ABSTRACT
Background: Long COVID has affected 13.5% of Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System users during the first pandemic year. With 700,000+ United States Veterans diagnosed with COVID-19, addressing the impact of Long COVID on this population is crucial. Since empirically-based mental health interventions for Long COVID are lacking, a vital need exists for a tailored recovery-oriented intervention for this population. This study intends to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a novel recovery-oriented intervention, Long COVID Coping and Recovery (LCCR), for Veterans with Long COVID, aiming to support symptom management and quality of life. LCCR is an adaptation of Continuous Identity Cognitive Therapy (CI-CT), a suicide recovery-oriented treatment for Veterans. Methods: In a two-year open-label pilot, three single-arm treatment trials will be conducted with 18 Veterans suffering from Long COVID. Each trial includes 16 weekly 60-min sessions delivered via VA Video Connect (VVC) and/or VA WebEx. Primary objectives include optimizing LCCR for Veterans with Long COVID and assessing the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention, using attendance and retention rates, drop-out statistics, and client satisfaction levels. Additionally, potential benefits of LCCR will be explored by evaluating alterations in quality of life, resilience, mental health status (anxiety, depression, suicide risk/behavior), and personal identity. The protocol has been tailored based on Veterans' needs assessment interviews and stakeholder feedback. Conclusion: If the LCCR intervention proves feasible and acceptable, a manualized version will be created and a randomized controlled trial planned to examine its efficacy in the broader Veteran population.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Determine strategies and resources used by VA Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) teams to discuss firearm safety and suicide risk with older veterans and their families or caregivers. Training and resource needs for promoting firearm safety with older veterans were also ascertained. METHODS: Ten focus groups (N = 37) were conducted virtually in 2022 with HBPC directors and psychologists. Qualitative rapid response coding identified domains and themes within transcripts. RESULTS: Analysis revealed three major domains: firearm safety, suicide risk, and resources/trainings. Firearm safety themes included discussions during clinical procedures, firearm-related challenges, veteran culture, and barriers and facilitators to effective conversations. Suicide risk themes included assessment procedures, frequency/types of risk conversations, factors related to suicidal ideation/behavior, challenges, and strategies to enhance communication. Resource/training themes included those currently used and perceived needs. CONCLUSIONS: Participants described strategies for facilitating firearm safety and suicide prevention discussions with older veterans, their families, and caregivers. Using respectful language and attending to values related to firearm ownership were identified as essential. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Additional clinician/staff training/resources are needed for addressing older veteran firearm safety and suicide risk, including how to conduct more effective conversations with older veterans on these topics and better engage families/caregivers in prevention efforts.
ABSTRACT
Background: Suicide is a leading cause of death among Veterans, with rates significantly higher than the general population. To address this issue, it is crucial to develop and implement more effective treatments for Veterans with suicidal thoughts and/or behaviors, particularly those in the post-acute suicidal episode (PASE) stage. The present study aims to establish the feasibility and acceptability of a novel, recovery-oriented treatment called Continuous Identity Cognitive Therapy (CI-CT) for PASE Veterans. Methods: This 3-year open-label pilot study will include three one-arm trials and a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT). A total of 57 Veterans with a history of an acute suicidal episode within the previous year will be recruited. Primary outcome measures will include changes in personal recovery, suicidal thoughts, and behaviors. Secondary outcomes will include changes in self-identity, life satisfaction, and hopefulness. Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed through attendance and retention rates, drop-out rates, and client satisfaction. Conclusion: This study aims to develop and evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a novel recovery-oriented intervention for Veterans experiencing PASE. If the intervention is found to be feasible and acceptable, a manualized version will be finalized and a large-scale multi-site RCT will be designed to assess its clinical efficacy on a broader Veteran population. The results of this trial will aid in the development of effective treatment and provide valuable insights into the preliminary feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of this approach in reducing suicidal thoughts and behaviors and promoting recovery and rehabilitation in this population.
