Epidemiology and Management of Zenker Diverticulum in a Low-Threshold Single-payer Health Care System.

IMPORTANCE: The incidence of Zenker diverticulum has been established; previous estimates have been extrapolated from small institutional cohorts. OBJECTIVE: To describe the population-wide incidence of Zenker diverticulum over a 20-year period and characterize management strategies across specialties and treatment settings. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective national cohort study was conducted from January 1, 1996, through December 31, 2015, and reviewed patient records from the Care Register for Healthcare in Finland, from which patients with Zenker diverticulum were identified. The data were analyzed in October 2021. EXPOSURES: Zenker diverticulum. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: The incidence of Zenker diverticulum per 100 000 person-years. RESULTS: A total of 2736 patients (median [IQR] age at diagnosis 72.0 [19-106] years; 1278 women [46.7%]) were identified, making the annual incidence of Zenker diverticulum in Finland 2.9/100 000 person-years. Men had higher incidence (3.7/100 000 person-years) compared with women (2.3/100 000 person-years), with an incidence rate ratio of 1.61 (95% CI, 1.48-1.76; P < .001). Within the study population, 1044 patients (38.2%) underwent surgical treatment and 227 (8.3%) underwent 2 or more surgeries. The choice of initial operative approach depended on the medical specialty (Cramer V = 0.41) and on specific catchment area (Cramer V = 0.41). Overall, endoscopic approaches for initial operations were most popular. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The cohort study results found that the incidence of Zenker diverticulum was 2.9/100 000 person-years. Most patients with Zenker diverticulum did not undergo definitive therapy. Some hospital districts and some medical specialties were more likely to opt for conservative treatment than others. The choice of operative approach depended more on physician-level factors rather than patient profiles.

Learning curve in robotic-assisted lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer is not steep after experience in video-assisted lobectomy; single-surgeon experience using cumulative sum analysis.

BACKGROUND: Robotic assistance in lung lobectomy has been suggested to enhance the adoption of minimally invasive techniques among surgeons. However, little is known of learning curves in different minimally invasive techniques. We studied learning curves in robotic-assisted versus video- assisted lobectomies for lung cancer. METHODS: A single surgeon performed his first 75 video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomies from April 2007 to November 2012, and his 75 first robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) lobectomies between August 2011 and May 2018. A retrospective chart review was done. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to identify the learning curve. RESULTS: No operative deaths occurred for VATS patients or RATS patients. Conversion-to-open rate was significantly lower in the RATS group (2.7% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.016). Meanwhile, 90-day mortality (1.3% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.172), postoperative complications (24% vs. 24%, p = 0.999), re- operation rates (4% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.688), operation time (170±56 min vs. 178±66 min, p = 0.663) and length of stay (8.9 ± 7.9 days vs. 8.2 ± 5.8 days, p = 0.844) were similar between the two groups. Based on CUSUM analysis, learning curves were similar for both procedures, although slightly shorter for RATS (proficiency obtained with 53 VATS cases vs. 45 RATS cases, p = 0.198). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic lung lobectomy can be implemented safely and efficiently in an expert center with earlier experience in VATS lobectomies. However, there seems to be a learning curve of its own despite the surgeon's previous experience in conventional thoracoscopic surgery.

Bronchial sleeve resection or pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of long-term results, survival and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: No randomized studies exist comparing pneumonectomy (PN) and sleeve lobectomy (SL). We evaluated surgical results and long-term quality of life in patients operated on for central non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using either SL or PN. METHODS: A total of 641 NSCLC patients underwent surgery 2000-2010. SL was performed in 40 (6.2%) and PN in 67 (10.5%). In 2011, all surviving patients were sent a 15D Quality of Life Questionnaire which 83% replied. Propensity-score-matching analysis was utilized to compare the groups. RESULTS: Thirty-two bronchial (18 right/14 left), seven vasculobronchial (3 right/4 left), one right wedge SL, and 18 right and 22 left PN were performed. Preoperatively, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and diffusion capacity did not differ between groups. The perioperative complication rate and pattern were similar, but SL group had less major complications (P<0.027). One perioperative death (2.5%) occurred in SL group and four (6%) in PN. The 90-day mortality rate was 5% (n=2) for SL and 7.5% (n=5) for PN. In the follow-up total cancer recurrence did not differ (P=0.187). Quality of life measured by 15D showed no significant difference in separate dimensions or total score, except tendency to favor SL in moving or breathing. The 5-year survival did not differ between groups (P=0.458), but no deaths were observed in SL group after 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Due to less major operative complications and better long-term survival, we would advocate using SL when feasible, but in patients tolerating PN it should be considered if SL seems not to be oncologically sufficiently radical.