Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Euro Surveill ; 26(7)2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33602385

ABSTRACT

In early June 2018, an increase in non-travel-related cases of Legionella non-pneumophila Legionnaires' disease (LD) was observed in Sweden and a national outbreak investigation was started. Outbreak cases were defined as notified confirmed or probable cases of L. non-pneumophila LD, with symptom onset after 1 April 2018. From April to August 2018, 41 cases were reported, 30 of whom were identified as L. longbeachae. We conducted a case-control study with 27 cases and 182 matched controls. Results from the case-control study indicated that gardening and handling commercial bagged soil, especially dusty dry soil, were associated with disease. L. longbeachae was isolated in soils from cases' homes or gardens, but joint analysis of soil and human specimens did not identify any genetic clonality. Substantial polyclonality was noted between and within soil samples, which made finding a genetic match between soil and human specimens unlikely. Therefore, whole genome sequencing may be of limited use to confirm a specific soil as a vehicle of transmission for L. longbeachae. Handling soil for residential gardening was associated with disease and the isolation of L. longbeachae in different soils provided further evidence for Legionella non-pneumophila infection from soil.


Subject(s)
Legionella longbeachae , Legionella pneumophila , Legionnaires' Disease , Case-Control Studies , Disease Outbreaks , Gardening , Humans , Legionella pneumophila/genetics , Legionnaires' Disease/diagnosis , Legionnaires' Disease/epidemiology , Soil , Sweden/epidemiology
3.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol ; 65(Pt 2): 598-603, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25406235

ABSTRACT

Fourteen isolates of an unknown species identified as belonging to the genus Legionella by selective growth on BCYE agar were isolated from the biopurification systems of three different wood processing plants. The mip gene sequence of all 14 isolates was identical and a close match alignment revealed 86 % sequence similarity with Legionella pneumophila serogroup 8. The whole genome of isolate LEGN(T) was sequenced, and a phylogenetic tree based on the alignment of 16S rRNA, mip, rpoB, rnpB and the 23S-5S intergenic region clustered LEGN(T) with L. pneumophila ATCC 33152(T). Analysis of virulence factors showed that strain LEGN(T) carries the majority of known L. pneumophila virulence factors. An amoeba infection assay performed to assess the pathogenicity of strain LEGN(T) towards Acanthamoeba castellanii showed that it can establish a replication vacuole in A. castellanii but does not significantly affect replication of amoebae. Taken together, the results confirm that strain LEGN(T) represents a novel species of the genus Legionella, for which the name Legionella norrlandica sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is LEGN(T) ( = ATCC BAA-2678(T) = CCUG 65936(T)).


Subject(s)
Legionella/classification , Phylogeny , Wood/microbiology , Amoeba/microbiology , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Intergenic/genetics , Genes, Bacterial , Legionella/genetics , Legionella/isolation & purification , Molecular Sequence Data , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Virulence Factors/genetics
4.
Acta Ophthalmol ; 91(5): 413-7, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22583841

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare clinicians and a trained artificial neural network (ANN) regarding accuracy and certainty of assessment of visual fields for the diagnosis of glaucoma. METHODS: Thirty physicians with different levels of knowledge and experience in glaucoma management assessed 30-2 SITA Standard visual field printouts that included full Statpac information from 99 patients with glaucomatous optic neuropathy and 66 healthy subjects. Glaucomatous eyes with perimetric mean deviation values worsethan -10 dB were not eligible. The fields were graded on a scale of 1-10, where 1 indicated healthy with absolute certaintyand 10 signified glaucoma; 5.5 was the cut-off between healthy and glaucoma. The same fields were classified by a previously trained ANN. The ANN output was transformed into a linear scale that matched the scale used in the subjective assessments. Classification certainty was assessed using a classification error score. RESULTS: Among the physicians, sensitivity ranged from 61% to 96% (mean 83%) and specificity from 59% to 100% (mean 90%). Our ANN achieved 93% sensitivity and 91% specificity, and it was significantly more sensitive than the physicians (p < 0.001) at a similar level of specificity. The ANN classification error score was equivalent to the top third scores of all physicians, and the ANN never indicated a high degree of certainty for any of its misclassified visual field tests. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that a trained ANN performs at least as well as physicians in assessments of visual fields for the diagnosis of glaucoma.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Glaucoma/diagnosis , Neural Networks, Computer , Visual Fields , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Glaucoma/physiopathology , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Male , Middle Aged , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Visual Field Tests/methods
5.
Acta Ophthalmol ; 90(4): 310-5, 2012 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20946342

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the measures of validity for selective or population screening of the time-domain Stratus and the spectral-domain Cirrus Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) imaging techniques in a population-based sample and in clinical glaucoma patients at different stages of glaucoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A random sample of 307 subjects living in two rural areas in southern Sweden, and a random sample of 394 clinical glaucoma patients were selected. A large battery of examinations, including Stratus and Cirrus OCT was performed. OCT retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness analyses for average thickness, quadrant and clock-hour sectors were compared with normative significance limits available in the instruments. RESULTS: The population-based sample included 129 healthy and nine glaucoma subjects, and the sample of clinical glaucoma patients included 138 patients. Specificity and positive predictive values were generally better with Stratus than for Cirrus, and sensitivity was generally better with Cirrus. With the average RNFL thickness parameter, Stratus reached 100% specificity and a positive predictive value of 100% and 68% sensitivity in the whole group of the clinical glaucoma patients, but sensitivity was only 28% among the earliest stage glaucoma patients. Sensitivity increased considerably when relying on the quadrant sector parameter, while specificity decreased only marginally. CONCLUSION: Stratus, with high specificity and positive predictive values, seemed to be best of choice for screening purposes, while Cirrus, with high sensitivity, was the better choice for early detection.


Subject(s)
Exfoliation Syndrome/diagnosis , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/diagnosis , Nerve Fibers/pathology , Optic Disk/pathology , Optic Nerve Diseases/diagnosis , Retinal Ganglion Cells/pathology , Tomography, Optical Coherence/instrumentation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Exfoliation Syndrome/classification , False Positive Reactions , Female , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/classification , Humans , Intraocular Pressure , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Rural Population , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sweden , Time Factors
6.
BMC Ophthalmol ; 11: 12, 2011 May 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21595936

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of one lesson of continuing medical education (CME) of subjective assessment of optic nerve head appearance on sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of glaucoma. METHODS: Ophthalmologists and residents in ophthalmology attending an international glaucoma meeting arranged at Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden, were asked to grade optic nerve head (ONH) photographs of healthy and glaucomatous subjects at two sessions separated by a lecture on glaucoma diagnosis by ONH assessment. Each grader had access to an individual portfolio of 50 ONH photographs randomly selected from a web-based data bank including ONH photographs of 73 glaucoma patients and 123 healthy subjects. The individual portfolio of photographs was graded before and after the lecture, but in different randomized order. RESULTS: Ninety-six doctors, 91% of all attending the meeting, completed both assessment sessions. The number of correct classifications increased from 69 to 72% on the average. Diagnostic sensitivity increased significantly (p < 0.0001) from 70% to 80%, and the number of photographs classified as uncertain decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) from 22% to 13%. Specificity remained at 68%, and intra-grader agreement decreased. CONCLUSION: CME had only a small effect on the assessment of ONH for the glaucoma diagnosis. Sensitivity increased and the amount of uncertain classifications decreased, while specificity was unchanged.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Continuing/standards , Glaucoma/pathology , Optic Disk/pathology , Photography , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity , Single-Blind Method
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...