Fotografia digital: análise do conhecimento de cirurgiões-dentistas de diferentes especialidades / Digital photography: analysis of knowledge of Dentists of different specialties

Objetivo: Avaliar o nível de conhecimento dos cirurgiões-dentistas especialistas de João Pessoasobre fotografia digital. Material e Métodos: Tratou-se de um estudo observacional e prospectivo com amostragem não probabilística. A amostra foi composta por 60 profissionais inscritos no Conselho Regional de Odontologia da Paraíba (CRO-PB), nas seguintes especialidades: Prótese, Ortodontia, Dentística e Periodontia. A coleta de dados foi realizada por meio de um questionário, com perguntas objetivas e subjetivas. Os dados foram tabulados em banco de dados e submetidos à análise estatística descritiva. Resultados: Foi possível verificar que a maior parte dos cirurgiões-dentistas são adeptos a utilização da fotografia digital (71,6%) para diversos fins. Dentre as especialidades, a ortodontia obteve o maior percentual (86,6%), seguido da prótese (73,3%), da periodontia (66,6%) e da dentística (60%). Conclusões: A maioria dos especialistas utiliza a fotografia digital como parte da documentação odontológica. Os ortodontistas têm destaque quanto à utilização e frequência das fotografias. Ainda são necessários estudos adicionais para maior aprofundamento sobre o tema em questão.

Objective: This research aimed to evaluate the level of knowledge of specialists dentists in João Pessoa on digital photography. Material and Methods: It was a prospective observational study with non-probability sampling. The sample was composed by 60 professionals enrolled in Regional Council of Dentistry of Paraiba (CRO-PB), in the following specialties: Prosthesis, Orthodontics, Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry. The data collection was performed by means of a questionnaire, with objective and subjective questions. The data were tabulated in a database and submitted to descriptive statistical analysis. Results: It was possible to verify that the greater parts of dentists are adherents to the use of digital photography (71.6 %) for various purposes. Among the specialties, Orthodontics has obtained the highest percentage (86.6 %), followed by Prosthodontics (73.3 %), Periodontics (66.6 %) and Restorative Dentistry (60 %). Conclusions: The majority of specialists use digital photography as part of the dentistry documentation, with orthodontists being the specialists that most commonly uses it. Although additional studies are necessary to further deepening on the topic in question.

Genotype-phenotype correlation of 16p13.3 terminal duplication and 22q13.33 deletion: Natural history of a patient and review of the literature.

This article reports a patient with a de novo ∼ 9.32 Mb duplication at 16p13.3 and a ∼ 71 Kb deletion at 22q13.33. The patient was followed from 1 month old to 3 years and 8 months of age and presented typical features of the 16p13.3 duplication syndrome. In addition, the patient presents a portal cavernoma, an alteration rarely reported in this condition. Renal agenesis was detected as additional developmental defect. After genomic array and FISH analysis, the karyotype was 46,XX,ins(22;16)(q13;p13.2p13.3). ish ins(22;16)(RP11-35P16+, RP11-27M24+). arr16p13.2p13.3(85,880-9,413,353)×3 dn arr22q13.33 (51,140,789-51,197,838)×1 dn. The authors provide a comprehensive review of the literature. This approach shed light on the genotype-phenotype correlation.

Diagnostic implications of associated defects in patients with typical orofacial clefts / Implicações diagnósticas de defeitos associados em pacientes com fendas orofaciais típicas

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: To describe prevalence of associated defects and clinical-genetic characteristics of patients with typical orofacial clefts seen at a reference genetic service. METHODS: Descriptive study conducted between September of 2009 and July of 2014. Two experienced dysmorphologists personally collected and coded clinical data using a validated, standard multicenter protocol. Syndromic cases were defined by the presence of four or more minor defects, one or more major defects, or recognition of a specific syndrome. Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for statistics. RESULTS: Among 141 subjects, associated defects were found in 133 (93%), and 84 (59.5%) were assigned as syndromic. Cleft palate was statistically associated with a greater number of minor defects (p < 0.0012) and syndromic assignment (p < 0.001). Syndromic group was associated with low birth weight (p < 0.04) and less access to surgical treatment (p < 0.002). There was no statistical difference between syndromic and non-syndromic groups regarding gender (p < 0.55), maternal age of 35 years and above (p < 0.50), alcohol (p < 0.50) and tobacco consumption (p < 0.11), consanguinity (p < 0.59), recurrence (p < 0.08), average number of pregnancies (p < 0.32), and offspring (p < 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of information on syndromic clefts. The classification system for phenotype assignment adopted in this study has facilitated recognition of high prevalence of associated defects and syndromic cases. This system may be a useful strategy to gather homogeneous samples, to elect appropriate technologies for etiologic and genotype-phenotype approaches, and to assist with multiprofessional care and genetic counseling.

RESUMO OBJETIVOS: Descrever a prevalência de defeitos associados e as características genético-clínicas de pacientes com fendas orofaciais típicas (FOT) em um serviço de referência em genética. MÉTODOS: Estudo descritivo feito entre setembro/2009 e julho/2014. Os dados foram colhidos e codificados por dois observadores clínicos com experiência em dismorfologia, com protocolo validado em estudo multicêntrico. Presença de quatro ou mais defeitos minor, um ou mais defeitos major e diagnóstico de síndrome reconhecida foram critérios usados para classificar o caso como sindrômico. Usou-se teste exato de Fisher para análise de variáveis categóricas e o de Kruskal-Wallis para igualdade de médias. RESULTADOS: Entre 141 sujeitos, 133 (93%) apresentavam ao menos um defeito minor ou major associado, 84 (59,5%) classificados como sindrômicos. As fendas de palato estiveram associadas com maior número de defeitos minor (p < 0,0012) e com a classificação sindrômica (p < 0,01). O grupo sindrômico apresentou maior taxa de baixo peso (p < 0,04) e menor acesso a tratamento cirúrgico (p < 0,02). Não houve diferenças entre os grupos quanto ao gênero (p < 0,55), idade materna ≥ 35 anos (p < 0,50), ingestão de álcool (p < 0,50) e tabagismo (p < 0,11), consanguinidade (p < 0,59), recorrência familial (p < 0,08) e média de gestações (p < 0,32) e de filhos nascidos vivos (p < 0,35). CONCLUSÕES: Existe escassez de informações sobre fendas sindrômicas. O método de classificação fenotípica usado possibilitou a identificação de alta prevalência de defeitos associados e de casos sindrômicos. Esse método seria uma opção para homogeneizar amostras, determinar tecnologias com vistas à investigação etiológica e estudos de correlação genótipo-fenótipo, além de colaborar para intervenção multiprofissional e aconselhamento genético.

Diagnostic implications of associated defects in patients with typical orofacial clefts.

OBJECTIVES: To describe prevalence of associated defects and clinical-genetic characteristics of patients with typical orofacial clefts seen at a reference genetic service. METHODS: Descriptive study conducted between September of 2009 and July of 2014. Two experienced dysmorphologists personally collected and coded clinical data using a validated, standard multicenter protocol. Syndromic cases were defined by the presence of four or more minor defects, one or more major defects, or recognition of a specific syndrome. Fisher's exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for statistics. RESULTS: Among 141 subjects, associated defects were found in 133 (93%), and 84 (59.5%) were assigned as syndromic. Cleft palate was statistically associated with a greater number of minor defects (p<0.0012) and syndromic assignment (p<0.001). Syndromic group was associated with low birth weight (p<0.04) and less access to surgical treatment (p<0.002). There was no statistical difference between syndromic and non-syndromic groups regarding gender (p<0.55), maternal age of 35 years and above (p<0.50), alcohol (p<0.50) and tobacco consumption (p<0.11), consanguinity (p<0.59), recurrence (p<0.08), average number of pregnancies (p<0.32), and offspring (p<0.35). CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of information on syndromic clefts. The classification system for phenotype assignment adopted in this study has facilitated recognition of high prevalence of associated defects and syndromic cases. This system may be a useful strategy to gather homogeneous samples, to elect appropriate technologies for etiologic and genotype-phenotype approaches, and to assist with multiprofessional care and genetic counseling.

Diagnosis and treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity.

This bibliographic review provides a general view of the etiology, characteristics and treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity, so that professionals can use this information in the therapeutic management of this clinical condition. For this purpose, the authors have analyzed whole texts of relevant articles on the subject. This study showed that the predisposing factors associated with the causes of dentinal hypersensitivity must be controlled or eliminated, by educating the patient regarding the excessive intake of acidic food, as well as providing guidance on the proper tooth brushing technique and analysis of occlusion. Effective treatment must be preceded by a proper diagnosis, established after the exclusion of any other possible causes of the pain. These cases must be managed efficiently, quickly and permanently. The availability of a wide variety of treatment could be an indicator that there is still no effective desensitizing agent to completely resolve the patient's discomfort, or that it is difficult to treat, irrespective of the available treatment options. Even with the large number of published studies, it has not been possible to reach a consensus about the product that represents the gold standard in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity.