Defining pre-existing disability among adults captured by the National Trauma Data Bank: A descriptive assessment of patient characteristics and details of injury.

BACKGROUND: There is limited research on trauma in people with disability (PWD), despite potentially increased risk for trauma and negative outcomes following injury. OBJECTIVE: This study describes characteristics of trauma among both narrow and broad subsamples of PWD. METHODS: Data from the 2016 National Trauma Data Bank was used to identify two Disability Comparison Groups (DCGs). DCG-1 included adult patients with a functionally dependent health status, and DCG-2 included DCG-1 plus other adult patients with disability-associated diagnoses. Trauma characteristics (e.g., signs of life, intent of injury, mechanism of injury, and injury severity score [ISS]) were compared via logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 782,241 reported trauma events, 39,011 belonged to DCG-1 and 193,513 to DCG-2. Falls caused most instances of trauma across both groups (DCG-1: 88.7 %; DCG-2: 67.3 %). Both DCGs were less likely than patients without disability to arrive at the facility without signs of life (DCG-1:aOR = 0.22, 95%CI 0.15-0.31; DCG-2:aOR = 0.40, 95%CI 0.36-0.45) or to have an ISS greater than 15 (DCG-1:aOR = 0.81, 95%CI 0.79-0.84; DCG-2:aOR = 0.92, 95%CI:0.91-0.94). They were, however, more likely to have an ISS greater than or equal to 8 (DCG-1:aOR = 1.14, 95%CI 1.11-1.16; DCG-2:aOR = 1.06, 95%CI 1.05-1.07). CONCLUSION: PWD have greater odds for moderately scored injuries and presenting with signs of life at U.S. trauma centers compared to patients without disability. However, they can be more likely to have certain intents and mechanisms of trauma depending on their functional status and the nature of their impairment. Differences warrant further and continued assessment of trauma experiences among patients with pre-existing disability.

The Use of Self-Reported Functional Limitation to Examine Pregnancy and Reproductive Health Experiences in a National Sample of Women.

Context: A lack of consensus in the literature examining reproductive health experiences of women with disability prevails, in part, due to various operational definitions of disability. Methods: Results from the 2015-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were utilized to assess reproductive health, disability, and demographic variables among women aged 20-44. Disability was assessed using the six functional limitation subgroups. Analyses included modified Poisson regression and negative binomial regression. Results: One hundred eighty-two (14%) women reported having any functional limitation. Women with at least one functional limitation (WWFL) were significantly more likely than women without a functional limitation (WWOFL) to have had a hysterectomy and had more cesarean deliveries. WWFL did not differ significantly from WWOFL in key pregnancy outcomes (ever been pregnant, number of pregnancies, or number of unsuccessful pregnancies). A high degree of overlap between mobility and self-care (66.1%), cognitive and independent living (61%), and mobility and independent living (37.4%) limitations was found. Conclusions: This work summarizes key reproductive health variables among US women of reproductive age and contextualizes disability experiences through subgroup and overlap analysis. Subgroup analysis results demonstrate the need for detailed operational definitions of disability to accurately capture experiences of women with different limitations, and overlap analysis indicates the interconnectedness of limitations among this group. Findings call for future exploration of reproductive health-related similarities and differences between WWD and women without disability, and employment of detailed operational definitions of disability.