Test-enhanced learning improves learner attendance during a laparoscopic box trainer simulation program.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is the gold standard approach for many surgical procedures, but it is a complex skill to learn. Laparoscopic simulation training may help, but it is unclear how to best engage trainees in these programs. Test-enhanced learning (TEL) uses regular, well-defined assessments of performance throughout the training phase of learning. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of TEL on a laparoscopic simulation program involving a cohort of medical student volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed with a convenience sample of 40 medical students. Students were recruited to participate in a ten-week laparoscopic simulation program. Twenty students participated in a laparoscopic surgical program with TEL ('TEL group'), and 20 students participated in a standard laparoscopic simulation program ('control group'). RESULTS: Attendance in the TEL group was significantly higher than in the standard group (71 vs 51.5%, P = 0.03). There was no difference between groups in mean time scores. Four themes were identified in qualitative data drawn from student surveys - personal traits and motivators, training context, clear goals and feedback enabling understanding of one's own performance. CONCLUSION: Testing laparoscopic skills throughout a learning program, in conjunction with individualised feedback and tracking of learning trajectory, increases trainee attendance. Laparoscopic simulation training programs are encouraged to reflect on the pedagogic framework in which their procedural skills training operates.

Are we 'gritty' enough? The importance of 'grit' in O&G training: Association of passion and perseverance with burnout, thriving and career progression.

BACKGROUND: Objective assessment of grit and its association with burnout in obstetrics and gynaecology (O&G) training is underexplored. AIM: This study utilises the Short Grit Scale and the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory to investigate the association of grit with burnout, thriving and career progression among O&G trainees and Fellows in Australia/New Zealand. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of the RANZCOG (Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists) members was conducted. Participants were categorised by seniority level (core trainees, advanced trainees and Fellows). Mean grit and burnout scores were compared with one-way analyses of variance. Correlation between grit and burnout was estimated using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with high vs low burnout. Grit was categorised as low/medium/high for regression models. RESULTS: A total of 751 (26%) participants completed the survey. Fellows reported higher mean grit than core (P = 0.02) and advanced trainees (P = 0.03), and lower mean burnout than core trainees (P < 0.001). Moderate negative correlation was demonstrated between grit and burnout scores (r = -0.34). In the multivariable model, only seniority (adjusted adds ratio (OR): 0.40 for Fellows vs core trainees, P = 0.008) and grit levels (adjusted OR:4.52 for low versus high, P < 0.001; 2.32 for low vs medium, P = 0.001) were significantly associated with burnout. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the protective role of grit in combating burnout among RANZCOG trainees and Fellows. While further well-designed studies are warranted, findings from our study are expected to help the College in developing targeted interventions and subsequently minimise burnout-related adverse outcomes in high-risk groups.

Exploring the impact of endometriosis on partners.

AIM: This study aimed to determine how endometriosis affects the quality of life of partners of women who suffer from this disease and how it impacts their relationships, finances, mental states, and daily living. METHODS: This was a questionnaire-based cohort study that took place at a large tertiary hospital gynecology unit, which covered two sites. Fifty-one partners of women who had surgically diagnosed endometriosis agreed to participate in the study and returned completed surveys. RESULTS: Ninety-two percent (n = 46) of partners reported negative feelings about the diagnosis of endometriosis. Seventy percent (n = 35) reported that endometriosis affected their day-to-day life either moderately or severely. Over half (52%) also felt that their finances were affected. Only 34% (n = 17) of partners felt that health professionals had engaged them in decision-making processes and had been supportive of them. Eighty percent (n = 40) of partners reported that they had received no information about the impact of endometriosis on couples. Partners reported a significant affect on their sex life (74%) and their relationship as a whole (56%). Participants whose relationships had been affected by endometriosis had also more likely had their day-to-day life (P = 0.027), sex life (P = 0.001), and finances (P = 0.002) affected. CONCLUSION: Overall, our findings suggest that endometriosis can have a significant impact on partners with respect to day-to-day living, finances, sex lives, and relationships. Improvements can be made to engage partners in the treatment process, and to provide better education, support, and holistic management to women and families who suffer with endometriosis.

Could Elastography Be Used in the Prediction of Morbidly Adherent Placentation?

Morbidly adherent placentation (MAP) is a condition in which the placenta is abnormally attached to the uterine myometrium. MAP is a complication of pregnancy that can cause significant morbidity to the mother and fetus and therefore early diagnosis is crucial in its management and prevention of adverse outcomes. Ultrasonography remains the primary diagnostic tool for MAP, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serving as a secondary diagnostic modality. Elastography is a relatively new concept in ultrasound based imaging, which has found application in several fields of medicine, including obstetrics, primarily for evaluation of the firmness of cervical tissue in a preterm labour setting. We report a case on a patient who was diagnosed with placenta increta on ultrasound, aided by elastography and her subsequent management with an en bloc hysterectomy.

A retrospective comparison of water birth and conventional vaginal birth among women deemed to be low risk in a secondary level hospital in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Water birth involves the complete birth of the baby under warm water. There is a lack of consensus regarding the safety of water birth. AIM: This study aimed to describe the maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with water birth among labouring women deemed at low risk for obstetric complications and compare these outcomes against women of similar risk who had a standard land birth. METHOD: A retrospective audit and comparison of women giving birth in water with a matched cohort who birthed on land at Bankstown hospital over a 10 year period (2000-2009). RESULTS: In total 438 childbearing women were selected for this study (N=219 in each arm). Primigravida women represented 42% of the study population. There was no significant difference in mean duration of both first and second stages of labour or postpartum blood loss between the two birth groups. There were no episiotomies performed in the water birth arm which was significantly different to the comparison group (N=33, p<0.001). There were more babies in the water birth group with an Apgar score of 7 or less at 1min (compared to land births). However, at 5min there was no difference in Apgar scores between the groups. Three of eight special care nursery admissions in the water birth group were related to feeding difficulties. CONCLUSION: This is the largest study on water birth in an Australian setting. Despite the limitations of a retrospective audit the findings make a contribution to the growing body of knowledge on water birth.

Should liquid-based cytology be performed prior to colposcopy? A comparison of the accuracy, unsatisfactory rates and cost in a tertiary referral setting.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of liquid-based cytology (LBC) with conventional cytology (CC) in the assessment cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) prior to colposcopy. DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study. METHODS: Liquid-based cytology and CC findings were compared with colposcopic assessment and directed cervical biopsy in terms of sensitivity and specificity for high grade lesions only and for any abnormalities. The degree of correlation was sought. Secondary outcomes were unsatisfactory rate and cost. RESULTS: A total of 1961 women had colposcopy of whom 528 had cervical biopsy. LBC and CC have similar sensitivity and specificity for both high-grade lesions and any abnormalities. In comparison with cervical biopsy, LBC and CC sensitivity for high-grade disease was 89.1% and 88.6% respectively and for any abnormalities, the sensitivity was 86.6% and 87.0%. Specificity for high-grade disease was 83.1% and 84.7% and for any abnormalities, the specificity was 53.8% and 56.4%. The unsatisfactory rate was significantly lower in LBC 4.38% compared to 1.84% (P < 0.001). However, the use of LBC was associated with an additional cost of A$1496 for each unsatisfactory smear avoided. CONCLUSION: In high prevalence setting, LBC showed no statistically significant difference in sensitivity and specificity from CC for the detection of CIN. A reduction in unsatisfactory smears was evident, but at significant additional cost.

Institution of universal screening for Group B streptococcus (GBS) from a risk management protocol results in reduction of early-onset GBS disease in a tertiary obstetric unit.

AIM: To determine the effect of institution of a universal screening protocol as per CDC 2002 guidelines had on the incidence of early-onset Group B streptococcal (GBS) and non-GBS disease in a tertiary obstetric unit. METHODS: A prospective study with historical control data reporting the incidence of early-onset GBS and non-GBS disease following institution of a universal screening strategy at John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, Australia. We compared the incidence of early-onset GBS and non-GBS disease during prescreening (1994-2002) with screening period (2004 to June 2006). The outcome measure was the incidence of early-onset GBS disease. We specifically reported the number of women needed to treat (NNT) with antibiotics and the number of women needed to screen. RESULTS: The incidence of early-onset GBS and non-GBS during the prescreening period was 0.84/1000 and 0.94/1000 live births, respectively. After institution of universal screening, the incidence was 0.00/1000 and 0.72/1000 live births, respectively. This is a statistically significant reduction in early-onset GBS disease by 84% (chi(2) = 5.75; P = 0.016). There was no difference in non-GBS disease (chi2 = 0.14; P = 0.71). The NNT is 1191 and we needed to screen 5704 women to prevent one case of early-onset GBS disease. CONCLUSION: Screening for GBS rather than by assessing risk factors has significantly reduced the incidence of early-onset GBS disease in our unit. Despite low incidence of early-onset GBS prior to screening period, we still found a significant decrease in early-onset GBS disease after institution of universal screening protocol. These results support the screening-based approach at 34-37 weeks gestation.