Efficacy and safety of microvascular decompression with or without partial sensory rhizotomy: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review in treating trigeminal neuralgia.

Classical trigeminal neuralgia (TN), caused by vascular compression of the nerve root, is a severe cause of pain with a considerable impact on a patient's quality of life. While microvascular decompression (MVD) has lower recurrence rates when compared with partial sensory rhizotomy (PSR) alone, refractoriness can still be as high as 47%. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety profile of MVD + PSR when compared to standalone MVD for TN. We searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included those with ≥ 4 patients, in English, published between January 1980 and December 2023, comparing MVD vs. MVD + PSR for TN. Endpoints were pain cure, immediate post-operative pain improvement, long-term effectiveness, long-term recurrence, and complications (facial numbness, hearing loss, and intracranial bleeding). We pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals with a random-effects model. I2 was used to assess heterogeneity, and sensitivity and Baujat analysis were conducted to address high heterogeneity. Eight studies were included, comprising a total of 1,338 patients, of whom 1,011 were treated with MVD and 327 with MVD + PSR. Pain cure analysis revealed a lower likelihood of pain cure in patients treated with MVD when compared to patients treated with MVD + PSR (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.72). Immediate postoperative pain improvement assessment revealed a lower likelihood of improvement in the MVD group when compared with the MVD + PSR group (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.95). Facial numbness assessment revealed a lower likelihood of occurrence in MVD alone when compared to MVD + PSR (OR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.15). Long-term effectiveness, long-term recurrence, hearing loss, and intracranial bleeding analyses revealed no difference between both approaches. Our meta-analysis identified that MVD + PSR was superior to MVD for pain cure and immediate postoperative pain improvement for treating TN. However, MVD + PSR demonstrated a higher likelihood of facial numbness complications. Furthermore, identified that hearing loss and intracranial bleeding complications appear comparable between the two treatments, and no difference between long-term effectiveness and recurrence.

Clinical and Technical Outcomes of Intracranial-Intracranial Bypass for Treating Complex Intracranial Aneurysms: An Analysis of 255 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Despite the recent increase in publications centered on intracranial-intracranial (IC-IC) bypasses for complex aneurysms, there is no systematic evidence regarding its outcomes. The purpose was to assess the outcomes of patients subjected to IC-IC bypass for aneurysms. METHODS: Following PRISMA, a systematic review was conducted. Criteria for inclusion entailed studies with a cohort of at least four patients having undergone IC-IC bypass for aneurysms, detailing at least one outcome, such as patency, clinical outcomes, complications, and procedure-related mortality. When the study included patients who had undergone extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass, the authors extracted the patency and clinical data to juxtapose it with the results of IC-IC. RESULTS: Of the 2,509 shortlisted studies, 22 met our inclusion criteria, encompassing 255 patients and 263 IC-IC bypass procedures. The IC-IC bypass procedure exhibited a patency rate of 93% (95% CI: 89%-95%). The patency rate of IC-IC and EC-IC bypasses did not significantly differ (OR = 0.60 (95% CI: 0.18 - 1.96). Concerning clinical outcomes, 91% of the IC-IC patients had positive results (95% CI: 85% - 97%), with no significant disparity between the IC-IC and EC-IC groups (OR = 1.29 (95% CI: 0.43 - 3.88). After analysis, the complication rate was 11% (95% CI: 5% - 18%). Procedure-related mortality was 1% (95% CI: 0% - 4 %). CONCLUSION: IC-IC bypass is valuable for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms, boasting high patency and positive clinical outcomes. Complications are unusual, and procedure-related mortality is minimal. Comparing IC-IC and EC-IC led to no significant differences.

Optimizing radiotherapy strategies for skull base chordoma: a comprehensive meta-analysis and systematic review of treatment modalities and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: In the treatment of skull base chordoma (SBC) surgery is considered the mainstay approach, and gross-total resection has an established relationship with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). However, the tumor's location often interferes with attempts at complete resection. In this case, surgery for maximal resection followed by high-dose radiotherapy has been demonstrated to be the standard treatment. In this context, various modalities are available, yet no consensus exists on the most effective. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different radiotherapy modalities for SBC. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, the authors systematically searched for the treatment of SBC with radiation modalities in the PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases. Outcomes assessed for each modality were as follows: OS, PFS, local control (LC), and complications. The random-effects model was adopted. A single-proportion analysis with 95% CI was used to measure the effects in single-arm analysis. For the comparative analysis, the OR with 95% CI was used to compare outcome treatment effects. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 32 studies comprising 3663 patients, with 2322 patients who were treated with radiotherapeutic modalities, were included. Regarding 5-year OS findings in each modality study, the findings were as follows: in photon fractionated radiotherapy, an estimated rate of 77% (69%-84%, 568 patients); in conventional fractionated radiotherapy, 76% (65%-87%, 517 cases); in proton-based + carbon ion-based radiotherapy, 85% (82%-88%, 622 cases); and in a comparative analysis of proton-based and carbon ion-based therapy, there was an OR of 1.2 (95% CI 0.59-2.43, 306 cases). Regarding the 5-year PFS estimate, the rates were as follows: 35% (26%-45%, 95 cases) for photon fractionated therapy; 35% (25%-45%, 85 cases) for stereotactic radiotherapy; 77% (50%-100%, 180 cases) for proton-based and carbon ion-based radiotherapy; and 74% (45%-100%, 102 cases) for proton-based radiotherapy. Regarding LC in periods of 3 and 5 years after proton- and carbon ion-based therapy, the overall estimated rates were 84% (78%-90%, 326 cases) and 75% (65%-85%, 448 cases), respectively. For proton-based radiotherapy and carbon ion-based therapy, the 5-year LC rates were 76% (67%-86%, 259 cases) and 75% (59%-91%, 189 cases), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis highlights the finding that particle-based modalities like proton beam radiotherapy and carbon ion radiotherapy are the most effective radiation therapies available for the treatment of SBC. Furthermore, it reinforces the idea that surgery followed by radiotherapy constitutes the standard treatment.

Retrosigmoid versus middle fossa approach for hearing and facial nerve preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery: A systematic review and comparative meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign tumors arising from vestibular nerve's Schwann cells. Surgical resection via retrosigmoid (RS) or middle fossa (MF) is standard, but the optimal approach remains debated. This meta-analysis evaluated RS and MF approaches for VS management, emphasizing hearing preservation and Cranial nerve seven (CN VII) outcomes stratified by tumor size. METHODS: Systematic searches across PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase identified relevant studies. Hearing and CN VII outcomes were gauged using the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Gardner Robertson, and House-Brackmann scores. RESULTS: Among 7228 patients, 56 % underwent RS and 44 % MF. For intracanalicular tumors, MF recorded 38 % hearing loss, compared to RS's 54 %. In small tumors (<1.5 cm), MF showed 41 % hearing loss, contrasting RS's lower 15 %. Medium-sized tumors (1.5 cm-2.9 cm) revealed 68 % hearing loss in MF and 55 % in RS. Large tumors (>3cm) were only reported in RS with a hearing loss rate of 62 %. CONCLUSION: Conclusively, while MF may be preferable for intracanalicular tumors, RS demonstrated superior hearing preservation for small to medium-sized tumors. This research underlines the significance of stratified outcomes by tumor size, guiding surgical decisions and enhancing patient outcomes.

Effectiveness and Safety of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Versus Lumboperitoneal Shunt for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH) is a condition characterized by elevated intracranial pressure. Although several mechanisms have been proposed as underlying causes of IIH, no identifiable causative factor has been determined for this condition. Initial treatments focus on weight or CSF reduction, but severe cases may require surgery. This study compares outcomes in IIH patients treated with lumboperitoneal shunts (LPSs) versus ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPSs). METHODS: This systematic-review and meta-analysis follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines and includes studies about VPS and LPS patients, reporting one of the outcomes of interest. We conducted searches on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. RESULTS: Our analysis involved twelve studies, comprising 5990 patients. The estimated odds ratio (OR) for visual improvement was 0.97 (95% CI 0.26-3.62; I2 = 0%) and for headache improvement was 0.40 (95% CI 0.20-0.81; I2 = 0%), favoring LPS over VPS. Shunt revision analysis revealed an OR of 1.53 (95% CI 0.97-2.41; I2 = 77%). The shunt complications showed an OR of 0.91 (95% CI 0.68-1.22; I2 = 0%). The sub-analyses for shunt failure uncovered an OR of 1.41 (95% CI 0.92-2.18; I2 = 25%) and for shunt infection events an OR of 0.94 (95% CI 0.50-1.75; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: The interventions showed general equivalence in complications, shunt failure, and other outcomes, but LPS seems to hold an advantage in improving headaches. Substantial heterogeneity highlights the need for more conclusive evidence, emphasizing the crucial role for further studies. The findings underscore the importance of considering a tailored decision between VPS and LPS for the management of IIH patients.

Transradial access for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Woven EndoBridge device: A systematic review and pooled analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is a minimally invasive endovascular treatment option for patients with cerebral aneurysms. Transradial access (TRA) is a technique that involves accessing the arterial system through the radial artery in the wrist rather than the femoral artery in the groin. Several studies have investigated the use of TRA for WEB device deployment in treating intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the TRA for WEB device deployment in treating intracranial aneurysms. The databases PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. To reduce the risk of bias, this systematic review only included studies reporting on using TRA in WEB device deployment for intracranial aneurysm treatment with a minimum of four patients. RESULTS: In this systematic review, 186 patients were included across five studies, with TRA used in 183 cases analyzed. The study population had a higher proportion of females (n = 118%-69%) than males, with a mean age of 62 years old. Among the aneurysms treated, 46 were ruptured, and 119 were located at bifurcation sites, with a mean maximum diameter/width of 6.6 mm and mean height of 5.9 mm. Adjunctive coiling was used in three cases, and adjunctive stenting was used in nine cases. In two cases, conversion to a femoral artery access was necessary. CONCLUSION: The available results suggest TRA with the WEB device is a safe and effective alternative. However, using TRA versus TFA should be individualized based on patient factors and operator experience.

Ultrasound-Guided Resection of High-Grade Gliomas: A Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: High-grade gliomas (HGGs) present a challenge in neuro-oncology, often necessitating surgical resection for optimal management. Ultrasound holds promise in achieving better gross total resection (GTR) and improving outcomes. This meta-analysis systematically evaluates literature providing robust evidence on the use of intraoperative ultrasonography (iUSG) in HGG resection. METHODS: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines a comprehensive search was made across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science utilized terms related to iUSG for HGG resection. The meta-analysis examined randomized trials and observational cohort studies on iUSG-guided HGG resection. GTR, subtotal resection, and postresection complications were assessed. Statistical analysis, employing R software for a single proportion analysis with confidence intervals of 95%, I2 statistics for heterogeneity, and the instrumental variables method with restricted maximum likelihood for a random effects model. RESULTS: A total of 178 patients were included in our study. The GTR overall rate in patients with iUSG-guided resection was found to be 64% (95% confidence interval: 46%-81%). Two-dimensional ultrasound remains dominant at 80% against other options of ultrasound. Complications were reported at a 15% rate (95% confidence interval: 7%-23%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provided robust data on the utilization of iUSG-guided resection regarding the attainment of GTR and the complications related to resection. However, challenges such as outcome heterogeneity and limited complication reporting highlight the need for further research to optimize iUSG in HGG treatment. Long-term follow-up studies on patient survival and postsurgery quality of life will complement existing literature, guiding clinical practices in managing HGG.

Transradial artery access for carotid artery stenting: A pooled analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) through transradial access (TRA) is emerging as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy. However, the current evidence base is limited, mainly comprising single-center studies. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the safety and effectiveness of TRA for CAS, providing evidence to support clinical decisions. METHODS: We conducted searches on PUBMED, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases, including studies on TRA for CAS. Studies with fewer than 20 patients, non-primary outcomes, and non-full-text articles were excluded. RESULTS: We analyzed 14 studies involving 1,166 patients who underwent CAS via TRA. Procedural success rate was high in 13 studies, with a 95% rate (95% CI; 92%-98%). Crossover to TFA access was observed in 12 studies at 6% (95% CI: 3%-9%). Transradial access failure was reported in four studies, with a rate of 0% (95% CI: 0%-0%). Cannulation failure resulted in a rate of 4% (95% CI: 2%-7%). Asymptomatic radial artery occlusion (ARAO) occurred at a rate of 2% based on eight studies (95% CI: 0%-5%). Forearm hematoma was reported in 10 studies, with an occurrence of 1% (95% CI: 0%-2%). Cerebral vascular attacks (CAV) within 30 days were assessed in 13 studies, indicating a 2% occurrence (95% CI: 1%-2%). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that TRA for CAS yields promising outcomes with high success rates and low complication rates. Further research should focus on randomized controlled trials and long-term outcomes to validate and extend findings.

Maxillary artery utilization in subcranial-intracranial bypass procedures: a comprehensive systematic review and pooled analysis.

The utilization of the internal maxillary artery (IMAX) in subcranial-intracranial bypass for revascularization in complex aneurysms, tumors, or refractory ischemia shows promise. However, robust evidence concerning its outcomes is lacking. Hence, the authors embarked on a systematic review with pooled analysis to elucidate the efficacy of this approach. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases following PRISMA guidelines. Included articles used the IMAX as a donor vessel for revascularizing an intracranial area and reported at least one of the following outcomes: patency, complications, or clinical data. Favorable outcomes were defined as the absence of neurologic deficits or improvement in the baseline condition. Complications were considered any adverse event directly related to the procedure. Out of 418 retrieved articles, 26 were included, involving 183 patients. Among them, 119 had aneurysms, 41 experienced ischemic strokes (transient or not), 2 had arterial occlusions, and 3 had neoplasia. Furthermore, 91.8% of bypasses used radial artery grafts, and 87.9% revascularized the middle cerebral artery territory. The median average follow-up period was 12 months (0.3-53.1). The post-operation patency rate was 99% (95% CI: 97-100%; I2=0%), while the patency rate at follow-up was 82% (95% CI: 68-96%; I2=77%). Complications occurred in 21% of cases (95% CI: 9-32%; I2=58%), with no significant procedure-related mortality in 0% (95% CI: 0-2%; I2=0%). Favorable outcomes were observed in 88% of patients (95% CI: 81-96%; I2=0%), and only 3% experienced ischemia (95% CI: 0-6%; I2=0%). The subcranial-intracranial bypass with the IMAX shows excellent postoperative patency and considerable favorable clinical outcomes. While complications exist, the procedure carries a minimal risk of mortality. However, long-term patency presents heterogeneous findings, warranting additional research.

Evaluating the efficacy of stent retriever and catheter aspiration combination in refractory cerebral venous sinus Thrombosis: A comprehensive Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (CVST) is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition, often associated with specific risk factors. The primary treatment for CVST is anticoagulation, but some cases progress to Refractory CVST (rCVST), requiring endovascular treatment. A combination of stent retriever and catheter aspiration is emerging as a promising technique to enhance treatment effectiveness. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of this approach, aiming to improve recanalization success and neurological outcomes while reducing complications in rCVST patients. METHODS: A search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted across Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify studies on the use of stent retrievers and catheter aspiration for rCVST. Pooled analysis with 95 % confidence intervals was used to assess the effects. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2 statistics and a random-effects model was used. Complete recanalization. good clinical outcomes (mRS ≤ 2), hemorrhagic, neurological, ischemic, and total complications, poor clinical outcomes (mRS > 2), and mortality were assessed. RESULTS: A meta-analysis of five retrospective studies involving 55 patients examined outcomes in CVST. The median mean age was 40 years. Complete recanalization rate: 36 % (95 % CI: 9 % to 62 %, I2 = 90 %). Good clinical outcomes: 72 % (95 % CI: 50 % to 94 %, I2 = 76 %). Hemorrhagic complications: 2 % (95 % CI: 0 % to 8 %, I2 = 15 %). Ischemic complications: 0 % (95 % CI: 0 % to 6 %, I2 = 0 %). Neurological complications: 7 % (95 % CI: 0 % to 14 %, I2 = 0 %). Poor clinical outcomes: 26 % (95 % CI: 6 % to 46 %, I2 = 70 %). Total complications: 6 % (95 % CI: 0 % to 15 %, I2 = 10 %). Mortality rate: 5 % (95 % CI: 0 % to 13 %, I2 = 19 %). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis scrutinized the efficacy of combining Stent Retriever and Catheter Aspiration for rCVST. Findings highlighted varied outcomes, including recanalization rates, complications, and mortality. The dichotomy between good and poor outcomes underscores the necessity for personalized therapeutic decisions. While offering a comprehensive overview, the study emphasizes literature heterogeneity, suggesting a need for more rigorous and standardized research to optimize therapeutic strategies in clinical practice.

Endovascular treatment of mycotic aneurysms: An update meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Intracranial mycotic or infectious aneurysms result from the infection of arterial walls, most caused by bacterial or fungal organisms. These infections can weaken the arterial wall, leading to the formation of an aneurysm, a localized dilation, or a bulge. The management can be conservative mainly based on antibiotics or invasive methods such as clipping or endovascular treatment. PURPOSE: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature on endovascular treatment of mycotic aneurysms, analyzing the safety and efficacy associated with this procedure. METHODS: We systematically searched on PUBMED, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Our search strategy was carefully crafted to conduct a thorough investigation of the topic, utilizing a comprehensive combination of relevant keywords. This meta-analysis included all studies that reported endovascular treatment of mycotic aneurysms. To minimize the risk of bias, studies with fewer than four patients, studies where the main outcome was not found, and studies with no clear differentiation between microsurgical and endovascular treatment were excluded. RESULTS: In a comprehensive analysis of 134 patients, it was observed that all except one patient received antibiotics as part of their treatment. Among the patients, 56% (a total of 51 out of 90 patients) underwent cardiac surgery. Additionally, three patients required a craniotomy following endovascular treatment. 12 patients experienced morbidity related to the procedures performed, indicating complications arising from the interventions. Furthermore, four aneurysms experienced rebleeding while treatment. A pooled analysis of the endovascular treatment of the mycotic aneurysm revealed a good level of technical success, achieving a 100% success rate in 12 out of 14 studies (97-100%; CI 95%; I2 = 0%), as illustrated in Fig. 2. Similarly, the aneurysm occlusion rate demonstrated a notable efficacy, with a success rate of 97% observed in 12 out of 14 studies (97-100%; CI 95%; I2 = 0%), as depicted in Fig. 3. CONCLUSION: The results strongly support the efficacy of endovascular treatment in achieving technical success, complete aneurysm occlusion, and favorable neurological outcomes. Additionally, the notably low incidence of complications and procedure-related mortality reaffirms the safety and benefits associated with this intervention.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Management and Outcome of Isolated Skull Fractures in Pediatric Patients.

BACKGROUND: The impact of traumatic brain injury (TBI) on the pediatric population is profound. The aim of this study is to unveil the state of the evidence concerning acute neurosurgical intervention, hospitalizations after injury, and neuroimaging in isolated skull fractures (ISF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase were searched for papers until April 2023. Only ISF cases diagnosed via computed tomography were considered. RESULTS: A total of 10,350 skull fractures from 25 studies were included, of which 7228 were ISF. For the need of acute neurosurgical intervention, the meta-analysis showed a risk of 0% (95% CI: 0-0%). For hospitalization after injury the calculated risk was 78% (95% CI: 66-89%). Finally, for the requirement of repeated neuroimaging the analysis revealed a rate of 7% (95% CI: 0-15%). No deaths were reported in any of the 25 studies. CONCLUSIONS: Out of 7228 children with ISF, an almost negligible number required immediate neurosurgical interventions, yet a significant 74% were hospitalized for up to 72 h. Notably, the mortality was zero, and repeat neuroimaging was uncommon. This research is crucial in shedding light on the outcomes and implications of pediatric TBIs concerning ISFs.

Enhancing meningioma resection: a comprehensive study on the safety and effectiveness of Onyx™ presurgical embolization.

Presurgical embolization (PE) has emerged as an interesting strategy to help turn brain tumor resection more amenable. This study aims to systematically review the safety and effectiveness of Onyx™ PE in meningioma resection. We followed Cochrane Collaboration and PRISMA for systematic review and meta-analysis, querying PUBMED, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases. Major complications were defined as other artery occlusion, visual deficits due to PE, or non temporary nerve damage, while minor included transitory conditions and others without clinical implications. A total of 186 patients were included, in which 120 were WHO grade I (80%), II (16%), and III (4%). Patient baseline characteristics and complications were distributed in groups without or with individual patient data analysis. Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis (IPDMA) was performed on the last category, comprising 51 meningiomas that underwent Onyx™ PE. Among available data, 70%, 17%, and 13% were WHO grade I, II, and III, respectively. Considering all studies, tumor characteristics regarding grade underscored a certain homogeneity. Complications occurred at a rate of 9% (95% CI, 4 to 14%; I2 = 35%), with the rate of major complications significantly lower at only 1% (95% CI, 0 to 3%; I2 = 32%), whereas of minor complications was 7% (95% CI, 3 to 10%; I2 = 0%). Mean surgery blood loss was 668.7 (95% CI, 534.9 to 835.8; I2 = 0%) in IPDMA. Onyx™ PE is promising for safer surgical meningioma resection, despite limitations. Further studies are required to validate efficacy, enhance patient selection, and refine techniques.

Transradial versus transfemoral approach in cerebral angiography: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral angiography has two common access sites: Transradial approach and transfemoral approach. However, there's no definitive answer to which one is superior. OBJECTIVE: Compare transradial approach and transfemoral approach for a cerebral angiography procedure. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature of studies reporting both transradial approach and transfemoral approach results was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were queried. RESULTS: The meta-analysis examined 18 studies comprising 9388 patients undergoing cerebral angiography. Among the patients, 4598 underwent transradial approach (48.9%) and 4790 underwent transfemoral approach (51.1%). Our results revealed no statistical differences between the approaches regarding procedure success, crossover to transfemoral approach, procedure and fluoroscopy time between both approaches in cerebral angiography. Total, major, and minor complications comparisons were more favorable to transradial approach for this procedure. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest, despite the ultimate decision regarding the choice of access method might be influenced by the physician's experience and personal preference, the data distinctly lean toward transradial approach as the preferable option for cerebral angiography. The advantages of transradial approach, highlighted by its lower complication rates, especially major complications, suggest that its adoption could contribute to enhanced patient safety and procedural outcomes.

Evaluating the safety and efficacy of transvenous embolization for brain arteriovenous malformation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Transvenous embolization is a potential therapy for brain arteriovenous malformation, involving the use of microcatheters to guide an ethylene vinyl alcohol coil for vessel occlusion. However, the safety and efficacy of transvenous embolization are not fully established. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transvenous embolization for brain arteriovenous malformation. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature of studies investigating the safety and efficacy of transvenous embolization for brain arteriovenous malformation was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase were queried. RESULTS: In the final analysis of 16 studies involving 368 brain arteriovenous malformation cases who received transvenous embolization, the complete occlusion was achieved in 91% (95% CI: 88%, 94%; I2 = 43%, p = 0.04) of cases. The overall rate of good outcomes after discharge was high at 89% (95% CI: 82%, 95%; I2 = 60%, p < 0.01). Ischemic complications were reported in 1% of cases (95% CI: 0%, 2%; I2 = 0%, p = 0.96), while hemorrhagic complications occurred in 6% of cases (95% CI: 3%, 8%; I2 = 8%, p = 0.37), and technical complications rate of 8% (95% CI: 4%, 11%; I2 = 8%, p = 0.36). Finally, only one death was related to the procedure. CONCLUSION: Transvenous embolization for brain arteriovenous malformation shows promising safety and effectiveness, with low mortality, a considerable rate of positive outcomes, and a relatively low incidence of complications. The majority of patients achieved complete occlusion, indicating transvenous embolization as a potential option, especially for challenging deep-seated lesions.

Assessing the efficacy and safety of hemangioblastoma embolization: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hemangioblastomas (HBs) are highly vascular tumors linked to substantial morbidity and mortality. Recently, interventional neuroradiology has evolved rapidly, spurring interest in preoperative embolization as a possible HB treatment. PURPOSE: This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of preoperative embolization in managing HB. METHODS: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, this meta-analysis considered randomized and nonrandomized studies meeting specific criteria, encompassing intracranial HB and preoperative embolization. Primary outcomes were preoperative embolization efficacy and safety. Complications were classified as major (cerebellar ischemia, ischemic strokes, intratumoral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage) and minor (transient nystagmus, slight facial nerve palsy, nausea, transient dysarthria, hemiparesis, hemisensory impairment, thrombotic complications, extravasation). RESULTS: Thirteen studies involving 166 patients with preoperative embolization before HB resection were included. Two studies using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) showed 5 patients with good recovery, 6 with moderate disability, and 3 with severe disability. Major complications occurred in 1% (95% CI: 0% to 3%), and minor complications occurred in 1% (95% CI: 0% to 4%). Intraoperative blood loss during resection was estimated at 464.29 ml (95% CI: 350.63 ml to 614.80 ml). CONCLUSION: Preoperative embolization holds promise in reducing intraoperative bleeding risk in neurosurgical intracranial HB treatment, primarily due to its low complication rates. Nonetheless, additional research and larger-scale studies are essential to establish its long-term efficacy and safety. These findings highlight preoperative embolization as a valuable tool for HB management, potentially enhancing future patient outcomes.