Blood glucose control and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in people with type 1 diabetes.

PURPOSE: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) may have distinctive pathophysiological features in type 1 diabetes (T1D). We evaluated the independent role of blood glucose control on MASLD in T1D. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study on 659 T1D adult patients, MASLD was assessed by the Fatty Liver Index (FLI) and the Hepatic Steatosis Index (HSI). Anthropometric, biochemical, and clinical parameters were retrieved from electronic records. Blood glucose control status was evaluated by dividing participants into subgroups according to the median value of HbA1c [7.6% (60 mmol/mol)], and this analysis was repeated excluding overweight/obese patients. RESULTS: Patients with HbA1c above 7.6% (60 mmol/mol) showed significantly higher MASLD indices (HSI 38 ± 6 vs. 36 ± 5, p < 0.001; FLI 26 ± 26 vs.19 ± 19, p < 0.001), and higher proportions of MASLD identified by HSI (57 vs. 44%, p < 0.001) and FLI (14 vs. 7%, p < 0.001) than patients with HbA1c below 7.6% (60 mmol/mol). Similar results were obtained for HSI after the exclusion of overweight/obese patients. Stepwise linear regression analysis confirmed that HbA1c was independently associated with HSI (r = 0.496, p = 0.009) and FLI (r = 0.722, p = 0.007); waist circumference with HSI (r = 0.492, p < 0.001); and waist circumference (r = 0.700, p < 0.001), HDL cholesterol (r = 0.719, p < 0.001), and LDL cholesterol (r = 0.712, p < 0.001) with FLI. CONCLUSIONS: Blood glucose control is a main factor associated with MASLD in adults with T1D, also independently of overweight and obesity. Appropriate therapeutic strategies focused on tight blood glucose control may also be needed for the prevention and treatment of MASLD in T1D.

Postprandial glucose variability in type 1 diabetes: The individual matters beyond the meal.

AIM: To explore intraindividual (between-meals) and interindividual (between-subjects) variability of postprandial glucose response (PGR) in type 1 diabetes (T1DM). METHODS: Data were taken from five cross-over trials in 61 subjects with T1DM on insulin pump wherein the effects of different dietary components or the intraindividual-variability of PGR to the same meal were evaluated by CGM. Predictors (type of meal or nutrient composition) of early (iAUC0-3h), late (iAUC3-6h), total (iAUC0-6h), and time-course of postprandial blood glucose changes (iAUC3-6hminus0-3h) were evaluated using two mixed-effect linear regression models considering the patient's identification number as random-effect. RESULTS: High-glycemic-index (HGI) and low-glycemic-index meals were the best positive and negative predictors of glucose iAUC0-3h, respectively. A Low-Fat-HGI meal significantly predicted iAUC3-6hminus0-3h (Estimate 3268; p = 0.017). Among nutrients, dietary fiber was the only significant negative predictor of iAUC0-3h (Estimate -550; p < 0.001) and iAUC0-6h (Estimate -742; p = 0.01) and positive predictor of iAUC3-6hminus0-3h (Estimate 336; p = 0.043). For all models, the random-effect patient was statistically significant (p < 0.001 by ANOVA). CONCLUSION: Beyond the meal characteristics (including glycemic index, fat and fiber content), individual traits significantly influence PGR. Specific interindividual factors should be further identified to properly predict glucose response to meals with different composition in individuals with T1DM.

Adverse effects of fructose on cardiometabolic risk factors and hepatic lipid metabolism in subjects with abdominal obesity.

BACKGROUND: Overconsumption of dietary sugars, fructose in particular, is linked to cardiovascular risk factors such as type 2 diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. However, clinical studies have to date not clarified whether these adverse cardiometabolic effects are induced directly by dietary sugars, or whether they are secondary to weight gain. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of fructose (75 g day-1 ), served with their habitual diet over 12 weeks, on liver fat content and other cardiometabolic risk factors in a large cohort (n = 71) of abdominally obese men. METHODS: We analysed changes in body composition, dietary intake, an extensive panel of cardiometabolic risk markers, hepatic de novo lipogenesis (DNL), liver fat content and postprandial lipid responses after a standardized oral fat tolerance test (OFTT). RESULTS: Fructose consumption had modest adverse effects on cardiometabolic risk factors. However, fructose consumption significantly increased liver fat content and hepatic DNL and decreased ß-hydroxybutyrate (a measure of ß-oxidation). The individual changes in liver fat were highly variable in subjects matched for the same level of weight change. The increase in liver fat content was significantly more pronounced than the weight gain. The increase in DNL correlated positively with triglyceride area under the curve responses after an OFTT. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrated adverse effects of moderate fructose consumption for 12 weeks on multiple cardiometabolic risk factors in particular on liver fat content despite only relative low increases in weight and waist circumference. Our study also indicates that there are remarkable individual differences in susceptibility to visceral adiposity/liver fat after real-world daily consumption of fructose-sweetened beverages over 12 weeks.

Insulin resistance, postprandial GLP-1 and adaptive immunity are the main predictors of NAFLD in a homogeneous population at high cardiovascular risk.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The role of the different factors associated with fatty liver is still poorly defined. We evaluated the relationships between liver fat content (LF) and metabolic, inflammatory and nutritional factors in a homogeneous cohort of individuals at high cardio-metabolic risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 70 individuals with high waist circumference and at least one more criterion for metabolic syndrome enrolled in a nutritional intervention study, LF was evaluated at baseline by hepatic/renal echo intensity ratio (H/R), together with dietary habits (7-day dietary record), insulin sensitivity and ß-cell function (fasting and OGTT-derived indices), fasting and postprandial plasma GLP-1 and lipoproteins, and plasma inflammatory markers. H/R correlated positively with fasting and OGTT plasma glucose and insulin concentrations, HOMA-IR and ß-cell function, and IL-4, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, FGF and GCSF plasma concentrations (p < 0.05 for all), and negatively with insulin sensitivity (OGIS), dietary, polyphenols and fiber (p < 0.05 for all). By multiple stepwise regression analysis, the best predictors of H/R were OGIS (ß = -0.352 p = 0.001), postprandial GLP-1 (ß = -0.344; p = 0.001), HDL-cholesterol (ß = -0.323; p = 0.002) and IFN-γ (ß = 0.205; p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: A comprehensive evaluation of factors associated with liver fat, in a homogeneous population at high cardio-metabolic risk, indicated a pathogenic combination of the same pathways underlying the atherosclerotic process, namely whole body insulin sensitivity and inflammation. The higher predictive value of postprandial variables suggests that liver fat is essentially a postprandial phenomenon, with a relevant role possibly played by GLP-1. REGISTRATION NUMBER FOR CLINICAL TRIALS: NCT01154478.

Glycaemic load versus carbohydrate counting for insulin bolus calculation in patients with type 1 diabetes on insulin pump.

AIMS: To evaluate feasibility and effectiveness on short-term blood glucose control of using glycaemic load counting (GLC) versus carbohydrate counting (CC) for prandial insulin dosing in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: Nine T1D patients on insulin pump, aged 26-58 years, HbA1c 7.7 ± 0.8 % (61 ± 8.7 mmol/mol), participated in this real-life setting study. By a crossover design, patients were randomised to calculate their pre-meal insulin dose based on the insulin/glycaemic load ratio (GLC period) or the insulin/carbohydrate ratio (CC period) for 1 week, shifting to the alternate method for the next week, when participants duplicated their first week food plan. Over either week, a blind subcutaneous continuous glucose monitoring was performed, and a 7-day food record was filled in. RESULTS: Total daily insulin doses (45 ± 10 vs. 44 ± 9 I.U.; M ± SD, p = 0.386) and basal infusion (26 ± 7 vs. 26 ± 8 I.U., p = 0.516) were not different during GLC and CC periods, respectively. However, the range of insulin doses (difference between highest and lowest insulin dose) was wider during GLC, with statistical significance at dinner (8.4 ± 6.2 vs. 6.0 ± 3.9 I.U., p = 0.041). Blood glucose iAUC after lunch was lower, albeit not significantly, during GLC than CC period (0.6 ± 8.6 vs. 3.4 ± 8.2 mmol/l∙3 h, p = 0.059). Postprandial glucose variability, evaluated as the maximal amplitude after meal (highest minus lowest glucose value), was significantly lower during GLC than CC period at lunch (4.22 ± 0.28 vs. 5.47 ± 0.39 mmol/l, p = 0.002) and dinner (3.89 ± 0.33 vs. 4.89 ± 0.33, p = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: Calculating prandial insulin bolus based on glycaemic load counting is feasible in a real-life setting and may improve postprandial glucose control in people with T1D.

Test meals rich in marine long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids increase postprandial chylomicron response.

Postprandial lipid abnormalities are considered an independent cardiovascular risk factor. Hence, it is important to find nutritional strategies that are able to positively influence these abnormalities. Since the effect of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and polyphenols on postprandial lipids in humans is still under debate, we evaluated the acute response of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins to test meals that are naturally rich in polyphenols and/or marine long-chain (LC) n-3 PUFAs. We hypothesized that LC n-3 PUFA would have a different effect on chylomicron and very low density lipoproteins when compared with polyphenols or their combination. We randomly assigned 78 individuals who were at high cardiometabolic risk to 4 isoenergetic diets. These diets only differed in amount of LC n-3 PUFA and/or polyphenols. Prior to starting the intervention, each subject underwent a test meal similar to the type of diet assigned: low in LC n-3 PUFA and polyphenols (control), rich in LC n-3 PUFA and low in polyphenols, rich in polyphenols and low in LC n-3 PUFA, or rich in both. Blood samples were taken before and up to 6 hours after the test meal in order to evaluate cholesterol and triglycerides (plasma and triglyceride-rich lipoprotein), apolipoprotein B-48 (large very low density lipoprotein), glucagon-like peptide-1, and free fatty acid plasma levels. The levels of chylomicron cholesterol and triglyceride in response to the test meal rich in LC n-3 PUFA were significantly higher than after the control meal (P = .037 and P = .018); there was no difference in the other variables. In conclusion, this study indicates that acute administration of marine LC n-3 PUFA increases postprandial chylomicron response in contrast with their lowering chronic effects. These differences underline the importance of understanding the acute and chronic effects of nutritional, as well as of other types of, interventions.

The results of Look AHEAD do not row against the implementation of lifestyle changes in patients with type 2 diabetes.

The Look AHEAD trial, evaluating the effects of weight loss on cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality in overweight/obese people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), was interrupted after a median 9.5-year follow-up because the incidence of CV events was not different between the Intensive Lifestyle Intervention (ILI) and the control groups, and unlikely to statistically change thereafter. This made health providers and patients wondering about clinical value of diet and physical exercise in diabetic patients. Many factors may have made difficult to ascertain benefits of lifestyle intervention, besides the lower than predicted CV event rates. Among others, LDL-cholesterol was lowered more, with a higher use of statins, in the control group. Anyhow, ILI significantly improved numerous health conditions, including quality of life, CV risk factors and blood glucose control, with more diabetes remissions and less use of insulin. The intervention aimed at weight loss by reducing fat calories, and using meal replacements and, eventually, orlistat, likely underemphasizing dietary composition. There is suggestive evidence, in fact, that qualitative changes in dietary composition aiming at higher consumption of foods rich in fiber and with a high vegetable/animal fat ratio favorably influence CV risk in T2D patients. In conclusion, the Look AHEAD showed substantial health benefits of lifestyle modifications. Prevention of CV events may need higher attention to dietary composition, contributing to stricter control of CV risk factors. As a better health-related quality of life in people with diabetes is an important driver of our clinical decisions, efforts on early implementation of behavioral changes through a multifactorial approach are strongly justified.

A CHO/fibre diet reduces and a MUFA diet increases postprandial lipaemia in type 2 diabetes: no supplementary effects of low-volume physical training.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of a supervised physical training added to a healthy diet-rich in either carbohydrate and fibre (CHO/fibre) or monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA)-on postprandial dyslipidaemia, an independent cardiovascular risk factor particularly relevant in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Participants were forty-five overweight/obese subjects with T2D, of both genders, in good blood glucose control with diet or diet+metformin, with normal fasting plasma lipids. According to a parallel groups 2 × 2 factorial design, participants were randomized to an 8-week isoenergetic intervention with a CHO/fibre or a MUFA diet, with or without a supervised low-volume aerobic training programme. The main outcome of the study was the incremental area under the curve (iAUC) of lipid concentrations in the plasma chylomicron+VLDL lipoprotein fraction, isolated by preparative ultracentrifugation (NCT01025856). Body weight remained stable during the trial in all groups. Physical fitness slightly improved with training (VO2 peak, 16 ± 4 vs. 15 ± 3 ml/kg/min, M ± SD, p < 0.05). Postprandial triglyceride and cholesterol iAUCs in plasma and chylomicron+VLDL fraction decreased after the CHO/fibre diet, but increased after the MUFA diet with a significant effect for diet by two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). The addition of exercise training to either dietary intervention did not significantly influence postprandial lipid response. A diet rich in carbohydrates and fibre reduced postprandial triglyceride-rich lipoproteins compared with a diet rich in MUFA in patients with T2D. A supervised low-volume physical training did not significantly influence these dietary effects.

The association of hs-CRP with fasting and postprandial plasma lipids in patients with type 2 diabetes is disrupted by dietary monounsaturated fatty acids.

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether two dietary approaches recommended for diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular prevention-high-MUFA or complex carbohydrates/fiber-differently influence inflammation. A 4-week crossover study in 12 individuals with type 2 diabetes was performed. Fasting and postprandial hs-CRP plasma levels were not significantly different after a high-carbohydrate/high-fiber/low-glycemic index (CHO/fiber) and a high-MUFA diet. Compared with fasting, hs-CRP levels decreased significantly after the MUFA but not after the CHO/fiber meal. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins were significantly lower after the CHO/fiber than the MUFA diet. At fasting and postprandially, hs-CRP correlated with triglyceride in whole plasma, chylomicrons, small and large VLDL after the CHO/fiber but not after the MUFA diet. In conclusion, a MUFA-rich diet and a carbohydrate/fiber-rich diet induced similar effects on plasma hs-CRP concentrations. However, these dietary approaches seem to influence hs-CRP levels through different mechanisms. i.e., direct acute postprandial effects by MUFA and triglyceride-rich lipoproteins mediated effects by CHO/fiber.

Effects of meals with different glycaemic index on postprandial blood glucose response in patients with Type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of high-glycaemic index and low-glycaemic index meals on postprandial blood glucose in patients with Type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. METHODS: Sixteen patients with Type 1 diabetes under continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion treatment, age 36±0.5 years (mean±sem), HbA(1c) 7.6±0.2% (56±1.1 mmol/mol), consumed two test meals with an identical macronutrient composition, but with a different glycaemic index: 59 vs. 90. Blood glucose was checked before the test meal and every 30 min thereafter for 180 min. The same preprandial insulin dose was administered on the two occasions. RESULTS: Blood glucose concentrations following the low-glycaemic index meal were significantly lower than those of the high-glycaemic index meal (P<0.05 to P<0.01). The blood glucose area under the curve after the low-glycaemic index meal was 20% lower than after the high-glycaemic meal (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that meals with the same carbohydrate content but a different glycaemic index produce clinically significant differences in postprandial blood glucose.

Fasting and post-prandial adipose tissue lipoprotein lipase and hormone-sensitive lipase in obesity and type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Fasting and post-prandial abnormalities of adipose tissue (AT) lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and hormone- sensitive lipase (HSL) activities may have pathophysiological relevance in insulin-resistant conditions. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate activity and gene expression of AT LPL and HSL at fasting and 6 h after meal in two insulin-resistant groups - obese with Type 2 diabetes and obese without diabetes - and in non-diabetic normal-weight controls. MATERIAL/SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Nine obese subjects with diabetes, 10 with obesity alone, and 9 controls underwent measurements of plasma levels of glucose, insulin, and triglycerides before and after a standard fat-rich meal. Fasting and post-prandial (6 h) LPL and HSL activities and gene expressions were determined in abdominal subcutaneous AT needle biopsies. RESULTS: The diabetic obese subjects had significantly lower fasting and post-prandial AT heparin-releasable LPL activity than only obese and control subjects (p<0.05) as well as lower mRNA LPL levels. HSL activity was significantly reduced in the 2 groups of obese subjects compared to controls in both fasting condition and 6 h after the meal (p<0.05), while HSL mRNA levels were not different. There were no significant changes between fasting and 6 h after meal measurements in either LPL or HSL activities and gene expressions. CONCLUSIONS: Lipolytic activities in AT are differently altered in obesity and Type 2 diabetes being HSL alteration associated with both insulin-resistant conditions and LPL with diabetes per se. These abnormalities are similarly observed in the fasting condition and after a fat-rich meal.

Preprandial combination of lispro and NPH insulin improves overall blood glucose control in type 1 diabetic patients: a multicenter randomized crossover trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: While lispro insulin has been reported to lower postprandial blood glucose concentrations, less consistent effects have been shown for glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. Aim of this study was to determine whether pre-meal association of NPH, an intermediate-acting insulin, with lispro improves overall glycemic control in type 1 diabetic patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-five type 1 diabetic patients were studied in a multicenter randomized comparative (human regular vs lispro insulin) crossover (3-month) study in which NPH insulin was given as a dinner or bedtime injection and at breakfast and lunch if necessary. The number of injections was kept constant: 42% and 58% of patients injected insulin 3 and 4 times per day, respectively. Fasting and preprandial blood glucose levels were similar, while postprandial levels improved after lispro compared to human regular insulin (breakfast: 8.28 +/- 2.39 vs 9.28 +/- 2.72 mmol/l; lunch: 8.33 +/- 2.67 vs 9.06 +/- 2.67 mmol/l, dinner: 8.06 +/- 2.72 vs 9.28 +/- 2.44 mmol/l, ANOVA: p = 0.003). HbA1c also improved after lispro: 8.1 +/- 0.9 vs 8.3 +/- 0.8%, p < 0.05. The rate of hypoglycemia was similar. Patients showed better acceptance of lispro treatment (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Lispro improves overall blood glucose control in type 1 diabetic patients without increasing the incidence of hypoglycemia. This can be achieved by an optimal combination of lispro insulin with NPH whenever the time intervals between meals are too long.

Effect of acute exogenous hyperinsulinaemia on very low density lipoprotein subfraction composition in normal subjects.

Subtle abnormalities of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) composition and distribution seem to be associated with increased cardiovascular risk. The aims of this study were first, to evaluate whether hyperinsulinaemia per se is able to produce VLDL abnormalities and second, whether this occurs through a stimulation of lipolytic enzymes. Eight normal male volunteers, age 36 +/- 7 years (M +/- SD), body mass index (BMI) 26+/-3 kg m-2, underwent a 5-h euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp (1.2 mU insulin/kg b.w. min-1). Nine sex, age and BMI comparable subjects underwent control experiments (saline infusion). Three VLDL subfractions of decreasing size were isolated by density gradient ultracentrifugation; lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and hepatic lipase (HL) post-heparin plasma activities were determined by the 3H-labelled triolein method. Hyperinsulinaemia ( approximately 65 mU mL-1) produced the expected plasma free fatty acid suppression. Triglyceride levels were reduced in total VLDL (- 27 +/- 32% vs. + 38 +/- 52% after saline, P < 0.05) and in the larger VLDL (- 56 +/- 19 vs. + 34 +/- 38, P < 0.001). Moreover the relative contribution of the larger subfraction was decreased (- 39 +/- 15% vs. - 3 +/- 21%, P < 0.01), while the percentage of smaller particles was increased (+17 +/- 20 vs. - 9 +/- 22, P < 0.05). LPL and HL activities were decreased to the same degree during either insulin or saline infusion. Exogenous hyperinsulinaemia produced lipoprotein abnormalities partially similar to those previously shown in type 1 diabetic patients, indicating that these abnormalities may be secondary to insulin therapy.

Effect of insulin and sulfonylurea therapy, at the same level of blood glucose control, on low density lipoprotein subfractions in type 2 diabetic patients.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of sc insulin (INS) compared with sulfonylurea (SUL) therapy, at the same level of blood glucose control, on the low density lipoprotein (LDL) subfraction profile in normolipidemic type 2 diabetic patients. Nine normolipidemic type 2 diabetic men (age, 56+/-3 yr; body mass index, 26.5+/-0.9 kg/m2; mean +/- SEM), after a 3-week wash-out period, were assigned to INS or SUL for 2 months in a randomized cross-over design. Doses were adjusted only during the first month and then were kept constant. At the end of the treatments, hemoglobin A1c, plasma lipids, LDL, and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) subfraction profiles and plasma postheparin lipoprotein lipase and hepatic lipase (HL) activities were evaluated. Despite glucose control was similar at the end of both periods (hemoglobin A1c, 7.4+/-0.3% vs. 7.0+/-0.2%, INS vs. SUL), INS compared with SUL significantly reduced plasma triglyceride (0.9+/-0.1 vs. 1.1+/-0.1 mmol/L; P < 0.05). Although INS did not affect the LDL concentration, it induced a decrease in both the amount (59.0 = 9.8 vs. 76.1+/-16.8 mg/dL; P = NS) and the proportion (31.2+/-3.0% vs. 38.3+/-3.8%; P < 0.03) of small LDL. Moreover, the decrease in small LDL was positively related to the reduction of large VLDL (r = 0.67; P < 0.04) and HL (r = 0.69, P < 0.05) induced by insulin therapy. In conclusion, sc insulin therapy, independently of glucose control and even in the presence of quite low plasma triglyceride levels, is able to reduce small LDL particles in type 2 diabetic patients. This change is related to decreases in both HL activity and large VLDL particles.

Long-term effects of fish oil on lipoprotein subfractions and low density lipoprotein size in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients with hypertriglyceridemia.

The effects of fish oil on lipoprotein subfractions and low density lipoprotein (LDL) size in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients with hypertriglyceridemia are unknown. To elucidate this, 16 NIDDM hypertriglyceridemic patients (plasma triglyceride 2.25- 5.65 mmol/l, plasma cholesterol < or = 7.75 mmol/l) were randomly assigned to a 6-month period with either moderate amounts of fish oil (n = 8) or placebo (n = 8) after 4 weeks of wash-out and 3 weeks of run-in. Diet and hypoglycemic treatment were unchanged throughout the experiment. LDL size were evaluated at baseline and after 6 months. Three VLDL and LDL subfractions were measured at the end of the two periods. The total lipid concentration of all very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) subfractions was lower at the end of fish oil treatment compared with placebo (large VLDL 124.3 +/- 19.7 mg/dl vs 156.7 +/- 45.5 mg/dl; intermediate VLDL 88.5 +/- 9.5 mg/dl vs 113.9 +/- 23.2 mg/dl; small VLDL 105.9 +/- 9.7 mg/dl vs 128.9 +/- 40.7 mg/dl) (mean +/- SEM), although the difference was not statistically significant. Moreover, at the end of the two treatments, the percentage distribution of VLDL subfractions was very similar (large 37.5 +/- 3.3% vs 37.6 +/- 2.6%, intermediate 27.6 +/- 0.9% vs 31.0 +/- 2.4%; small 34.9 +/- 3.7% vs 31.4 +/- 2.1%). Concerning LDL, no significant change in LDL size was observed after the two treatments (255.4 +/- 2.2 A vs 254.2 +/- 1.7 A, fish oil; 253.7 +/- 2.0 A vs 253.3 +/- 1.7 A, placebo). LDL subfraction distribution was also very similar (large 17 +/- 3% vs 17 +/- 2%; intermediate 62 +/- 3% vs 65 +/- 3%; small 21 +/- 3% vs 18 +/- 2%), at the end of the two periods, confirming the lack of effects on LDL size. In conclusion, our study indicates that in NIDDM patients with hypertriglyceridemia, fish oil does not induce any improvement in LDL distribution and LDL size despite its positive effects on plasma triglycerides.

Insulin and sulfonylurea therapy in NIDDM patients. Are the effects on lipoprotein metabolism different even with similar blood glucose control?

This study evaluates the effects of insulin versus glibenclamide on lipoprotein metabolism at comparable levels of blood glucose control, in particular on the concentration and distribution of VLDL subfractions and lipolytic enzyme activities in nine NIDDM men (aged 56 +/- 3 years, BMI 26.5 +/- 0.9 kg/m2) (means +/- SE) participating in a crossover study. After a 3-week washout period, patients were randomly assigned to 2-month treatment periods (insulin or glibenclamide); thereafter, each patient crossed to the other treatment. At the end of each period, mean daily blood glucose (MDBG), HbA1e, plasma lipids, lipoproteins (VLDL, LDL, HDL), lipoprotein subfractions (VLDL1, 2, 3; HDL2, HDL3), and post-heparin lipase activities (lipoprotein lipase [LPL], hepatic lipase [HL]) were evaluated. Although glucose control was similar at the end of both periods (MDBG 8.3 +/- 0.3 vs. 7.9 +/- 0.3 mmol/l; HbA1c 7.4 +/- 0.3 vs. 7.0 +/- 0.2%, insulin versus glibenclamide), insulin compared with glibenclamide induced a significant reduction in plasma triglycerides (0.9 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.1 mmol/l, P < 0.05), VLDL triglycerides (50.1 +/- 12.2 vs. 63.6 +/- 12.3 mg/dl, P < 0.02), VLDL1 lipid concentration (24.9 +/- 7.5 vs. 39.9 +/- 9.5 mg/dl, P < 0.006), and increased HDL2 cholesterol (25.2 +/- 1.6 vs. 20.3 +/- 1.3 mg/dl, P < 0.03). In terms of VLDL percentage subfraction distribution, with insulin, there was a decrease in the larger subfractions (VLDL1 26.5 +/- 3.0 vs. 37.8 +/- 3.4%, P < 0.02) and an increase in the smallest (VLDL3 47.3 +/- 3.8 vs. 37.3 +/- 3.3%, P < 0.05). Moreover, HL activity was significantly lower after insulin than after glibenclamide (HL 247.2 +/- 22.3 vs. 263.5 +/- 22.6 mU/ml, P < 0.05). In conclusion, compared with glibenclamide, insulin treatment (independent of variations in glucose control) is able to decrease significantly plasma triglycerides, to increase HDL2 cholesterol, and to reduce only the concentration of the larger VLDL subfractions, with a consequent redistribution of their profile.

NaCl sensitivity of essential hypertensive patients is related to insulin resistance.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate insulin sensitivity of essential hypertensive patients with different salt sensitivities of blood pressure in the absence of confounding factors such as obesity, glucose intolerance and the inclusion both of normotensive and of hypertensive subjects that have affected most previous studies. PATIENTS: Ninety-nine patients with untreated mild or moderate essential hypertension, World Health Organization class I-II, participated in the study. METHODS: Salt sensitivity was estimated using the Weinberger protocol with minor modifications and the patients were classified into tertiles of salt sensitivity. RESULTS: Patients with high NaCl sensitivities were slightly older and had somewhat higher blood pressures than did subjects with low salt sensitivities. Plasma renin activity significantly decreased with increasing salt sensitivity. There were no differences among the three groups in terms of body mass index, fasting blood glucose and insulin plasma levels. There were no differences among the groups in the integrated glucose and insulin response to a standard oral-glucose tolerance test However, there was a significant difference in insulin sensitivity between two subgroups of the upper and lower tertile of salt sensitivity, the salt-sensitive hypertensives having a markedly lower utilization of glucose than did the salt-resistant ones, with a minor overlap (5.4 +/- 0.6 versus 7.4 +/- 0.3 mg/kg per min, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that essential hypertensive patients with high NaCl sensitivities were relatively insulin resistant compared with those with low NaCl sensitivities, independently of confounding factors such as age, obesity and glucose intolerance. Insulin resistance was not associated with overt hyperinsulinaemia among these patients.

Long-term effects of fish oil on insulin resistance and plasma lipoproteins in NIDDM patients with hypertriglyceridemia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term (6-month) effects of moderate fish oil supplementation on insulin sensitivity and plasma lipoproteins in NIDDM patients with hypertriglyceridemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study has been performed according to a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled design with a parallel group sequence. After a washout period of 4 weeks and a run-in period of 3 weeks, 16 NIDDM patients with hypertriglyceridemia (triglyceride [TG], 2.25-5.65 mmol/l) were randomly assigned to either fish oil (2.7 g/day eicosapentaenoic plus docosahexaenoic acid for 2 months, then 1.7 g/day for 4 more months) (n = 8) or placebo (n = 8). Diet and hypoglycemic drugs remained unchanged throughout the whole experiment. At baseline and after 6 months, insulin sensitivity was measured by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp (insulin infused, 2.0 mIU.kg-1 body wt.min-1). At the same time, blood glucose control, fasting and postprandial serum insulin and nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentrations, and fasting plasma lipoprotein concentrations were evaluated. RESULTS: In the group treated with fish oil compared with the baseline, there was: 1) a significant reduction in both plasma TG (2.92 +/- 0.23 vs. 3.85 +/- 0.32 [mean +/- SE] mmol/l, P < 0.001) and VLDL-TG (2.35 +/- 0.24 vs. 4.25 +/- 0.66 mmol/l, P < 0.01), without significant changes in blood glucose control; 2) a significant reduction in fasting NEFA concentrations (572 +/- 100 vs. 825 +/- 131 mumol/l, P < 0.01); and 3) a significant enrichment in long-chain omega-3 fatty acids of erythrocyte membrane phospholipids. In the placebo group, there were no changes in any of the variables analyzed. The insulin-mediated glucose uptake was unchanged in both groups (fish oil, 4.04 +/- 0.82 mg.kg-1.min-1 at baseline and 3.96 +/- 0.50 mg.kg-1.min-1 at 6 months; placebo, 3.51 +/- 0.62 mg.kg-1.min-1 at baseline and 4.09 +/- 0.49 mg.kg-1.min-1 at 6 months). CONCLUSIONS: In NIDDM patients with hypertriglyceridemia, moderate amounts of fish oil induce a long-term significant reduction in plasma triglycerides, VLDL triglycerides, and NEFA and a significant enrichment in the erythrocyte phospholipid content of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, without deteriorating blood glucose control. However, this amount of omega-3 fatty acids was unable to improve insulin sensitivity in this group of patients.