Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr ; 112(10-11): 400-6, 1999.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10598359

ABSTRACT

The systemic tolerance of a solution of calcium aspartate and magnesium aspartate was studied in 7 cows. Intravenously administered dosages of 500 ml per cow were well tolerated. A twofold increase of the serum calcium concentration was measured. In 2 cows which were treated with 1000 ml of the solution a threefold increased calcium concentration and heart arrhythmia were found. The clinical efficacy of the solution was demonstrated in a study with 44 hypocalcemic cows. A long lasting increase of the serum calcium as well as an enhanced phosphorus concentration were measurable. In conclusion, the calcium-magnesium-aspartate solution seems to be an efficacious and well tolerated alternative for the treatment of hypocalcemia in cows.


Subject(s)
Aspartic Acid/therapeutic use , Calcium Compounds/therapeutic use , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Hypocalcemia/veterinary , Magnesium Compounds/therapeutic use , Parturient Paresis/drug therapy , Animals , Aspartic Acid/administration & dosage , Calcium Compounds/administration & dosage , Calcium Compounds/blood , Cattle , Female , Hypocalcemia/drug therapy , Hypocalcemia/etiology , Magnesium Compounds/administration & dosage , Magnesium Compounds/blood , Parturient Paresis/complications , Pregnancy , Solutions
2.
Laryngorhinootologie ; 70(11): 586-93, 1991 Nov.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1755896

ABSTRACT

Though noise induced hearing loss is no longer the most frequent occupational disease in the Federal Republic of Germany, the environmental pollution by the product "noise" in our technical and industrialized world has not been reduced. On the contrary, the situation is worsened by the rising influence of leisure noise. To avoid occupational hearing loss, the "Noise Injury Prevention Code" issued by the insurers would demand wearing personal ear protection, e.g. ear plugs, if ambient noise levels are above 85 dB(A). But there are working places in which such equipment would have precisely the adverse effect, because one of the reasons for possible damage to hearing is radio communication. In military aircraft cockpits for example noise exposure measurements showed ambient noise levels above 90 dB(A) during regular flight service nearly all the time. To be able to understand radio traffic in spite of the noisy environment, the headphone volume must be raised above the noise of the engines. The use of ear plugs can only be of limited value. Whereas pilots with normal hearing show only little impairment of speech intelligibility, those with noise-induced hearing losses show substantial impairment that varies in proportion to their hearing loss. Communication abilities may be drastically reduced which may compromise the reliability of radio traffic. To avoid compromising air security one has to demand a noise protection system which allows to reduce ambient noise levels without disturbing speech intelligibility in the inevitable radio communication. Nowadays active noise cancelling (ANC) systems by electronic compensation in different ways provide effective protection against noise induced hearing loss.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Communication , Ear Protective Devices , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/prevention & control , Aircraft , Environmental Exposure , Humans , Noise, Occupational , Speech Intelligibility
3.
Laryngorhinootologie ; 68(2): 101-9, 1989 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2706059

ABSTRACT

Noise exposure measurements were performed in pilots of the Federal Navy during realistic flight situations. The ambient noise levels during regular flight service were maintained at levels nearly all the time above 90 dB. To avoid occupational hearing loss, the "Noise Injury Prevention Code" issued by the insurers would demand wearing personal ear protection, e.g. ear plugs. But such equipment in the aircraft cockpit would have precisely the opposite effect, because one of the reasons for possible damage to hearing is radio communication. To be able to understand radio traffic in spite of the noisy environment, headphone volume must be raised above the noise of the engines. The use of ear plugs can be of only limited value. Whereas pilots with normal hearing show only little impairment of speech intelligibility, those with noise-induced hearing loss show substantial impairment that varies in proportion to their hearing loss. Communication abilities may be drastically reduced which may compromise the reliability of radio traffic. Cockpit noise has its maximum intensity around 125 Hz and flight helmets and ear defenders are not very effective in low frequency ranges. Sennheiser electronic KG developed an active noise compensation circuit, which makes use of the "anti noise" principle. Here the outside noises picked up by two microphones integrated into the headset are processed electronically in such a way that they largely neutralise the original noise. It had to be made sure that the radio traffic signal was not also compensated and that the signal to noise ratio was clearly increased.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Aircraft/instrumentation , Ear Protective Devices , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/prevention & control , Noise, Occupational/adverse effects , Noise/adverse effects , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Protective Devices , Speech Perception , Humans , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...