Are ventriculopleural shunts the second option for treating hydrocephalus? A meta-analysis of 543 patients.

BACKGROUND: Some centers utilize ventriculopleural shunt (VPLS) for treating hydrocephalus when conventional approaches are not feasible. Nonetheless, the literature regarding this approach is scarce. PURPOSE: Evaluate the outcomes of VPLS through a single-arm meta-analysis. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors systematically searched for articles utilizing the VPLS in a cohort with more than four patients. Outcomes included: mortality, pleural effusion, number of patients who underwent revisions, obstructions, shunt migration, emphysema, and subdural hematoma. RESULTS: A total of 404 articles were reviewed, resulting in the inclusion of 13 retrospective studies encompassing 543 patients, with the majority being children (62.6 %). The median average follow-up period was 35.4 months (10-64.1). After analysis, results yielded a revision rate of 54 % (95 % CI: 44 %-64 %; I2=73 %). The most common complication observed was pleural effusion, with a post-analysis incidence of 16 % (95 % CI: 11 %-21 %; I2=63 %), followed by infections at 7 % (95 % CI: 4 %-10 %; I2=33 %). Shunt obstruction occurred in 13 % (95 % CI: 4 %-21 %; I2=84 %) of cases after analysis, while migrations, overdrainage, subdural hematoma, and cutaneous emphysema had minimal occurrence rates (0 %, 95 % CI: 0 %-1 %; I2=0 %). Notably, there were no reported cases of shunt-related mortality. CONCLUSION: VPLS can be considered when there are no other suitable options for placing the distal catheter. However, the notable rates of shunt revisions, pleural effusion, infections, and the inherent heterogeneity of outcomes currently limit the widespread adoption of VPLS. In this scenario, other alternatives should be given priority.

Enhancing the quality of evidence, comparability, and reproducibility in ventriculoatrial shunt research for normal pressure hydrocephalus: A systematic review and VAS-NPH reporting guideline.

BACKGROUND: Ventriculoatrial shunt (VAS) is an important treatment option for normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). However, clinical studies reporting the use of VAS for NPH lack sufficient standardization for meta-analytic comparisons that could provide robust evidence regarding its use. This study aims to assess the quality of reporting in these studies and develop a reporting guideline checklist to standardize terminology, concepts, and reporting while reinforcing the essential elements to ensure comparability and reproducibility. METHODS: This is a systematic literature review that followed the PRISMA guidelines with the search in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases, with no timeframe restriction. The level of evidence of the studies was assessed using the GRADE system, and the rigor used in the publication of the results was assessed concerning adherence to the guidelines indicated by the EQUATOR Network Group. Furthermore, the studies were scrutinized focusing on eight domains: (1) Characteristics of the included studies and baseline characteristics of the patients; (2) Reporting methodology; (3) Pivotal concepts definition; (4) Adverse events assessment; (5) Data writing and reporting; (6) Detailed outcomes reporting; (7) Specific clinical outcomes assessment and reporting; and (8) Complications reporting. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies with 734 patients and 753 shunts were included in this review, and the assessment exposes notable deficiencies in reporting, specifically in baseline patient details, methodology, and outcome assessments. Only two studies followed reporting guidelines, prompting concerns about comprehensive reporting of adverse events and intraoperative complications. Varied reporting completeness existed for shunt-related issues. The absence of standardized definitions for key concepts and insufficient intervention details were observed. A VAS-NPH reporting guideline, encompassing 36 items across eight domains, was developed to address these shortcomings. CONCLUSION: This systematic review reveals significant deficiencies in methodological rigor and reporting quality. The proposed VAS-NPH Reporting Guideline covers all essential aspects and is a potential solution to rectify these shortcomings and increase transparency, comparability, and reproducibility. This initiative aims to advance the level of evidence and enhance knowledge regarding the use of VAS in NPH.

Same-day discharge in craniotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, patients undergoing craniotomy were subject to extended hospital stays for intensive monitoring and management of potential complications. However, with the evolution of surgical methods, anesthesia, and postoperative protocols, the feasibility and interest in same-day discharge (SDD) are growing. This study aimed to evaluate whether same-day discharge is a safe and feasible approach in craniotomy through a meta-analysis of the available literature. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases from inception to December 2023. Eligible studies comprised reports in English with a minimum of 4 patients who underwent craniotomies and were discharged with same-day discharge, whether single-arm or comparative with normal discharge. Single proportion analysis with 95 % confidence interval (CI) was used to pool the studies and Odds Ratio (OR) with 95 % CI was used to measure effects in comparative analysis. A random-effects model was adopted. Endpoints included success and failure of pre-planned same-day discharge, and postoperative complications throughout the hospital stay (until discharge), these complications were further categorized into major and minor complications. Also, need for reoperation, readmission within 24 h, readmission after 24 h, and mortality. RESULTS: Seven observational studies were included. Five studies were included in the single-arm analysis, comprising data from 715 patients. Four studies comprising 731 patients were included in the comparative analysis, of whom 233 were discharged on SDD, and 498 were discharged normally. The analysis revealed a success rate of 88 % (95 % CI, 83 %-94 %), readmission to the hospital within the initial 24 h rate of 2 % (95 % CI, 1 %-2 %), readmission after 24 h rate of 1 % (95 % CI, 0 %-2 %;), total postoperative complications until discharge rate of 2 % (95 % CI, 1 %-4 %), major complications rate of 0 % (95 % CI, 0 %-0 %), minor complications rate of 2 % (95 % CI, 1 %-4 %), and mortality rate of 0 % (95 % CI, 0 %-0 %). Comparative analysis for complications and mortality showed no difference between both approaches. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis identified that same-day discharge in craniotomy for selected patients, as well as for tumor resection craniotomies, is highly feasible and safe, with a high success rate, low failure, and reoperation rates. Moreover, for selected patients, no evidence of harm in same-day discharge was identified when compared with normal discharge. Consequently, same-day discharge may be considered a viable option, provided appropriate selection criteria are employed.

Adenosine-assisted embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are complex lesions that can cause hemorrhagic stroke and significant neurological disability. Adenosine induces cardiac standstill and hypotension, which are thought to be useful during cerebral AVM embolization. Herein, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the technique's safety. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, four databases were queried for studies describing the use of adenosine-assisted embolization of cerebral AVMs. Adenosine-related intraoperative complications, permanent neurological outcomes, morbidity, and mortality assessed the technique's safety. Single proportion analysis under a random-effects model was performed. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics, and publication bias was evaluated through funnel plot analysis and Egger's regression test. RESULTS: Ten studies were included, involving 79 patients (55.7% male) with 79 AVMs (54.4% unruptured and 70.9% Spetzler-Martin grade III-V) who underwent 123 embolizations (80.4% and 5.9% under transarterial and transvenous approaches, respectively) with n-butyl cyanoacrylate (80.4%), ethylene vinyl alcohol (14.4%), or both (5.2%). The incidence of transient adenosine-related intraoperative complications was 0% (95% CI 0% to 3%, I2=24%). Besides, the incidence of adenosine-related morbidity, mortality, and permanent outcomes was 0% (95% CI 0% to 3%, I2=0%). During follow-up, good functional outcomes were reported for 64 patients (81%). CONCLUSIONS: Adenosine's effects on blood flow control can facilitate embolization and mitigate the risk of AVM rupture and embolic agent migration. Although current evidence stems from observational studies, the results of this meta-analysis suggest a safe drug profile due to minimal associated morbidity and mortality. Further research from larger randomized and controlled studies is warranted to attain a higher level of evidence. PROSPERO REGISTRY NUMBER: CRD42023494116.

Optimizing radiotherapy strategies for skull base chordoma: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of treatment modalities and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: In the treatment of skull base chordoma (SBC) surgery is considered the mainstay approach, and gross-total resection has an established relationship with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). However, the tumor's location often interferes with attempts at complete resection. In this case, surgery for maximal resection followed by high-dose radiotherapy has been demonstrated to be the standard treatment. In this context, various modalities are available, yet no consensus exists on the most effective. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different radiotherapy modalities for SBC. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors systematically searched for the treatment of SBC with radiation modalities in the PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases. Outcomes assessed for each modality were as follows: OS, PFS, local control (LC), and complications. The random-effects model was adopted. A single-proportion analysis with 95% CI was used to measure the effects in single-arm analysis. For the comparative analysis, the OR with 95% CI was used to compare outcome treatment effects. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 32 studies comprising 3663 patients, with 2322 patients who were treated with radiotherapeutic modalities, were included. Regarding 5-year OS findings in each modality study, the findings were as follows: in photon fractionated radiotherapy, an estimated rate of 77% (69%-84%, 568 patients); in conventional fractionated radiotherapy, 76% (65%-87%, 517 cases); in proton-based + carbon ion-based radiotherapy, 85% (82%-88%, 622 cases); and in a comparative analysis of proton-based and carbon ion-based therapy, there was an OR of 1.2 (95% CI 0.59-2.43, 306 cases). Regarding the 5-year PFS estimate, the rates were as follows: 35% (26%-45%, 95 cases) for photon fractionated therapy; 35% (25%-45%, 85 cases) for stereotactic radiotherapy; 77% (50%-100%, 180 cases) for proton-based and carbon ion-based radiotherapy; and 74% (45%-100%, 102 cases) for proton-based radiotherapy. Regarding LC in periods of 3 and 5 years after proton- and carbon ion-based therapy, the overall estimated rates were 84% (78%-90%, 326 cases) and 75% (65%-85%, 448 cases), respectively. For proton-based radiotherapy and carbon ion-based therapy, the 5-year LC rates were 76% (67%-86%, 259 cases) and 75% (59%-91%, 189 cases), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis highlights the finding that particle-based modalities like proton beam radiotherapy and carbon ion radiotherapy are the most effective radiation therapies available for the treatment of SBC. Furthermore, it reinforces the idea that surgery followed by radiotherapy constitutes the standard treatment.

Clinical and Technical Outcomes of Intracranial-Intracranial Bypass for Treating Complex Intracranial Aneurysms: An Analysis of 255 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite the recent increase in publications centered on intracranial-intracranial (IC-IC) bypasses for complex aneurysms, there is no systematic evidence regarding their outcomes. The purpose was to assess the outcomes of patients subjected to IC-IC bypass for aneurysms. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis, a systematic review was conducted. Criteria for inclusion entailed studies with a cohort of at least 4 patients having undergone IC-IC bypass for aneurysms, detailing at least one outcome, such as patency, clinical outcomes, complications, and procedure-related mortality. When the study included patients who had undergone extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass, the authors extracted the patency and clinical data to juxtapose them with the results of IC-IC. RESULTS: Of the 2509 shortlisted studies, 22 met our inclusion criteria, encompassing 255 patients and 263 IC-IC bypass procedures. The IC-IC bypass procedure exhibited a patency rate of 93% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89%-95%). The patency rate of IC-IC and EC-IC bypasses did not significantly differ (odds ratio=0.60 [95% CI: 0.18-1.96]). Concerning clinical outcomes, 91% of the IC-IC patients had positive results (95% CI: 85%-97%), with no significant disparity between the IC-IC and EC-IC groups (odds ratio=1.29 [95% CI: 0.43-3.88]). After analysis, the complication rate was 11% (95% CI: 5%-18%). Procedure-related mortality was 1% (95% CI: 0%-4%). CONCLUSIONS: IC-IC bypass is valuable for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms, boasting high patency and positive clinical outcomes. Complications are unusual, and procedure-related mortality is minimal. Comparing IC-IC and EC-IC led to no significant differences.

Efficacy and safety of microvascular decompression with or without partial sensory rhizotomy: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review in treating trigeminal neuralgia.

Classical trigeminal neuralgia (TN), caused by vascular compression of the nerve root, is a severe cause of pain with a considerable impact on a patient's quality of life. While microvascular decompression (MVD) has lower recurrence rates when compared with partial sensory rhizotomy (PSR) alone, refractoriness can still be as high as 47%. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety profile of MVD + PSR when compared to standalone MVD for TN. We searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included those with ≥ 4 patients, in English, published between January 1980 and December 2023, comparing MVD vs. MVD + PSR for TN. Endpoints were pain cure, immediate post-operative pain improvement, long-term effectiveness, long-term recurrence, and complications (facial numbness, hearing loss, and intracranial bleeding). We pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals with a random-effects model. I2 was used to assess heterogeneity, and sensitivity and Baujat analysis were conducted to address high heterogeneity. Eight studies were included, comprising a total of 1,338 patients, of whom 1,011 were treated with MVD and 327 with MVD + PSR. Pain cure analysis revealed a lower likelihood of pain cure in patients treated with MVD when compared to patients treated with MVD + PSR (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.72). Immediate postoperative pain improvement assessment revealed a lower likelihood of improvement in the MVD group when compared with the MVD + PSR group (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.95). Facial numbness assessment revealed a lower likelihood of occurrence in MVD alone when compared to MVD + PSR (OR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.15). Long-term effectiveness, long-term recurrence, hearing loss, and intracranial bleeding analyses revealed no difference between both approaches. Our meta-analysis identified that MVD + PSR was superior to MVD for pain cure and immediate postoperative pain improvement for treating TN. However, MVD + PSR demonstrated a higher likelihood of facial numbness complications. Furthermore, identified that hearing loss and intracranial bleeding complications appear comparable between the two treatments, and no difference between long-term effectiveness and recurrence.

Retrosigmoid versus middle fossa approach for hearing and facial nerve preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery: A systematic review and comparative meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign tumors arising from vestibular nerve's Schwann cells. Surgical resection via retrosigmoid (RS) or middle fossa (MF) is standard, but the optimal approach remains debated. This meta-analysis evaluated RS and MF approaches for VS management, emphasizing hearing preservation and Cranial nerve seven (CN VII) outcomes stratified by tumor size. METHODS: Systematic searches across PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase identified relevant studies. Hearing and CN VII outcomes were gauged using the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Gardner Robertson, and House-Brackmann scores. RESULTS: Among 7228 patients, 56 % underwent RS and 44 % MF. For intracanalicular tumors, MF recorded 38 % hearing loss, compared to RS's 54 %. In small tumors (<1.5 cm), MF showed 41 % hearing loss, contrasting RS's lower 15 %. Medium-sized tumors (1.5 cm-2.9 cm) revealed 68 % hearing loss in MF and 55 % in RS. Large tumors (>3cm) were only reported in RS with a hearing loss rate of 62 %. CONCLUSION: Conclusively, while MF may be preferable for intracanalicular tumors, RS demonstrated superior hearing preservation for small to medium-sized tumors. This research underlines the significance of stratified outcomes by tumor size, guiding surgical decisions and enhancing patient outcomes.

Enhancing the quality of evidence, comparability, and reproducibility in brain arteriovenous malformations treated with open surgery research: a systematic review and proposal of a reporting guideline for surgical and clinical outcomes.

Brain Arteriovenous Malformations (bAVMs) are rare but high-risk developmental anomalies of the vascular system. Microsurgery through craniotomy is believed to be the mainstay standard treatment for many grades of bAVMs. However, a significant challenge emerges in the existing body of clinical studies on open surgery for bAVMs: the lack of reproducibility and comparability. This study aims to assess the quality of studies reporting clinical and surgical outcomes for bAVMs treated by open surgery and develop a reporting guideline checklist focusing on essential elements to ensure comparability and reproducibility. This is a systematic literature review that followed the PRISMA guidelines with the search in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases, for studies published between January 1, 2018, and December 1, 2023. Included studies were scrutinized focusing on seven domains: (1) Assessment of How Studies Reported on the Baseline Characteristics of the Patient Sample; (2) Assessment and reporting on bAVMs grading, anatomical characteristics, and radiological aspects; (3) Angioarchitecture Assessment and Reporting; (4) Reporting on Pivotal Concepts Definitions; (5) Reporting on Neurosurgeon(s) and Staff Characteristics; (6) Reporting on Surgical Details; (7) Assessing and Reporting Clinical and Surgical Outcomes and AEs. A total of 47 studies comprising 5,884 patients were included. The scrutiny of the studies identified that the current literature in bAVM open surgery is deficient in many aspects, ranging from fundamental pieces of information of methodology to baseline characteristics of included patients and data reporting. Included studies demonstrated a lack of reproducibility that hinders building cumulative evidence. A bAVM Open Surgery Reporting Guideline with 65 items distributed across eight domains was developed and is proposed in this study aiming to address these shortcomings. This systematic review identified that the available literature regarding microsurgery for bAVM treatment, particularly in studies reporting clinical and surgical outcomes, lacks rigorous scientific methodology and quality in reporting. The proposed bAVM Open Surgery Reporting Guideline covers all essential aspects and is a potential solution to address these shortcomings and increase transparency, comparability, and reproducibility in this scenario. This proposal aims to advance the level of evidence and enhance knowledge regarding the Open Surgery treatment for bAVMs.

Spinal tumor embolization with Onyx: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Onyx embolization has emerged as a promising technique for spinal tumor embolization due to its high devascularization rate and low incidence of complications. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of Onyx embolization in spinal tumor procedures. METHODS: Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. To be included, the articles had to report specific outcomes of Onyx embolization for spinal tumors (complications, mortality, blood loss, tumor devascularization, or reduction in tumor blush). RESULTS: We selected 11 out of 2941 articles, encompassing 127 patients. Among them, no major complications or persistent neurological deficits were reported, and no deaths occurred as a result of the embolization procedure. Of the 63 patients with available data, two complications were observed: one infarct leading to transient neurological deficit and one clinically silent vessel perforation related to the microcatheter. Thus, the complication rate was 1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0% to 6%). Blood loss during surgery ranged from 100 to 1500 mL (four studies). Complete tumor blush reduction was achieved in 52% of the cases (95% CI: 16% to 88%) across 32 patients. Three studies reported a median percentage of tumor devascularization of 91% (86.1% to 97.5%). CONCLUSION: Onyx embolization for spinal tumor procedures appears to be a safe technique, as evidenced by the absence of major complications or deaths. However, the determination of its efficacy remains challenging due to limited data availability and substantial heterogeneity across studies. These findings highlight the need for future research to address this knowledge gap and further validate our results.

Transradial access for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Woven EndoBridge device: A systematic review and pooled analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is a minimally invasive endovascular treatment option for patients with cerebral aneurysms. Transradial access (TRA) is a technique that involves accessing the arterial system through the radial artery in the wrist rather than the femoral artery in the groin. Several studies have investigated the use of TRA for WEB device deployment in treating intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the TRA for WEB device deployment in treating intracranial aneurysms. The databases PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. To reduce the risk of bias, this systematic review only included studies reporting on using TRA in WEB device deployment for intracranial aneurysm treatment with a minimum of four patients. RESULTS: In this systematic review, 186 patients were included across five studies, with TRA used in 183 cases analyzed. The study population had a higher proportion of females (n = 118%-69%) than males, with a mean age of 62 years old. Among the aneurysms treated, 46 were ruptured, and 119 were located at bifurcation sites, with a mean maximum diameter/width of 6.6 mm and mean height of 5.9 mm. Adjunctive coiling was used in three cases, and adjunctive stenting was used in nine cases. In two cases, conversion to a femoral artery access was necessary. CONCLUSION: The available results suggest TRA with the WEB device is a safe and effective alternative. However, using TRA versus TFA should be individualized based on patient factors and operator experience.

Effectiveness and Safety of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Versus Lumboperitoneal Shunt for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH) is a condition characterized by elevated intracranial pressure. Although several mechanisms have been proposed as underlying causes of IIH, no identifiable causative factor has been determined for this condition. Initial treatments focus on weight or CSF reduction, but severe cases may require surgery. This study compares outcomes in IIH patients treated with lumboperitoneal shunts (LPSs) versus ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPSs). METHODS: This systematic-review and meta-analysis follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines and includes studies about VPS and LPS patients, reporting one of the outcomes of interest. We conducted searches on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. RESULTS: Our analysis involved twelve studies, comprising 5990 patients. The estimated odds ratio (OR) for visual improvement was 0.97 (95% CI 0.26-3.62; I2 = 0%) and for headache improvement was 0.40 (95% CI 0.20-0.81; I2 = 0%), favoring LPS over VPS. Shunt revision analysis revealed an OR of 1.53 (95% CI 0.97-2.41; I2 = 77%). The shunt complications showed an OR of 0.91 (95% CI 0.68-1.22; I2 = 0%). The sub-analyses for shunt failure uncovered an OR of 1.41 (95% CI 0.92-2.18; I2 = 25%) and for shunt infection events an OR of 0.94 (95% CI 0.50-1.75; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: The interventions showed general equivalence in complications, shunt failure, and other outcomes, but LPS seems to hold an advantage in improving headaches. Substantial heterogeneity highlights the need for more conclusive evidence, emphasizing the crucial role for further studies. The findings underscore the importance of considering a tailored decision between VPS and LPS for the management of IIH patients.

Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery-Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Bypass versus Occipital Artery-Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Bypass for Treating Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: When traditional therapies are unsuitable, revascularization becomes essential for managing posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) or vertebral artery aneurysms. Notably, the PICA-PICA bypass has emerged as a promising option, overshadowing the occipital artery-PICA (OA-PICA) bypass. The objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of OA-PICA and PICA-PICA bypasses. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of OA-PICA and PICA-PICA bypasses for treating posterior circulation aneurysms. RESULTS: We analyzed 13 studies for the PICA-PICA bypass and 16 studies on the OA-PICA bypass, involving 84 and 110 patients, respectively. The median average follow-up for PICA-PICA bypass was 8 months (2-50.3 months), while for OA-PICA, it was 27.8 months (6-84 months). The patency rate for OA-PICA was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92%-100%) and 100% (95% CI: 95%-100%) for PICA-PICA. Complication rates were 29% (95% CI: 10%-47%) for OA-PICA and 12% (95% CI: 3%-21%) for PICA-PICA. Good clinical outcomes were observed in 71% (95% CI: 52%-90%) of OA-PICA patients and 87% (95% CI: 75%-100%) of PICA-PICA patients. Procedure-related mortality was 1% (95% CI: 0%-6%) for OA-PICA and 1% (95% CI: 0%-10%) for PICA-PICA. CONCLUSIONS: Both procedures have demonstrated promising results in efficacy and safety. PICA-PICA exhibits slightly better patency rates, better clinical outcomes, and fewer complications, but with a lack of substantial follow-up and a smaller sample size. The choice between these procedures should be based on the surgeon's expertise and the patient's anatomy.

Ultrasound-Guided Resection of High-Grade Gliomas: A Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: High-grade gliomas (HGGs) present a challenge in neuro-oncology, often necessitating surgical resection for optimal management. Ultrasound holds promise in achieving better gross total resection (GTR) and improving outcomes. This meta-analysis systematically evaluates literature providing robust evidence on the use of intraoperative ultrasonography (iUSG) in HGG resection. METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines a comprehensive search was made across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science utilized terms related to iUSG for HGG resection. The meta-analysis examined randomized trials and observational cohort studies on iUSG-guided HGG resection. GTR, subtotal resection, and postresection complications were assessed. Statistical analysis, employing R software for a single proportion analysis with confidence intervals of 95%, I2 statistics for heterogeneity, and the instrumental variables method with restricted maximum likelihood for a random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 178 patients were included in our study. The GTR overall rate in patients with iUSG-guided resection was found to be 64% (95% confidence interval: 46%-81%). Two-dimensional ultrasound remains dominant at 80% against other options of ultrasound. Complications were reported at a 15% rate (95% confidence interval: 7%-23%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provided robust data on the utilization of iUSG-guided resection regarding the attainment of GTR and the complications related to resection. However, challenges such as outcome heterogeneity and limited complication reporting highlight the need for further research to optimize iUSG in HGG treatment. Long-term follow-up studies on patient survival and postsurgery quality of life will complement existing literature, guiding clinical practices in managing HGG.

Maxillary artery utilization in subcranial-intracranial bypass procedures: a comprehensive systematic review and pooled analysis.

The utilization of the internal maxillary artery (IMAX) in subcranial-intracranial bypass for revascularization in complex aneurysms, tumors, or refractory ischemia shows promise. However, robust evidence concerning its outcomes is lacking. Hence, the authors embarked on a systematic review with pooled analysis to elucidate the efficacy of this approach. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases following PRISMA guidelines. Included articles used the IMAX as a donor vessel for revascularizing an intracranial area and reported at least one of the following outcomes: patency, complications, or clinical data. Favorable outcomes were defined as the absence of neurologic deficits or improvement in the baseline condition. Complications were considered any adverse event directly related to the procedure. Out of 418 retrieved articles, 26 were included, involving 183 patients. Among them, 119 had aneurysms, 41 experienced ischemic strokes (transient or not), 2 had arterial occlusions, and 3 had neoplasia. Furthermore, 91.8% of bypasses used radial artery grafts, and 87.9% revascularized the middle cerebral artery territory. The median average follow-up period was 12 months (0.3-53.1). The post-operation patency rate was 99% (95% CI: 97-100%; I2=0%), while the patency rate at follow-up was 82% (95% CI: 68-96%; I2=77%). Complications occurred in 21% of cases (95% CI: 9-32%; I2=58%), with no significant procedure-related mortality in 0% (95% CI: 0-2%; I2=0%). Favorable outcomes were observed in 88% of patients (95% CI: 81-96%; I2=0%), and only 3% experienced ischemia (95% CI: 0-6%; I2=0%). The subcranial-intracranial bypass with the IMAX shows excellent postoperative patency and considerable favorable clinical outcomes. While complications exist, the procedure carries a minimal risk of mortality. However, long-term patency presents heterogeneous findings, warranting additional research.