Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Crit Rev Toxicol ; 44(4): 348-91, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24494825

ABSTRACT

The framework analysis previously presented for using DNA adduct information in the risk assessment of chemical carcinogens was applied in a series of case studies which place the adduct information into context with the key events in carcinogenesis to determine whether they could be used to support a mutagenic mode of action (MOA) for the examined chemicals. Three data-rich chemicals, aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), tamoxifen (Tam) and vinyl chloride (VCl) were selected for this exercise. These chemicals were selected because they are known human carcinogens and have different characteristics: AFB1 forms a unique adduct and human exposure is through contaminated foods; Tam is a pharmaceutical given to women so that the dose and duration of exposure are known, forms unique adducts in rodents, and has both estrogenic and genotoxic properties; and VCl, to which there is industrial exposure, forms a number of adducts that are identical to endogenous adducts found in unexposed people. All three chemicals produce liver tumors in rats. AFB1 and VCl also produce liver tumors in humans, but Tam induces human uterine tumors, only. To support a mutagenic MOA, the chemical-induced adducts must be characterized, shown to be pro-mutagenic, be present in the tumor target tissue, and produce mutations of the class found in the tumor. The adducts formed by AFB1 and VCl support a mutagenic MOA for their carcinogenicity. However, the data available for Tam shows a mutagenic MOA for liver tumors in rats, but its carcinogenicity in humans is most likely via a different MOA.


Subject(s)
Aflatoxin B1/toxicity , DNA Adducts , Mutagens/toxicity , Risk Assessment/methods , Tamoxifen/toxicity , Vinyl Chloride/toxicity , Aflatoxin B1/pharmacokinetics , Animals , Carcinogens/toxicity , DNA Adducts/analysis , DNA Adducts/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Liver Neoplasms, Experimental/chemically induced , Mutation , Rats , Tamoxifen/pharmacokinetics , Tissue Distribution , Vinyl Chloride/pharmacokinetics
2.
Crit Rev Toxicol ; 41(3): 230-68, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21401327

ABSTRACT

Methyl methacrylate (MMA) is a respiratory irritant and dermal sensitizer that has been associated with occupational asthma in a small number of case reports. Those reports have raised concern that it might be a respiratory sensitizer. To better understand that possibility, we reviewed the in silico, in chemico, in vitro, and in vivo toxicology literature, and also epidemiologic and occupational medicine reports related to the respiratory effects of MMA. Numerous in silico and in chemico studies indicate that MMA is unlikely to be a respiratory sensitizer. The few in vitro studies suggest that MMA has generally weak effects. In vivo studies have documented contact skin sensitization, nonspecific cytotoxicity, and weakly positive responses on local lymph node assay; guinea pig and mouse inhalation sensitization tests have not been performed. Cohort and cross-sectional worker studies reported irritation of eyes, nose, and upper respiratory tract associated with short-term peaks exposures, but little evidence for respiratory sensitization or asthma. Nineteen case reports described asthma, laryngitis, or hypersensitivity pneumonitis in MMA-exposed workers; however, exposures were either not well described or involved mixtures containing more reactive respiratory sensitizers and irritants. The weight of evidence, both experimental and observational, argues that MMA is not a respiratory sensitizer.


Subject(s)
Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Irritants/toxicity , Methylmethacrylates/toxicity , Respiratory Mucosa/drug effects , Air Pollutants, Occupational/chemistry , Air Pollutants, Occupational/toxicity , Animals , Asthma/chemically induced , Asthma/epidemiology , Asthma/immunology , Computer Simulation , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Inhalation Exposure/adverse effects , Inhalation Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Irritants/chemistry , Laryngitis/chemically induced , Laryngitis/epidemiology , Laryngitis/immunology , Methylmethacrylates/chemistry , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Mucosa/immunology , Structure-Activity Relationship
3.
Crit Rev Toxicol ; 39(8): 659-78, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19743944

ABSTRACT

The assessment of human cancer risk from chemical exposure requires the integration of diverse types of data. Such data involve effects at the cell and tissue levels. This report focuses on the specific utility of one type of data, namely DNA adducts. Emphasis is placed on the appreciation that such DNA adduct data cannot be used in isolation in the risk assessment process but must be used in an integrated fashion with other information. As emerging technologies provide even more sensitive quantitative measurements of DNA adducts, integration that establishes links between DNA adducts and accepted outcome measures becomes critical for risk assessment. The present report proposes an organizational approach for the assessment of DNA adduct data (e.g., type of adduct, frequency, persistence, type of repair process) in concert with other relevant data, such as dosimetry, toxicity, mutagenicity, genotoxicity, and tumor incidence, to inform characterization of the mode of action. DNA adducts are considered biomarkers of exposure, whereas gene mutations and chromosomal alterations are often biomarkers of early biological effects and also can be bioindicators of the carcinogenic process.


Subject(s)
Carcinogens/toxicity , DNA Adducts/analysis , Data Collection/methods , Environmental Exposure , Neoplasms/etiology , Neoplasms/genetics , Animals , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Risk Assessment/methods
4.
Crit Rev Toxicol ; 39(6): 462-86, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19545197

ABSTRACT

Propylene oxide (PO) is an important industrial chemical used primarily in the synthesis of other compounds. Inhalation carcinogenesis studies in rodents, with no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) of 100 and 200 ppm, have revealed that chronic, high exposure to PO can induce tumors at the site of contact. Despite these characteristics, there is no evidence that typical environmental or occupational exposures to PO constitute a health risk for humans. The nongenotoxic effects of PO (glutathione depletion and cell proliferation) that augment its DNA-reactive and non-DNA-reactive genotoxicity are expected to be similar in humans and rodents. Available evidence on mode-of-action suggests that cancer induction by PO at the site of contact in rodents is characterized by a practical threshold. Human toxicity reference values for potential carcinogenic effects of PO were derived based on nasal tumors identified in rodent studies and specified uncertainty factors. The 95% lower confidence limit on the dose producing a 10% increase in additional tumor risk (LED10) was calculated using the rat and mouse data sets. The human reference values derived from the rat and mouse LED10 values were 0.7 and 0.5 ppm PO, respectively. A similar noncancer reference value, 0.4 ppm, was derived on the basis of non-neoplastic nasal effects in rats.


Subject(s)
Carcinogens/analysis , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Epoxy Compounds/analysis , Threshold Limit Values , Animals , Carcinogens/metabolism , Carcinogens/toxicity , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/standards , Epoxy Compounds/metabolism , Epoxy Compounds/toxicity , Humans , Reference Values , Risk Assessment
5.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 35(3): 308-19, 2002 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12202046

ABSTRACT

Mice are particularly sensitive to respiratory tract toxicity following styrene exposure. Inhalation of styrene by mice results in cytotoxicity in terminal bronchioles, followed by increased incidence of bronchioloalveolar tumors, as well as degeneration and atrophy of nasal olfactory epithelium. In rats, no effects on terminal bronchioles are seen, but effects in the nasal olfactory epithelium do occur, although to a lesser degree and from higher exposure concentrations. In addition, cytotoxicity and tumor formation are not related to blood levels of styrene or styrene oxide (SO) as measured in chronic studies. Whole-body metabolism studies have indicated major differences in styrene metabolism between rats and mice. The major differences are 4- to 10-fold more ring-oxidation and phenylacetaldehyde pathways in mice compared to rats. The data indicate that local metabolism of styrene is responsible for cytotoxicity in the respiratory tract. Cytotoxicity is seen in tissues that are high in CYP2F P450 isoforms. These tissues have been demonstrated to produce a high ratio of R-SO compared to S-SO (at least 2.4 : 1). In other rat tissues the ratio is less than 1, while in mouse liver the ratio is about 1.1. Inhibition of CYP2F with 5-phenyl-1-pentyne prevents the styrene-induced cytotoxicity in mouse terminal bronchioles and nasal olfactory epithelium. R-SO has been shown to be more toxic to mouse terminal bronchioles than S-SO. In addition, 4-vinylphenol (ring oxidation of styrene) has been shown to be highly toxic to mouse terminal bronchioles and is also metabolized by CYP2F. In human nasal and lung tissues, styrene metabolism to SO is below the limit of detection in nearly all samples, and the most active sample of lung was approximately 100-fold less active than mouse lung tissue. We conclude that styrene respiratory tract toxicity in mice and rats, including mouse lung tumors, are mediated by CYP2F-generated metabolites. The PBPK model predicts that humans do not generate sufficient levels of these metabolites in the terminal bronchioles to reach a toxic level. Therefore, the postulated mode of action for these effects indicates that respiratory tract effects in rodents are not relevant for human risk assessment.


Subject(s)
Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System/metabolism , Lung Neoplasms/chemically induced , Respiratory System/drug effects , Styrene/toxicity , Animals , Humans , Inhalation Exposure , Isoenzymes , Lung/drug effects , Lung/metabolism , Lung Neoplasms/enzymology , Mice , Models, Biological , Nasal Mucosa/drug effects , Nasal Mucosa/metabolism , Rats , Respiratory System/enzymology , Risk Assessment , Species Specificity , Styrene/pharmacokinetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...