Effects of acetylation of histone H4 at lysines 8 and 16 on activity of the Hat1 histone acetyltransferase.

During nucleosome assembly in vivo, newly synthesized histone H4 is specifically diacetylated on lysines 5 and 12 within the H4 NH(2)-terminal tail domain. The highly conserved "K5/K12" deposition pattern of acetylation is thought to be generated by the Hat1 histone acetyltransferase, which in vivo is found in the HAT-B complex. In the following report, the activity and substrate specificity of the human HAT-B complex and of recombinant yeast Hat1p have been examined, using synthetic H4 NH(2)-terminal peptides as substrates. As expected, the unacetylated H4 peptide was a good substrate for acetylation by yeast Hat1p and human HAT-B, while the K5/K12-diacetylated peptide was not significantly acetylated. Notably, an H4 peptide previously diacetylated on lysines 8 and 16 was a very poor substrate for acetylation by either yeast Hat1p or human HAT-B. Treating the K8/K16-diacetylated peptide with histone deacetylase prior to the HAT-B reaction raised acetylation at K5/K12 to 70-80% of control levels. These results present strong support for the model of H4-Hat1p interaction proposed by Dutnall et al. (Dutnall, R. N., Tafrov, S. T., Sternglanz, R., and Ramakrishnan, V. (1998) Cell 94, 427-438) and provide evidence for the first time that site-specific acetylation of histones can regulate the acetylation of other substrate sites.

Separation of histone variants and post-translationally modified isoforms by triton/acetic acid/urea polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

Due to their similarities in size and charge, complete resolution of histones by electrophoresis poses a considerable challenge. The addition of nonionic detergents to the traditional acetic acid/urea (AU) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) system has afforded an excellent method to separate not only the different modified forms of histones, but also the primary sequence variant subtypes of selected histone species; it is widely used to separate histones with varying levels of acetylation. This unit describes the use of gels containing the nonionic detergent Triton X-100, referred to as Triton/acetic acid/urea (TAU) polyacrylamide gels, for analysis of histones. Also included are support protocols detailing several accessory techniques: assembly of gel plates for the TAU gel, preparation of histones from isolated nuclei in a solubilized form amenable to electrophoresis, and electrophoretic transfer of proteins from these gels to PVDF membranes.

Role of histone acetylation in the assembly and modulation of chromatin structures.

The acetylation of the core histone N-terminal "tail" domains is now recognized as a highly conserved mechanism for regulating chromatin functional states. The following article examines possible roles of acetylation in two critically important cellular processes: replication-coupled nucleosome assembly, and reversible transitions in chromatin higher order structure. After a description of the acetylation of newly synthesized histones, and of the likely acetyltransferases involved, an overview of histone octamer assembly is presented. Our current understanding of the factors thought to assemble chromatin in vivo is then described. Genetic and biochemical investigations of the function the histone tails, and their acetylation, in nucleosome assembly are detailed, followed by an analysis of the importance of histone deacetylation in the maturation of newly replicated chromatin. In the final section the involvement of the histone tail domains in chromatin higher order structures is addressed, along with the role of histone acetylation in chromatin folding. Suggestions for future research are offered in the concluding remarks.

Preparation/analysis of chromatin replicated in vivo and in isolated nuclei.

This article outlined biochemical methodologies for the labeling, detection, and analysis of newly replicated and newly assembled nucleosomes. The isolation of specific vertebrate factors that may be involved in chromatin assembly in vivo, such as nucleoplasmin, CAF-1, and NAP-1 and their counterparts in Drosophila and yeast add a further dimension to the study of nucleosome assembly in living cells. In particular, the ability to genetically manipulate the yeast system, together with the identification of yeast enzymes that acetylate newly synthesized H4, will certainly provide exciting new avenues for the investigation of chromatin assembly in vivo.

Histones in transit: cytosolic histone complexes and diacetylation of H4 during nucleosome assembly in human cells.

The organization and acetylation of nascent histones prior to their stable incorporation into chromatin were examined. Through sedimentation and immunoprecipitation analyses of HeLa cytosolic extracts, two somatic non-nucleosomal histone complexes were detected: one containing nascent H3 and H4, and a second containing H2A (and probably H2B) in association with the nonhistone protein NAP-1. The H3/H4 complex has a sedimentation coefficient of 5-6S, consistent with the presence of one or more escort proteins. H4 in the cytosolic H3/H4 complex is diacetylated, fully in accord with the acetylation state of newly synthesized H4 in chromatin. The diacetylation of nascent human H4 is therefore completed prior to nucleosome assembly. As part of our studies of the nascent H3/H4 complex, the cytoplasmic histone acetyltransferase most likely responsible for acetylating newly synthesized H4 was also investigated. HeLa histone acetyltransferase B (HAT B) acetylates H4 but not H3 in vitro, and maximally diacetylates H4 even in the presence of sodium butyrate. Human HAT B acetylates H4 exclusively on the lysine residues at positions 5 and 12, in complete agreement with the highly conserved acetylation pattern of nascent nucleosomal H4 (Sobel et al., 1995), and has a native molecular weight of approximately 100 kDa. Based on our findings a model is presented for the involvement of histone acetylation and NAP-1 in H2A/H2B deposition and exchange, during nucleosome assembly and chromatin remodeling in vivo.

Relationship between methylation and acetylation of arginine-rich histones in cycling and arrested HeLa cells.

In the following report the relationship between histone methylation and histone acetylation has been examined in HeLa cells to better define the distribution of these two modifications. By labeling methylated histones in the presence or absence of sodium butyrate, we have found that the methylation of H3 is much more targeted to rapidly acetylated chromatin than is the methylation of H4, which largely involves the unacetylated subtype even in the presence of butyrate. Newly methylated H3 is highly likely to be complexed in nucleosomes that contain acetylated H4, as determined by immunoprecipitating radiolabeled chromatin with antibodies specific for acetylated H4 isoforms. In contrast, dynamically methylated H4 is underrepresented in acetylated chromatin, relative to newly methylated H3. The preferential methylation of acetylated H3 continues after pretreatment of cells with cycloheximide, indicating that not all acetylation-related methylation is associated with histone synthesis. This was confirmed by analyzing histone methylation in cells arrested at the G1/S boundary, in which histone synthesis was sharply lowered (relative to randomly cycling cells): under these conditions H3 methylation declined only approximately 4-fold, although ongoing methylation of H4 decreased approximately 20-fold. The continuing methylation of H3 in arrested cells included all H3 sequence variants, was selective for acetylated H3, and coincided with methyl group turnover that could not be ascribed to histone replacement synthesis. Most newly methylated H3 in arrested cells was complexed with acetylated H4 in chromatin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Conservation of deposition-related acetylation sites in newly synthesized histones H3 and H4.

Newly synthesized histone H4 is deposited in a diacetylated isoform in a wide variety of organisms. In Tetrahymena a specific pair of residues, lysines 4 and 11, have been shown to undergo this modification in vivo. In this report, we demonstrate that the analogous residues, lysines 5 and 12, are acetylated in Drosophila and HeLa H4. These data strongly suggest that deposition-related acetylation sites in H4 have been highly, perhaps absolutely, conserved. In Tetrahymena and Drosophila newly synthesized histone H3 is also deposited in several modified forms. Using pulse-labeled H3 we have determined that, like H4, a specific, but distinct, subset of lysines is acetylated in these organisms. In Tetrahymena, lysines 9 and 14 are highly preferred sites of acetylation in new H3 while in Drosophila, lysines 14 and 23 are strongly preferred. No evidence has been obtained for acetylation of newly synthesized H3 in HeLa cells. Thus, although the pattern and sites of deposition-related acetylation appear to be highly conserved in H4, the same does not appear to be the case for histone H3.

Generation and characterization of novel antibodies highly selective for phosphorylated linker histone H1 in Tetrahymena and HeLa cells.

Phosphorylated forms of Tetrahymena macronuclear histone H1 were separated from each other and from dephosphorylated H1 by cation-exchange HPLC. A homogeneous fraction of hyperphosphorylated macronuclear H1 was then used to generate novel polyclonal antibodies highly selective for phosphorylated H1 in Tetrahymena and in human cells. These antibodies fail to recognize dephosphorylated forms of H1 in both organisms and are not reactive with most other nuclear or cytoplasmic phosphoproteins including those induced during mitosis. The selectivity of these antibodies for phosphorylated forms of H1 in Tetrahymena and in HeLa argues strongly that these antibodies recognize highly conserved phosphorylated epitopes found in most H1s and from this standpoint Tetrahymena H1 is not atypical. Using these antibodies in indirect immunofluorescence analyses, we find that a significant fraction of interphase mammalian cells display a strikingly punctate pattern of nuclear fluorescence. As cells enter S-phase, nuclear staining becomes more diffuse, increases significantly, and continues to increase as cells enter mitosis. As cells exit from mitosis, staining with the anti-phosphorylated H1 antibodies is rapidly lost presumably owing to the dephosphorylation of H1. These immunofluorescent data document precisely the cell cycle changes in the level of H1 phosphorylation determined by earlier biochemical studies and suggest that these antibodies represent a powerful new tool to probe the function(s) of H1 phosphorylation in a wide variety of eukaryotic systems.

Parental nucleosomes segregated to newly replicated chromatin are underacetylated relative to those assembled de novo.

Antibodies specific for acetylated histone H4 were used to examine the acetylation state of parental histones that segregate to newly replicated DNA. To generate newly replicated chromatin containing only segregated parental nucleosomes, isolated nuclei were labeled with [3H]TTP in vitro; alternatively, whole cells were labeled with [3H]thymidine in the presence of cycloheximide. Soluble chromatin was prepared by micrococcal nuclease digestion, and subjected to immunoprecipitation with "penta" antibodies (Lin et al., 1989). In sharp contrast to nucleosomes containing newly synthesized, diacetylated H4 (Perry et al., 1993), chromatin replicated in vitro was only marginally susceptible to immunoprecipitation. Control experiments established that bona fide acetylated chromatin was selectively immunoprecipitated by the same techniques and that segregated nucleosomes were not disassembled during treatment with "penta" antibodies. When replication was coupled to an in vitro histone acetylation system, the enrichment for segregated nucleosomes in the immunopellet increased approximately 3-fold, demonstrating that changes in the acetylation state of segregated histones can be detected immunologically and that parental histones on new DNA are accessible to acetyltransferases during, or immediately after, DNA replication. In vivo pulse-chase experiments, performed in the presence of cycloheximide, confirmed these results. Uptake experiments further established that concurrent histone acetylation did not alter the rate of DNA synthesis in vitro. Our results provide evidence that replication-competent chromatin is not obligatorily acetylated, and indicate that the acetylation status of segregated histones may be maintained during chromatin replication. The possible significance of this, with respect to the regulation of chromatin higher order structures during DNA replication, and the propagation of transcriptionally active vs inactive chromatin structures, is discussed.

Analysis of nucleosome assembly and histone exchange using antibodies specific for acetylated H4.

Using antibodies that specifically recognize the acetylated forms of histone H4, we show that it is possible to immunoprecipitate newly assembled (acetylated) nucleosomes. Newly replicated HeLa cell chromatin was labeled for 5-30 min with [3H]thymidine in the presence of sodium butyrate (thus inhibiting the deacetylation of newly deposited H4); bulk chromatin DNA was labeled for 24 h with [14C]thymidine. When soluble nucleosomes were incubated with immobilized antibodies, a comparison of the bound and unbound fractions showed up to a 65-fold enrichment for new chromatin DNA in the immunoprecipitate (bound), relative to the supernatant (unbound). No enrichment for new DNA was observed when preimmune control serum was used in a similar fashion. The enrichment for new DNA in the immunopellet was paralleled by a similar enrichment for all four newly synthesized histones. Acetylation was required for antibody recognition: When chromatin was replicated in the absence of butyrate (permitting histone deacetylation and chromatin maturation), equally low levels of new and old chromatin were immunoprecipitated, and no enrichment for new DNA was observed. Competition experiments confirmed these results. Analyses of histone deposition during the inhibition of DNA replication established that acetylated chromatin is the preferential target for H2A/H2B exchange. These experiments provide evidence for the highly selective assembly of newly synthesized H3, H2A, and H2B with acetylated H4, and for the involvement of histone acetylation in dynamic chromatin remodeling. In addition, immunoprecipitations of radiolabeled cytosolic extracts identified a possible somatic chromatin preassembly complex, containing newly synthesized H3 and new (acetylated) H4.

Histone acetylation reduces H1-mediated nucleosome interactions during chromatin assembly.

During chromatin replication and nucleosome assembly, newly synthesized histone H4 is acetylated before it is deposited onto DNA, then deacetylated as assembly proceeds. In a previous study (Perry and Annunziato, Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 4275 [1989]) it was shown that when replication occurs in the presence of sodium butyrate (thereby inhibiting histone deacetylation), nascent chromatin fails to mature fully and instead remains preferentially sensitive to DNaseI, more soluble in magnesium, and depleted of histone H1 (relative to mature chromatin). In the following report the relationships between chromatin replication, histone acetylation, and H1-mediated nucleosome aggregation were further investigated. Chromatin was replicated in the presence or absence of sodium butyrate; isolated nucleosomes were stripped of linker histone, reconstituted with H1, and treated to produce Mg(2+)-soluble and Mg(2+)-insoluble chromatin fractions. Following the removal of H1, all solubility differences between chromatin replicated in sodium butyrate for 30 min (bu-chromatin) and control chromatin were lost. Reconstitution with H1 completely restored the preferential Mg(2+)-solubility of bu-chromatin, demonstrating that a reduced capacity for aggregation/condensation is an inherent feature of acetylated nascent nucleosomes; however, titration with excess H1 caused the solubility differences to be lost again. Moreover, when the core histone N-terminal "tails" (the sites of acetylation) were removed by trypsinization prior to reconstitution, H1 was unable to reestablish the altered solubility of chromatin replicated in butyrate. Thus, the core histone "tails," and the acetylation thereof, not only modulate H1-mediated nucleosome interactions in vitro, but also strongly influence the ability of H1 to differentiate between new and old nucleosomes. The data suggest a possible mechanism for the control of H1 deposition and/or chromatin folding during nucleosome assembly.

Inhibitors of topoisomerases I and II arrest DNA replication, but do not prevent nucleosome assembly in vivo.

Specific inhibitors of eukaryotic DNA topoisomerases I and II (camptothecin and VM-26, respectively) were used to examine the involvement of topoisomerases in DNA replication and chromatin assembly in vivo. When used singly, either camptothecin or VM-26 inhibited DNA synthesis in HeLa cells by more than 80%; when used simultaneously, the inhibitors effectively stopped replication, demonstrating that at least one class of topoisomerase must be active for fork propagation in vivo. To study nucleosome assembly during topoisomerase inhibition, three experimental strategies were employed: (1) pulse-chase experiments; (2) analyses of chromatin synthesized during residual replication in the presence of either camptothecin or VM-26; and (3) the assembly of previously replicated, unassembled DNA, generated in the presence of protein synthesis inhibitors. Using sensitivity to micrococcal nuclease and the maturation of non-nucleosomal replication intermediates as criteria, neither camptothecin nor VM-26, alone or in concert, inhibited nucleosome assembly under any experimental protocol tested. These data provide evidence that, although topoisomerase activity is essential for DNA replication, neither continuous fork propagation nor topoisomerase activity is required for chromatin assembly on new DNA.

Influence of histone acetylation on the solubility, H1 content and DNase I sensitivity of newly assembled chromatin.

In a previous report [Annunziato, A.T. and Seale, R.L. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258:12675] a novel intermediate in chromatin assembly was described (detected by labeling new DNA in the presence of the deacetylase inhibitor sodium butyrate), which retained approximately 50% of the heightened sensitivity of newly replicated chromatin to DNaseI. It is now reported that nucleosomes replicated in butyrate are considerably more soluble in the presence of magnesium, relative to chromatin replicated under control conditions, and that this heightened magnesium-solubility is reflected in a concomitant increase in the preferential solubility of nucleosomes containing newly synthesized core histones. This differential solubility was accompanied by a 5- to 6-fold depletion of histone H1, and was completely abolished by the selective removal of H1 from isolated nuclei. The removal of H1 also markedly reduced the preferential DNaseI sensitivity of chromatin replicated in butyrate. Further, when mononucleosomes of control and (acetylated) nascent chromatin were compared, no differences in DNaseI sensitivity were detected. These results provide evidence that the interactions between newly assembled nucleosomes and histone H1 are altered when histone deacetylation is inhibited during chromatin replication, and suggest a mechanism for the control of H1 deposition during nucleosome assembly in vivo.

Treatment with sodium butyrate inhibits the complete condensation of interphase chromatin.

The effects of histone hyperacetylation on chromatin fiber structure were studied using direct observations with the electron microscope. Histone hyperacetylation was induced in HeLa cells by treatment with sodium butyrate, and the ultrastructure of control and of acetylated chromatin fibers examined after fixation at different stages of compaction. No differences between control and acetylated chromatin were seen when the fibers were partially unfolded (10 mM NaCl, 20 mM NaCl, 50 mM NaCl), but in 100 mM NaCl, control chromatin showed further compaction to the "30 nm" fiber, while hyperacetylated chromatin failed to undergo this final compaction step. These results strongly suggest that histone acetylation causes a moderate "relaxation" rather than complete decondensation of interphase chromatin fibers. The relationship of these findings to the increased DNase I sensitivity of acetylated chromatin, and to transcription and replication, is discussed.

Presence of nucleosomes within irregularly cleaved fragments of newly replicated chromatin.

In previous reports (Annunziato et al., J. Biol. Chem., 256:11880-11886 [1981]; Annunziato and Seale, Biochemistry 21:5431-5438 [1982]) we have described two classes of newly replicated chromatin which differ in structure, solubility properties, and requirements for maturation. One class is nucleosomal, soluble at low to intermediate ionic strengths, and acquires mature nucleosomal composition and normal repeat length in the absence of concurrent protein synthesis. In contrast, the other class is cleaved irregularly by MNase (appearing as a smear in DNA gels), is insoluble at moderate ionic strengths, requires protein synthesis to gain normal subunit structure, and comprises approximately 60% of total new chromatin DNA after mild nuclease digestion. It is now demonstrated that this heterogeneous component (produced by the action of either MNase or Hae III on chromatin replicated in cycloheximide) yields nucleosomes when redigested with MNase. The presence of nucleosomes within heterogeneous chromatin fragments suggests that nucleosomal and non-nucleosomal regions may be juxtaposed during chromatin replication. These findings are discussed with respect to current models of nucleosome segregation.

High mobility group proteins: abundance, turnover, and relationship to transcriptionally active chromatin.

We have measured the abundance of high mobility group (HMG) proteins 14 and 17 in HeLa cell chromatin and their fractionation with respect to transcriptionally active sequences. HMG protein 17 constitutes 10-20% of the mass of an individual core histone; HMG 14 is approximately one-tenth the mass of HMG 17. The enrichment of HMG proteins, relative to bulk chromatin, is less than 2-fold in the chromatin fraction enriched 6-fold in active sequences. The digestion characteristics of HMG nucleosomes indicate that they are interspersed with H1 nucleosomes and other monomer species. The HMG monomers are quite resistant to degradation by micrococcal nuclease and can be resolved as distinct nucleoprotein entities after trimming of the DNA to core length. Turnover measurements showed that HMG proteins 14 and 17 are stable for at least 24 h. When nucleosome monomers are reconstituted with a 0.35 M NaCl nuclear protein extract, each nucleosome subtype can be reconstituted; however, this is a function of both the amount of extract added and the DNA length of the nucleosomes. When the kinetics of reconstitution of bulk vs. coding sequences were measured with cDNA, there was no significant enrichment of active sequences in the HMG-containing mononucleosomes of HeLa cells at any ratio of extract to monomer employed. In Friend cells, the abundance of sequences among mononucleosome species was the same for the transcribed beta-major globin gene, a transcriptionally inactive embryonic globin, and an inactive immunoglobulin gene. There was little correlation of HMG content with transcriptionally active chromatin, either native or reconstituted.

Histone deacetylation is required for the maturation of newly replicated chromatin.

The effects of inhibiting histone deacetylation on the maturation of newly replicated chromatin have been examined. HeLa cells were labeled with [3H]thymidine in the presence or absence of sodium butyrate; control experiments demonstrated that butyrate did not significantly inhibit DNA replication for at least 70 min. Like normal nascent chromatin, chromatin labeled for brief periods (0.5-1 min) in the presence of butyrate was more sensitive to digestion with DNase I and micrococcal nuclease than control bulk chromatin. However, chromatin replicated in butyrate did not mature as in normal replication, but instead retained approximately 50% of its heightened sensitivity to DNase I. Incubation of mature chromatin in butyrate for 1 h did not induce DNase I sensitivity: therefore, the presence of sodium butyrate was required during replication to preserve the increased digestibility of nascent chromatin DNA. In contrast, sodium butyrate did not inhibit or retard the maturation of newly replicated chromatin when assayed by micrococcal nuclease digestion, as determined by the following criteria: 1) digestion to acid solubility, 2) rate of conversion to mononucleosomes, 3) repeat length, and 4) presence of non-nucleosomal DNA. Consistent with the properties of chromatin replicated in butyrate, micrococcal nuclease also did not preferentially attack the internucleosomal linkers of chromatin regions acetylated in vivo. The observation of a novel chromatin replication intermediate, which is highly sensitive to DNase I but possesses normal resistance to micrococcal nuclease, suggests that nucleosome assembly and histone deacetylation are not obligatorily coordinated. Thus, while deacetylation is required for chromatin maturation, histone acetylation apparently affects chromatin organization at a level distinct from that of core particle or linker, possibly by altering higher order structure.

Chromatin replication, reconstitution and assembly.

Many previously held concepts about the replication of chromatin have recently been revised, or seriously challenged. For instance, within the last two years, evidence has accumulated to indicate that newly synthesized DNA is not the sole site of deposition of newly synthesized histones, and that histones are not only made, but are assembled into chromatin in the absence of DNA synthesis. Furthermore, segregation of parental histones to daughter DNA duplexes may be bidirectional, rather than the previously accepted unidirectional mechanism. The storage of histones prior to assembly apparently involves histone pairs rather than octamers, and similarly, histones associate with DNA in (apparent) pairs, rather than as pre-assembled octameric units. It is currently questioned whether or not nucleoplasmin is involved in either histone storage or nucleosome assembly. The onset of histone synthesis has recently been found to occur in late G1 rather than in S, and thus is independent of DNA synthesis; however, the cessation of histone synthesis is linked to that of DNA. Thus, there emerges from this newly accumulated data the conclusion that chromatin biosynthesis is not as straightforward as was believed just a few years ago. As we review the evidence on each of these subjects, we attempt to point out directions for future experimentation.

Maturation of nucleosomal and nonnucleosomal components of nascent chromatin: differential requirements for concurrent protein synthesis.

The DNA of newly replicated chromatin is comprised of two components, distinguishable by their solubility characteristics and requirements for maturation. One of these components possesses core histones, typical nucleosomal structure, a nuclease-resistant core containing 146 base pairs (bp) of new DNA, and all the nucleosomal species found in bulk chromatin (due to bound histone H1 and high mobility group proteins). In addition, this class of nascent chromatin exhibits a shortened repeat length of approximately 165 bp, as opposed to the 288-bp repeat of bulk chromatin. Within 10 min of DNA synthesis, the spacing of mature chromatin is established; the spacing maturation can occur in the absence of protein synthesis. The second class of nascent DNA is distinguished from the nucleosomal component by its insolubility, lack of discernible nucleosomal organization, and dependence on protein synthesis to attain typical subunit structure. This unassembled component is not free DNA, as demonstrated by its intermediate resistance to nucleolytic degradation. The structural properties and maturation requirements of this material suggest that it is the site of de novo nucleosome assembly.

Association of newly synthesized histones with replicating and nonreplicating regions of chromatin.

Histone deposition in HeLa cells has been studied by monitoring the fractionation and electrophoresis mobility of pulse-labeled histones under conditions that separate newly replicated from bulk chromatin DNA. The separation efficiency of these two methods is approximately 70%. Following micrococcal nuclease digestion, chromatin was fractionated by salt elution. 50-65% of the newly synthesized histones eluted with bulk chromatin at NaCl concentrations between 0.1 and 0.3 M and were further down to co-electrophorese with bulk chromatin DNA, not with the more extensively digested newly replicated chromatin DNA contained in those fractions. The remaining chromatin fractions, solubilized with 0.4-0.6 M NaCl, were several-fold enriched in nascent DNA (Annunziato, A. T., Schindler, R. K., Thomas, C. A., Jr., and Seale, R. L. (1981) J. Biol. Chem. 256, 11880-11886) and were correspondingly enriched for the balance (35-50%) of newly synthesized core histones. This fraction of newly synthesized core histone may be preferentially deposited onto newly replicated DNA. In contrast, histone H1 showed little tendency toward deposition onto new DNA. Within 15 min all new core histones attained the same solubility and electrophoretic mobility as bulk chromatin. We conclude that newly synthesized histones are deposited onto both replicating and nonreplicating regions of chromatin.