Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33946914

ABSTRACT

We aimed to identify and compare medication profiles in populations with polypharmacy between 2005 and 2015. We conducted a cross-sectional study using information from the Computerized Database for Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies in Primary Care (BIFAP, Spain). We estimated the prevalence of therapeutic subgroups in all individuals 15 years of age and older with polypharmacy (≥5 drugs during ≥6 months) using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system level 4, by sex and age group, for both calendar years. The most prescribed drugs were proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), statins, antiplatelet agents, benzodiazepine derivatives, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. The greatest increases between 2005 and 2015 were observed in PPIs, statins, other antidepressants, and ß-blockers, while the prevalence of antiepileptics was almost tripled. We observed increases in psychotropic drugs in women and cardiovascular medications in men. By patient´s age groups, there were notable increases in antipsychotics, antidepressants, and antiepileptics (15-44 years); antidepressants, PPIs, and selective ß-blockers (45-64 years); selective ß-blockers, biguanides, PPIs, and statins (65-79 years); and in statins, selective ß-blockers, and PPIs (80 years and older). Our results revealed important increases in the use of specific therapeutic subgroups, like PPIs, statins, and psychotropic drugs, highlighting opportunities to design and implement strategies to analyze such prescriptions' appropriateness.


Subject(s)
Drug Prescriptions , Polypharmacy , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Pharmacoepidemiology , Spain/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 29(4): 433-443, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31908111

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To analyze the evolution of the prevalence of polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy in a Spanish population, and to improve the identification of patients with polypharmacy. METHODS: A descriptive, annual cross-sectional observational study was carried out. PATIENTS: individuals over 14 years of age included in a multiregional primary care database of the Spanish population (BIFAP). ANALYSIS: prescription data. Period 2005-2015. VARIABLES: proportion of patients with polypharmacy (simultaneous prescription of ≥5 drugs) and excessive polypharmacy (≥10 drugs) for at least 6 months, according to sex and age groups. A trend analysis of the studied period was performed (overall, and by sex and age groups). RESULTS: The data are reported on a comparative basis (2005 vs 2015). Number of patients analyzed: 2664743 vs 4 002 877. The prevalence of polypharmacy increased significantly (2.5% vs 8.9%, P-value for trend <0.001), being greater in females throughout the study period and in the group aged ≥80 years (P-value for trends <0.001). The prevalence of excessive polypharmacy also increased significantly (0.1% vs 1%, P-value for trend <0.001), being higher in the group aged ≥80 years (P-value for trend <0.001). The proportion of patients with no chronic treatment decreased (80.2% vs 63.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of polypharmacy in this Spanish population has tripled in the period 2005-2015, while excessive polypharmacy has increased 10-fold. These increments are seen in both sexes and in all age groups, particularly in individuals over 80 years of age. The proportion of patients without chronic treatments has decreased.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual/trends , Inappropriate Prescribing/trends , Polypharmacy , Population Surveillance/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Databases, Factual/standards , Drug Prescriptions/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Spain/epidemiology , Young Adult
3.
Aten. prim. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 50(supl.2): 70-79, nov. 2018. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-179660

ABSTRACT

La creciente longevidad de la población, el aumento de la morbilidad y del consumo de medicamentos han provocado que la polimedicación sea un problema de salud prioritario por sus consecuencias en el incremento de efectos adversos, interacciones farmacológicas y favorecer el deterioro funcional del paciente. La situación clínica de los pacientes cambia a lo largo del tiempo y es preciso ajustar la medicación en cada etapa, valorando la fragilidad, el nivel de dependencia y el deterioro funcional. La labor de deprescribir es compleja y requiere una adecuada formación clínica y farmacológica. En atención primaria reside el mayor conocimiento del paciente y su entorno, y de forma compartida con el paciente y cuidadores se debe valorar qué medicamentos mantener y cuáles retirar desde una perspectiva clínica, ética y social. Existen herramientas de ayuda a la deprescripción que pueden resultar útiles para el médico de familia para facilitar este proceso y que se detallan en este artículo


The increasing longevity of the population, the increase in morbidity and the consumption of medications have caused that polypharmacy is a priority health problem due to its consequences: increase of adverse effects, pharmacological interactions and favor the functional deterioration of the patient. The clinical situation of the patients changes over time and it is necessary to adjust the medication in each stage, assessing the fragility, the level of dependence and the functional deterioration. Deprescription is complex and requires an adequate clinical and pharmacological formation. In Primary Care lies the greater knowledge of the patient and their environment, and in a shared way with the patient and caregivers, it is necessary to assess which drugs to maintain and which ones to withdraw from a clinical, ethical and social perspective. There are tools to help deprescription that can be useful for Primary Care to facilitate this process and that are detailed in this article


Subject(s)
Humans , Medical Overuse , Inappropriate Prescribing , Polypharmacy
4.
Aten Primaria ; 50 Suppl 2: 70-79, 2018 11.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30279013

ABSTRACT

The increasing longevity of the population, the increase in morbidity and the consumption of medications have caused that polypharmacy is a priority health problem due to its consequences: increase of adverse effects, pharmacological interactions and favor the functional deterioration of the patient. The clinical situation of the patients changes over time and it is necessary to adjust the medication in each stage, assessing the fragility, the level of dependence and the functional deterioration. Deprescription is complex and requires an adequate clinical and pharmacological formation. In Primary Care lies the greater knowledge of the patient and their environment, and in a shared way with the patient and caregivers, it is necessary to assess which drugs to maintain and which ones to withdraw from a clinical, ethical and social perspective. There are tools to help deprescription that can be useful for Primary Care to facilitate this process and that are detailed in this article.


Subject(s)
Deprescriptions , Family Practice , Frail Elderly , Neurodegenerative Diseases , Terminal Care , Aged , Humans , Polypharmacy , Primary Health Care
5.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy ; 8: 175-83, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26586971

ABSTRACT

With the unprecedented international migration seen in recent years, policies that limit health care access have become prevalent. Barriers to health care for undocumented immigrants go beyond policy and range from financial limitations, to discrimination and fear of deportation. This paper is aimed at reviewing the literature on barriers to health care for undocumented immigrants and identifying strategies that have or could be used to address these barriers. To address study questions, we conducted a literature review of published articles from the last 10 years in PubMed using three main concepts: immigrants, undocumented, and access to health care. The search yielded 341 articles of which 66 met study criteria. With regard to barriers, we identified barriers in the policy arena focused on issues related to law and policy including limitations to access and type of health care. These varied widely across countries but ultimately impacted the type and amount of health care any undocumented immigrant could receive. Within the health system, barriers included bureaucratic obstacles including paperwork and registration systems. The alternative care available (safety net) was generally limited and overwhelmed. Finally, there was evidence of widespread discriminatory practices within the health care system itself. The individual level focused on the immigrant's fear of deportation, stigma, and lack of capital (both social and financial) to obtain services. Recommendations identified in the papers reviewed included advocating for policy change to increase access to health care for undocumented immigrants, providing novel insurance options, expanding safety net services, training providers to better care for immigrant populations, and educating undocumented immigrants on navigating the system. There are numerous barriers to health care for undocumented immigrants. These vary by country and frequently change. Despite concerns that access to health care attracts immigrants, data demonstrates that people generally do not migrate to obtain health care. Solutions are needed that provide for noncitizens' health care.

6.
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...