Use of alternative and complementary medicine in menopause.

OBJECTIVES: To review the clinical evidence available for the treatment of menopausal symptoms with alternative and complementary medicine. METHODS: The MEDLINE, PREMEDLINE and COCHRANE electronic databases for the years 1980-2002 were searched for articles concerning soy products, black cohosh, dong quai, acupuncture, ginseng and evening primrose oil. Studies pertaining to menopausal vasomotor symptoms, lipid profiles and bone mineral densities of postmenopausal women were included. The data from clinical trials were reviewed. RESULTS: Soy isoflavones slightly decrease total cholesterol and LDL levels. The clinical significance of this small change is yet to be determined. The synthetic isoflavone derivative ipriflavone increases bone mineral density in healthy peri- and postmenopausal women with moderate bone mineral densities. Although earlier reports have claimed that soy is beneficial for the improvement of vasomotor symptoms, recent data do not support this claim. There are insufficient data on the other alternative therapies for treating menopausal symptoms at this time. CONCLUSION: Alternative and complementary medicine may play a role in the management of menopause, however, well-designed large studies are still needed.

Electroejaculation and assisted reproductive technologies in the treatment of anejaculatory infertility.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of electroejaculation in combination with assisted reproductive technology (ART). DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: University fertility program. PATIENT(S): One hundred twenty-one consecutive couples seeking treatment of anejaculatory infertility. INTERVENTION(S): Electroejaculation with IUI, or gamete intrafallopian transfer or IVF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy and pregnancy outcome. RESULT(S): Fifty-two couples became pregnant (43%), 39 by IUI alone (32.2%). Cycle fecundity for IUI was 8.7%. No difference in cycle fecundity was seen among ovarian stimulation protocols (clomiphene citrate, 7.6%, hMG, 13.2%, and natural cycle, 11.2%). Pregnancy was unlikely when the inseminated motile sperm count was <4 million. Female management protocol and etiology of anejaculation did not affect results. Patients undergoing IVF had higher cycle fecundity (37.2%) than did those undergoing IUI. The rates of spontaneous abortion and multiple gestations were 23% and 12%, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): Electroejaculation with stepwise application of ART is effective in treating anejaculatory infertility. Intrauterine insemination with the least expensive monitoring protocol should be used for most couples, because use of more expensive monitoring did not improve results. It is cost-effective to bypass IUI and proceed directly to IVF in men who require anesthesia for electroejaculation and in those with a total inseminated motile sperm count < 4 million.

The pharmacokinetics and efficacy of different estrogens are not equivalent.

In the next decade many women will turn to the medical community for advice on maintaining or improving health after menopause. Estrogen replacement therapy, with or without progestins, alleviates menopausal symptoms, prevents or manages osteoporosis, and reduces the increased cardiovascular disease risk that results from estrogen deficiency caused by ovarian decline. Although several estrogen replacement products are available, the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of these products may vary depending on either the estrogen formulation or the route of administration, or both. For example, oral estrogens, which elicit a marked hepatic response, induce greater beneficial effects on serum lipoproteins than transdermal estrogens, which circumvent first-pass liver metabolism. Oral conjugated estrogens and transdermal estradiol increase bone density and prevent bone loss. This article summarizes the studies comparing estrogen formulations and discusses the differential effects of various estrogen products that promote postmenopausal health.

Low-dose oral contraceptives: health consequences of discontinuation.

Presently, the lowest effective estrogen dose available as a combination oral contraceptive (OC) in the United States is 20 microg of ethinyl estradiol (EE) with different progestins. Twenty micrograms of EE coupled with levonorgestrel results in fewer side effects and cycle control comparable with higher-dose pills. Differences between therapeutically equivalent and brand-name, low-dose oral contraceptives, with respect to the bioavailability of hormones, may interfere with contraceptive efficacy and increase breakthrough bleeding. One of the most common reasons why women discontinue OCs is increased breakthrough bleeding. Because after OC discontinuation most women switch to a less-effective method, or no method, of contraception, an increase in breakthrough bleeding could ultimately result in an increase in unintended pregnancy. Thus, substituting a therapeutically equivalent for a brand-name low-dose oral contraceptive may have significant clinical and economic effects on individual and public health.

Comparison of low-technology and high-technology monitoring of clomiphene citrate ovulation induction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether newer monitoring techniques, including urinary detection of the LH surge and vaginal ultrasound, offer an advantage over basal body temperature (BBT) charts alone in achieving pregnancy using clomiphene citrate (CC). DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Infertility patients in an academic research environment. PATIENT(S): Forty-five women undergoing ovulation induction with CC. INTERVENTION(S): The women were assigned randomly to receive either low- or high-technology ovulation monitoring for a total of 3 ovulatory cycles. Both groups were followed with BBT charts. The high-technology group also was monitored with urinary LH kits and vaginal ultrasound. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cycle fecundity rates for each technique were compared statistically with use of life-table analysis. RESULT(S): Forty-five patients were studied during a total of 134 cycles. The overall cycle fecundity rate was 8%, 10% (8 of 81 cycles) for the low-technology monitoring group and 6% (3 of 53 cycles) for the high-technology monitoring group. These rates were not statistically significant when evaluated by Fisher's exact test (P = .53) or when using life-table analysis and a log-rank test (P = .48). CONCLUSION(S): These data suggest that, for initial attempts at ovulation induction with CC in unselected patients, high-technology monitoring of ovulation offers no increase in fecundity over low-technology monitoring.

Luteal support with both estradiol and progesterone after clomiphene citrate stimulation for in vitro fertilization.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if pregnancy rates (PRs) for clomiphene citrate (CC)-stimulated IVF-ET can be increased by luteal support with E2 and P. DESIGN: Prospective randomized crossover clinical study. SETTING: Infertile women volunteers in an academic research environment. PATIENTS: Ninety-three infertile women underwent a total of 143 IVF-ET cycle using CC for ovulation induction. INTERVENTIONS: Each woman received either no luteal support (control group) or luteal support with both oral E2 (2 mg three times daily) starting on the day of retrieval and vaginal P suppositories (100 mg twice daily) starting on the day of ET. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Clinical PR. RESULTS: In 79 of 143 (55%) of the cycles, at least one embryo was transferred. Compared with the control group (n = 35 cycles), the luteal support group (n = 44 cycles) had a significantly higher PR per retrieval (control: 2% versus luteal support: 16%) and were older (control: 33 +/- 4 versus luteal support: 35 +/- 4 years; mean +/- SEM). They did not differ in terms of E2 or P levels, endometrial thickness on the day of hCG, number of follicles > 16 mm in diameter, mature oocytes retrieved, or embryos transferred. CONCLUSIONS: Luteal support with both E2 and P significantly increase the clinical PRs for CC-stimulated IVF-ET.

Kallmann's syndrome: pregnancy achieved through gamete intrafallopian transfer.

This case report describes the use of GIFT to achieve pregnancy for a man with Kallmann's syndrome who obtained only marginal sperm counts with both the pulsatile GnRH infusion pump and gonadotropin injections. Failure of this man to achieve a pregnancy with hormonal therapy alone and in combination with IUI suggests that assisted reproductive technologies should be considered in male patients with Kallmann's syndrome when suboptimal sperm concentrations are achieved despite exogenous hormonal stimulation.

Comparison of intracervical, intrauterine, and intratubal techniques for donor insemination.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of intracervical insemination (ICI), intrauterine insemination (IUI), and a combination of intratubal and intrauterine insemination (ITI/IUI) for donor insemination. DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial. SETTING: The University of Michigan donor insemination program. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Forty-one women undergoing donor insemination with cryopreserved sperm for either isolated male factor or male factor plus ovulatory dysfunction corrected by clomiphene citrate. INTERVENTION: Each patient was randomly assigned to receive each of the three insemination techniques in consecutive cycles until pregnancy occurred or the patient dropped from the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cycle fecundity rates were compared using the chi 2 test, and cumulative pregnancy rates (PRs) determined by life table analysis were compared using a log-rank test. RESULTS: Cycle fecundity rate was significantly higher for IUI (18.3%) than for ICI (3.9%) or ITI/IUI (7.3%). By life table analysis, the cumulative PR for IUI was significantly higher than for ICI, but the PR for ITI/IUI was not. CONCLUSION: For donor insemination with cryopreserved sperm, IUI increases cycle fecundity compared with ICI. The addition of ITI to IUI, however, interferes with the apparent beneficial effect of IUI alone.

Transcervical tubal cannulation: a comparison of two techniques.

Transcervical tubal cannulation using tactile guidance has a similar rate of successful cannulation compared with that with US guidance (78% versus 73%) but takes less time to perform (2.3 +/- 1.8 minutes versus 8.7 +/- 6.2 minutes, mean +/- SD) and is associated with less pain and bleeding. This appears to be because of the design of the Labotect tubal cannulation set that uses a special speculum and tenaculum to straighten the uterus before insertion of the guide cannula and a less traumatic ball-tipped guide catheter.

Allergic reactions to penicillin during in vitro fertilization and intrauterine insemination.

Two cases are reported in which hypersensitivity reactions occurred after intrauterine placement of spermatozoa or embryos. Because the cells were processed and transferred in antibiotic-containing media, these reactions were suspected to be because of penicillin allergy. One patient had no prior penicillin allergy but was found to be penicillin allergic by skin testing. The other had a history of allergy to oral penicillin. In both cases, the allergy symptoms did not occur during subsequent cycles when antibiotics were removed from the transfer media. These reports suggest that in patients known to be penicillin sensitive, penicillin should not be used during transfer of gametes and embryos for assisted reproductive procedures. In addition, the routine use of antibiotics in these procedures should be scientifically evaluated.

Interchangeability of low-dose oral contraceptives. Are current bioequivalent testing measures adequate to ensure therapeutic equivalency?

Current Food and Drug Administration guidelines for assessing the differences in bioavailability between generic oral contraceptives and brand-name products are inadequate to ensure therapeutic equivalence. The guidelines do not take into account those women who may have blood levels of active ingredients well outside the range of acceptability. Due to the narrow therapeutic range of steroids, these women may become pregnant or experience an increased incidence of breakthrough bleeding. Furthermore, oral contraceptive packaging is unique to each manufacturer, and any change in brands (and therefore packaging) can easily negate the sequential administration of the appropriate tablet. These are among the reasons proposed for placing oral contraceptives in the critical drug category, in which generic substitution and interchangeability of products should not be allowed.