Vital capacity versus maximal inspiratory pressure in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome and myasthenia gravis.

BACKGROUND: The objective is to determine whether maximal inspiratory pressure (P(imax)) measurement is more sensitive than vital capacity (VC) measurement to detect acute respiratory muscle failure considering a theoretical curvilinear relationship between volume and pressure. METHODS: Review of VC and P(imax) of all patients hospitalized in ICU for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and myasthenia gravis (MG) exacerbation. RESULTS: 84 consecutive caucasian patients between 19- and 70-years-old hospitalized in intensive care unit from April 2008 to December 2010, for MG exacerbation (44 patients) and GBS (40 patients). The regression curve between VC and P(imax) was linear rather than exponential (r = 0.599, P > 0.0001). The contingency table demonstrated agreement between VC and P(imax) (χ(2)= 26.7, P = 0.0001), with similar number of patients having abnormal P(imax) associated to normal VC and normal P(imax) associated to abnormal VC (9 (10.7%) vs. 8 (9.5%) respectively). Six of the patients developed an important decrease of VC from normal value to less than 60% of the predicted value and did not present evident curvilinear relationship between VC and P(imax) during this follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Because the regression between VC and P(imax) was linear rather than curvilinear, P(imax) was not more sensitive than VC for early detection of respiratory muscle failure in patients hospitalized in ICU for GBS and MG exacerbation. Therefore, VC remains well suited to assess acute respiratory muscle failure and P(imax) gives poor additional information.

Ability of family members to predict patient's consent to critical care research.

OBJECTIVE: A European Union Directive provides for the designation of a surrogate who can consent to or refuse inclusion of an incapacitated patient in research studies. The accuracy with which surrogates consent to research on behalf of patients has not been evaluated in the intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A prospective multicenter study was conducted in ten ICUs of the French Famirea study group between July and October 2004. Two hypothetical studies were simultaneously submitted to the patient, surrogate, and physician at the time that the patient was discharged to a ward. One study involved minimal risk and the other greater-than-minimal risk to the patients. RESULTS: With the minimal risk study there was patient-surrogate discrepancy in 32% of cases and patient-physician discrepancy in 25%. Corresponding figures with the greater-than-minimal risk study were 42% and 46%. None of the collected variables differed significantly between cases with and without patient-surrogate discrepancy. CONCLUSIONS: Family members designated to serve as surrogate decision makers may fail to accurately consent to research for critically ill patients in one-third to nearly one-half of cases.

Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients.

RATIONALE: Intensive care unit (ICU) admission of a relative is a stressful event that may cause symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). OBJECTIVES: Factors associated with these symptoms need to be identified. METHODS: For patients admitted to 21 ICUs between March and November 2003, we studied the family member with the main potential decision-making role. MEASUREMENTS: Ninety days after ICU discharge or death, family members completed the Impact of Event Scale (which evaluates the severity of post-traumatic stress reactions), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and 36-item Short-Form General Health Survey during a telephone interview. Linear regression was used to identify factors associated with the risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms. MAIN RESULTS: Interviews were obtained for family members of 284 (62%) of the 459 eligible patients. Post-traumatic stress symptoms consistent with a moderate to major risk of PTSD were found in 94 (33.1%) family members. Higher rates were noted among family members who felt information was incomplete in the ICU (48.4%), who shared in decision making (47.8%), whose relative died in the ICU (50%), whose relative died after end-of-life decisions (60%), and who shared in end-of-life decisions (81.8%). Severe post-traumatic stress reaction was associated with increased rates of anxiety and depression and decreased quality of life. CONCLUSION: Post-traumatic stress reaction consistent with a high risk of PTSD is common in family members of ICU patients and is the rule among those who share in end-of-life decisions. Research is needed to investigate PTSD rates and to devise preventive and early-detection strategies.

Half the family members of intensive care unit patients do not want to share in the decision-making process: a study in 78 French intensive care units.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the opinions of intensive care unit staff and family members about family participation in decisions about patients in intensive care units in France, a country where the approach of physicians to patients and families has been described as paternalistic. DESIGN: Prospective multiple-center survey of intensive care unit staff and family members. SETTING: Seventy-eight intensive care units in university-affiliated hospitals in France. PATIENTS: We studied 357 consecutive patients hospitalized in the 78 intensive care units and included in the study starting on May 1, 2001, with five patients included per intensive care unit. INTERVENTIONS: We recorded opinions and experience about family participation in medical decision making. Comprehension, satisfaction, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores were determined in family members. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Poor comprehension was noted in 35% of family members. Satisfaction was good but anxiety was noted in 73% and depression in 35% of family members. Among intensive care unit staff members, 91% of physicians and 83% of nonphysicians believed that participation in decision making should be offered to families; however, only 39% had actually involved family members in decisions. A desire to share in decision making was expressed by only 47% of family members. Only 15% of family members actually shared in decision making. Effectiveness of information influenced this desire. CONCLUSION: Intensive care unit staff should seek to determine how much autonomy families want. Staff members must strive to identify practical and psychological obstacles that may limit their ability to promote autonomy. Finally, they must develop interventions and attitudes capable of empowering families.

Junior versus senior physicians for informing families of intensive care unit patients.

To compare the effectiveness of information delivered to family members of critically ill patients by junior and senior physicians, we performed a prospective randomized multicenter trial in 11 French intensive care units. Patients (n = 220) were allocated at random to having their family members receive information by only junior or only senior physicians throughout the intensive care unit stay; there were 92 and 93 evaluable cases in the junior and senior groups, respectively, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Between Days 3 and 5, one family representative per patient was evaluated for comprehension of the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment in the patient; satisfaction with information and care; and presence of symptoms of anxiety and depression. No significant differences were found between the two groups for any of these three criteria. Family members informed by a junior physician were more likely to feel they had not been given enough information time (additional time wanted: 3 [0-6.5] vs. 0 [0-5] minutes, p = 0.01) and to have sought additional explanations from their usual doctor (48.9 vs. 34.4%, p = 0.004). Specialty residents, if given opportunities for acquiring experience, can become proficient in communicating with families and share this task with senior physicians.

Impact of a family information leaflet on effectiveness of information provided to family members of intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Comprehension and satisfaction are relevant criteria for evaluating the effectiveness of information provided to family members of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. We performed a prospective randomized trial in 34 French ICUs to compare comprehension of diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and satisfaction with information provided by ICU caregivers, in ICU patient family representatives who did (n = 87) or did not (n = 88) receive a family information leaflet (FIL) in addition to standard information. An FIL designed specifically for this study was delivered at the first visit of the family representative: it provided general information on the ICU and hospital, the name of the ICU physician caring for the patient, a diagram of a typical ICU room with the names of all the devices, and a glossary of 12 terms commonly used in ICUs. Characteristics of the ICUs, patients, and family representatives were similar in the two groups. The FIL reduced the proportion of family members with poor comprehension from 40.9% to 11.5% (p < 0.0001). In the representatives with good comprehension, the FIL was associated with significantly better satisfaction (21 [18 to 24, quartiles] versus 27 [24 to 29, quartiles], p = 0.01). These results indicate that ICU caregivers should consider using an FIL to improve the effectiveness of the information they impart to families.