Postoperative Delirium After Intracranial Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance of postoperative delirium (POD) in neurosurgery remains unclear and should be investigated because these patients are vulnerable. Hence, we investigated the impact of POD, by means of incidence and health outcomes, and identified independent risk factors. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing an intracranial surgical procedure in the Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam between June 2017 and September 2020 were retrospectively included. POD incidence, defined by a Delirium Observation Screening Scale (DOSS) ≥3 or antipsychotic treatment for delirium within 5 days after surgery, was calculated. Logistic regression analysis on the full data set was conducted for the multivariable risk factor and health outcome analyses. RESULTS: After including 2901 intracranial surgical procedures, POD was present in 19.4% with a mean onset in days of 2.62 (standard deviation, 1.22) and associated with more intensive care unit admissions and more discharge toward residential care. Onset of POD was not associated with increased length of hospitalization or mortality. We identified several independent nonmodifiable risk factors such as age, preexisting memory problems, emergency operations, craniotomy compared with burr-hole surgery, and severe blood loss. Moreover, we identified modifiable risk factors such as low preoperative potassium and opioid and dexamethasone administration. CONCLUSIONS: Our POD incidence rates and correlation with more intensive care unit admission and discharge toward residential care suggest a significant impact of POD on neurosurgical patients. We identified several modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors, which shed light on the pathophysiologic mechanisms of POD in this cohort and could be targeted for future intervention studies.

Physicians' acceptance of pharmacists' interventions in daily hospital practice.

Background The physicians' acceptance rate of pharmacists' interventions to improve pharmacotherapy can vary depending on the setting. The acceptance rate of interventions proposed by pharmacists located in the hospital pharmacy over the telephone and factors associated with acceptance are largely unknown. Objective To determine the physicians' acceptance rate of pharmacists' interventions proposed over the telephone in daily hospital practice and to identify factors associated with acceptance. Setting A retrospective case-control study was performed concerning adult patients admitted to a university hospital in the Netherlands. Method Pharmacists' interventions, based on alerts for drug-drug interactions and drug dosing in patients with renal impairment, recorded between January 2012 and June 2013 that were communicated over the telephone were included. Factors associated with physicians' acceptance were identified with the use of a mixed-effects logistic model. Main outcome measure The primary outcome was the proportion of accepted interventions. Results A total of 841 interventions were included. Physicians accepted 599 interventions, resulting in an acceptance rate of 71.2%. The mixed-effects logistic model showed that acceptance was significantly associated with the number of prescribed drugs (16 to ≤ 20 drugs ORadj 1.88; 95% CI 1.05-3.35, > 20 drugs ORadj 2.90; 95% CI 1.41-5.96, compared to ≤ 10 drugs) and the severity of the drug-related problem (problem without potential harm ORadj 6.36; 95% CI 1.89-21.38; problem with potential harm OR 6.78; 95% CI 2.09-21.99, compared to clinically irrelevant problems), and inversely associated with continuation of pre-admission treatment (ORadj 0.55; 95% CI 0.35-0.87). Conclusion Over the study period, the majority of pharmacists' interventions proposed over the telephone were accepted by physicians. The probability for acceptance increased for patients with an increasing number of medication orders, for clinically relevant problems and for problems related to treatment initiated during admission.

Influence of young age on outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of esophageal cancer has risen among all age groups. Controversy exists about the clinical presentation and prognosis of young patients. The aim of this study was to compare the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes after surgery between patients with esophageal cancer who were <50 years of age and those ≥50 years of age. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy between January 1990 and December 2010 in a single institution were selected from a prospective database. Patients aged <50 years at diagnosis (n = 163) were compared with those ≥50 years (n = 1151) with respect to clinicopathologic stage and oncologic outcome. RESULTS: Younger patients had less co-morbidity (p < 0.001). There were no significantly differences in tumor localization, histology, differentiation, or TNM stage in the two groups. In both groups, 37 % of the patients underwent neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy. One or more nonsurgical complications developed in 53 % of the older group versus 42 % in the younger group (p = 0.012). In-hospital mortality was 6.3 % for patients ≥50 years compared to 1.8 % for younger patients (p = 0.021). The 5 year overall survival was significantly better for the younger patients than for those ≥50 years (41 vs. 31 %, p < 0.001), but median disease-specific and disease-free survival did not differ between the groups (37 vs. 30 months, p = 0.140 and 49 vs. 28 months, p = 0.079, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified moderate, poorly, and undifferentiated tumors; tumor-positive resection margins (pR1-2); and TNM stage IIB-IV as independent predictors of disease-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable proportion (12 %) of patients diagnosed with resectable esophageal carcinoma were <50 years. Phenotypic tumor characteristics and disease-specific survival were comparable for the two age groups.