Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Enferm. infecc. microbiol. clín. (Ed. impr.) ; 40(7): 367-370, Ago - Sep 2022. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-207359

ABSTRACT

Introducción: El objetivo fue realizar la validación clínica del sistema molecular AMR Direct Flow Chip® para la detección de genes de resistencia a antimicrobianos partiendo de aislados bacterianos en cultivo, así como de hisopos de muestras nasales o rectales. Métodos: El ensayo AMR es una PCR multiplex seguida de hibridación reversa tipo dot blot en arrays de ADN completamente automatizada mediante la plataforma HS24, con un tiempo de realización de 3h. Se realizó la validación preclínica con 104 cepas bacterianas caracterizadas y posteriormente se analizaron 210 muestras de hisopos nasales o rectales. Resultados: La sensibilidad y la especificidad del ensayo preclínico fueron del 100%, identificando correctamente las 104 cepas. En la validación clínica, la sensibilidad fue del 100% y la especificidad fue del 100% en muestras rectales y del 97% en hisopos nasales. Conclusiones: El sistema AMR Direct Flow Chip® es un sistema rápido y eficaz para la detección de microorganismos multirresistentes a partir de muestras rectales y nasales.(AU)


Introduction The main objective of this work is to carry out the clinical validation of the trial with the AMR Direct Flow Chip® starting from either nasal swabs, rectal swabs directly or from isolated strains to detect antibiotic resistance genes. Methods: We developed the preclinical validation of the assay with 104 known bacterial isolates. A total of 210 nasal or rectal swab samples were analyzed. The AMR assay is based on multiplex PCR followed by reverse dot blot hybridization on DNA arrays fully automated by using the HS24 platform. The completion time of the full analysis is 3 hours. Results :Both the sensitivity and specificity of the preclinical assay were 100%, with the 104 samples correctly identified. In the clinical validation, the sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was between 100% in rectal swabs and 97% in nasal swabs. Conclusions: The AMR Direct Flow Chip® is a rapid and effective assay for the detection of multidrug-resistant microorganisms from nasal and rectal swab samples.(AU)


Subject(s)
Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Drug Resistance, Multiple , Molecular Epidemiology , Anti-Infective Agents , Sensitivity and Specificity , Microbiology , Communicable Diseases
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35550363

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The main objective of this work is to carry out the clinical validation of the trial with the AMR Direct Flow Chip starting from either nasal swabs, rectal swabs directly or from isolated strains to detect antibiotic resistance genes. METHODS: We developed the preclinical validation of the assay with 104 known bacterial isolates. A total of 210 nasal or rectal swab samples were analyzed. The AMR assay is based on multiplex PCR followed by reverse dot blot hybridization on DNA arrays fully automated by using the HS24 platform. RESULTS: Both the sensitivity and specificity of the preclinical assay were 100%, with the 104 samples correctly identified. In the clinical validation, the sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was between 100% in nasal swabs and 97% in rectal swabs. CONCLUSIONS: The AMR Direct Flow Chip® is a rapid and effective assay for the detection of multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDR) from nasal and rectal swab samples.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Microbial
3.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33573838

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The main objective of this work is to carry out the clinical validation of the trial with the AMR Direct Flow Chip® starting from either nasal swabs, rectal swabs directly or from isolated strains to detect antibiotic resistance genes. METHODS: We developed the preclinical validation of the assay with 104 known bacterial isolates. A total of 210 nasal or rectal swab samples were analyzed. The AMR assay is based on multiplex PCR followed by reverse dot blot hybridization on DNA arrays fully automated by using the HS24 platform. The completion time of the full analysis is 3 hours. RESULTS: Both the sensitivity and specificity of the preclinical assay were 100%, with the 104 samples correctly identified. In the clinical validation, the sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was between 100% in rectal swabs and 97% in nasal swabs. CONCLUSIONS: The AMR Direct Flow Chip® is a rapid and effective assay for the detection of multidrug-resistant microorganisms from nasal and rectal swab samples.

4.
PLoS One ; 12(9): e0184762, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28910402

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Current diagnostic methods for detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae in children with suspected invasive pneumococcal disease have limitations of accuracy, timeliness, and patient convenience. This study aimed to determine the performance of pneumococcal load quantified with a real-time polymerase-chain reaction in nasopharyngeal samples to diagnose invasive pneumococcal disease in children. METHODS: Matched case-control study of patients <5 years of age with invasive pneumococcal disease admitted to the Manhiça District Hospital (Mozambique) and asymptomatic controls recruited in different periods between 2006 and 2014. Cases were confirmed by a positive bacterial culture for S. pneumoniae in blood or cerebrospinal fluid. Nasopharyngeal aspirates were collected from cases and controls and pneumococcal density was quantified by lytA real-time polymerase-chain reaction. RESULTS: Thirty cases (median age 12.8 months) and sixty controls (median age 11.7 months) were enrolled and 70% of them were male. Nasopharyngeal pneumococcal carriage was high in both groups: 28/30 (93.3%) for cases vs. 53/60 (88.3%) for controls (p = 0.71). Mean nasopharyngeal pneumococcal load was identified as a marker for invasive pneumococcal disease (7.0 log10 copies/mL in cases vs. 5.8 log10 copies/mL in controls, p<0.001) and showed good discriminatory power (AUC-ROC: 82.1%, 95% CI 72.5%-91.8%). A colonization density of 6.5 log10 copies/mL was determined as the optimal cut-off value to distinguish cases from controls (sensitivity 75.0%, specificity 73.6%). CONCLUSION: Use of non-invasive nasopharyngeal aspirates coupled with rapid and accurate quantification of pneumococcal load by real-time polymerase chain reaction has the potential to become a useful surrogate marker for early diagnosis of invasive pneumococcal disease in children.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Nasopharynx/microbiology , Pneumococcal Infections/diagnosis , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Bacterial Load , Case-Control Studies , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Mozambique , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Streptococcus pneumoniae/physiology
5.
PLoS One ; 12(3): e0174305, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28355283

ABSTRACT

There is an unambiguous association of Streptococcus gallolyticus infection with colorectal cancer, although there is limited information about epidemiology or interaction between molecular and environmental factors. We performed an original quantitative analysis of S. gallolyticus in unselected colorectal cancer patients (n = 190) and their association with clinical, pathological tumor molecular profiles (microsatellite instability, hypermethylator phenotype and chromosomal instability pathways), and other biological factors in colorectal tumor and normal tissues (cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus infection). We developed a new quantitative method to assess bacterial load. Analytical validation was reached with a very high sensitivity and specificity. Our results showed a 3.2% prevalence of S. gallolyticus infection in our unselected cohort of colorectal cancer cases (6/190). The average S. gallolyticus copy number was 7,018 (range 44-34,585). No previous reports relating to S. gallolyticus infection have been published for unselected cohorts of patients. Finally, and despite a low prevalence of S. gallolyticus in this study, we were able to define a specific association with tumor tissue (p = 0.03) and with coinfection with Epstein-Barr virus (p = 0.042; OR: 9.49; 95% IC: 1.1-82.9). The prevalence data provided will be very useful in the design of future studies, and will make it possible to estimate the sample size needed to assess precise objectives. In conclusion, our results show a low prevalence of S. gallolyticus infection in unselected colorectal cancer patients and an association of positive S. gallolyticus infection with tumor tissue and Epstein-Barr virus coinfection. Further studies will be needed to definitively assess the prevalence of S. gallolyticus in colorectal cancer and the associated clinicopathological and molecular profiles.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/microbiology , Streptococcal Infections/complications , Streptococcus gallolyticus/physiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colon/microbiology , Colon/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Female , Humans , Male , Microsatellite Instability , Middle Aged , Streptococcal Infections/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...