Costs of brain disorders in Finland.

OBJECTIVE: To calculate the costs of brain disorders on the national level. METHODS: Electronic data bases, national registers and internet data. RESULTS: Any brain disorder was estimated to affect a fifth of the Finnish population. The three most common disorders were migraine, anxiety disorder and affective disorder. The total costs of brain disorders constituted 3% of the national gross product, or 45% of all the health-care costs. However, this is likely a conservative estimate, because not all chronic brain disorders and not all costs were included. Of the total costs of brain disorders, 32% were for direct health care, 23% for indirect medical care and 45% for indirect costs. Dementia was the most costly individual brain disorder followed by addiction and affective disorders. Most costly per case were brain tumours and multiple sclerosis. CONCLUSION: Brain disorders constitute a costly part of the population's health costs. Directed preventive measures are needed to counteract the population morbidity and to control the increasing cost pressure in health care.

Funding of headache research in Europe.

Migraine costs European Society 27 billion Euro per year. Other headaches may account for a similar amount. Given this enormous impact, the question arises as to whether the funding of research efforts in this field are sufficient. A recent European study called the Resource Allocation to Brain Research in Europe (RABRE) examined funding of brain research. Identified charities and Government agencies in Europe filled out a questionnaire regarding their funding of brain diseases. Industry spending was evaluated by three different previously validated methods. In the present report, detailed results are presented for migraine and other headaches. In 2004, migraine research was funded by nearly 315 million Euro . Of this, 308 million Euro was invested by the pharmaceutical industry, whereas public funding was estimated at 7 million Euro . No funding was identified for non-migraine headache disorders. Of the public spending, 714,000 Euro came from private foundations. There was a very large difference between different European countries in the funding of headache research. When public funding was compared with the cost of different brain disorders, migraine funding was in the middle range. This was due to relatively large industry funding. Compared with societal costs, migraine received the least public funds amongst all brain disorders, i.e. 0.025%. We conclude that migraine attracts reasonable interest from the pharmaceutical industry, but Governmental and charity funding is extremely low and no funding was identified for non-migraine headache disorders. Considering the huge economic impact of these disorders, public funding of research into migraine and other headaches should be greatly increased in the future.

The burden of ankylosing spondylitis and the cost-effectiveness of treatment with infliximab (Remicade).

OBJECTIVES: In the past, treatment options for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) have been limited, and the introduction of new treatments such as infliximab will have a noticeable impact on health-care budgets. The objective of this study was therefore to assess the current burden of the disease and estimate the cost-effectiveness of infliximab treatments. METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective observational study of resource consumption and utility related to disease severity was performed in patients who had participated in a population survey between 1992 and 1994 at the University of Bath and patients regularly followed at the Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases in Bath for up to 9 years. Mean costs and utility were estimated using a regression model including age, gender, disease duration, disease activity and functional status, and disease development was expressed as annual progression of functional disability. Cost-effectiveness of infliximab was modelled using a 3-month placebo-controlled clinical trial with open 1-yr extension in 70 patients, over a total time frame of 2 yr. In the model, costs and utility controlled for disease severity and age from the observational study were assigned to individual patients. The effect of long-term treatment was evaluated in a hypothetical model over 30 yr. RESULTS: Fifty-seven per cent of patients answered the questionnaires. The mean age was 57 (s.d. 11.2) yr, 74% were male and mean disease duration was 30.2 (11.7) yr. Mean total costs were estimated at pound 6765 (s.d. pound 166). Indirect costs represented 57.9% and non-medical costs such as investments and informal care accounted for 16.5% of total costs. Mean utility was 0.67 (0.21). In the main model, mean costs for untreated patients are estimated at pound 25,128. For the infliximab group, mean costs (excluding treatment) are estimated at pound 17,240, a reduction of 31%. Thus, part of the treatment cost was offset by savings in other resources ( pound 7888), leaving an incremental cost of pound 6214. Treatment increased the number of quality-adjusted live years (QALYs) by 0.175 QALYs, leading to a cost per QALY gained of pound 35,400 for the first year of treatment. When treatment is assumed to continue for the full 2 yr, the cost per QALY is pound 32,800. When infliximab infusions are given every 8 weeks instead of every 6 weeks, the cost per QALY is reduced to pound 17,300. In the long-term model, the cost per QALY is estimated at pound 9600. CONCLUSIONS: Non-medical costs and production losses dominate costs in AS, and economic evaluation must therefore adopt a societal perspective. The cost of treatment with infliximab is partly offset by reductions in the cost of the disease and patients' quality of life is increased, leading to a cost per QALY gained in the vicinity of pound 30,000 to pound 40,000 in the short term, but potentially below pound 10,000 in the long term.

Pharmacokinetics of astemizole in children.

Astemizole is often administered to children in the treatment of rhinoconjunctivitis and urticaria with good efficacy and few side effects. Both astemizole and its major metabolite desmethylastemizole (DMA) are clinically effective without annoying side effects such as sedation. The pharmacokinetics in adults is well known. In three different studies we have investigated the pharmacokinetical properties of the drug in children. Study I (absorption): Thirty-eight children 8-16 years old (mean 12.6 years) and weighing 25-80 kg (mean 45 kg), with rhinoconjunctivitis due to birch pollinosis, were pretreated with either astemizole 5 mg daily or placebo for two weeks. Then, all children were treated with astemizole in doses increasing every week, i.e. 5, 10, 20 and 40 mg per day. There was a good correlation between the given dose per kg body weight and the plasma concentration of astemizole plus hydroxylated metabolites, indicating that astemizole is completely absorbed. Study II (time to reach steady state): A group of 21 children 7-18 years old (mean 13.9 years), plus 2 younger children, 2 and 5 years old, with allergy against birch- or grass pollen were treated with astemizole 10 mg daily for 12 weeks. Astemizole had reached steady-state plasma levels when the first sample was taken after 1 week, DMA reached steady state within 4 weeks. Study III (elimination half-life [t1/2 beta]): In 10 of the children from study II, t1/2 beta for astemizole plus DMA could be calculated (two samples) and was 10.8 days.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)