ABSTRACT
Patients with hematologic malignancies have poor outcomes from COVID infection and are less likely to mount an antibody response after COVID infection. There is limited data on the efficacy of the COVID vaccines in lymphoma patients, and to suggest the optimal timing of vaccination to elicit immunity in patients receiving immunochemotherapy. This is a retrospective study of adult lymphoma patients who received the COVID vaccine between 12/1/2020 and 11/30/2021. The primary endpoint was a positive anti-COVID spike protein antibody titer following the primary COVID vaccination series. The primary series was defined as 2 doses of the COVID mRNA vaccines or 1 dose of the COVID adenovirus vaccine. Subgroups were compared using Fishers exact test, and unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models were used for univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) analyses. A total of 243 patients were included in this study; 72 patients (30%) with indolent lymphomas; 56 patients (23%) with Burkitts, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBL) combined; 55 patients (22%) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL); and 44 patients (18%) with Hodgkin and T-cell lymphomas (HL/TCL) combined. One-hundred fifty-eight patients (65%) developed anti-COVID spike protein antibodies after completing the primary COVID vaccination series. Thirty-eight of 46 (83%) patients who received an additional primary shot and had resultant levels produced anti-COVID spike protein antibodies. When compared to other lymphoma types, patients with CLL/SLL had a numerically lower seroconversion rate of 51% following the primary series whereas patients with HL/TCL appeared to have a robust antibody response with a seropositivity rate of 77% (p=0.04). Lymphoma patients are capable of mounting a humoral response to the COVID mRNA vaccines. Further studies are required to confirm our findings, including whether T-cell immunity would be of clinical relevance in this patient population.
ABSTRACT
Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 with high transmission and immune evasion potential, the so-called Variants of Concern (VOC), is a major concern. We describe the early genomic epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 recovered from vaccinated healthcare professionals (HCP). Our post-vaccination COVID-19 symptoms-based surveillance program among HCPs in a 17-hospital network, identified all vaccinated HCP who tested positive for COVID-19 after routine screening or after self-reporting. From 01/01/2021 to 04/30/2021, 23,687 HCP received either mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. All available post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 samples and a random collection from non-vaccinated patients during the similar timeframe were subjected to VOC screening and whole genome sequencing (WGS). 62% (23,697/37,500) of HCPs received at least one vaccine dose, with 95% (22,458) fully vaccinated. We detected 138 (0.58%, 138/23,697) COVID-19 cases, 105 among partially vaccinated and 33 (0.15%, 33/22,458) among fully vaccinated. Five partially vaccinated required hospitalization, four with supplemental oxygen. VOC screening from 16 fully vaccinated HCPs identified 6 (38%) harboring N501Y and 1 (6%) with E484K polymorphisms; concurrent non-vaccinated samples was 37% (523/1404) and 20% (284/1394), respectively. There was an upward trend from January to April for E484K/Q (3% to 26%) and N501Y (1% to 49%). WGS analysis from vaccinated and non-vaccinated individuals indicated highly congruent phylogenies. We did not detect an increased frequency of any RBD/NTD polymorphism between groups (P>0.05). Our results support robust protection by vaccination, particularly among recipients of both doses. Despite VOCs accounting for over 40% of SARS-CoV-2 from fully vaccinated individuals, the genomic diversity appears to proportionally represent those among non-vaccinated populations. IMPORTANCEA number of highly effective vaccines have been developed and deployed to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. The emergence and epidemiological dominance of SARS-CoV-2 mutants, with high transmission potential and immune evasion properties, the so-called Variants of Concern (VOC), continues to be a major concern. Whether these VOCs alter the efficacy of the administered vaccines is of great concern, and a critical question to study. We describe the initial genomic epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 recovered from vaccinated healthcare professionals and probe specifically for VOC enrichment. Our findings support the high-level of protection provided by full vaccination despite a steep increase in the prevalence of polymorphisms associated with increased transmission potential (N501Y) and immune evasion (E484K) in the non-vaccinated population. Thus, we do not find evidence of VOC enrichment among vaccinated groups. Overall, the genomic diversity of SARS-CoV-2 recovered post-vaccination appears to proportionally represent the observed viral diversity within the community.
ABSTRACT
BackgroundHydroxychloroquine has not been associated with improved survival among hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the majority of observational studies and similarly was not identified as an effective prophylaxis following exposure in a prospective randomized trial. We aimed to explore the role of hydroxychloroquine therapy in mildly symptomatic patients diagnosed in the outpatient setting. MethodsWe examined the association between outpatient hydroxychloroquine exposure and the subsequent progression of disease among mildly symptomatic non-hospitalized patients with documented SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome assessed was requirement of hospitalization. Data was obtained from a retrospective review of electronic health records within a New Jersey USA multi-hospital network. We compared outcomes in patients who received hydroxychloroquine with those who did not applying a multivariable logistic model with propensity matching. ResultsAmong 1274 outpatients with documented SARS-CoV-2 infection 7.6% were prescribed hydroxychloroquine. In a 1067 patient propensity matched cohort, 21.6% with outpatient exposure to hydroxychloroquine were hospitalized, and 31.4% without exposure were hospitalized. In the primary multivariable logistic regression analysis with propensity matching there was an association between exposure to hydroxychloroquine and a decreased rate of hospitalization from COVID-19 (OR 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29, 0.95). Sensitivity analyses revealed similar associations. QTc prolongation events occurred in 2% of patients prescribed hydroxychloroquine with no reported arrhythmia events among those with data available. ConclusionsIn this retrospective observational study of SARS-CoV-2 infected non-hospitalized patients hydroxychloroquine exposure was associated with a decreased rate of subsequent hospitalization. Additional exploration of hydroxychloroquine in this mildly symptomatic outpatient population is warranted. Lay SummaryIn this observational study of 1,274 COVID-19 patients, hydroxychloroquine given as an outpatient treatment was associated with a 47% reduction in the hazard of hospitalization. Adverse events were not increased (2% QTc prolongation events, 0% arrhythmias). Further validation is required. Use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19 in the outpatient setting should be reserved for a clinical trial or after discussion with a physician regarding risks and benefits.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVESTo determine the rate of intubation, overall survival, viral clearance, and the development of endogenous antibodies in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia treated with convalescent plasma containing high levels of neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. We also aimed to describe the laboratory parameters of the plasma products. DESIGNThis was a phase IIa, single institution, prospective study in adults hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. SETTINGHackensack University Medical Center, a 770-bed research and teaching hospital located in Bergen County NJ, 11 km from New York City. The study was conducted between April 15 and June 18, 2020. PARTICIPANTS47 hospitalized adult patients were treated: 32 in the non-mechanically ventilated group and 15 in the mechanically ventilated group. All patients had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia by radiographic and laboratory evaluation. INTERVENTIONFresh or frozen convalescent plasma from donors with high titers of viral neutralizing antibodies was administered. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESIncidence of intubation, overall survival, and discharge rate of patients divided in cohorts based on severity of disease. Description of infused plasma characteristics. Evaluation of recipients pre-treatment viral immunity, immunity transfer from convalescent plasma administration, and late immunity 30 and 60 days after treatment. Rates of viral clearance by nasopharyngeal PCR at 10 and 30 days. Outcomes of patients with no pre-treatment immunity. Survival comparison with institutional data for each cohort. RESULTSAnalysis for the non-mechanically ventilated patients showed an intubation rate of 15.6% (95% CI: 5.3%-32.8%) and a day-30 survival rate of 87.5% (28/32; 95% CI:70.2%-96.4%). The overall survival for a comparative group based on institutional data was 66% (675/1023; p=0.012). The rates of negative nasopharyngeal swab by PR-PCR on day+10 and +30 post treatment were 42.9% (95% CI: 24%-63%) and 78% (95% CI: 56%-93%) respectively. Patients mechanically ventilated had a day-30 mortality of 46.7% (95% CI:21.3%-73.4%); the mortality for a comparative group based on institutional data was 68.5% (217/317; p=0.093). The rates of negative nasopharyngeal swab by PR-PCR at day+10 and +30 was 85.7% (95% CI: 42-100%; n=7) and 100% (95% CI: 63-100%; n=8). Seven patients (15%) had no pre-infusion immunity, and all were found to have anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing titers three days post infusion. All evaluable patients were found to have neutralizing antibodies on day+30 (n=30) and on day+60 (n=12) post treatment. There was no difference in outcomes within the ranges of high antiviral neutralizing titers used, mostly greater than 1:1000. There was also no difference between fresh or frozen plasma. The only adverse event was a mild rash in one patient. CONCLUSIONIn this study of adult patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, convalescent plasma was safe and conferred effective transfer of immunity while preserving endogenous immune response. Intubation rates, survival rates compared with institutional data, and viral clearance rates, support the continued evaluation of this antiviral modality. STUDY REGISTRATIONClinicalTrials.gov NTC04343755
ABSTRACT
BackgroundHydroxychloroquine has been touted as a COVID-19 treatment. Tocilizumab, an inhibitor of IL-6, has been proposed as a treatment of critically ill patients. ObjectiveTo describe the association between mortality and hydroxychloroquine or tocilizumab therapy among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. DesignRetrospective observational cohort study of electronic health records Setting: 13-hospital network spanning the state of New Jersey. ParticipantsPatients hospitalized between March 1, 2020 and April 22, 2020 with positive polymerase chain reaction results for SARS-CoV-2. Follow up was through May 5, 2020. Main OutcomesThe primary outcome was death. ResultsAmong 2512 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 there have been 547 deaths (22%), 1539 (61%) discharges and 426 (17%) remain hospitalized. 1914 (76%) received at least one dose of hydroxychloroquine and 1473 (59%) received hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin. After adjusting for imbalances via propensity modeling, compared to receiving neither drug, there were no significant differences in associated mortality for patients receiving any hydroxychloroquine during the hospitalization (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.80-1.22]), hydroxychloroquine alone (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.83-1.27]), or hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.75-1.28]). The 30-day unadjusted mortality for patients receiving hydroxychloroquine alone, azithromycin alone, the combination or neither drug was 25%, 20%, 18%, and 20%, respectively. Among 547 evaluable ICU patients, including 134 receiving tocilizumab in the ICU, an exploratory analysis found a trend towards an improved survival association with tocilizumab treatment (adjusted HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.57-1.00]), with 30 day unadjusted mortality with and without tocilizumab of 46% versus 56%. ConclusionsThis observational cohort study suggests hydroxychloroquine, either alone or in combination with azithromycin, was not associated with a survival benefit among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Tocilizumab demonstrated a trend association towards reduced mortality among ICU patients. Our findings are limited to hospitalized patients and must be interpreted with caution while awaiting results of randomized trials. Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04347993
ABSTRACT
IntroductionCOVID-19 disproportionately affects those with comorbidities and the elderly. Hypertension is the most common pre-existing condition amongst COVID-19 patients. Upregulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is common in hypertensive patients and may promote inflammation and ensuing cytokine storm in COVID-19. It is unknown whether RAAS inhibition with ACE1 inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) can be harmful or beneficial. MethodsWithin Hackensack Meridian Health network, the largest healthcare provider in New Jersey, we performed a retrospective, multicenter, convenience sampling study of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were manually abstracted. Fishers exact tests, and logistic regression were performed. ResultsAmong 3017 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, 1584 (52.5%) carried a diagnosis of hypertension. In the discharged or deceased cohort, the overall mortality was significantly increased at 35% vs 13% among COVID-19 patients with hypertension. However, when adjusted for age, the effect of hypertension on mortality was greatly diminished, with a reduction in odds-ratio by over half; and completely disappeared when adjusted for other major covariates. The mortality rates were lower for hypertensive patients prescribed ACE1 (27%, p=0.001) or ARBs (33%, p=0.12) compared to other anti-hypertensive agents (39%) in the unadjusted analyses. RAAS inhibitor therapy appeared protective compared to other anti-hypertensive agents (p=0.001). ConclusionsWhile our results are limited by the retrospective nature of our study and by potential confounders, our data argue against a harmful effect of RAAS inhibition and support the HFSA/AHA/ACC joint statement recommending continuing ACE1 and ARB therapy in hypertensive COVID-19 patients.
