Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BJU Int ; 132(3): 314-320, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37129977

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether low-dose tadalafil (5 mg) is more efficient than tamsulosin (0.4 mg) in facilitating calculus expulsion in those receiving extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for solitary upper urinary tract calculi. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a triple-blinded, prospective, superiority, randomized controlled, single-centre trial. A total of 250 patients with solitary renal or ureteric calculus measuring 6-24 mm were randomized (1:1) to receive either 0.4 mg tamsulosin or 5 mg tadalafil daily for 30 days or until calculus clearance, whichever was earlier. RESULTS: There was no difference in the primary outcome, namely, calculus expulsion rate at 30 days (tamsulosin vs tadalafil, n (%) 99 [81.1%] vs 98 [80.3%] respectively, 95% confidence interval = 0.8% [-9.0, 10.7], P = 0.874). Similarly, a lack of difference was also noted in the secondary outcome, number of days to expulsion (tamsulosin vs tadalafil, geometric mean [SD] 13.59 [2.39] vs 13.74 [2.39] respectively, P = 0.928). Four patients discontinued the drug due to adverse drug reactions in the tadalafil group. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose tadalafil is not superior to tamsulosin in improving calculus expulsion when used as an adjunct to shockwave lithotripsy. In this study, we also noted that tadalafil was less tolerated.


Subject(s)
Lithotripsy , Ureteral Calculi , Humans , Tamsulosin/therapeutic use , Tadalafil/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Ureteral Calculi/therapy , Ureteral Calculi/complications , Lithotripsy/adverse effects
2.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 30(3): 242-9, 2007 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17644318

ABSTRACT

Diclofenac sodium (Dc), an anti-inflammatory agent, has remarkable inhibitory action both against drug-sensitive and drug-resistant clinical isolates of various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. The aim of this study was to determine the ability of Dc to protect mice from a virulent Salmonella infection. Dc injected at 1.5 microg/g and 3.0 microg/g mouse body weight significantly protected animals from the lethality of Salmonella infection. As was the case for the in vitro interaction, Dc in combination with streptomycin was even more effective. The non-antibiotic drug Dc has potential for the management of problematic antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Diclofenac/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/toxicity , Antipsychotic Agents/pharmacology , Colony Count, Microbial , Culture Media , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Diclofenac/toxicity , Drug Synergism , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Male , Mice , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Plasmids/genetics , Salmonella enterica/drug effects , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Streptomycin/pharmacology , Trifluoperazine/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...