ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare performance of visual inspection and Laser fluorescence methods to detect occlusal caries lesions under clinical and laboratory conditions in permanent teeth. METHODS: One hundred and ten sites in 57 third molars scheduled for extraction were examined with visual inspection and laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent) device by two trained examiners. After the extraction, teeth were re-examined. Then, teeth were sectioned to perform histological validation. Best cut-off points were calculated with ROC analysis, and sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated at D2 and D3 thresholds. Comparisons between the methods and conditions of examination were performed using McNemar test. Inter-examiner agreement in the same conditions and agreement between the methods performed in vivo and in vitro conditions were assessed by Kappa test. Laser fluorescence values obtained in two conditions were compared with Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: No difference was observed with visual inspection in both conditions. Laser fluorescence performed in vitro presented higher specificity and accuracy at D3 threshold. Visual inspection showed higher reproducibility. After adjustment of cut-off points for laser fluorescence method, there was no difference between the evaluated parameters. CONCLUSION: Only slightly differences were observed between the examinations performed under clinical and laboratory conditions in the detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent teeth.
Subject(s)
Dental Caries/diagnosis , Lasers , Molar, Third , Adult , Epidemiologic Methods , Fluorescence , HumansABSTRACT
A redução da prevalência de cáries não ocorreu uniformemente para todas as superfícies dentárias. Como as superfícies oclusais ainda são as mais susceptíveis ao desenvolvimento de lesões, novos métodos de diagnóstico ainda estão sendo avaliados. Este estudo comparou um sistema de fluorescência a laser (DIAGNOdent DD) com o método visual de Ekstrand na detecção de cárie oclusal. Um total de 57 terceiros molares com superfícies oclusais macroscopicamente intactas foram selecionados. Dois examinadores examinaram 110 sítios por inspecção visual (IV) e DD. Após dez dias da primeira mensuração, todos os dentes foram novamente avaliados pelos mesmos métodos. A extensão de cárie foi validada por exame histológico (40 X). Os dados foram analisados quanto a sensibilidade, especificidade, reprodutibilidade intra e interexaminador e área sob a curva ROC. O teste kappa demonstrou boa reprodutibilidade intra e interexaminadores para ambos os métodos. A IV e o DD apresentaram sensibilidade semelhante para ambos os examinadores, entretanto, a IV apresentou maior especificidade que o DD. A análise geral, através da área sob a curva ROC, mostrou que a IV teve um melhor desempenho que o DD. Concluiu-se que o critério visual proposto por Ekstrand é mais confiável para o diagnóstico de cáries oclusais. O DD deve ser considerado apenas como um coadjuvante no exame de cárie em superfícies oclusais.
Subject(s)
Humans , Dentition, Permanent , Dental Caries Activity Tests/standards , Dental Caries/pathology , Lasers , Molar, Third/pathology , Dental Caries Activity Tests/instrumentation , Dental Caries , Dental Cavity Preparation/methods , Dental Enamel/pathology , Dentin/pathology , Fluorescence , Lasers/standards , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , ROC Curve , Surface PropertiesABSTRACT
The reduction in caries prevalence has not occurred uniformly for all dental surfaces. As the occlusal surfaces are still the most likely sites for the development of lesions, new methods of diagnosis are still being evaluated. This study compared a laser fluorescence (LF) system (DIAGNOdent) with the Ekstrands visual system for in vitro detection of occlusal caries. A total of 57 extracted molars with macroscopically intact occlusal surfaces were selected. Two-examiners assessed 110 sites by visual inspection (VI) and LF. After ten days from the first measurement, all teeth were re-evaluated through the same methods by each examiner. Caries extension was histologically assessed (X 40). The methods were compared by means of sensitivity, specificity, intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility and area under the ROC curve. The kappas test showed good intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility for both methods. VI and LF showed similar sensitivities for both examiners, however, VI showed higher specificities than LF. The overall analysis, as demonstrated by the area under the ROC curve, showed that VI had a better performance than the LF device. It was concluded that the Ekstrands visual system is more reliable than the LF device. LF should be considered only as an adjuvant for occlusal caries diagnosis.
