Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Stat Med ; 36(8): 1302-1318, 2017 04 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28028825

ABSTRACT

Randomisation schemes are rules that assign patients to treatments in a clinical trial. Many of these schemes have the common aim of maintaining balance in the numbers of patients across treatment groups. The properties of imbalance that have been investigated in the literature are based on two treatment groups. In this paper, their properties for K > 2 treatments are studied for two randomisation schemes: centre-stratified permuted-block and complete randomisation. For both randomisation schemes, analytical approaches are investigated assuming that the patient recruitment process follows a Poisson-gamma model. When the number of centres involved in a trial is large, the imbalance for both schemes is approximated by a multivariate normal distribution. The accuracy of the approximations is assessed by simulation. A test for treatment differences is also considered for normal responses, and numerical values for its power are presented for centre-stratified permuted-block randomisation. To speed up the calculations, a combined analytical/approximate approach is used. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Subject(s)
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Statistics as Topic/methods , Humans , Models, Statistical , Patient Selection , Poisson Distribution , Random Allocation , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods
4.
Pharm Stat ; 10(6): 517-22, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22140055

ABSTRACT

A new analytic statistical technique for predictive event modeling in ongoing multicenter clinical trials with waiting time to response is developed. It allows for the predictive mean and predictive bounds for the number of events to be constructed over time, accounting for the newly recruited patients and patients already at risk in the trial, and for different recruitment scenarios. For modeling patient recruitment, an advanced Poisson-gamma model is used, which accounts for the variation in recruitment over time, the variation in recruitment rates between different centers and the opening or closing of some centers in the future. A few models for event appearance allowing for 'recurrence', 'death' and 'lost-to-follow-up' events and using finite Markov chains in continuous time are considered. To predict the number of future events over time for an ongoing trial at some interim time, the parameters of the recruitment and event models are estimated using current data and then the predictive recruitment rates in each center are adjusted using individual data and Bayesian re-estimation. For a typical scenario (continue to recruit during some time interval, then stop recruitment and wait until a particular number of events happens), the closed-form expressions for the predictive mean and predictive bounds of the number of events at any future time point are derived under the assumptions of Markovian behavior of the event progression. The technique is efficiently applied to modeling different scenarios for some ongoing oncology trials. Case studies are considered.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Models, Statistical , Multicenter Studies as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Patient Selection , Bayes Theorem , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Humans , Markov Chains , Time Factors
5.
Pharm Stat ; 10(1): 50-9, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20112277

ABSTRACT

This paper deals with the analysis of randomization effects in multi-centre clinical trials. The two randomization schemes most often used in clinical trials are considered: unstratified and centre-stratified block-permuted randomization. The prediction of the number of patients randomized to different treatment arms in different regions during the recruitment period accounting for the stochastic nature of the recruitment and effects of multiple centres is investigated. A new analytic approach using a Poisson-gamma patient recruitment model (patients arrive at different centres according to Poisson processes with rates sampled from a gamma distributed population) and its further extensions is proposed. Closed-form expressions for corresponding distributions of the predicted number of the patients randomized in different regions are derived. In the case of two treatments, the properties of the total imbalance in the number of patients on treatment arms caused by using centre-stratified randomization are investigated and for a large number of centres a normal approximation of imbalance is proved. The impact of imbalance on the power of the study is considered. It is shown that the loss of statistical power is practically negligible and can be compensated by a minor increase in sample size. The influence of patient dropout is also investigated. The impact of randomization on predicted drug supply overage is discussed.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Multicenter Studies as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Random Allocation , Humans , Models, Statistical , Patient Dropouts/statistics & numerical data , Patient Selection , Poisson Distribution , Sample Size
6.
Stat Med ; 29(7-8): 721-30, 2010 Mar 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20213718

ABSTRACT

Some general points regarding efficiency in clinical trials are made. Reasons as to why fitting many covariates to adjust the estimate of the treatment effect may be less problematic than commonly supposed are given. Two methods of dynamic allocation of patients based on covariates, minimization and Atkinson's approach, are compared and contrasted for the particular case where all covariates are binary. The results of Monte Carlo simulations are also presented. It is concluded that in the cases considered, Atkinson's approach is slightly more efficient than minimization although the difference is unlikely to be very important in practice. Both are more efficient than simple randomization, although it is concluded that fitting covariates may make a more valuable and instructive contribution to inferences about treatment effects than only balancing them.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Biostatistics/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Computer Simulation/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Monte Carlo Method , Patient Selection
7.
Stat Med ; 26(27): 4958-75, 2007 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17639505

ABSTRACT

This paper is focused on statistical modelling, prediction and adaptive adjustment of patient recruitment in multicentre clinical trials. We consider a recruitment model, where patients arrive at different centres according to Poisson processes, with recruitment rates viewed as a sample from a gamma distribution. A statistical analysis of completed studies is provided and properties of a few types of parameter estimators are investigated analytically and using simulation. The model has been validated using many real completed trials. A statistical technique for predictive recruitment modelling for ongoing trials is developed. It allows the prediction of the remaining recruitment time together with confidence intervals using current enrolment information, and also provision of an adaptive adjustment of recruitment by calculating the number of additional centres required to accomplish a study up to a certain deadline with a pre-specified probability. Results are illustrated for different recruitment scenarios.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Models, Statistical , Multicenter Studies as Topic/methods , Patient Selection , Computer Simulation , Humans , Monte Carlo Method
8.
Stat Med ; 26(22): 4163-78, 2007 Sep 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17385187

ABSTRACT

Markov-type models have been used in the analysis of disease progression. Although standard errors of model parameters are usually estimated, available software often does not permit the construction of confidence intervals around predictions of the dependent or response variable. A method is presented to calculate means and confidence intervals of model-predicted responses in time governed by a non-homogeneous hidden Markov model in continuous time. The Kolmogorov equations serve as the basis for the calculations. The method is realised in S-Plus and is applied to the prediction of headache responses in clinical studies of anti-migraine treatment. Means and confidence intervals are calculated by numerically solving differential equations that are non-linear in the explanatory variable. Results indicate that uncertainty on predicted drug responses is larger than that on predicted placebo responses and that pain-free responses are less precisely predicted than pain-relief responses. This is due to the uncertainty in the drug-specific parameters which is not present in predicted placebo responses.


Subject(s)
Markov Chains , Migraine Disorders , Biometry , Clinical Trials as Topic , Confidence Intervals , Humans , Migraine Disorders/classification , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Pain/drug therapy , Sumatriptan/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...