ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The satisfaction perceived by patients with chronic diseases affects clinical outcomes and healthcare costs. Some patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) develop a more severe form requiring biologic therapy. We assessed the quality of care perceived by IBD patients in dedicated centers. METHODS: This prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study enrolled consecutive IBD patients who underwent biologic therapy in the participating centers. The nurses directly involved in the management of these patients explained the rationale of the survey, provided a specific questionnaire (CACHE), and collected data. The CACHE included 31 items structured in 6 domains: staff care, clinician care, center facilities, patient information, accessibility, and patient support. Patients' satisfaction score for each domain ranged from 0 to 100%. RESULTS: Sixteen different Italian centers participated and a total of 450 patients were enrolled (283 with Crohn's disease and 167 with ulcerative colitis). The overall score was 82.2±19.6, satisfaction with the clinicians care scoring the highest (87.6±3.2) and the information provided to the patient scoring the lowest (70.7±7.9). More specifically, it emerged that 5.2-19.5% of patients were unsatisfied with: 1) the communication between the IBD medical team and primary care physicians; 2) information received about the disease or patients' associations; and 3) the accessibility of the center. CONCLUSION: Although our data revealed an acceptably high rate of global satisfaction among IBD patients receiving biologic therapy, more effort should be made to improve patient information and communication between IBD teams, other specialists and primary care physicians.
ABSTRACT
Management of HCV infection and related liver disease with treatment currently available lead to a sustained virological response in 20% of patients using interferon (IFN)-alpha mono-therapy and approximately 40-45% in those on combination therapy with ribavirin.The aim of the present investigation was to compare the effect of consensus interferon alphacon-1 (C-IFN), and IFN-alpha 2b plus ribavirin, in patients relapsing after treatment with interferon alone. A total of 112 randomised patients with relapsing HCV infection (M/F=53/59), were treated for 24 weeks with: (A) IFN-alpha 2b starting with 5/6MU/day till negativity of HCV-RNA followed by 3MU every other day, plus ribavirin 15mg/kg/day (n=34); (B) C-IFN 9microg/day (n=40); (C) ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA; sodium salt) 450mg/day (n=37). At the end of treatment, patients were observed at follow-up for 24 weeks.Clearance of HCV-RNA was achieved by the end of treatment in 23 patients (68%) in Group A and 21 also showed a biochemical response with normal ALT; in Group B, 33 patients (82%) had both a virological and a biochemical response; in Group C, one patient cleared HCV-RNA. At the end of follow-up (sustained-response), 29% of patients in Group A (n=10/34) had negative PCR (seven patients relapsed at the 4th week, six at the 12th); in Group B, a sustained response was achieved in 58% (p<0.03; two patients relapsed at the 4th week, three at the 12th and five at the 24th).MAJOR SIDE EFFECTS COMPRISED: neutropenia (n=17) and decrease in Hb>1.5g/dl (n=33) in Group A, recurrence of psoriasis in two patients in Group B and abdominal discomfort and diarrhoea in 11 patients in Group C.Rapid clearance of circulating HCV-RNA was induced by C-IFN (66% at three weeks, 71% at six weeks): this was a good prognostic index both for end of treatment and sustained response. Treatment with C-IFN lead to a higher response rate compared to that of recombinant IFN-alpha 2b in association with ribavirin. The action of C-IFN is superior in the time taken to reach the maximal response rate during treatment and in the lower prevalence of relapse of the infection.
