Prognostic factors in Greek patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study.

BACKGROUND: Prognostic factors among Greek patients with SCLC were evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 516 patients with SCLC treated by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: Complete response (CR) was achieved in 26.8% and partial response in 40.1% of patients. The median duration of response was 7.4 months, the median survival 10.5 months and the 2-year survival rate 12%. The stage of the disease was a dominant prognostic factor for survival and response. PS 0-1 was a major prognostic factor for survival, duration of response and CR. Female gender was a favorable predictor for CR. Superior vena cava syndrome was a poor prognostic factor for survival and duration of response. Weight loss and age > or = 60 were poor predictors for response. The sites of metastases affected survival, duration of response and response. Normal alkaline phosphatase was a favorable prognostic factor for survival, duration of response and response. Normal lactate dehydrogenase and thoracic irradiation were favorable prognostic factors for survival and duration of response.

A summary of the Milan experience with multimodality therapies in patients with small cell lung cancer: attempts to improve long-term outcome.

From February 1985 to June 1993, 173 consecutive, previously untreated patients with small cell lung cancer received individualized treatment tailored to disease extent. Almost all patients (14 of 16) with stage I and II disease and 30 patients with operable stage III disease were submitted to surgery preceded or followed by chemotherapy. Chest irradiation and prophylactic brain radiotherapy (in complete responders) were administered at the end of treatment in 42 of 44 cases. Patients with inoperable limited disease received chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in 67 of 71 cases, while chemotherapy alone or followed by radiotherapy in sites of either initially bulky or residual disease was administered to 58 patients with extensive disease. The overall response rate was 77% (complete response, 45%; partial response, 32%). Complete responses were documented more frequently in limited disease than in extensive disease (57% v 22%; P < .001). The 2- and 5-year freedom from progression rates (24% and 16%, respectively), as well as overall survival rates (31% and 16%, respectively) were significantly affected by disease extent. No patient with extensive disease was progression free and alive at 2 years, while more than half of stage I and II patients were disease free and alive at 5 years. This retrospective analysis performed on a large number of consecutive, nonrandomized patients suggests that, at least in patients with limited disease, it is possible to achieve favorable long-term results using treatment tailored to disease extent. Nonetheless, the disappointing results commonly achieved in the treatment of small cell lung cancer strongly support the need for either prospective, randomized studies to confirm recently reported improved results or new pilot studies with investigation of entirely innovative approaches.

Randomized comparison of etoposide-cisplatin vs. etoposide-carboplatin and irradiation in small-cell lung cancer. A Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and toxicity of etoposide and cisplatin (EP) with etoposide and carboplatin (EC) in combination with irradiation in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). METHODS: Previously untreated patients (pts) with SCLC and measurable or evaluable disease were randomized to receive either cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on days 1-2 or carboplatin 300 mg/m2 on day 1, both combined with etoposide 300 mg/m2 on days 1-3 every 21 days for 6 treatment cycles. The vast majority of responding limited disease (LD) pts and complete responders (CR) with extensive disease (ED), also received thoracic irradiation (TI) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) concurrently with the third cycle. RESULTS: Of the 147 patients registered, 143 were eligible; median performance status (PS, WHO) was 1, and tumour stage was LD in 41 pts of each treatment group. The mean delay between cycles was 8 days in the EP group and 9 in the EC group increasing in both arms with the number of treatment courses. The drug dose administered per unit time as a proportion of the protocol dose was 74% and 80% for the two groups respectively. Leukopenia, neutropenic infections, nausea, vomiting, neurotoxicity and hyperergic reactions were more frequent and/or severe in the EP group. The CR rates were 57% and 58% for EP and EC respectively. Median survival for all pts was 12.5 and 11.8 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both treatments proved to be effective, with no differences in response and survival between the two treatment arms. The EC regimen was associated with significantly less toxicity.