Long-Term Outcome Following Treatment With Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells for Radiation-Induced Hyposalivation and Xerostomia.

BACKGROUND: Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (ASCs) are proposed as a new xerostomia treatment. The study evaluated the long-term safety and effectiveness of allogeneic ASCs in radiation-induced xerostomia among patients with previous oropharyngeal cancer. METHODS: This study constitutes 3-year follow-up on the original 10 patients who received allogeneic ASCs injections to the submandibular and parotid glands as part of the MESRIX-II trial. The MESRIX-II trial included the preliminary 4-month follow-up. The primary endpoint was long-term safety. Secondary endpoints were effectiveness evaluated by changes in salivary flow rate and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Immune response was evaluated by assessing the development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). FINDINGS: All 10 MESRIX-II patients completed the long-term follow-up (ie, no missing data). During the long-term follow-up, 2 patients encountered a significant adverse event, which was determined to be unrelated to the treatment. No DSAs were detectable at 3 years. The stimulated salivary flow rate increased significantly from an average of 0.66 mL/minute at baseline to 0.86 mL/minute at follow-up, corresponding to an increase of 0.20 [95% CI 0.08 to 0.30] mL/minute, or approximately 30%. Among the PROs, sticky saliva symptoms were reduced, with a -20.0 [95% CI -37.3 to -2.7] units. INTERPRETATION: In conclusion, this study is the first to present long-term follow-up outcomes of allogeneic ASC treatment as a therapeutic option for radiation-induced xerostomia. The study found that ASC treatment appears safe, and there were no indications of adverse immune responses at the 3-year follow-up. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the findings in larger settings.

Identification of the novel HLA allele HLA-DRB1*03:201 by next-generation sequencing.

HLA-DRB1*03:201 differs from HLA-DRB1*03:01 in exon 3 at codon 178 resulting in a proline to serine substitution.

Detection of the novel HLA allele, HLA-DQA1*01:65, identified in a Danish donor.

HLA-DQA1*01:65 differs from HLA-DQA1*01:03 in exon 1 at amino acid -7 a valine to methionine substitution.

Evaluation of mRNA-1273 against SARS-CoV-2 B.1.351 Infection in Nonhuman Primates

BackgroundVaccine efficacy against the B.1.351 variant following mRNA-1273 vaccination in humans has not been determined. Nonhuman primates (NHP) are a useful model for demonstrating whether mRNA-1273 mediates protection against B.1.351. MethodsNonhuman primates received 30 or 100 {micro}g of mRNA-1273 as a prime-boost vaccine at 0 and 4 weeks, a single immunization of 30 {micro}g at week 0, or no vaccine. Antibody and T cell responses were assessed in blood, bronchioalveolar lavages (BAL), and nasal washes. Viral replication in BAL and nasal swabs were determined by qRT-PCR for sgRNA, and histopathology and viral antigen quantification were performed on lung tissue post-challenge. ResultsEight weeks post-boost, 100 {micro}g x2 of mRNA-1273 induced reciprocal ID50 neutralizing geometric mean titers against live SARS-CoV-2 D614G and B.1.351 of 3300 and 240, respectively, and 430 and 84 for the 30 {micro}g x2 group. There were no detectable neutralizing antibodies against B.1351 after the single immunization of 30 {micro}g. On day 2 following B.1.351 challenge, sgRNA in BAL was undetectable in 6 of 8 NHP that received 100 {micro}g x2 of mRNA-1273, and there was a [~]2-log reduction in sgRNA in NHP that received two doses of 30 {micro}g compared to controls. In nasal swabs, there was a 1-log10 reduction observed in the 100 {micro}g x2 group. There was limited inflammation or viral antigen in lungs of vaccinated NHP post-challenge. ConclusionsImmunization with two doses of mRNA-1273 achieves effective immunity that rapidly controls lower and upper airway viral replication against the B.1.351 variant in NHP.

Identification of the novel HLA allele, HLA-DPA1*01:46, identified in a man of Serbian origin.

HLA-DPA1*01:46 differs from HLA-DPA1*01:03 in exon 2 at amino acid 85; Aspartate to Asparagine substitution.

[Donor search for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation].

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a clinical example of precision medicine, as one individual donor is selected for one individual patient based on genetic findings in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system. Unrelated donor search for Danish patients is based on an international collaboration between global registries hosting more than 37 million potential donors worldwide for patients in need. The implementation of next-generation sequencing technologies has been a revolution in donor registry typing due to more precise, detailed and cheaper HLA analyses, which is discussed in this review.

Addition of plerixafor for CD34+ cell mobilization in six healthy stem cell donors ensured satisfactory grafts for transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation, collection of a sufficient number of HSCs at a fixed time point is crucial. For HSC mobilization into the peripheral blood, the standard regimen, that is, granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), may be inadequate. Use of plerixafor as adjuvant to G-CSF is so far off-label in healthy donors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We present six cases in which the "just-in-time" addition of plerixafor ensured proper CD34+ collection from healthy donors with insufficient G-CSF mobilization. In four of these cases a high number of CD34+ cells was needed due to subsequent CD34+ selection or haploidentical transplantation. RESULTS: From all six donors a sufficient number of CD34+ cells was obtained by using plerixafor as an adjuvant to G-CSF. This treatment regimen resulted in only mild side effects for the donor. CONCLUSION: We have presented six cases with different causes leading to insufficient G-CSF mobilization in allogeneic donors and in which the administration of plerixafor just-in-time ensured a proper graft for transplantation.

Provocation of migraine with aura using natural trigger factors.

OBJECTIVE: It is well-known that migraine attacks can be precipitated by various stimuli. More than 50% of patients with migraine with aura (MA) know of at least one stimulus that always or often triggers their MA attacks. The objective of this study was to expose patients with MA to their self-reported trigger factors in order to assess the causal relation between trigger factors and attacks. METHODS: We recruited 27 patients with MA who reported that bright or flickering light or strenuous exercise would trigger their migraine attacks. The patients were experimentally provoked by different types of photo stimulation, strenuous exercise, or a combination of these 2 factors. During and following provocation, the patients would report any aura symptoms or other migraine-related symptoms. RESULTS: Of 27 provoked patients with MA, 3 (11%) reported attacks of MA following provocation. An additional 3 patients reported migraine without aura attacks. Following exercise, 4 out of 12 patients reported migraine, while no patients developed attacks following photo stimulation. CONCLUSION: Experimental provocation using self-reported natural trigger factors causes MA only in a small subgroup of patients with MA. Prospective confirmation is important for future studies of migraine trigger factors and in the clinical management of patients with migraine.

The nitric oxide synthase inhibitor and serotonin-receptor agonist NXN-188 during the aura phase of migraine with aura: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study.

Background and aims NXN-188 is a combined neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) inhibitor and 5HT-1B/1D receptor agonist which has previously shown efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine. Nitric oxide (NO) is involved in the pathogenesis of migraine pain and is formed after cortical spreading depression. Therefore NXN-188 could perhaps prevent the development of the headache phase in migraine with aura if taken during the aura. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 600mg NXN-188 in the acute treatment of migraine when dosed during the aura. Methods A single-centre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover trial. The study medication was taken during the aura and the patients kept a study diary for 48h post-dose. Results Of 615 patients screened, 50 patients were included in the study and randomized. Only 18 patients completed both treatments in compliance with the study procedures. 22% of patients reported freedom of headache at 2h after intake of NXN-188 compared with only 11% of patients after placebo. Conclusions The dual-action drug NXN-188 with 5HT-1B/1D agonism and nNOS inhibition, taken orally during the aura phase did not have a statistically substantial effect on migraine headache in this study. This study was limited by a high drop-out rate and small sample of included patients who were able to complete the cross-over protocol. Therefore, efficacy of the treatment cannot be refuted with certainty. Implications This study illustrates the difficulties of doing well controlled studies in migraine patients with aura. nNOS inhibition is expected to be effective mostly in the aura phase, i.e. the oral administration may have had too slow pharmacokinetics to have effect. Parenteral administration may overcome this obstacle. 5HT-1B/1D agonism is not effective when dosed during migraine aura. Repeated dosing of the NXN-188 during and immediately following the aura may have exploited more the dualaction. The high drop-out rate may be reduced in future studies by having the patients familiarize themselves with the study procedure by filling out the attack report form while treating one attack with their own medication before entering the trial. A parallel group comparison may be a more effective trial design for treatment during an aura.

Trigger factors for familial hemiplegic migraine.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to identify and describe migraine trigger factors in patients with familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) from a population-based sample. METHODS: 127 FHM patients were sent a questionnaire listing 16 trigger factors. Distinction was made between attacks of hemiplegic migraine (HM) and migraine with aura (MA) or without aura (MO) within each patient. RESULTS: The response rate was 59% (75/127) of whom 57 (76%) had current HM attacks. Sixty-three per cent (47/75) reported at least one factor triggering HM, and 36% (27/75) reported at least one factor that often or always caused HM. Twenty per cent (15/75) reported only HM, whereas FHM in combinations with MA and MO were reported by 80% (60/75). Stress (with attacks either following or during the stress), bright light, intense emotional influences and sleeping too much or too little were the trigger factors mentioned by most. CONCLUSION: Many FHM patients report trigger factors and one-third reported at least one trigger factor often or always triggering FHM. The typical triggers are the same as for MA. Patients should be educated to avoid these factors. The role of trigger factors in the onset of new or first attacks of FHM remains unknown.

Characterization of consistent triggers of migraine with aura.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to characterize perceived consistent triggers of migraine with aura (MA). METHOD: Questionnaires specifically designed to characterize various trigger factors were sent to 181 participants identified in an earlier study. All participants had formerly identified at least one factor that often or always triggered an MA attack. They only answered questions regarding this or these factor(s). RESULTS: The response rate to the questionnaire was 70% (126/179). A number of subtype triggers were mentioned by a high proportion of patients: too much work (under the stress category 54/64), reflected sunlight (under the light category 35/44), too little sleep (under the sleep category 19/24), red wine (under the alcohol category 20/22), passive smoking (under the smoke category 11/11), menstruation (under the menstruation or break from the pill category 12/14) and perfume (under the fumes/heavy scents category 12/15). Hormones, light and stress were reported to cause at least 50 % of MA attacks in 62%, 47% and 42% of participants, respectively. No participants reported alcohol to be the trigger of 50% or more of their attacks. In the groups of participants with "light", "fumes/heavy scents", "smoke" or "physical effort" as triggers, nearly all patients reported that an exposure time to the trigger of less than 3 hours (90-100% of patients) was necessary to trigger an attack and a latency to onset of attack of less than 3 hours (90-100% of patients). CONCLUSION: Our study has provided new knowledge about factors that in particular patients consistently trigger MA. In daily routine practice this information should be helpful in identifying factors to avoid. Patients with trigger factors that always or usually trigger attacks of MA will be highly useful for imaging and other experimental studies.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide triggers migraine-like attacks in patients with migraine with aura.

INTRODUCTION: Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a key molecule in migraine pathogenesis. Intravenous CGRP infusion triggers delayed migraine-like attacks in patients with migraine without aura (MO). In contrast to patients with MO, in prior studies patients with familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) did not report more migraine-like attacks compared to controls. Whether CGRP triggers migraine in patients with typical (non-hemiplegic) migraine with aura is (MA) unknown. In the present study we examined the migraine inducing effect of CGRP infusion in patients suffering from MA and healthy controls. METHODS: Fourteen patients suffering exclusively from migraine with typical aura (MA) and 11 healthy volunteers received a continuous intravenous infusion of 1.5 µg/min CGRP over 20 minutes. Headache and other migraine symptoms were scored every 10 minutes for one hour and self recorded hourly thereafter and until 13 hours post-infusion. RESULTS: CGRP infusion induced significantly more delayed headaches in MA patients (12 out of 14) than in controls (2 out of 11) (p = 0.001). Furthermore, significantly more MA patients (57%; 8 out of 14) fulfilled criteria for an experimentally induced migraine attack after CGRP than controls (0%; 0 out of 11) (P = 0.003). Four patients (28%) reported aura symptoms after CGRP infusion. CONCLUSION: CGRP triggered migraine-like attacks without aura in patients suffering exclusively from MA. It also triggered a typical aura in 28% of the patients. These data indicate similar neurobiological pathways responsible for triggering migraine headache in MA and MO patients, and suggest differences between MA/MO and FHM.

On the methodology of drug trials in migraine with aura.

INTRODUCTION: Specific problems occur in clinical treatment trials for migraine with aura that differ from those encountered in treatment trials for migraine without aura. DISCUSSION: Based on our experience with four such trials, we point to a number of possible solutions and outline areas for future inquiry. We make recommendations about subject selection; the choice, definition and assessment of outcome measures; optimal treatments in relation to aura and headache; and we provide samples of study report forms used to record occurrence of aura and headache in this population.