Assessment of Treatment Outcomes in the Management of Club foot using the Ponseti Technique: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The Ponseti technique remains the preferred method for club foot treatment. Although measures of treatment outcomes have been well documented, there is no consensus on the determinants of those outcomes. This study aims to assess treatment outcomes and the factors which can influence treatment outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. A total of 472 children representing 748 feet in total were recruited. Patient characteristics such as age at presentation, gender, tenotomy, walking with or without deformity, parental educational status and occupation were documented. Outcomes of care were assessed using indictors such as parents' satisfaction with the outcome of treatment and the patients' ambulation without deformity. The relationships between the determinant factors and these outcomes were explored using multivariable binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Most of the children (69.1%) were aged below 2 years. Brace compliance was very high (89.9%). The pre-treatment average Pirani scores were 3.9 ± 1.8 and 4.3 ± 1.8 for the right and left feet, respectively. Majority (88.3%) of the children achieved ambulation without deformity, whereas most (87%) of the parents were satisfied with the treatment outcomes. In total, parental satisfaction with child's treatment outcomes was lower in parents who were not formally educated odds ratio (OR) = 0.19 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.43), but parental satisfaction was lower if the child had higher Pirani score OR = 0.77 (95% CI 0.62-0.96). Children who had more casts applied to the affected foot were more likely to walk without deformity OR = 1.24 (95% CI 1.01-1.52). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that treatment outcomes in children with club foot can be determined by some sociodemographic and treatment-related factors.

Case studies of multi-disciplinary team management of atypical gastric cancer: challenges and lessons learned (about two cases).

There is a paradigm shift towards adopting a multidisciplinary team (MDT) model in the care of cancer patients, with increasing evidence to support its effectiveness. Cancers are biologically distinct, patients present in diverse ways and require, different therapeutic approaches in their management. Patient symptoms and treatment side-effects as well as physical and psychological impact vary according to cancer location and treatment plan. The varied clinical scenarios cancer patients present further buttress the need for MDT practice in hospitals to improve the quality of patient care, in contrast to the outdated concept of holistic treatment offered by a single physician. Unlike Europe, United States of America and Australia which have implemented successful MDT cancer care programs, Nigeria is just coming on board. We present two cases of gastric cancer (seen two months apart) with atypical presentation and the role of MDT in their evaluation and management. These case studies highlight the role of MDT in the management of cancer patients in Nigeria lending credence to the urgent need to implement this model of care in our cancer patients in a bid to improve the quality of care and outcome.