Preneoplastic lesions of the prostate-clinical, pathological and molecular biological aspects.

Needle biopsy is the mainstay of definitive diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCA). While prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has facilitated early diagnosis of PCA, it has also resulted in an increase in the proportion of prostate biopsies showing various preneoplastic lesions (PNLs). At times such lesions are the sole finding in the limited amount of tissue available for assessment in an individual biopsy. Hence accurate identification of these lesions is important to avoid errors in the diagnosis of prostatic malignancy and in patient management. Furthermore, some interesting observations have been made regarding the molecular biological aspects of various PNLs during the last decade. In parallel with anatomic and physiological differences in various human races, racial differences have also been observed regarding the incidence of prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia. This review focuses on prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH) and atypical prostatic glands or atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) as putative preneoplastic lesions of the prostate. These lesions are reviewed with reference to their overall incidence, histopathological findings, histological differential diagnosis, clinical significance and molecular biological aspects.

Angiogenesis and prostate cancer: in vivo and in vitro expression of angiogenesis factors by prostate cancer cells.

OBJECTIVES: Recently, it was confirmed that angiogenesis is important in the development and spread of a variety of human cancers, including prostate cancer (PCa). Tumor neovascularization is thought to be controlled by chemical signals, known as angiogenic factors (AF). To date, little is known regarding the existence and role of AF in PCa. We previously reported on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in PCa. Currently, we compare VEGF expression with that of interleukin-8 (IL-8), another putative regulator of angiogenesis. We evaluated the expression of these two important AF in PCa and explored the role of inflammatory cytokines IL-1 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in their regulation. METHODS: Ex vivo studies involved previously reported immunohistochemical analysis for VEGF and recent evaluation of IL-8 expression and distribution in archival tissue samples of PCa, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and normal prostate tissue. In vitro studies used PCa cells (DU-145) grown in culture and stimulated with cytokines thought to induce VEGF and IL-8 (ie, IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, TNF-alpha, and TNF-beta). After 24 hours, with or without cytokines, cell culture supernatants were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or radioimmunoassay for VEGF or IL-8 levels. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical studies of prostate tissue showed that PCa cells stained positively for VEGF and IL-8. Benign prostatic hyperplasia and normal prostate cells displayed little staining for either AF. Low levels of VEGF and IL-8 were produced by unstimulated DU-145 cells. Induction of DU-145 cells with cytokines resulted in differential stimulation whereby TNF was the predominant inducer of VEGF, whereas IL-1 was the predominant inducer of IL-8. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that significant levels of VEGF and IL-8 are present in PCa, but not BPH or normal prostate cells in vivo. In vitro studies suggest that differential regulation of AF expression occurs in PCa. Because IL-1 and TNF are present in the PCa tumor microenvironment, it is likely that differential regulation of AF also occurs in human PCa and contributes to differential tumor growth and metastasis.

Simultaneous microsurgical vasal reconstruction and varicocele ligation: safety profile and outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Simultaneous varicocele ligation and vasal reconstruction has previously been avoided because of concern regarding testicular devascularization. This study sought to investigate the safety of a simultaneous combined approach in the hands of an experienced microsurgeon. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of the records of 47 men who underwent vasal reconstruction, 10 (21%) of whom had simultaneous ligation of a clinically palpable varicocele. Specific attention was focused on the development of postoperative testicular atrophy and hydrocele and the analysis of postoperative semen parameters. RESULTS: No patient developed postoperative testicular atrophy or hydrocele. No statistically significant difference existed in postoperative seminal parameters between those patients who had vasal reconstruction alone and those who had a combined procedure. CONCLUSIONS: In the hands of an experienced microsurgeon, simultaneous vasal reconstruction and varicocele ligation is a management strategy that has an excellent safety profile. This approach is not recommended for the occasional microsurgeon.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in human prostate cancer: in situ and in vitro expression of VEGF by human prostate cancer cells.

PURPOSE: A growing body of literature supports the role of angiogenesis in the development and spread of a variety of human cancers including prostate cancer (Pca). Angiogenesis is controlled by chemical signals known as angiogenic factors (AF) however, little is known about angiogenesis factors in prostate cancer. We evaluated the in situ and in vitro expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a potent angiogenic factor, in archival prostate cancer specimens and prostate cancer cell cultures during unstimulated and cytokine stimulated conditions. METHODS: Ex-vivo studies involved immunohistochemical analysis for VEGF expression and distribution in 25 archival specimens including, prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and normal prostate tissue. In-vitro studies utilized prostate cancer cells (DU-145) grown in culture and stimulated with cytokines thought to induce VEGF (i.e. IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, TNF-alpha and TNF-beta). Cell culture supernatants were analyzed by ELISA for VEGF levels. RESULTS: Immunohistochemical studies demonstrated that in 20 of 25 specimens prostate cancers cells stained positively for VEGF. BPH and normal prostate cells displayed little staining for VEGF. DU-145 prostate cancer cells produced low levels of VEGF in unstimulated conditions. Induction of DU-145 cells with cytokines resulted in differential stimulation whereby TNF was a potent inducer of VEGF, and IL-1 produced lesser but statistically significant increases in VEGF expression. CONCLUSIONS: Our immunohistochemical results indicate that significant levels of VEGF are present in prostate cancer, but not in BPH or normal prostate cells in-vivo. In-vitro studies suggest that differential regulation of angiogenesis factor expression by IL-1 and TNF occurs in prostate cancer. Identifying the angiogenesis factors involved in prostate cancer growth and understanding their regulation will lead to the development of anti-angiogenic strategies useful for diagnostic studies and therapeutic interventions.