The experience of pregnant women and their families who were infected with covid-19 before vaccination: A qualitative approach within a multicenter study in Brazil.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant and postpartum women infected by COVID-19 are at increased risk of adverse outcomes, including negative effects on their mental health. Brazilian maternal mortality rate due to COVID-19 is 2.5 times higher than overall mortality rates. This study aimed to understand how pregnant/postpartum women experienced the COVID-19 suspicion/investigation or confirmed infection in different Brazilian cities, the pandemic's consequences to women and their families, and their needs to improve maternal health services during public health emergencies. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study with 27 women with COVID-19 and 6 of their family members, as part of a multicenter study among 15 maternity hospitals in Brazil. We applied in-depth interviews through telephone calls when women received the diagnostic or had a suspect infection and after 60 days. Another semi-structured interview was applied to their close family members. The interviews were considered through thematic analysis. RESULTS: From the thematic content analysis three major themes emerged from the first and second interviews: (Cucinotta and Vanelli, 2020) assistance received by the woman and newborn in the medical services; (World Health Organization (WHO) 2021) stigma/fear of contamination from health workers and from family and friends reported by the women; (Allotey et al., 2020) the COVID-19 pandemic impact. CONCLUSION: Before the availability of the COVID-19 vaccine, pregnant women experienced fear of death, hospitalization, quarantine, loss of family members, and financial repercussions, resulting in physical, psychological, and socioeconomic impacts on these women's lives.

Brazilian Black Women are at Higher Risk for COVID-19 Complications: An Analysis of REBRACO, a National Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the race (Black versus non-Black) on maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19 in Brazil. METHODS: This is a subanalysis of REBRACO, a Brazilian multicenter cohort study designed to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on pregnant women. From February 2020 until February 2021, 15 maternity hospitals in Brazil collected data on women with respiratory symptoms. We selected all women with a positive test for COVID-19; then, we divided them into two groups: Black and non-Black women. Finally, we compared, between groups, sociodemographic, maternal, and perinatal outcomes. We obtained the frequency of events in each group and compared them using X2 test; p-values < 0.05 were considered significant. We also estimated the odds ratio (OR) and confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: 729 symptomatic women were included in the study; of those, 285 were positive for COVID-19, 120 (42.1%) were Black, and 165 (57.9%) were non-Black. Black women had worse education (p = 0.037). The timing of access to the health system was similar between both groups, with 26.3% being included with seven or more days of symptoms. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (OR 2.22 CI 1.17-4.21), intensive care unit admission (OR 2.00 CI 1.07-3.74), and desaturation at admission (OR 3.72 CI 1.41-9.84) were more likely to occur among Black women. Maternal death was higher among Black women (7.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.048). Perinatal outcomes were similar between both groups. CONCLUSION: Brazilian Black women were more likely to die due to the consequences of COVID-19.

OBJETIVO: Avaliar o impacto da raça (negra versus não negra) nos desfechos maternos e perinatais de gestantes com COVID-19 no Brasil. MéTODOS: Esta é uma subanálise da REBRACO, um estudo de coorte multicêntrico brasileiro desenhado para avaliar o impacto da COVID-19 em mulheres grávidas. De fevereiro de 2020 a fevereiro de 2021, 15 maternidades do Brasil coletaram dados de mulheres com sintomas respiratórios. Selecionamos todas as mulheres com teste positivo para COVID-19; em seguida, as dividimos em dois grupos: mulheres negras e não negras. Finalmente, comparamos, entre os grupos, os resultados sociodemográficos, maternos e perinatais. Obtivemos a frequência dos eventos em cada grupo e comparamos usando o teste X2; Valores de p < 0,05 foram considerados significativos. Também estimamos o odds ratio (OR) e os intervalos de confiança (IC). RESULTADOS: 729 mulheres sintomáticas foram incluídas no estudo; desses, 285 foram positivos para COVID-19, 120 (42,1%) eram negros e 165 (57,9%) não eram negros. As mulheres negras apresentaram pior escolaridade (p = 0,037). O tempo de acesso ao sistema de saúde foi semelhante entre os dois grupos, com 26,3% incluídos com sete ou mais dias de sintomas. Síndrome respiratória aguda grave (OR 2,22 CI 1,17­4,21), admissão em unidade de terapia intensiva (OR 2,00 CI 1,07­3,74) e dessaturação na admissão (OR 3,72 CI 1,41­9,84) foram mais prováveis de ocorrer entre mulheres negras. A mortalidade materna foi maior entre as negras (7,8% vs. 2,6%, p = 0,048). Os resultados perinatais foram semelhantes entre os dois grupos. CONCLUSãO: Mulheres negras brasileiras tiveram maior probabilidade de morrer devido às consequências da COVID-19.

Brazilian Black Women are at Higher Risk for COVID-19 Complications: An Analysis of REBRACO, a National Cohort / Mulheres negras brasileiras correm maior risco de complicações da COVID-19: uma análise do REBRACO, uma coorte nacional

Abstract Objective To evaluate the impact of the race (Black versus non-Black) on maternal and perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19 in Brazil. Methods This is a subanalysis of REBRACO, a Brazilian multicenter cohort study designed to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on pregnant women. From February2020 until February 2021, 15 maternity hospitals in Brazil collected data on women with respiratory symptoms. We selected all women with a positive test for COVID-19; then, we divided them into two groups: Black and non-Black women. Finally, we compared, between groups, sociodemographic, maternal, and perinatal outcomes. We obtained the frequency of events in each group and compared them using X2 test; p-values < 0.05 were considered significant. We also estimated the odds ratio (OR) and confidence intervals (CI). Results 729 symptomatic women were included in the study; of those, 285 were positive for COVID-19, 120 (42.1%) were Black, and 165 (57.9%) were non-Black. Black women had worse education (p = 0.037). The timing of access to the health system was similar between both groups, with 26.3% being included with seven or more days of symptoms. Severe acute respiratory syndrome (OR 2.22 CI 1.17-4.21), intensive care unit admission (OR 2.00 CI 1.07-3.74), and desaturation at admission (OR 3.72 CI 1.41-9.84) were more likely to occur among Black women. Maternal death was higher among Black women (7.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.048). Perinatal outcomes were similar between both groups. Conclusion Brazilian Black women were more likely to die due to the consequences of COVID-19.

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar o impacto da raça (negra versus não negra) nos desfechos maternos e perinatais de gestantes com COVID-19 no Brasil. Métodos Esta é uma subanálise da REBRACO, um estudo de coorte multicêntrico brasileiro desenhado para avaliar o impacto da COVID-19 em mulheres grávidas. De fevereiro de 2020 a fevereiro de 2021, 15 maternidades do Brasil coletaram dados de mulheres com sintomas respiratórios. Selecionamos todas as mulheres com teste positivo para COVID-19; em seguida, as dividimos em dois grupos: mulheres negras e não negras. Finalmente, comparamos, entre os grupos, os resultados sociodemográficos, maternos e perinatais. Obtivemos a frequência dos eventos em cada grupo e comparamos usando o teste X2; Valores de p <0,05 foram considerados significativos. Também estimamos o odds ratio (OR) e os intervalos de confiança (IC). Resultados 729 mulheres sintomáticas foram incluídas no estudo; desses, 285 foram positivos para COVID-19, 120 (42,1%) eram negros e 165 (57,9%) não eram negros. As mulheres negras apresentaram pior escolaridade (p = 0,037). O tempo de acesso ao sistema de saúde foi semelhante entre os dois grupos, com 26,3% incluídos com sete ou mais dias de sintomas. Síndrome respiratória aguda grave (OR 2,22 CI 1,17-4,21), admissão em unidade de terapia intensiva (OR 2,00 CI 1,07-3,74) e dessaturação na admissão (OR 3,72 CI 1,41-9,84) foram mais prováveis de ocorrer entre mulheres negras. A mortalidade materna foi maior entre as negras (7,8% vs. 2,6%, p = 0,048). Os resultados perinatais foram semelhantes entre os dois grupos. Conclusão Mulheres negras brasileiras tiveram maior probabilidade de morrer devido às consequências da COVID-19.

The COVID-19 pandemic in Brazilian pregnant and postpartum women: results from the REBRACO prospective cohort study.

Brazil presented a very high number of maternal deaths and evident delays in healthcare. We aimed at evaluating the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated outcomes in the obstetric population. We conducted a prospective cohort study in 15 Brazilian centers including symptomatic pregnant or postpartum women with suspected COVID-19 from Feb/2020 to Feb/2021. Women were followed from suspected infection until the end of pregnancy. We analyzed maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes associated with confirmed COVID-19 infection and SARS, determining unadjusted risk ratios. In total, 729 symptomatic women with suspected COVID-19 were initially included. Among those investigated for COVID-19, 51.3% (n = 289) were confirmed COVID-19 and 48% (n = 270) were negative. Initially (before May 15th), only 52.9% of the suspected cases were tested and it was the period with the highest proportion of ICU admission and maternal deaths. Non-white ethnicity (RR 1.78 [1.04-3.04]), primary schooling or less (RR 2.16 [1.21-3.87]), being overweight (RR 4.34 [1.04-19.01]) or obese (RR 6.55 [1.57-27.37]), having public prenatal care (RR 2.16 [1.01-4.68]), planned pregnancies (RR 2.09 [1.15-3.78]), onset of infection in postpartum period (RR 6.00 [1.37-26.26]), chronic hypertension (RR 2.15 [1.37-4.10]), pre-existing diabetes (RR 3.20 [1.37-7.46]), asthma (RR 2.22 [1.14-4.34]), and anaemia (RR 3.15 [1.14-8.71]) were associated with higher risk for SARS. The availability of tests and maternal outcomes varied throughout the pandemic period of the study; the beginning was the most challenging period, with worse outcomes. Socially vulnerable, postpartum and previously ill women were more likely to present SARS related to COVID-19.

Preeclampsia among women with COVID-19 during pregnancy and its impact on maternal and perinatal outcomes: Results from a national multicenter study on COVID in Brazil, the REBRACO initiative.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of preeclampsia among cases of COVID-19 infection during pregnancy and the association between both conditions, in a multicenter cohort of Brazilian women with respiratory symptoms. STUDY DESIGN: Ancillary analysis of the Brazilian Network of COVID-19 in Obstetrics (REBRACO) study. We performed a nested case-control analysis selecting all women with COVID-19 and compared outcomes between women with and without PE. MAIN OUTCOMES: Maternal, gestational, and clinical characteristics and perinatal outcomes. MEASURES: Prevalence ratio (PR) and its 95%CI for each of the predictors and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 203 women were included: 21 (10.3%) in PE group and 182 (89.7%) in non-PE group. Preeclampsia was not different among women with and without COVID-19 (10.3% vs 13.1%, p-value = 0.41), neither complication such as eclampsia and HELLP syndrome. Chronic hypertension (33.4%) (p < 0.01) and obesity (60.0%) (p = 0.03) were the most frequent comorbidities in PE group, and they were significantly more frequent in this group. Women with PE had more cesarean section (RR 5.54 [1.33 - 23.14]) and their neonates were more frequently admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (PR 2.46[1.06 - 5.69]), most likely due to preterm-birth-related complications. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of PE among women with COVID-19 infection during pregnancy was around 10%; women with COVID-19 and a history of chronic hypertension or obesity are more likely to have preeclampsia. Cesarean section is increased among women with PE and COVID-19, with increased rates of neonatal admission to intensive care units, mostly due to prematurity.

Adequacy of Antenatal Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study with Postpartum Women / Adequação da assistência pré-natal durante a pandemia de covid-19: Estudo observacional com puérperas

Abstract Objective The present study aimed to evaluate the antenatal care adequacy for women who gave birth at the University Hospital of Santa Catarina in Florianopolis (Brazil) during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to evaluate the association of adequacy with sociodemographic, clinical, and access characteristics. Methods Data were collected between October and December 2020, including 254 patients who delivered in the University Hospital from Federal University of Santa Catarina and answered our questionnaires. Additional data were obtained from patients' antenatal booklets. Antenatal care was classified as adequate, intermediate, or inadequate according to the number of appointments, gestational age at the beginning of follow-up, and tests results. We carried out a descriptive statistical analysis and a bivariate/with odds ratio analysis onmaternal sociodemographic, clinical and health access variables that were compared with antenatal adequacy. Results Antenatal care was considered adequate in 35.8% of cases, intermediate in 46.8%, and inadequate in 17.4%. The followingmaternal variables were associated with inadequate prenatal care (intermediate or inadequate prenatal care): having black or brown skin colour, having two or more children, being of foreign nationality, not being fluent in Portuguese, and using illicit drugs during pregnancy; the clinical variables were more than 6 weeks between appointments, and not attending high-risk antenatal care; as for access, the variables were difficulties in attending or scheduling appointments, and attending virtual appointments only. Conclusion In a sample of pregnant women from a teaching hospital in Florianópolis during the COVID-19 pandemic, antenatal care was considered adequate in 35.8%, intermediate in 46.8%, and inadequate in 17.4% of cases.

Resumo Objetivo O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a adequabilidade do pré-natal de puérperas atendidas no hospital universitário da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, em Florianópolis, durante a pandemia de COVID-19 e avaliar a associação de características sociodemográficas, clínicas e de acesso com essa adequabilidade. Métodos Este estudo foi realizado de outubro a dezembro de 2020, com 254 puérperas que tiveram seus partos no hospital universitário. Os dados foram obtidos a partir de questionários respondidos pelas pacientes e dos seus cartões de pré-natal e prontuários para obter demais dados clínicos. O pré-natal foi classificado como adequado, intermediário ou inadequado segundo o número de consultas, idade gestacional ao início do pré-natal, e realização de exames. Inicialmente, se realizou uma análise estatística descritiva e, após, bivariada/com razão de chance quanto às variáveis maternas sociodemográficas, clínicas, e de acesso a saúde comparados com adequabilidade do pré-natal. Resultados O pré-natal foi considerado adequado em 35,8%, intermediário em 46,8% e inadequado em 17,4% dos casos. Estiveram associados a uma assistência pré-natal não-adequada (pré-natal intermediário ou inadequado) as seguintes variáveis maternas: cor de pele preta, parda, ou indígena, ter dois ou mais filhos, ser de nacionalidade estrangeira, não possuir fluência em português, uso de drogas ilícitas durante a gestação; as variáveis clinicas foram: lacuna de mais de 6 semanas entre consultas e não ser atendida em pré-natal de alto risco; quanto a acesso, as variáveis foram: dificuldade de ir e de agendar as consultas e ter tido consultas virtuais. Conclusão Em uma amostra de gestantes de um hospital universitário de Florianópolis durante a pandemia do Covid-19, a assistência pré-natal foi considerada adequada em 35,8%, intermediária em 46,8%, e inadequada em 17,4% dos casos.

Adequacy of Antenatal Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study with Postpartum Women.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the antenatal care adequacy for women who gave birth at the University Hospital of Santa Catarina in Florianopolis (Brazil) during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to evaluate the association of adequacy with sociodemographic, clinical, and access characteristics. METHODS: Data were collected between October and December 2020, including 254 patients who delivered in the University Hospital from Federal University of Santa Catarina and answered our questionnaires. Additional data were obtained from patients' antenatal booklets. Antenatal care was classified as adequate, intermediate, or inadequate according to the number of appointments, gestational age at the beginning of follow-up, and tests results. We carried out a descriptive statistical analysis and a bivariate/with odds ratio analysis on maternal sociodemographic, clinical and health access variables that were compared with antenatal adequacy. RESULTS: Antenatal care was considered adequate in 35.8% of cases, intermediate in 46.8%, and inadequate in 17.4%. The following maternal variables were associated with inadequate prenatal care (intermediate or inadequate prenatal care): having black or brown skin colour, having two or more children, being of foreign nationality, not being fluent in Portuguese, and using illicit drugs during pregnancy; the clinical variables were more than 6 weeks between appointments, and not attending high-risk antenatal care; as for access, the variables were difficulties in attending or scheduling appointments, and attending virtual appointments only. CONCLUSION: In a sample of pregnant women from a teaching hospital in Florianópolis during the COVID-19 pandemic, antenatal care was considered adequate in 35.8%, intermediate in 46.8%, and inadequate in 17.4% of cases.

OBJETIVO: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a adequabilidade do pré-natal de puérperas atendidas no hospital universitário da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, em Florianópolis, durante a pandemia de COVID-19 e avaliar a associação de características sociodemográficas, clínicas e de acesso com essa adequabilidade. MéTODOS: Este estudo foi realizado de outubro a dezembro de 2020, com 254 puérperas que tiveram seus partos no hospital universitário. Os dados foram obtidos a partir de questionários respondidos pelas pacientes e dos seus cartões de pré-natal e prontuários para obter demais dados clínicos. O pré-natal foi classificado como adequado, intermediário ou inadequado segundo o número de consultas, idade gestacional ao início do pré-natal, e realização de exames. Inicialmente, se realizou uma análise estatística descritiva e, após, bivariada/com razão de chance quanto às variáveis maternas sociodemográficas, clínicas, e de acesso a saúde comparados com adequabilidade do pré-natal. RESULTADOS: O pré-natal foi considerado adequado em 35,8%, intermediário em 46,8% e inadequado em 17,4% dos casos. Estiveram associados a uma assistência pré-natal não-adequada (pré-natal intermediário ou inadequado) as seguintes variáveis maternas: cor de pele preta, parda, ou indígena, ter dois ou mais filhos, ser de nacionalidade estrangeira, não possuir fluência em português, uso de drogas ilícitas durante a gestação; as variáveis clinicas foram: lacuna de mais de 6 semanas entre consultas e não ser atendida em pré-natal de alto risco; quanto a acesso, as variáveis foram: dificuldade de ir e de agendar as consultas e ter tido consultas virtuais. CONCLUSãO: Em uma amostra de gestantes de um hospital universitário de Florianópolis durante a pandemia do Covid-19, a assistência pré-natal foi considerada adequada em 35,8%, intermediária em 46,8%, e inadequada em 17,4% dos casos.

Maternal mortality and COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to collect and analyze data from different sources to have a general overview of COVID-19-related maternal deaths in Brazil, as well as to compare data with worldwide reports. STUDY DESIGN: We systematically searched data about COVID-19 maternal deaths from the Brazilian Ministry of Health surveillance system, State Departments of Health epidemiological reports, and media coverage. Data about timing of symptom onset and death (pregnancy or postpartum), gestational age, mode of birth, maternal age, comorbidities and/or risk factors, date of death, and place of death were retrieved when available. RESULTS: We identified 20 COVID-19-related maternal deaths, age range 20-43 years. Symptoms onset was reported as on pregnancy for 12 cases, postpartum for 3 cases, and during the cesarean section for 1 case (missing data for 4). In 16 cases, death occurred in the postpartum period. At least one comorbidity or risk factor was present in 11 cases (missing data for 4). Asthma was the most common risk factor (5/11). Ten cases occurred in the Northeast region, and nine cases occurred in the Southeast region (5 of them in São Paulo, the first epicenter of COVID-19 in the country). CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest available series of maternal deaths due to COVID-19. Barriers to access healthcare, differences in pandemic containment measures in the country and high prevalence of concomitant risk factors for COVID-19 severe disease may play a role in the observed disparity compared to worldwide reports on maternal outcomes.

Brazilian network of COVID-19 during pregnancy (REBRACO: a multicentre study protocol).

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, epidemiological and laboratory aspects of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and postpartum in 16 maternity hospitals. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective multicentre study, with five axes. First, the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among women admitted for childbirth will be described in a cross-sectional study. Second, maternal and perinatal outcomes will be assessed in a prospective cohort study including pregnant or postpartum women with suspected COVID-19. Third, a cohort of positive COVID-19 cases with sampling of a variety of biological material. Histopathological and viral analysis of biological maternal and neonatal samples will be performed, and the assessment of nutritional variables to evaluate the association between vitamin D and severity of infection. Fourth, a monitoring and evaluation committee to collect relevant healthcare information and plan actions in centres facing the pandemic. Furthermore, qualitative studies will be performed to study pregnant women, their families and health professionals. Fifth, an ecological study will monitor the number of live births, stillbirths and other outcomes to explore any trend among the periods before, during and after the pandemic. Data will systematically be collected in an electronic platform following standardised operational procedures. For quantitative study components, an appropriate statistical approach will be used for each analysis. For qualitative data, in-depth interviews recorded in audio will be transcribed, checking the text obtained with the recording. Subsequently, thematic analysis with the aid of the NVivo programme will be performed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained (letters of approval numbers 4.047.168, 4.179.679 and 4.083.988). All women will be fully informed to sign the consent form before enrolment in the study. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences.

[Prenatal care for normal-risk pregnant women by obstetric nurses and midwives: cost-effectiveness from the perspective of the Supplementary Health System in Brazil]. / Pré-natal de gestantes de risco habitual por enfermeira obstetra e obstetriz: custo-efetividade sob a perspectiva do Sistema de Saúde Suplementar.

In several countries, primary care for pregnant women is performed by obstetric nurses and/or midwives. In Brazil's Supplementary Health System (private health insurance and out-of-pocket care), coverage of prenatal care is mandatory and is performed by medical obstetricians. The objective of this study is to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis, comparing clinical outcomes and costs associated with the incorporation of prenatal care by obstetric nurses and midwives in the Supplementary Health System, from the perspective of the operator of health plans as the payment source. A decision tree was built, based on data from a Cochrane Collaboration meta-analysis that showed a reduction in the risk of premature birth in the group of normal-risk pregnant women accompanied by obstetric nurses and midwives. The analysis only considered the direct medical costs covered by health plan operators for essential appointments and tests, according to the prevailing Ministry of Health protocol. The study assumed equal unit costs of consultations by medical professionals and applied an increase in the overall cost of prenatal tests associated with medical follow-up, based on data from the literature. Incremental cost-effective ratio was estimated at -BRL 10,038.43 (savings of BRL 10,038.43) per premature birth avoided. This result was consistent with the sensitivity analyses, with savings associated with the substitution ranging from -BRL 2,544.60 to -BRL 31,807.46 per premature death avoided. In conclusion, prenatal care provided by obstetric nurses and midwives was superior to that provided by medical obstetricians for the prevention of premature birth, besides resulting in cost savings.

Em diversos países, a atenção primária às gestantes é conduzida por enfermeiras obstetras e/ou obstetrizes. No Sistema Suplementar de Saúde no Brasil, a cobertura da assistência pré-natal é obrigatória e realizada por médicos obstetras. O objetivo deste estudo é conduzir análise de custo-efetividade, comparando desfechos clínicos e custos associados à incorporação do pré-natal por enfermeiras obstetras e obstetrizes no âmbito do Sistema de Saúde Suplementar, sob a perspectiva da operadora de planos de saúde como fonte pagadora. Foi construída uma árvore de decisão, baseada nos dados de metanálise da Colaboração Cochrane que mostrou redução do risco de parto prematuro no grupo de gestantes de risco habitual acompanhado por enfermeiras obstetras e obstetrizes. Foram considerados apenas os custos médicos diretos cobertos pelas operadoras de planos de saúde para a realização de consultas e exames essenciais, conforme protocolo do Ministério da Saúde vigente. Assumiu-se custo unitário de consulta com cada profissional como iguais e aplicou-se um aumento do custo global com exames pré-natais associado ao acompanhamento médico, conforme dado obtido na literatura. Estimou-se a razão de custo-efetividade incremental de -R$ 10.038,43 (economia de R$ 10.038,43) por parto prematuro evitado. Esse resultado mostrou-se consistente nas análises de sensibilidade, com economias associadas à substituição variando de -R$ 2.544,60 até -R$ 31.807,46 por parto prematuro evitado. Como conclusão, observou-se que o cuidado pré-natal por enfermeiras obstetras e obstetrizes é superior ao prestado por médicos obstetras para o desfecho prevenção de parto prematuro, resultando ainda em economia de recursos.

En diversos países, la atención primaria a las gestantes se realiza con enfermeras obstetras y/o parteras. En el Sistema Suplementario de Salud en Brasil, la cobertura de la asistencia prenatal es obligatoria y la realizan médicos obstetras. El objetivo de este estudio es realizar un análisis de costo-efectividad, comparando resultados clínicos y costes asociados a la incorporación en el período prenatal de enfermeras obstetras y parteras, en el ámbito del Sistema de Salud Suplementaria, desde la perspectiva de una operadora de planes de salud como fuente pagadora. Se construyó un árbol de decisión, basado en datos de metaanálisis de la Colaboración Cochrane, que mostró una reducción del riesgo de parto prematuro en el grupo de gestantes de riesgo habitual, con un seguimiento de enfermeras obstetras y parteras. Se consideraron solo los costes médicos directos, cubiertos por las operadoras de planes de salud para la realización de consultas y exámenes esenciales, conforme el protocolo vigente del Ministerio de Salud. Se asumió el coste unitario de consulta con cada profesional como iguales, y se aplicó un aumento del coste global con exámenes prenatales asociado al seguimiento médico, conforme los datos obtenidos en la literatura. Se estimó la razón de costo-efectividad incremental de -BRL 10.038,43 (economía de BRL 10.038,43) por parto prematuro evitado. Este resultado se mostró consistente en los análisis de sensibilidad, con ahorros asociados a la sustitución, variando de -BRL 2.544,60 hasta -BRL 31.807,46 por parto prematuro evitado. Como conclusión, se observó que el cuidado prenatal por parte de enfermeras obstetras y parteras es superior al prestado por médicos obstetras para el desenlace de prevención de parto prematuro, resultando incluso en un ahorro de recursos.

Facing the COVID-19 pandemic inside maternities in Brazil: A mixed-method study within the REBRACO initiative.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 pandemic posed major challenges in obstetric health care services. Preparedness, development, and implementation of new protocols were part of the needed response. This study aims to describe the strategies implemented and the perspectives of health managers on the challenges to face the pandemic in 16 different maternity hospitals that comprise a multicenter study in Brazil, called REBRACO (Brazilian network of COVID-19 during pregnancy). METHODS: Mixed-method study, with quantitative and qualitative approaches. Quantitative data on the infrastructure of the units, maternal and perinatal health indicators, modifications on staff and human resources, from January to July/2020. Also, information on total number of cases, and availability for COVID-19 testing. A qualitative study by purposeful and saturation sampling was undertaken with healthcare managers, to understand perspectives on local challenges in facing the pandemic. RESULTS: Most maternities early implemented their contingency plan. REBRACO centers reported 338 confirmed COVID-19 cases among pregnant and post-partum women up to July 2020. There were 29 maternal deaths and 15 (51.8%) attributed to COVID-19. All maternities performed relocation of beds designated to labor ward, most (75%) acquired mechanical ventilators, only the minority (25%) installed new negative air pressure rooms. Considering human resources, around 40% hired extra health professionals and increased weekly workload and the majority (68.7%) also suspended annual leaves. Only one center implemented universal screening for childbirth and 6 (37.5%) implemented COVID-19 testing for all suspected cases, while around 60% of the centers only tested moderate/severe cases with hospital admission. Qualitative results showed that main challenges experienced were related to the fear of the virus, concerns about reliability of evidence and lack of resources, with a clear need for mental health support among health professionals. CONCLUSION: Study findings suggest that maternities of the REBRACO initiative underwent major changes in facing the pandemic, with limitations on testing, difficulties in infrastructure and human resources. Leadership, continuous training, implementation of evidence-based protocols and collaborative initiatives are key to transpose the fear of the virus and ascertain adequate healthcare inside maternities, especially in low and middle-income settings. Policy makers need to address the specificities in considering reproductive health and childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic and prioritize research and timely testing availability.

COVID-19-related deaths among women of reproductive age in Brazil: The burden of postpartum.

OBJECTIVE: To compare risk of death due to COVID-19 among pregnant, postpartum, and non-pregnant women of reproductive age in Brazil, using the severe acute respiratory syndrome surveillance system (SARS-SS). METHODS: A secondary analysis was performed of the Brazilian official SARS-SS, with data retrieved up to August 17, 2020. Cases were stratified by pregnancy status, risk factors or co-morbidities, and outcome (death or recovery). Multiple logistic regression was employed to examine associations between independent variables and risk of death. RESULTS: A total of 24 805 cases were included, with 3129 deaths (12.6%), including 271 maternal deaths. Postpartum was associated with increased risk of death, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU), and mechanical ventilation. Co-morbidities with higher impact on case fatality rate among non-obstetric cases were cancer and neurological and kidney diseases. Among pregnant women, cancer, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and rheumatology diseases were associated with risk of death. In the postpartum subgroup, age over 35 years and diabetes mellitus were independently associated with higher chance of death. CONCLUSION: Postpartum was associated with worse outcomes among the obstetric population, despite lower risk of dying without accessing ICU care. Non-pregnant women with cancer, neurological diseases, and kidney diseases have a higher risk of death due to COVID-19.

Women's well-being and functioning after evidence-based antenatal care: a protocol for a systematic review of intervention studies.

INTRODUCTION: The 2016 WHO antenatal guidelines propose evidence-based recommendations to improve maternal outcomes. We aim to complement these recommendations by describing and estimating the effects of the interventions recommended by WHO on maternal well-being or functioning. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review of experimental and quasi-experimental studies evaluating women's well-being or functioning following the implementation of evidence-based antenatal interventions, published in peer-reviewed journals through a 15-year interval (2005-2020). The lead reviewer will screen all records identified at MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, LILACS and SciELO. Two other reviewers will control screening strategy quality. Quality and risk of bias will be assessed using a specially designed instrument. Data synthesis will consider the instruments applied, how often they were used, conditions/interventions for positive or negative effects documented, statistical measures used to document effectiveness and how results were presented. A random-effects meta-analysis comparing frequently used instruments may be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be a systematic review with no human beings' involvement, therefore not requiring ethical approval. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and scientific events. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019143436.

The perinatal bereavement project: development and evaluation of supportive guidelines for families experiencing stillbirth and neonatal death in Southeast Brazil-a quasi-experimental before-and-after study.

BACKGROUND: For most parents, getting pregnant means having a child. Generally, the couple outlines plans and has expectations regarding the baby. When these plans are interrupted because of a perinatal loss, it turns out to be a traumatic experience for the family. Validating the grief of these losses has been a challenge to Brazilian society, which is evident considering the childbirth care offered to bereaved families in maternity wards. Positively assessed care that brings physical and emotional memories about the baby has a positive impact on the bereavement process that family undergoes. Therefore, this study aims to assess the effects supportive guidelines have on mental health. They were designed to assist grieving parents and their families while undergoing perinatal loss in public maternities in Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo state, Brazil. METHOD: A mixed-methods (qualitative/quantitative), quasi-experimental (before/after) study. The intervention is the implementation of bereavement supportive guidelines for women who experienced a stillbirth or a neonatal death. A total of forty women will be included. Twenty participants will be assessed before and twenty will be assessed after the implementation of the guidelines. A semi-structured questionnaire and three scales will be used to assess the effects of the guidelines. Health care professionals and managers of all childbirth facilities will be invited to participate in focus group. Data will be analyzed using statistical tests, as well as thematic analysis approach. DISCUSSION: The Perinatal Bereavement guidelines are a local adaptation of the Canadian and British corresponding guidelines. These guidelines have been developed based on the families' needs of baby memories during the bereavement process and include the following aspects: (1) Organization of care into periods, considering their respective needs along the process; (2) Creation of the Bereavement Professional figure in maternity wards; (3) Adequacy of the institutional environment; (4) Communication of the guidance; (5) Creation of baby memories. We expect that the current project generates additional evidence for improving the mental health of women and families that experience a perinatal loss. Trial registration RBR-3cpthr For many couples, getting pregnant does not only mean carrying a baby, but also having a child. Most of the time, the couple has already made many plans and has expectations towards the child. When these plans are interrupted because of a perinatal loss, it turns out to be a traumatic experience for the family. In Brazilian culture, validating this traumatic grief is very difficult, especially when it happens too soon. The barriers can be noticed not only by the way society deals with the parents' grief, but also when we see the care the grieving families receive from the health care establishment. Creating physical and emotional memories might bring the parents satisfaction regarding the care they receive when a baby dies. These memories can be built when there is good communication throughout the care received; shared decisions; the chance to see and hold the baby, as well as collect memories; privacy and continuous care during the whole process, including when there is a new pregnancy, childbirth and postnatal period. With this in mind, among the most important factors are the training of health staff and other professionals, the preparation of the maternity ward to support bereaved families and the continuous support to the professionals involved in the bereavement. This article proposes guidelines to support the families who are experiencing stillbirth and neonatal death. It may be followed by childbirth professionals (nurses, midwives, obstetricians and employees of a maternity ward), managers, researchers, policymakers or those interested in developing specific protocols for their maternity wards.

RESUMO: CONTEXTO: Uma assistência avaliada positivamente por mães e pais que passaram pela perda perinatal permite a criação de memórias físicas e afetivas do bebê e possuem efeitos positivos no processo de luto da família. Este estudo avaliará os efeitos de uma diretriz de acolhimento na saúde mental de mulheres em processo de luto perinatal e neonatal em maternidades públicas do município de Ribeirão Preto (SP, Brasil). MéTODO: Estudo de métodos mistos (quantitativo e qualitativo), quase-experimental (antes e depois). A intervenção é a implementação de diretrizes de acolhimento ao luto de mulheres que tiveram um natimorto ou óbito neonatal. Um total de quarenta mulheres serão incluídas. Vinte participantes serão avaliadas antes, e vinte após a implementação da diretriz de acolhimento nas instituições. Serão aplicadas três escalas e uma entrevista semiestruturada para avaliar os efeitos da diretriz. Profissionais da saúde e gestores serão convidados a participar de grupos focais. Os dados serão analisados por meio de testes estatísticos, e sob a metodologia de análise temática. A diretriz de acolhimento contará com material baseado em diretrizes canadense e britânica. DISCUSSãO: As diretrizes brasileiras de luto perinatal propostas são uma adaptação local das diretrizes canadense e britânica. Baseamo-nos na necessidade da família por memórias físicas e afetivas da criança morta para facilitar a vivência do processo do luto. Elas incluem os seguintes aspectos: (1) organização dos períodos da assistência a partir de suas respectivas necessidades, (2) criação do papel do Profissional do Luto, (3) ambientação das instituições, (4) disseminação das diretrizes e (5) criação de memórias do bebê. Espera-se que o projeto gere evidências adicionais para melhorar a saúde mental de mulheres e famílias que vivenciam uma perda perinatal. Registro do estudo: RBR-3cpthr.

Long-Term Consequences of Severe Maternal Morbidity on Infant Growth and Development.

OBJECTIVE: Severe maternal morbidity (SMM) is already known to be associated with adverse neonatal outcomes, however, its association with long-term deficits of weight and height, and impairment in neurodevelopment among children was not yet fully assessed. We aim to evaluate whether SMM has repercussions on the weight and height-for-age and neurodevelopmental status of the child. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis with women who had SMM events in a tertiary referral center in Brazil. They were compared to a control group of women who had not experienced any SMM. Childbirth and perinatal characteristics, weight and height-for-age deficits and neurodevelopmental impairment suspicion by Denver II Test were comparatively assessed in both groups using RR and 95% CI. Multiple regression analysis was used addressing deficit of weight-for-age, height-for-age and an altered Denver Test, estimating their independent adjusted RR and 95% CI. RESULTS: 634 women with perinatal outcomes available (311 with SMM and 323 without) and 571 children were assessed. Among women with SMM, increased rates in perinatal deaths, Apgar lower than 7 at five minutes, shorter breastfeeding period, preterm birth (49.0% × 11.1%), low birthweight (45.8% × 11.5%), deficits of weight-for-age [RR 3.11 (1.60-6.04)] and height-for-age [RR 1.52 (1.06-2.19)] and altered Denver Test [RR 1.5 (1.02-2.36)] were more frequently found than in the control group. SMM was not identified as independently associated with any of the main outcomes. CONCLUSION: SMM showed to be associated with a negative impact on growth and neurodevelopment aspects of perinatal and infant health. These findings suggest that effective health policies directed towards appropriate care of pregnancy may have an impact on the reduction of maternal, neonatal and infant morbidity and mortality.