Female patients are less satisfied with biological treatment for psoriasis and experience more side-effects than male patients: results from the prospective BioCAPTURE registry.

BACKGROUND: Female sex has been reported as a predictor for treatment discontinuation with biological therapies for psoriasis, although reasons remain unclear. It can be hypothesized that lower satisfaction with biological treatment in women might add to the lower drug survival rates. OBJECTIVES: To identify possible differences in satisfaction with biological treatment between female and male patients using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM). METHODS: Data of psoriasis patients treated with biologics were obtained from the prospective, multicentre, daily-practice BioCAPTURE registry. Longitudinal TSQM data were analysed by linear mixed models. Relevant patient characteristics were incorporated as possible confounding factors. Post hoc analysis of adverse events was performed in order to investigate differences between sexes. RESULTS: We included 315 patients with 396 corresponding treatment episodes (137 adalimumab, 90 etanercept, 137 ustekinumab, 24 secukinumab and 8 infliximab). Almost forty per cent of the patients were female. Women had significantly lower baseline PASI scores (P = 0.01). Longitudinal analyses demonstrated lower TSQM scores for 'side-effects' (P = 0.05) and 'global satisfaction' (P = 0.01) in female patients compared with male patients over 1 year of treatment. Women reported more relevant adverse events in the context of biologic treatment compared to men (rate ratio 1.79; P < 0.001), with more fungal (rate ratio 2.20; P = 0.001) and herpes simplex infections (rate ratio 3.25; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a prospective, longitudinal analysis of treatment satisfaction with biologics in female and male patients with psoriasis. Women were slightly less satisfied with treatment regarding side-effects and global satisfaction. Differences in treatment satisfaction and side-effects might add to the fact that women discontinue biological treatments more often.

Comparison of the 1- and 5-year effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and ustekinumab in patients with psoriasis in daily clinical practice: results from the prospective BioCAPTURE registry.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of etanercept and ustekinumab in psoriasis has been compared in one randomized controlled trial. Comparison of the long-term effectiveness of biologics in daily-practice psoriasis treatment is currently lacking. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness between the three widely used outpatient biologics adalimumab, etanercept and ustekinumab in daily-practice psoriasis treatment and to correct for confounders. METHODS: Data were extracted from the prospective, multicentre BioCAPTURE registry. Multilevel linear regression analyses (MLRAs) and generalized estimating equation (GEE) analyses were performed on the course of mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and PASI 75 (≥ 75% reduction vs. baseline). Both models were corrected for confounders. Subgroup analyses for biological dose were performed. RESULTS: We included 356 patients with 513 treatment episodes: 178 adalimumab, 245 etanercept and 90 ustekinumab. MLRA showed a similar effectiveness between adalimumab, etanercept and ustekinumab after 1 year, but the highest effectiveness for ustekinumab during 5 years of treatment (P = 0·047; ustekinumab vs. etanercept, P = 0·019). GEE analysis revealed a higher chance of attaining PASI 75 with adalimumab and ustekinumab than with etanercept at 1 year of treatment. A higher than label dose was more often used in patients treated with etanercept (adalimumab, etanercept and ustekinumab: respectively 31·5%, 55·1% and 17% after 1 year, P < 0·001; 39·3%, 71·4% and 24% after 5 years, P < 0·001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with etanercept, ustekinumab had the highest effectiveness during 5 years of treatment. Patients receiving adalimumab and ustekinumab more often reached PASI 75 than those on etanercept at 1 year of treatment. Dose escalation was more frequent in etanercept and adalimumab than in ustekinumab.

Comparing treatment goals for psoriasis with treatment decisions in daily practice: results from a prospective cohort of patients with psoriasis treated with biologics: BioCAPTURE.

BACKGROUND: Treatment goals have been developed to optimize daily clinical practice psoriasis care, but have not yet been studied in real life. OBJECTIVES: To investigate to what extent treatment decisions made by dermatologists in daily clinical practice for patients with psoriasis on biologics are already in accordance with treatment goals without the active application of the treatment goals algorithm. METHODS: Data were extracted from a prospective daily practice cohort of patients with psoriasis on biologics. Analysis was done on effectiveness (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score) and quality of life (Dermatology Life Quality Index questionnaire). Treatment decisions such as dosage adjustments, combination treatments, or switching therapy were compared with the treatment goals algorithm. RESULTS: In 64% (253 of 395) of visits, physicians followed the treatment goals algorithm. There were 162 (41%) visits in which there should have been a treatment modification according to treatment goals (group Modify) and a modification was indeed made in 59 of these 162 visits (36%). In 233 (59%) visits no treatment modification was necessary (group Continue) and therapy was indeed not modified in 194 of 233 visits (83%). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians acted in accordance with treatment goals in the majority of patient visits. In the patient group not achieving these goals, physicians should have modified therapy according to treatment goals but continued the same therapeutic regimen in the majority of visits. Optimizing therapy and defining barriers in the latter group might increase treatment results in daily practice psoriasis care.

'Happy' drug survival of adalimumab, etanercept and ustekinumab in psoriasis in daily practice care: results from the BioCAPTURE network.

BACKGROUND: Drug survival is a marker for treatment success. To date, no analyses relating dermatological quality-of-life measures to drug survival have been published. OBJECTIVES: (i) To describe 1-year drug survival for adalimumab, etanercept and ustekinumab in a daily practice psoriasis cohort, and (ii) to introduce the concept of 'happy' drug survival, defined as Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ≤ 5 combined with being 'on drug' at a specific time point. METHODS: Data were extracted from a prospective registry. Drug survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. 'Happy' drug survival was calculated, with data split into 'happy' (DLQI ≤ 5) vs. 'unhappy' (DLQI > 5) at baseline and months 3, 6, 9 and 12. RESULTS: 249 treatment episodes were included (101 adalimumab, 82 etanercept, 66 ustekinumab). The 1-year drug survival rates for ustekinumab, adalimumab and etanercept were 85%, 74% and 68%, respectively. Ustekinumab showed a better confounder-corrected drug survival vs. etanercept [hazard ratio (HR) 3·8, P = 0·02] and a trend towards better survival vs. adalimumab (HR 2·3, P = 0·1). At baseline, the majority (n = 115, 73%) was considered 'unhappy' and a minority 'happy' (n = 42, 27%) (ratio 'happy':'unhappy' was 1 : 2.7). The percentage of treatment episodes with 'happy' on-drug patients increased to 79% after 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Ustekinumab showed a better overall drug survival than etanercept, and a trend towards a better overall drug survival than adalimumab. After 1 year, patients reported to be 'happy' in 79% of episodes and 'unhappy' in 21%. We introduced the new concept of 'happy' drug survival because the proportion of on-drug patients with good quality of life is an important indicator for treatment success.

Satisfaction of treatment with biologics is high in psoriasis: results from the Bio-CAPTURE network.

BACKGROUND: Although the effectiveness of biologics for psoriasis has been measured extensively with objective outcome measures, studies based on subjective, patient-reported outcome measures remain scarce. OBJECTIVES: To investigate satisfaction with medication, as measured by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) for biologics in daily practice psoriasis care in the first 6 months of treatment; and to identify possible differences in satisfaction with medication between patients experienced (biologics-experienced) and inexperienced (biologics-inexperienced) in the use of biologics. METHODS: TSQM baseline measurements were compared using measurements taken after 6 months, using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired comparisons. Intention-to-treat with last observation carried forward (ITT with LOCF) and as-treated analyses were performed. The difference between biologics-experienced and biologics-inexperienced patients for TSQM was analysed using ITT with LOCF. At 6 months, outcomes for biologics-experienced and biologics-inexperienced patients were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: One hundred and six patients were eligible for analysis, and treated with etanercept (n = 34), adalimumab (n = 49) or ustekinumab (n = 23). Fifty-four per cent of patients were biologics-inexperienced. A statistically significant improvement was seen in all domains of the TSQM ('effectiveness', 'side-effects', 'convenience' and 'global satisfaction') by comparison of months 3 or 6 with baseline (all P ≤ 0·02). After 6 months, biologics-inexperienced patients scored better on the 'global satisfaction' domain than biologics-experienced patients (P < 0·01). CONCLUSIONS: We provide a prospective, longitudinal analysis of TSQM for biologics in daily practice psoriasis care. High satisfaction rates were achieved. The 'effectiveness' and 'convenience' domains showed the most room for improvement.