURPOSE: The relationship between perimetric stimulus area and Ricco's area (RA) determines measured thresholds and the sensitivity of perimetry to retinal disease. The nature of this relationship, in addition to effect of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) number on this, is currently unknown for the adaptation conditions of mesopic microperimetry. In this study, achromatic mesopic spatial summation was measured across the central visual field to estimate RA with the number of RGCs underlying RA also being established. METHODS: Achromatic luminance thresholds were measured for six incremental spot stimuli (0.009-2.07 deg2 ) and 190.4 ms duration, at four locations, each at 2.5°, 5° and 10° eccentricity in five healthy observers (mean age 61.4 years) under mesopic conditions (background 1.58 cd/m2 ). RA was estimated using two-phase regression analysis with the number of RGCs underlying RA being calculated using normative histological RGC counts. RESULTS: Ricco's area exhibited a small but statistically insignificant increase between 2.5° and 10° eccentricity. Compared with photopic conditions, RA was larger, with the difference between RA and the Goldmann III stimulus (0.43°) being minimised. RGC number underlying RA was also higher than reported for photopic conditions (median 70 cells, IQR 36-93), with no significant difference being observed across test locations. CONCLUSIONS: Ricco's area and the number of RGCs underlying RA do not vary significantly across the central visual field in mesopic conditions. However, RA is larger and more similar to the standard perimetric Goldmann III stimulus under mesopic compared with photopic adaptation conditions. Further work is required to determine if compensatory enlargements in RA occur in age-related macular degeneration, to establish the optimal stimulus parameters for AMD-specific microperimetry.

Ageing changes in retinal outer nuclear layer thickness and cone photoreceptor density using adaptive optics-free imaging.

PURPOSE: To investigate age-related changes of the outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness and cone density, and their associations in healthy participants using a modified, narrow scan-angle Heidelberg Retina Angiograph (HRA2). METHODS: Retinal cones were imaged outside the fovea at 8.8° eccentricity and cone density was compared to ONL thickness measurements obtained by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) at the same locations. Fifty-six eyes of 56 healthy participants with a median age (interquartile range, IQR) of 37 years (29-55) were included. RESULTS: Median (IQR) cone count was 7,472 (7,188, 7,746) cones/mm2 and median (IQR) ONL thickness was 56 (52, 60) µm for healthy participants. Both cone density and ONL thickness were negatively associated with age: cone density, R2 = 0.16 (F(1,54) = 10.41, P = 0.002); ONL thickness, R2 = 0.12 (F(1,54) = 7.41, P = 0.009). No significant association was seen between cone density and ONL thickness (R2 = 0.03; F(1,54) = 1.66, P = 0.20). CONCLUSION: Cone density was lower, and ONL thinner, in older compared to younger participants, therefore, image-based structural measures should be compared to age-related data. However, cone density and ONL thickness were not strongly associated, indicating that determinants of ONL thickness measurements other than cone density measurements, and including measurement error, have a major influence.

Factors associated with perceived personal risk for breast cancer among women with dense breasts.

PURPOSE: To determine what patient factors are associated with a high or an accurate perceived personal risk (PPR) for breast cancer. METHODS: An IRB-approved survey study of women with dense breasts presenting for annual screening mammography was previously conducted from March 2017 to February 2018. Patients were asked to estimate their personal risk for breast cancer and to answer questions about prior breast care-related medical interactions. Survey data were combined post hoc with demographic and clinical data, including breast cancer risk status, and socioeconomic data imputed for each patient from census data. Logistic regression was used to determine which patient factors were associated with a high or accurate PPR. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 508 women with dense breasts (median age 59.0 years). A high PPR was independently associated with younger age (AOR, 1.71 [95% CI, 1.13, 2.60]), family history of breast cancer (AOR 4.27 [95% CI, 2.81-7.34]), having a clinical "high-risk" designation (AOR, 3.43 [95% CI, 1.13-10.39], and having been called back from screening (AOR, 1.94 [95% CI, 1.14-3.32]). A lower accuracy of PPR was independently associated with a family history of breast cancer (AOR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.14-0.42]) and having been called back from screening (AOR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.35-0.98]). CONCLUSION: Women with dense breasts who had a family history of breast cancer or who had been called back from screening had a higher but less accurate PPR. Women with a "high-risk" clinical designation had a higher PPR, even when controlling for family history.

Factors Associated With Breast Cancer Screening Behaviors Among Women With Dense Breasts.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify patient factors associated with patient-reported screening behaviors in women with dense breasts. METHODS: An IRB-approved survey study of women with dense breasts presenting for annual screening mammography at an outpatient imaging center was previously conducted from March 2017 to February 2018. The survey included questions regarding mammographic screening frequency and recent participation in supplemental screening. These survey data were combined post hoc with clinical and demographic data and socioeconomic data imputed from census data. Logistic regression was used to identify patient factors associated with reported screening behaviors. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 508 women (median age, 59.0 years; range, 31.0-86.0 years) with dense breasts. Multivariable analysis demonstrated an independent association of undergoing mammographic screening annually with a history of discussing breast density with a doctor (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.60; P = 0.019). Undergoing supplemental screening in the previous three years was independently associated with younger age (AOR, 1.59; P = 0.004), strong family history of breast cancer (AOR, 3.84; P = 0.027), higher perceived personal risk for breast cancer (AOR, 3.47; P = 0.004), and increased concern about radiation associated with screening examinations (AOR, 3.31; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Women with dense breasts who had discussed breast density with a doctor were more likely to report undergoing annual screening mammography, while younger women and women with a strong family history of breast cancer, higher perceived personal risk for breast cancer, or greater concern about radiation were more likely to report recently undergoing supplemental screening.

Regional and racial disparities in major amputation rates among medicare beneficiaries with diabetes: a retrospective study in the southeastern USA.

Objective: While rates for non-traumatic lower extremity amputations (LEA) have been declining, concerns exist over disparities. Our objectives are to track major LEA (MLEA) rates over time among Medicare beneficiaries residing in a high diabetes prevalence region in the southeastern USA (the diabetes belt) and surrounding areas. Methods: We used Medicare claims files for ~900 000 fee-for-service beneficiaries aged ≥65 years in 2006-2015 to track MLEA rates per 1000 patients with diabetes. We additionally conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data for 2015 to compare regional and racial disparities in major amputation risks after adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, access-to-care and foot complications and other health factors. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defined the diabetes belt as 644 counties across Appalachian and southeastern US counties with high prevalence. Results: MLEA rates were 3.9 per 1000 in the Belt compared with 2.8 in the surrounding counties in 2006 and decreased to 2.3 and 1.6 in 2015. Non-Hispanic black patients had 8.5 and 6.9 MLEAs per 1000 in 2006 and 4.8 and 3.5 in 2015 in the Belt and surrounding counties, respectively, while the rates were similar for non-Hispanic white patients in the two areas. Although amputation rates declined rapidly in both areas, non-Hispanic black patients in the Belt consistently had >3 times higher rates than non-Hispanic whites in the Belt. After adjusting for patient demographics, foot complications and healthcare access, non-Hispanic blacks in the Belt had about twice higher odds of MLEAs compared with non-Hispanic whites in the surrounding areas. Discussion: Our data show persistent disparities in major amputation rates between the diabetes belt and surrounding counties. Racial disparities were much larger in the Belt. Targeted policies to prevent MLEAs among non-Hispanic black patients are needed to reduce persistent disparities in the Belt.

Cancer Prevention from the Viewpoint of UVA Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Prevention is a cornerstone of the guiding mission of the University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center, which is "to reduce the burden of cancer for the patients of today, through skilled, integrated, and compassionate care and to eliminate the threat of cancer for the patients of tomorrow, through research and education in an environment that promotes diversity, equity, and inclusion." We find it useful to conceptualize different opportunities for cancer prevention using NCI's Health Behaviors Research Branch's multilevel translational framework. The latter considers three intersecting continuums: cancer control-from prevention through survivorship; translation-from basic sciences to dissemination and implementation; and level of influence or impact-from genetics to policy. An advantage of this heuristic is that "prevention" is inherently defined as an inter-programmatic concept cutting across basic, clinical, and population science research rather than solely as a programmatic domain of Population Sciences. Through the UVA community outreach and engagement, we apply this multilevel framework to mitigate the social determinants of cancer risk and outcomes that drive cancer inequities in our catchment area. Below, we provide examples of our prevention research and translation along the model continuums and focus on equity.

Cancer Prevention from the Viewpoint of UVA Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Prevention is a cornerstone of the guiding mission of the University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center, which is "to reduce the burden of cancer for the patients of today, through skilled, integrated, and compassionate care and to eliminate the threat of cancer for the patients of tomorrow, through research and education in an environment that promotes diversity, equity, and inclusion." We find it useful to conceptualize different opportunities for cancer prevention using NCI's Health Behaviors Research Branch's multilevel translational framework. The latter considers three intersecting continuums: cancer control-from prevention through survivorship; translation-from basic sciences to dissemination and implementation; and level of influence or impact-from genetics to policy. An advantage of this heuristic is that "prevention" is inherently defined as an inter-programmatic concept cutting across basic, clinical, and population science research rather than solely as a programmatic domain of Population Sciences. Through the UVA community outreach and engagement, we apply this multilevel framework to mitigate the social determinants of cancer risk and outcomes that drive cancer inequities in our catchment area. Below, we provide examples of our prevention research and translation along the model continuums and focus on equity.

The State of Breast Cancer Reconstruction in Virginia: An Evidence-Based Framework for Identifying Locoregional Health Disparities.

BACKGROUND: Age, race, socioeconomic status, and proximity to plastic surgeons have been shown to impact receipt of reconstruction after mastectomy in several national studies. Given that targeted outreach efforts and programs to address these discrepancies would occur locoregionally, investigation of these reconstructive trends on a state level is warranted. STUDY DESIGN: Patients diagnosed with breast cancer in Virginia between 2000 and 2018 were identified in the Virginia Department of Health Cancer Registry. Patients who underwent mastectomy breast conservation surgery, and/or breast reconstruction at the time of oncologic surgery were identified. Patient demographics were analyzed, and logistic regression analyses were used to determine the likelihood of receipt of mastectomy, receipt of mastectomy versus breast conservation surgery, receipt of mastectomy with reconstruction versus mastectomy alone, and receipt of mastectomy with reconstruction versus breast conservation surgery with respect to the demographic variables. Geographically weighted regression analyses were also performed to determine impact of geographic location on receipt of mastectomy and reconstruction after mastectomy. RESULTS: A total of 78,682 patients in Virginia underwent surgical treatment for breast cancer between 2000 and 2018. Living outside a metropolitan area, increased age, lower socioeconomic status, non-White race, and lower number of plastic surgeons within 50 miles were associated with decreased rates of postmastectomy reconstruction. Rural setting, lower socioeconomic status, and lower plastic surgeon supply were also associated with decreased rates of breast conservation surgery. Reconstruction after mastectomy was lowest in the northwest, central, and southwest regions of Virginia. CONCLUSIONS: Within the state of Virginia, programs to improve access to breast reconstruction for patients residing in rural regions, as well as non-White patients, older patients, and those in lower socioeconomic groups should be implemented. Future studies would implement and study the efficacy of such outreach programs, which could then be applied and tailored to other states or regions to address sociodemographic disparities in access to breast reconstruction.

Examining the concordance of retinal ganglion cell counts generated using measures of structure and function.

PURPOSE: There are several indirect methods used to estimate retinal ganglion cell (RGC) count in an individual eye, but there is limited information as to the agreement between these methods. In this work, RGC receptive field (RGC-RF) count underlying a spot stimulus (0.43°, Goldmann III) was calculated and compared using three different methods. METHODS: RGC-RF count was calculated at a retinal eccentricity of 2.32 mm for 44 healthy adult participants (aged 18-58 years, refractive error -9.75 DS to +1.75 DS) using: (i) functional measures of achromatic peripheral grating resolution acuity (PGRA), (ii) structural measures of RGC-layer thickness (OCT-model, based on the method outlined by Raza and Hood) and (iii) scaling published histology density data to simulate a global expansion in myopia (Histology-Balloon). RESULTS: Whilst average RGC-RF counts from the OCT-model (median 105.3, IQR 99.6-111.0) and the Histology-Balloon model (median 107.5, IQR 97.7-114.6) were similar, PGRA estimates were approximately 65% lower (median 37.7, IQR 33.8-46.0). However, there was poor agreement between all three methods (Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement; PGRA/OCT: 55.4; PGRA/Histology-Balloon 59.3; OCT/Histology-Balloon: 52.4). High intersubject variability in RGC-RF count was evident using all three methods. CONCLUSIONS: The lower PGRA RGC-RF counts may be the result of targeting only a specific subset of functional RGCs, as opposed to the coarser approach of the OCT-model and Histology-Balloon, which include all RGCs, and also likely displaced amacrine cells. In the absence of a 'ground truth', direct measure of RGC-RF count, it is not possible to determine which method is most accurate, and each has limitations. However, what is clear is the poor agreement found between the methods prevents direct comparison of RGC-RF counts between studies utilising different methodologies and highlights the need to utilise the same method in longitudinal work.