Role of Liver Transplantation in Bilio-Vascular Liver Injury After Cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to report 2 cases of liver transplantation (LT) for iatrogenic bile-vascular injury (BVI) sustained during cholecystectomy and to review the literature for LT after cholecystectomy. METHODS: Between March 2001 and July 2013, within our institution, 12 patients were treated after cholecystectomy, 3 of 12 received LT, 1 for acute de-compensation in a cirrhotic patient and 2 after iatrogenic lesions. RESULTS: The majority of iatrogenic injury occurred during video-laparocholecystectomy (63,6%; 7/11). Three patients of 12 (25%) received LT: the first patient developed acute de-compensation in chronic and after liver failure. The second patient developed recurrent cholangitis and secondary biliary cirrhosis. The third patient had undergone emergency hepatectomy because of bleeding and subsequent total hepatectomy with porto-caval shunt. Five of 12 (42%) patients were treated with bilio-digestive anastomosis: 1 patient with direct repair on T-tube; 2 patients (17%) with arterial vascular lesion requiring surgical treatment; and 1 patient treated with medical therapy. No deaths occurred. The post-operative morbidity included 1 re-intervention, 3 recurrent cholangitis, 1 anastomotic biliary stricture, 1 anastomotic bile leak, and cholestasis in 3 patients. The overall hospital stays were higher after LT. Median follow-up was 8.25 years (range, 2-14). CONCLUSIONS: The management of iatrogenic injury during cholecystectomy depends on the time of recognition, extent of injury, experience of the surgeon, and the patient's general condition. If safe repair is possible, BVI should be treated promptly, otherwise all patients should be treated in an experienced center.

Split-liver full-left full-right: proposal for an operative protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Worldwide, organ shortage is a major limiting factor to transplantations. One possible way to face graft scarcity is splitting full livers into hemilivers; this procedure would allow transplantation in 2 adult recipients with the use of a single organ from a deceased donor. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to describe an adult-to-adult split liver operative protocol and share it between centers interested in exploring this procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review was first conducted to elaborate on the present protocol; second, selection criteria for suitable deceased donors were identified. The technical aspects of performing the procurement were also analyzed; finally, the recipient selection criteria and the transplantation criteria were determined. RESULTS: The donor characteristics should be consistent with the following: age≤55 years; weight≥70 kg; body mass index<28 kg/m2; intensive care unit stay<7 days; sodium level<160 mEq/L if the intensive care unit stay is >2 days; maximum transaminase value 3 times normal; hemodynamic stability; negative for hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C virus, and human immunodeficiency virus; macrosteatosis<20%; macroscopic adequacy; and absence of anatomic anomalies requiring complex reconstruction. The procurement hospital should provide the preoperative computed tomography scan, liver dissector, and the intraoperative ultrasound. Indication for in situ or ex situ splitting depends on the hepatic vein outflow anatomy. Graft-to-recipient weight ratio should be ≥1%, and the graft-to-recipient spleen size ratio should be ≥0.6. United Network for Organ Sharing status 1 and 2A recipients are excluded, as are patients with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hemiliver transplants are performed as in living-donor liver transplantation, and portal hyperflow is corrected by splenic artery ligation, splenectomy, and portal infusion of vasoactive drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The present protocol was proposed to test the validity of the full-left full-right split liver procedure. A retrospective analysis found that 130 transplantations were suitable for this procedure according to the present protocol in the period January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2011 (65 donors). We believe that these numbers could be greatly increased once this procedure is proven feasible and safe within the proposed criteria.

Predictability and survival in liver replantransplantation: monocentric experience.

Liver retransplantation is the only treatment for patients with hepatic graft failure. Due to the shortage of organs, it is essential to optimize its use. Between 1998-2010, our center performed retransplantations on 48 (12.8%) patients (re-OLT). The data are compared with those for a group of 374 patients who did not receive retransplantations (NO re-OLT). The re-OLT vs NO re-OLT groups did not significantly differ in mean age of recipients (47 vs 51 years), indications for transplantation (hepatitis C virus cirrhosis 54% vs 56%, alcoholic cirrhosis 25% vs 17%, hepatocellular carcinoma 14% vs 22%), mean Model for End-stage Liver Disease (25 vs 20), mean total cold ischemia time (385 vs 379 minutes), or mean age of donors (52 vs 49 years). The main causes of retransplantation were primary graft nonfunction (64%), arterial thrombosis (8%), biliary complications (6%), and hepatitis C virus recurrence (4%). The difference in overall patient survival was not statistically significant. The patient's survival at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years for RE-OLT vs NO-reOLT was 56% vs 63%, 53% vs 60%, 46% vs 57%, and 44% vs 53%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified Model for End-stage Liver Disease≥23 as a predictor factor of retransplantation (P=.04). Other variables predicting outcome included age of donors (≥65 years vs younger group), age of recipients (≥50 years vs younger group), cold ischemia (≥600 vs <600 minutes), and transplantation indications (hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus, alcohol, and others). The retransplantation performed between 8-15 days appeared to have worse results than those in other periods (0-7 days, 16-30 days, 1-6 months, >6 months). The incidence of re-OLT in the series (12.8%) was comparable to that in the literature, and primary graft nonfunction in the study represents the main cause of retransplantation. Our analysis showed that the indication of the first transplant and the age of the donor were not risk factors for re-OLT. Liver retransplantation is a concrete alternative lifesaver for patients with graft failure.

Laparoscopic approach for down-staging in hepatocellular carcinoma patients who are candidates for liver transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of laparoscopic thermoablation (LTA) and laparoscopic resection (LR) as neoadjuvant therapy before orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: From June 2005 to November 2010, 50 consecutive patients affected by HCC with liver cirrhosis were treated with LTA under ultrasound guidance or LR. Of them, 10 patients (mean age, 58.3 ± 5.59 years; male:female, 8:2) underwent OLT. They were mostly Child-Pugh class A (80%). RESULTS: A LTA of 12 nodules was achieved in 7 patients and an LR of 3 HCC nodules in the other 3 subjects. The mean length of surgery was 163 minutes (range; 60-370). The mean hospital stay was 6.1 days. Transient mild postoperative liver failure was reported in 1 case. Complete tumor necrosis was observed in 10 thermoablated nodules (83.3%) via spiral computerized tomographic scan at 1 month after treatment; the resected patients showed absence of recurrence. All patients underwent OLT after a mean interval of 7 months. The histology of the native liver showed complete necrosis in 9/12 thermoablated nodules (75%); a recurrence at surgical site occurred in 1 patient in the resection group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ultrasound can be used in potential OLTs candidates to accurately stage HCC in advanced cirrhosis with minimal morbidity. LTA and LR proved to be safe and effective techniques for HCC patients, representing a valid "bridge" to OLT.

Impact of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score on transfusion rates in liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation (OLT) can entail a high risk of blood loss requiring transfusions, which increase morbidity and mortality. In recent years many efforts have been spent to improve the surgical and anesthetic management to decrease transfusion rates during OLT. Preoperative predictors for transfusion in OLT, remain uncertain. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the 219 OLT performed from 2005 to 2011 focusing on blood product (BP) transfusions. Statistical analysis sought the impact of transfusions on OLT outcomes to identify possible independent predictors of higher BP requirements. RESULTS: The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 86.6% and 76.45% for patients and 81.0% and 71.8% for grafts respectively. The mean intra- and perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion rates were 12.3 ± 11.7 U and 15.5 ± 13.0 U respectively. A statistical analysis demonstrated a significant influence of BP transfusion on post-OLT complications and survivals. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score to be the only independent predictor of perioperative RBC transfusions. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed the link between intra- and perioperative transfusions and outcome of OLT patients. MELD score resulted the only independent variable associated with increased perioperative RBC transfusions.

Full-right-full-left split liver transplantation: the retrospective analysis of an early multicenter experience including graft sharing.

Full-right-full-left split liver transplantation divides a donor liver into two grafts to be transplanted in adult-size patients. Major technical and organizational difficulties have limited its application to few single center series. We retrospectively analyzed the long-term results of the first multicenter series of this procedure with graft sharing. Between November 1998 and January 2005, 43 transplants were performed by five centers from 23 full-right-full-left in situ split liver procedures; 65% of the grafts were shared. A total of 31 (72%) patients had complications above grade II; 3 (6.9%) were retransplanted. Hospital mortality was 23% with sepsis as the main cause. Six patients died in the long term, two of them for a road accident. A total of 27 patients are alive after a median follow-up of 3200 days (2035-4256). Actuarial survival at 1 and 10 years were 72.1%, 62.6% and 65.1%, 57.9%, respectively for patients and grafts. These figures are similar to those reported for adult living donor liver transplantation by the European Registry over a similar period. Multicenter collaboration in sharing of these grafts is feasible and can help facing the organizational limits, thus increasing diffusion of full-right-full-left split liver transplantation.

Percutaneous embolization of periduodenal varix due to portal hypertension in a patient with kidney-pancreas transplantation: a case report.

Kidney-pancreas transplantation is a valid therapeutic option for patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. However, vascular complications associated with pancreas transplantation are not uncommon. Herein we have reported a 32-year-old woman with a history of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and celiac disease. She underwent liver transplantation for acute hepatitis. After 7 years, the patient developed end-stage kidney disease beginning hemodialysis and being listed for a kidney-pancreas transplantation, which was successfully performed when she was 29 years old with enteric diversion (Roux intestinal loop reconstruction). Five years after kidney-pancreas transplantation, she was admitted to our hospital with serious intestinal bleeding and poor liver function. The ultrasound showed a pattern like a arteriovenous fistula near the head of the pancreas. Computed Tomography was not diagnostic; an arteriogram showed the presence of a mesenteric varix and a mesenteric-caval shunt through the duodenum of the pancreatic graft. The liver biopsy and portal pressure gradient showed portal hypertension and liver cirrhosis. To obtain time a waiting a new liver, the patient underwent percutaneous embolization of the mesenteric varix through jugular access. The procedure was uneventful. The patient was successfully transplanted 2 months later. Pancreas function was always satisfactory.

Biochemical and morphologic effects after extended liver resection in rats: preliminary results.

After hepatic resection and transplantation with a partial graft, death and regeneration of the hepatocytes coexist in the liver. However, when the functional liver mass is inadequate to ensure a proper balance between regeneration vs functional and metabolic demands, small-for-size syndrome develops. We assessed the early effects of extended hepatic resection on liver function in a rat model. Six male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent 80% resection of the liver, and 6 rats served as a control group. At 6 hours after resection, blood samples were obtained from the hepatic vein for measurement of reduced glutathione (GSH), oxidized glutathione (GSSG), and hepatic venous oxygen saturation (Shvo(2)), and for standard liver function tests including determination of concentrations of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and total bilirubin. The remnant lobe was removed for GSH assay and histopathologic analysis. In the resection group, values were significantly higher for ALT (P = .002), AST (P = .002), and Shvo(2) (P = .01), whereas a significant decrease was observed for blood GSH (P = .009) but not liver GSH. Also in the resection group, we observed characteristic hepatocyte vacuolization with a gradient from periportal acinar zone 1 to the centrolobular area, the presence of hemorrhagic necrosis, and several leukocyte adhesions. The Shvo(2) and GSH data suggest early alteration of oxygen metabolism, as demonstrated by the reduction in oxygen uptake and decreased liver GSH secretion, with preservation of hepatic GSH. Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative injury seem to have a crucial role in early onset of liver damage.

Alcohol abstinence and orthotopic liver transplantation in alcoholic liver cirrhosis.

Patients diagnosed with acute alcoholic hepatitis (AAH) are routinely managed medically and not considered suitable for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The eligibility for OLT in these patients has been questioned due to the social stigma associated with alcohol abuse, based on the fact that AAH is "self-induced" with an unacceptably high recidivism rate. Many centers in Europe and the United States require abstinence periods between 6 and 12 months before OLT listing. AAH outcomes in the literature are poor, in particular due to patient noncompliance during the immediate 3 months preceeding OLT. Between January 1997 and December 2007, 246 patients were evaluated in our center for alcoholic liver disease: 133 (54%) were listed for OLT (I-OLT), including 110 (83%) who underwent transplantation and 8 (6%) still listed as well as 15 (11%) removed from consideration. One hundred thirteen (46%) patients had no indication for OLT (NO I-OLT), including 18 (16%) who died, 81 (71%) still monitored, and 14 (12%) lost to follow-up. Patient survival rates post-OLT were 79%, 74%, 68%, and 64% at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. Explant (native liver) pathologic examination revealed AAH in 8 (7.2%) patients who underwent OLT. In this group, patient survival and the post-OLT recidivism rate were statistically identical to the overall group of transplant recipients.

A 20-year period of orthotopic liver transplantation activity in a single center: a time series analysis performed using the R Statistical Software.

In many Western countries a "minimum volume rule" policy has been adopted as a quality measure for complex surgical procedures. In Italy, the National Transplant Centre set the minimum number of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) procedures/y at 25/center. OLT procedures performed in a single center for a reasonably large period may be treated as a time series to evaluate trend, seasonal cycles, and nonsystematic fluctuations. Between January 1, 1987 and December 31, 2006, we performed 563 cadaveric donor OLTs to adult recipients. During 2007, there were another 28 procedures. The greatest numbers of OLTs/y were performed in 2001 (n = 51), 2005 (n = 50), and 2004 (n = 49). A time series analysis performed using R Statistical Software (Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), a free software environment for statistical computing and graphics, showed an incremental trend after exponential smoothing as well as after seasonal decomposition. The predicted OLT/mo for 2007 calculated with the Holt-Winters exponential smoothing applied to the previous period 1987-2006 helped to identify the months where there was a major difference between predicted and performed procedures. The time series approach may be helpful to establish a minimum volume/y at a single-center level.

Torque Teno Virus--cause of viral liver disease following liver transplantation: a case report.

Torque Teno Virus (TTV), a nonenveloped human virus of the Circoviridae family, is hepatotropic, causing liver damage, cirrhosis, and, rarely, fulminant hepatitis. It prevails in 10% to 75% of blood donors due to environmental differences, independent of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV)/HCV hepatitis, cryptogenic cirrhosis, alcoholic cirrhosis, and in fulminant hepatitis non-A-G. Reports about the efficacy of clinical alpha interferon are rare. In July 2007, a 65-year-old man who was serologically negative for A-E viruses presented with acute liver failure due to a ruptured hepatic artery aneurysm and underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine and steroids. At postoperative day 20, there was persistent hypertransaminasemia with otherwise normal liver function. A percutaneous hepatic biopsy documented pattern suggestive of a viral etiology. Multiple tests for hepatotropic viruses in the donor and the recipient from the pre- and post-OLT periods remained negative. Only the TTV qualitative test, assessed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on patient sera, was positive. Immunosuppressive therapy was not changed; no antiviral therapy was undertaken. At 6 months posttransplantation, transaminase levels spontaneously normalized and the clinical situation was unchanged. No complications were observed; the patient is in good clinical condition. No graft rejection was observed. In histologically proven non-A-E viral hepatitis, it is important to consider TTV as an incidental pathogenic agent. It may be useful to extend virological tests to TTV among transplant recipients and donors and to gain further knowledge about this virus.

Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and organ allocation from cadaveric donors for 198 liver transplantation procedures performed in a single center.

Since February 2002, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) proposed to adopt a modified version of the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) to assign priority on the waiting list for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). In this study, we evaluated the impact of MELD score on liver allocation in a single center series of 198 liver recipients (mean age of patients, 52.21+/-8.92 years), considering the relationship between clinical urgency derived from MELD score (overall MELD, 18.7+/-6.83; MELD <15 in 69 patients, MELD >or=15 in 129 patients) and geographical distribution of cadaveric donors (inside/outside Liguria Region, 125/73). The waiting time for OLT was 230+/-248 days, whereas the 3-month and 1-year patient survivals were 87.37% and 79.79%, respectively. No difference was observed for MELD score retrospectively calculated for patients who underwent OLT before February 2002 (n=71) compared with MELD score calculated for patients who received a liver thereafter (18.26+/-6.68 vs 18.94+/-6.92; P= .504). No significant difference was found in waiting time before and after adoption of MELD score (213+/-183 vs 238+/-278 days; P= .500), or by stratifying patients for MELD <15/>or=15 (225+/-234 vs 232+/-256 days; P= .851). Using the geographical distribution of donors as a grouping variable (outside vs inside Liguria Region), no significance occurred for MELD score (19.68+/-7.42 vs 18.17+/-6.42; P= .135) or waiting time (211+/-226 vs 242+/-261 days; P= .394). In our series, more OLTs were performed among sicker patients and no differences were found in the management of livers procured from cadaveric donors outside or inside Liguria Region. However, further efforts are needed to reduce the waiting time among patients with higher MELD scores.

Sirolimus therapy in liver transplant patients: an initial experience at a single center.

Sirolimus (SRL) is an mTOR inhibitor that has been shown, in contrast to calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), to inhibit cancers in experimental models. Since February 2005, we introduced SRL in liver transplant patients in group a, in whom the primary disease was hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), alcoholic or autoimmune liver cirrhosis, and group b, HCC-negative patients who developed posttransplantation cancers de novo. Of 18 patients in group a, 11 received SRL ab initio (subgroup a1), starting for 10 patients at 66.1+/-29.2 days after surgical healing and after 10 days in 1 case; the remaining 7 patients (subgroup a2) received SRL at 31.2+/-24.2 months. Three patients in group b, included 1 with Kaposi's sarcoma, 1 with bladder cancer, and 1 with thyroid cancer. In this group, SRL was introduced at 80.8+/-40.4 months. In all patients but one, who received a single 5 mg loading dose, SRL was started at 2 mg/d and adjusted to 6 to 8 ng/mL blood levels. CNI drugs, present as primary therapy, were gradually tapered to low levels and eventually stopped. The following observations were drawn from this initial experience: (1) 4/21 (19.0%) patients had to discontinue SRL because of early and late side effects: thrombocytopenia (n=2) and headache with leukopenia and leg edema associated with knee joint arthralgia (n=2); (2) 14 patients (11 in group a and 3 in group b) are still on SRL monotherapy; (3) 1 HCC recurrence and 1 de novo pancreatic adenocarcinoma were observed at 14 and 16 months, respectively (at the time of transplantation, both patients were beyond the MIlan HCC criteria), and (4) 1 patient, from subgroup a1, died after 99 days due to pneumonitis and possible relation to SRL lung toxicity. In conclusion, SRL appeared to be an effective immunosuppressant that could be used as monotherapy in liver transplant patients. Any conclusion on SRL anticancer effects can only come from randomized large studies after long follow-up.

Preliminary results of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma among allocation organ policy strategies, neoadjuvant treatments, and intention-to-treat analysis.

We retrospectively evaluated the impact of our strategy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) according to an intention-to-treat analysis and drop-out probability. We evaluated only patients within the Milan criteria. We analyzed the outcomes of neoadjuvant strategies for HCC, organ allocation policy, and systematic application of strategies to increase the deceased donor pool as the current tendency to expand transplantability criteria for those patients. Kaplan-Meier survival probability rates at 1, 3, and 5 years according to an intention-to-treat analysis were 87.02%, 74.53%, and 65.93% for transplanted patients (n=108), and 50%, 14.29%, and 14.29% for the excluded or waiting list group (n=13), respectively (P< .0001). Drop-out risk at 3, 6, and 12 months was 2.40%, 8.59%, and 16.54%, respectively. During the same period, the mortality probability rates at 3, 6, and 12 months among patients without HCC awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) were 3.60%, 9.50%, and 18.34%, respectively. Drop-out rate was lower among patients treated before OLT (P< .0001). On the basis of the neoadjuvant treatment results to reduce drop-out risk, we suggest avoiding the high priority for the HCC cohort, particularly within the first 6 months from entrance on the waiting list, because this approach can reduce the chances of patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) alone.

Relationship between laboratory parameters and intensive care unit stay post-liver transplantation: proposal of a model.

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to create a model that forecasted the stay in the intensive care unit in post-liver transplantation. METHODS: Twenty-three consecutive patients who underwent liver transplantation provided samples for serum sodium, serum creatinine, total bilirubin, cholesterol, aspartate and alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), albumin, and platelet count for correlation together with age at transplantation in a Pearson correlation model with intensive care unit stay. Multivariate analysis used a regression model to evaluate the relationship between the dependent variable "intensive care unit stay" and the predictor variables that were correlated by a Pearson correlation test. To test the acceptability and strength of the model, analyses of variance was performed and a multiple correlation coefficient R was calculated for the model. RESULTS: Pearson correlation test showed a strong correlation between intensive care unit stay and creatinine (correlation coefficient = 0.34, P = .03), serum sodium (correlation coefficient = -0.42, P < .01), and total bilirubin (correlation coefficient = -0.29, P = .06). Other variables showed no significant correlation, namely correlation coefficients < 0.24 (P > .1). The final model to evaluate the relationship between the dependent variable "intensive care unit stay" and laboratory parameters included ALP, serum creatinine, serum sodium, and total bilirubin as well as a correction for age. CONCLUSIONS: The most significant parameters were total bilirubin, serum creatinine, and serum sodium. The proposal model significantly correlated with the variable "intensive care unit stay." Such data are particularly important since increased intensive care unit stay correlates with a significant reduction in 1-year survival rate.

Application of a Bayesian simulation model to a database for split liver transplantation on two adult recipients in the environment of WinBUGS (Bayesian Inference Using Gibbs Sampling).

A Bayesian simulation model has been applied to a database developed for split liver transplantation on two adult recipients (SLT A/A) in the context of a macroregional project funded by the Italian Ministry of Health. The model was entered within Bayesian inference Using Gibbs Sampling (WinBUGS), a free software for Bayesian analysis of complex statistical models using Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques developed by the MRC Biostatistics Unit Cambridge jointly with the Imperial College School of Medicine at St Mary's, London. The model was built by using data entry performed from January 1, 2005 to August 5, 2005. In that period, 20 potential donors suitable for the SLT A/A procedure were entered into the database. We only selected the continuous and dichotomous donor-related variables (DRV, n = 62) for which almost one data entry procedure. The model assumed that a database user learned during data entry procedures for each donor, and that the probability of a successful input may depend on the number of previous errors and corrections. After binary transformation of the DRV (value 0 for each input record, value 1 for each no input record), we calculated an overall value of 0.28 +/- 0.27 (median: 0.3; 95% confidence interval: from 0.18 to 0.629). The transformed DRV were entered within the WinBUGS environment after model specification, assuming as success (y = 1) each procedure of input record, and as failure (y = 0) each procedure of no input record. A unequivocal convergence was obtained after 10,000 iterations, and a simulation run was launched for a further 10,000 updates. We obtained a negligible Monte Carlo error and a fine profile in the kernel density plot. This study supported the application of simulation models to databases concerning liver transplantation as a useful strategy to identify a critical state in the data entry process.

A preliminary data entry analysis on a multicentric informative system for split liver transplantation in two adult recipients.

In the context of the national research program "Innovative Strategies to Expand Cadaveric Donor Pool for Liver Transplantation" (SITF project), funded by the Italian Ministry of Health, an experimental and multicentric Web-based information system was developed to automate theoretical matching between a potential donor and two adult recipients for in situ split liver transplantation (SLT A/A). Data entry in the SITF database was performed in addition to activities formally required for patient and donor management by national legislation and guidelines. Data entry carried out within the SITF database from January 1, 2005 to August 8, 2005 was processed by stratifying original variables as donor- and patient-related. Only records required for donor-recipients matching had a mandatory data entry. The donor subset showed data entry procedures in 62 variables for 20 potential donors, whereas in the patient subset, we found 28 variables for 100 potential liver recipients. In the donor subset, 1004 records were filled, for a raw completeness of 77.08%. After adjustment for appropriateness, there were 935 remaining records with an adjusted completeness of 76.64% (P = .823). In the patient subset, 2653 records were filled, for a raw completeness of 98.69%. No difference in patient subset records was found after rechecking for appropriateness. A significant difference occurred for adjusted completeness between the donor versus the patient subsets (P < .0001). The results of this study suggested that only the presence of mandatory donor records may produce a consistent database suitable for SLT A/A.

Split liver network: a collaborative internet-based scenario to expand the organ pool.

BACKGROUND: Split liver transplantation (SLT) has become a crucial option to maximize the liver pool, while organ procurement organizations (OPOs) usually allocate whole livers to single centers. In 2003, Italian Ministry of Health funded the Innovative Strategies to Expand Cadaveric Donor Pool for Liver Transplantation project with the goal to establish sharing criteria for SLT for two adults (SLT A/A), involving Italian transplantation centers, the North Italy Transplant OPO, and the Italian National Transplant Center. METHODS: SITF group defined donor/recipient inclusion criteria, setting minimum graft/recipient weight ratio (GRWR) at 1.2%. Donors and recipients on waiting list were shared on an Internet secured Web-based application (Split Liver Network [SLN]). SLN performs real-time matches between the registered donor and all patients on the bases of GRWR, displaying a size-based list of matched donor/patients, figuring hemiliver allocation once the whole organ is referred to a specific center. RESULTS: In the 2005 period, 47 donors and 124 patients were entered by nine centers, and six hemiliver allocations for three SLT A/A procedures were performed. By retrospective simulation of 32 donors and 613 recipients in the Nord Italia Transplant area, matchable recipients were available for all donors, while blood group frequency seemed a determining factor, more than donor body weight. COMMENTS: SLN hemiliver allocation might increase matching possibilities, offering a timely transplant for recipients of rare group, small-size, or in need of short wait. Our experience suggests that such an environment may be helpful to share a macroregional pool of liver recipients and to optimize SLT.

Application of the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method to evaluate an informative system for liver transplantation in adult and pediatric recipients.

The Delphi Method (DM) is the most frequently used technique to acquire structured expert-opinion elicitation (EOE). It has been increasingly applied to construct guidelines in medicine and to evaluate the appropriateness of clinical procedures. In this study, the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was used as a structured EOE process to evaluate the appropriateness of a dataset concerning liver transplantation in adult and pediatric recipients for an information system funded by the Italian Ministry of Health. The original dataset was obtained using an interdisciplinary pool of regional experts (n = 60). This dataset held 280 items stratified into three groups: I. pretransplant items (n = 123); II. transplant items (n = 65); III. early posttransplant and follow-up items (n = 92). In the second DM round, the dataset was subjected to an extraregional panel of independent experts (n = 9) to assess a score ranging from 1 to 9 on each item based on increasing appropriateness, according to the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Overall agreement, uncertainty, and disagreement between experts was 95.89%, 3.12%, and 0.99%, respectively. For each group, agreement-uncertainty-disagreement were 99.35%/0.65%/0% (group I), 91.53%/5.30%/3.17% (group II), and 96.87%/3.13%/0% (group III), respectively. This study supported the use of a structured EOE process to evaluate the appropriateness of a large dataset for liver transplantation activity.