Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 109(5): 797-803, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22910976

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The relationship between ethnicity and early opioid consumption is not well understood. Our prospective cohort study tested whether Chinese patients in Hong Kong require less opioid after major abdominal surgery compared with Caucasian patients in Australia. METHODS: Matched cohorts of patients from Hong Kong (n=68) and Australia (n=68) were recruited. Patient attitudes and expectations to pain management documented. After operation, all patients received i.v. morphine using a patient-controlled analgesia device. Postoperative opioid consumption, pain intensity, and incidence of opioid-related side-effects were recorded. RESULTS: The average (sd) opioid requirement (i.v. morphine equivalent) at 72 h after surgery was significantly less among Chinese patients [86.8 (62.6) mg (95% CI 71.8, 101.8)] compared with Caucasian patients [130.6 (71.9) mg, (P<0.0005) (95% CI 113.4, 147.8)]. Numeric rating scale pain score (0-10) was, however, higher in Chinese patients compared with Caucasian Australians, 5.3 (2.7) vs 4.4 (2.3) (P=0.029). The incidence of pruritus among Chinese patients was significantly higher than Caucasians at 24-48 h (P=0.001) and 48-72 h (P=0.001). Chinese patients also reported a strong preference for others to manage their pain, and their nurse carers were more likely to expect severe pain after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Chinese patients in Hong Kong required less opioid and experienced greater pain intensity and pruritus than Caucasian patients. Clinicians should consider differences in the side-effect profile of morphine and patient expectations related to pain control when planning postoperative analgesia for patients of Chinese ethnicity.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/surgery , Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/statistics & numerical data , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Morphine/administration & dosage , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Attitude to Health , Australia/ethnology , Cohort Studies , Female , Hong Kong/ethnology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement/methods , Pain Measurement/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Young Adult
2.
Burns ; 35(4): 491-9, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19111995

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pain arising in burns sufferers is often severe and protracted. The prospect of a dressing change can heighten existing pain by impacting both physically and psychologically. In this trial we examined whether pre-procedural virtual reality guided relaxation added to patient controlled analgesia with morphine reduced pain severity during awake dressings changes in burns patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial in all patients with burns necessitating admission to a tertiary burns referral centre. Eligible patients requiring awake dressings changes were randomly allocated to single use virtual reality relaxation plus intravenous morphine patient controlled analgesia (PCA) infusion or to intravenous morphine patient controlled analgesia infusion alone. Patients rated their worst pain intensity during the dressing change using a visual analogue scale. The primary outcome measure was presence of 30% or greater difference in pain intensity ratings between the groups in estimation of worst pain during the dressing change. FINDINGS: Of 88 eligible and consenting patients having awake dressings changes, 43 were assigned to virtual reality relaxation plus intravenous morphine PCA infusion and 43 to morphine PCA infusion alone. The group receiving virtual reality relaxation plus morphine PCA infusion reported significantly higher pain intensities during the dressing change (mean=7.3) compared with patients receiving morphine PCA alone (mean=5.3) (p=0.003) (95% CI 0.6-2.8). INTERPRETATION: The addition of virtual reality guided relaxation to morphine PCA infusion in burns patients resulted in a significant increase in pain experienced during awake dressings changes. In the absence of a validated predictor for responsiveness to virtual reality relaxation such a therapy cannot be recommended for general use in burns patients having awake dressings changes.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/prevention & control , Bandages , Burns/therapy , Imagery, Psychotherapy/methods , Pain/prevention & control , Relaxation Therapy/methods , Adult , Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/methods , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Anxiety/psychology , Burns/psychology , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Computer Simulation , Female , Humans , Male , Morphine/therapeutic use , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/psychology , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies , Therapy, Computer-Assisted/methods , Treatment Outcome
3.
Anaesth Intensive Care ; 35(2): 199-203, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17444308

ABSTRACT

In some patients, control of postoperative pain can be difficult with morphine alone. This double-blind randomised controlled trial was designed to evaluate whether a small bolus dose of ketamine could improve pain scores in those patients who had inadequate relief of their postoperative pain after two standard doses of morphine. Forty-one patients with uncontrolled postoperative pain were randomly assigned to receive either morphine (M) alone, or morphine plus 0.25 mg/kg ketamine (K) in the recovery room. No other analgesics were to be given. The study had adequate power to detect a 25% difference in pain scores. There was no statistically significant difference in verbal rating scale pain scores between the two groups either in the recovery room (K = 5.16, M = 6.28, P = 0.065), or at a later time on the ward. There was no apparent difference between groups in sedation, morphine consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, quality of recovery or need for rescue analgesia. We could not demonstrate an effective role for ketamine in the management of problematic postoperative pain at the dose studied.


Subject(s)
Analgesia/methods , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Ketamine/therapeutic use , Morphine/administration & dosage , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Recovery Room , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Morphine/therapeutic use , Pain Measurement/methods , Postoperative Care , Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
Anaesthesia ; 59(11): 1053-8, 2004 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15479310

ABSTRACT

Smoking is a risk factor for complications during and after surgery, but most smokers are unable to quit before elective surgery. We tested the efficacy of bupropion in improving smoking cessation rates in this setting by enrolling 47 patients from the elective surgery waiting list in a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Patients receiving bupropion had a lower daily cigarette consumption at the time of hospital admission, median (IQR) cigarettes per day: 6 (2-7) vs. 15 (9-20), p = 0.046. They also had a reduction in end-expired carbon monoxide (p = 0.004), a known contaminant of cigarette smoke, and increased arterial oxygen saturation on pulse oximetry (p = 0.011). They were more likely to have stopped smoking at the 3-week visit (p = 0.036), but not at the 6-week visit (p = 0.25) or at the time of hospital admission for surgery (p > 0.99). This study found that smokers waiting for elective surgery are more likely to reduce or stop smoking when treated with bupropion.


Subject(s)
Bupropion/therapeutic use , Preoperative Care/methods , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Prevention , Adult , Bupropion/adverse effects , Carbon Monoxide/metabolism , Double-Blind Method , Elective Surgical Procedures , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygen/blood , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...