Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Singapore Med J ; 61(10): 540-547, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31489436

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Migrant workers comprise about one-fifth of Singapore's resident population and form a substantial and vital component of the nation's workforce. However, limited data is available regarding the barriers that migrant workers face in accessing healthcare from the healthcare providers' perspective. METHODS: We conducted a survey on doctors working in four restructured hospitals in Singapore, to assess what they perceived to be barriers faced by migrant workers in accessing healthcare. We also assessed the doctors' understanding of migrant-health-related policies in Singapore. RESULTS: A total of 427 survey responses were collected. Most respondents were senior doctors (senior residents or consultants) who had been practising medicine for a median of ten years. Among doctors, the most common perceived barriers to migrant workers accessing healthcare were related to culture/language (92.3%) and finances (healthcare cost) (81.0%). Of the six questions asked pertaining to migrant healthcare policy in Singapore, the respondents achieved a median of four correctly answered questions (interquartile range 3-5), and about 55% were unaware or unsure of available resources for migrant workers. CONCLUSION: Our study identified healthcare providers' perceived barriers to the delivery of healthcare to migrant workers, which corroborate previously published data reported by migrant workers themselves. Further efforts should be directed towards diminishing these barriers and increasing the literacy of migrant health among healthcare workers.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Health Services Accessibility , Physicians/psychology , Transients and Migrants/psychology , Adult , Female , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Insurance, Health/economics , Language , Male , Middle Aged , Singapore , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tertiary Care Centers
2.
Ann Acad Med Singap ; 46(5): 195-201, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28600580

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: High levels of toxicities have been observed when docetaxel is administered at the standard dose of 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (Q3W) in the real-world treatment of Asian patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of 2 attenuated regimens more widely used in an Asian setting to minimise toxicity - 60 mg/m2 Q3W and weekly docetaxel (20 mg/m2 to 35 mg/m2). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of 89 CRPC patients between December 2003 and April 2013 were reviewed. Pairwise statistical analysis was performed, comparing efficacy and safety outcomes of 75 mg/m2 Q3W and weekly docetaxel with 60 mg/m2 Q3W. Treatment endpoints used were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (decrease of ≥50% from baseline), pain improvement after cycle 2, overall survival, time to disease progression and radiological response. RESULTS: Patients who received docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 Q3W were younger than those who received 60 mg/m2 Q3W (62 years and 66 years, respectively; P = 0.0489). Both groups had similar response rates. Compared with patients on 60 mg/m2 Q3W, more patients on weekly regimens were symptomatic at baseline (63.2% and 87.5%, respectively; P = 0.0173). Longer overall survival was observed in the 60 mg/m2 Q3W arm than the weekly docetaxel arm (16.9 months and 10.6 months, respectively; P = 0.0131), though other measures of response did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: Our data supports the use of 60 mg/m2 Q3W docetaxel which has similar efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile compared to the standard 75 mg/m2 Q3W regimen. Weekly docetaxel has significant palliative benefits among symptomatic patients despite lower overall survival.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Taxoids/administration & dosage , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Asian People , Docetaxel , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/blood , Taxoids/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
3.
BMJ Glob Health ; 2(2): e000213, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28589024

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Low-wage migrant workers are vulnerable to healthcare inequities. We sought to identify potential barriers to healthcare and risk factors for mental health issues in non-domestic migrant workers in Singapore, and identify high-risk subgroups. METHODS: A cross-sectional, interviewer-administered survey of 433 non-domestic migrant workers was conducted at subsidised clinics and a foreign worker dormitory from July to August 2016. Questions assessed healthcare usage patterns, affordability issues, barriers to care and psychological distress using a validated screening scale (Kessler-6). FINDINGS: Bangladeshi workers surveyed were more likely to be single, have more financial dependents, a lower level of education and salary and pay higher agent fees (p<0.01). 61.4% of workers reported that they had insurance, but had poor understanding of whether it covered inpatient/outpatient expenses. The majority of workers had not, or were not sure if they had, received information about company-bought insurance (72.4%). Among those who had, most reported that information was not in their native language (67.7%). Non-specific psychological distress was found in 21.9%, as estimated by the Kessler-6 scale. Multivariate analysis found that psychological distress was independently associated with Bangladeshi nationals (OR 2.98, 95% CI 1.58 to 5.62; p=0.001) and previous experience of financial barriers to healthcare (OR 3.86, 95% CI 2.25 to 6.62; p<0.0001). INTERPRETATION: We identified gaps in non-domestic migrant workers' knowledge of healthcare coverage, and substantial financial barriers to healthcare. The Bangladeshi population in our study was at higher risk of such barriers and psychological distress. These represent areas for further research and intervention.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...