High-Definition Liposculpture: What are the Complications and How to Manage Them?

BACKGROUND: High-definition liposculpture is a novel surgical technique widely accepted among plastic surgeons. The aim of this article is to describe surgical outcomes with a special emphasis on complications in high-definition liposculpture patients. METHODS: An historical cohort of patients who underwent high-definition liposculpture from two senior surgeons was reviewed. Technique, patient selection criteria, preoperative marks and surgical outcomes are described. Postoperative complications are discussed. RESULTS: A total of 417 patients underwent high-definition liposculpture between 2015 and 2018. Primary liposuction and secondary liposuction were performed in 308 (74%) and 109 (26%), respectively. Combined surgeries were performed in 121 cases (29%). There were no systemic complications. Local complications included hyperpigmentation (n = 276), seroma (n = 125), nodular fibrosis (n = 83), unsatisfactory definition in superficial liposuction areas (n = 16), unnatural appearance of body contour (n = 17), VASER-related burns (n = 3) and Mondor's syndrome (n = 2). Most patients (94%) were satisfied with the results. CONCLUSION: High-definition liposculpture is a body contouring technique that has shown excellent results. Despite non-serious complications were frequent, most complications were local and safely treated without affecting surgical outcome. To know these complications will help to recognize them earlier and to adjust patient expectation about the postoperative period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Is Banning Texturized Implants to Prevent Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma a Rational Decision? A Meta-Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Study.

BACKGROUND: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is an emergent disease that threatens patients with texturized breast implants. Major concerns about the safety of these implants are leading to global changes to restrict the utilization of this product. The principal alternative is to perform breast augmentation utilizing smooth implants, given the lack of association with BIA-ALCL. The implications and costs of this intervention are unknown. OBJECTIVES: The authors of this study determined the cost-effectiveness of smooth implants compared with texturized implants for breast augmentation surgery. METHODS: A tree decision model was utilized to analyze the cost-effectiveness. Model input parameters were derived from published sources. The capsular contracture (CC) rate was calculated from a meta-analysis. Effectiveness measures were life years, avoided BIA-ALCL, avoided deaths, and avoided reoperations. A sensitivity analysis was performed to test the robustness of the model. RESULTS: For avoided BIA-ALCL, the incremental cost was $18,562,003 for smooth implants over texturized implants. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was negative for life years, and avoided death and avoided reoperations were negative. The sensitivity analysis revealed that to avoid 1 case of BIA-ALCL, the utilization of smooth implants would be cost-effective for a risk of developing BIA-ALCL equal to or greater than 1:196, and there is a probability of CC with smooth implants equal to or less than 0.096. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of smooth implants to prevent BIA-ALCL is not cost-effective. Banning texturized implants to prevent BIA-ALCL may involve additional consequences, which should be considered in light of higher CC rates and more reoperations associated with smooth implants than with texturized implants.

Geometric analysis of the V-Y advancement flap and its clinical applications.

BACKGROUND: Geometry is fundamental in the comprehension of local flap design. The purpose of this study was to discuss the differences between the V-Y advancement flap and other local flaps, understand its geometry, and analyze its clinical applications. METHODS: The analysis was based on qualitative measurements of an injury, taking into consideration the following dimensions: largest diameter, shortest diameter, and depth. Standardization of the flap design consisted of directing its advancement over the shortest diameter and making the V base match the size of the largest diameter. The flap was analyzed in two planes: the horizontal plane includes the V-Y design and the vertical plane includes the flap pedicle. The height of the flap can be obtained by simple trigonometry, taking into consideration the largest diameter and alpha angle in the horizontal plane. In the vertical plane, where the pedicle and pivot plane are positioned, for known shortest diameter and depth, the final depth of the pivot plane can be calculated using Pythagoras' principles. RESULTS: This analysis was applied to 25 patients with adequate skin coverage at follow-up. A correction factor was added to reduce the overdeepening of the vertical plane calculations. The final concepts for clinical application in the classic deep pedicle V-Y flap design are to calculate the length of the V by modifying the alpha angle and to move the pivot plane deeper to accomplish optimal flap movement. CONCLUSIONS: Using these principles, tension-free closure of the Y and appropriate advancement of the flap are obtained.

Abdominoplasty: the use of polypropylene mesh to correct myoaponeurotic-layer deformity.

The aponeurotic layer is a very important element to consider during abdominoplasty. For most patients, a simple midline plication is enough to obtain good results. However, for in patients with severe aponeurotic laxity, some other maneuvers must be performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of polypropylene mesh in this group of patients. We analyzed the results for 20 patients in whom three types of mesh anchoring were used on the basis of intraoperative findings. Adequate long-term follow-up results were obtained, with no recurrence of rectus diastases, as shown by ultrasonography.

Nasal reconstruction with a forehead flap in children younger than 10 years of age.

Nasal reconstruction has been analyzed extensively in adults but not in children. The purpose of this article is to review the authors' experience with the forehead flap for nasal reconstruction in 10 children under the age of 10 during a 10-year period. Outcomes were assessed by an objective grading system for cosmetic surgical results. Subjective criteria were also applied by an assistant surgeon and by the patients' relatives. Appropriate results were obtained by the following principles: (1) A modified approach that considers three subunits consisting of the dorsum, tip, and ala was used; (2) a forehead flap is the best option for an entire subunit or a full-thickness defect repair; (3) the forehead flap design should be paramedian, oblique, and opposite to the major defect to avoid the hairline and allow better caudal advancement; (4) ear or costal cartilages are good options for structural support (the septum is a nasal growth center that should not be touched); (5) infundibular undermining of vestibular mucosa, turnover flaps, and skin grafts are good options for internal lining; (6) reconstruction is a three-stage procedure (an intermediate operation is added to thin the flap and perform secondary revisions for lining and support); (7) reconstruction should be completed before the child is school aged, to achieve good aesthetic results immediately and avoid psychosocial repercussions; and (8) the reconstructed nose, with skin, lining, and support, will grow with the child (no final surgery should be planned at the age of 18, other than revisions of late complications).

SMAS graft of the nasolabial area during deep plane rhytidectomy.

The extensive list of treatments for the nasolabial area illustrates that the problem is not solved yet. Although a better understanding of the anatomy and physiology of the nasolabial area has been developed, the ideal treatment has not been found. It seems that a combined approach based on summation of partially effective modalities is the best option. The authors present their experience with combined deep plane rhytidectomy, malar fat lift, and superficial musculoaponeurotic system graft in the treatment of the aging nasolabial area. Results in 70 consecutive patients are presented with this simple, nonscarring, inexpensive technique.