Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Surg Oncol ; 114(3): 385-91, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27238092

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the pattern and timing of major wound complications (MWCs) in patients at our institution who received multimodality treatment for lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma (LE-STS) and to evaluate the impact of MWCs on tumor control and patient outcomes. METHODS: The medical records of 102 LE-STS patients treated with limb-sparing surgery and radiation therapy were reviewed. MWCs were defined as secondary operations with anesthesia, seroma/hematoma aspiration, admission for IV antibiotics, or persistent deep packing. RESULTS: MWCs occurred in 22% of patients, with 45% of events occurring >120 days after resection. On multivariate analysis, preoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (OR 4.29, 95% CI 1.06-17.40, P = 0.042) and skin graft placement (OR 6.39, 95% CI 1.37-29.84, P = 0.018) were found to be independent predictors of MWCs. MWC occurrence did not predict for chronic toxicity and did not impact tumor control or survival. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion of MWCs occur >120 days from surgical resection with preoperative EBRT and skin graft placement independent predictors for MWCs. While an additional source of morbidity, MWC occurrence did not impact tumor control, nor did it predict for chronic toxicity. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:385-391. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Subject(s)
Lower Extremity , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Sarcoma/therapy , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/pathology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sarcoma/mortality , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/mortality , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
2.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 9: 149, 2014 Aug 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25164440

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is performed under general anesthesia with selective ventilation and endotracheal intubation. Although some sparse data exists on VATS under local anesthesia, most series reserve this technique for pleural-based surgery. Performing VATS under local anesthesia may extend the benefits of this procedure to those unable to tolerate general anesthesia and improve outcomes. METHOD: We have extended this technique to include more complex procedures, with results that surpass traditional open thoracotomies. We analyzed 293 patients who underwent awake video-assisted thoracic surgery (AVATS) from June 2010 to January 2014. RESULTS: Procedures such as pleural biopsies, wedge resections, decortications, and even lobectomies were able to be safely performed using AVATS technique with comparable or better results than VATS under general anesthesia. CONCLUSION: AVATS is a feasible technique with equal or improved outcomes without compromise in safety. Further study may help delineate the role of this technique in the care of the thoracic surgical patient.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Local , Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Positioning , Patient Selection , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...