Number of conspecifics and reproduction in the invasive plant Eschscholzia californica (Papaveraceae): is there a pollinator-mediated Allee effect?

The component Allee effect has been defined as 'a positive relationship between any measure of individual fitness and the number or density of conspecifics'. Larger plant populations or large patches have shown a higher pollinator visitation rate, which may give rise to an Allee effect in reproduction of the plants. We experimentally tested the effect of number of conspecifics on reproduction and pollinator visitation in Eschscholzia californica Cham., an invasive plant in Chile. We then built patches with two, eight and 16 flowering individuals of E. californica (11 replicates per treatment) in an area characterised by dominance of the study species. We found that E. californica exhibits a component Allee effect, as the number of individuals of this species has a positive effect on individual seed set. However, individual fruit production was not affected by the number of plants examined. Pollinator visitation rate was also independent of the number of plants, so this factor would not explain the Allee effect. This rate was positively correlated with the total number of flowers in the patches. We also found that the number of plants did not affect the seed mass or proportion of germinated seeds in the patches. Higher pollen availability in patches with 16 plants and pollination by wind could explain the Allee effect. The component Allee effect identified could lead to a weak demographic Allee effect that might reduce the rate of spread of E. californica. Knowledge of this would be useful for management of this invasive plant in Chile.

Training and practice of cytotechnologists: a discussion forum focused on Europe.

OBJECTIVES: To discuss the role and training of cytotechnologists (CTs) in Europe, to identify areas of good practice and to provide an informed opinion to those providing guidelines for training and practice in Europe. METHODS: All members of the Editorial Advisory Board of Cytopathology were invited to take part in a 'discussion forum' for which six topics were circulated in advance concerning the roles of CTs with regard to: (1) pre-screening slides; (2) 'signing out' reports; (3) carrying out ancillary techniques; (4) supervising laboratory staff; (5) taking part in rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of fine needle aspirates (FNAs); and (6) whether CTs were trained specifically in cytopathology or in general histopathology. Notes of the meeting were circulated by email and a final report was agreed by 22 participants from 17 predominantly European countries. RESULTS: Training for CTs throughout Europe was variable, especially for non-gynaecological cytology, which was inconsistent with the range of activities required. The participants recommended graduate entry, preliminary training in general laboratory technology, and subsequent training to take account of the probability and, in some centres, the reality of primary cervical cancer screening changing from cytology to human papillomavirus (HPV) testing. They further recommended that CTs should perform HPV tests and take part in ROSE for FNAs, and they supported the European Federation of Cytology Societies developing guidelines for training and practice. CONCLUSION: With CT training added to a university-based education in laboratory or biomedical science, a career in cytotechnology should be an attractive option involving a diverse range of laboratory and clinically based activities.

Survey of training and education of cytotechnologists in Europe.

OBJECTIVE: This report presents the results of a survey of the training and education of cytotechnologists (CTs) in 15 European countries and suggests guidelines on which future education should be developed. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 25 countries in 2011: 14 with and 11 without a European Advisory Committee of Cytotechnology (EACC) member or representative. We received responses from 18 countries, among which three were excluded from the survey because they did not have CTs in training. RESULTS: The number of fully trained and employed CTs in these 15 European countries varied from 35 to 2600. The level of responsibility for most CTs in 14 of these countries was intermediate (signing out negative and inadequate gynaecological samples), whereas seven also had a minority of CTs at an advanced level (signing out abnormal gynaecological samples). Basic education was equally divided (7/8) between countries requiring a bachelor degree or training in medical technology before entry into cytology training. The training in cytology was given as a separate course/education or a combination of separate courses and in-house training, but was often confined to gynaecological cytology. It was recognized that CTs should extend their activities with the advent of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and vaccination. The training requirement for CTs was usually decided by the national professional society. Most cytology training programmes were accredited by academic institutions at university level and were recognized nationally in almost all of the countries. For most of the countries, the optimal education in the future should be at university level with a diploma in cytotechnology certified or accredited by the European Federation of Cytology Societies. CONCLUSION: The survey showed variation in basic education and cytology training, especially with respect to non-gynaecological cytology, although graduate entry was favoured. The role of CTs is changing and the education and training programmes need to adapt to these changes.